jbrownson0831
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2020
- 23,676
- 21,111
- 2,288
Still a politically driven invasion of privacyThe reports contain the committee’s summation of its findings but not the raw tax returns
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still a politically driven invasion of privacyThe reports contain the committee’s summation of its findings but not the raw tax returns
So whatIts tax return data and not the actual tax return. The reports contain the committee’s summation of its findings but not the raw tax returns.
Then try to change the laws.Still a politically driven invasion of privacy
None of you guys cared when they did it to Hunter Biden.Still a politically driven invasion of privacy
Whether that be via IRS tax returns or from a laptop.The American people deserve to know if their president is involved financially with other governments.
1. Are you a tax attorney? If not, how do think you will understand what is certain to be very complicated tax returns?How are they going to smear Trump because he exaggerates. We all know that. The perception of trump will not change. IF they are releasing them then there is something juicy.
NYT reports says that they have obtained these records that report Trump just paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016, and that same tiny amount the following year. Trump paid no income tax at all in 11 out of the 18 years that the Times examined after obtaining his tax-return data.
Yeah I want to see them
Don't worry. Plenty of tax attorneys will happily analyze them for us all.. Are you a tax attorney? If not, how do think you will understand what is certain to be very complicated tax returns?
Uh huh. They were cowed by Trump into not doing their jobs. Therefore laws must be written compelling them to release their taxes.Why? You mean ILLEGALLY involved with other countries, and name me any big business this day NOT involved with other countries!
And if he was, the IRS would have already caught that.
So, to be accurate then, you don't REALLY want to see them at all, you want somebody ELSE to see them and give you a number on a line you can parrot other peoples' opinions about. And, of course, those tax attorneys will be the same ones in the IRS that put TRUMP!'s returns under the microscope all these years and didn't find anything worth reporting to anyone?Don't worry. Plenty of tax attorneys will happily analyze them for us all.
Uh huh. They were cowed by Trump into not doing their jobs. Therefore laws must be written compelling them to release their taxes.
Ha, yes, I know how the Trump cult feels about education and expertise. That's why you fools voted for the guy who knows more about war than the generals.So, to be accurate then, you don't REALLY want to see them at all, you want somebody ELSE to see them and give you a number on a line you can parrot other peoples' opinions about
I am smart enough to know it would take a good deal of study for me to accurately read the details of TRUMP!'s tax returns and confidently point out where the IRS's tax attorneys were wrong. I'll stick to the intricacies of SQL Server Availability Groups, so by all means, screech about something someone online tells you was not only in the returns, but what it all means.Ha, yes, I know how the Trump cult feels about education and expertise. That's why you fools voted for the guy who knows more about war than the generals.![]()
Okay, se let's elect him, then if the case turns up something you're like all mad about and stuff, we can impeach him again. Deal?Because he's running again and there is an ongoing case against him.
What a bunch of vapid goosestepping.I am smart enough to know it would take a good deal of study for me to accurately read the details of TRUMP!'s tax returns and confidently point out where the IRS's tax attorneys were wrong. I'll stick to the intricacies of SQL Server Availability Groups, so by all means, screech about something someone online tells you was not only in the returns, but what it all means.
Well, consider that you admitted you don't really want to see the returns, you want someone to dig through them for you and tell you what to be outraged about. How is that even controversial to you? And if you're willing to do that, you're willing to be a dupe for someone with an agenda feeding you disinformation that you will then uncritically regurgitate, all in the hope of, something.What a bunch of vapid goosestepping.
IT does not matter why he choose not to, this committee has no right and no authority to release his personal information to the whole fucking world.
This vapid whining won't help. Your dislike of knowledge, education, and expertise only embarrasses you.Well, consider that you admitted you don't really want to see the returns, you want someone to dig through them for you and tell you what to be outraged about. How is that even controversial to you? And if you're willing to do that, you're willing to be a dupe for someone with an agenda feeding you disinformation that you will then uncritically regurgitate, all in the hope of, something.
Lol, bless your heart. Trump paid taxes in advance and in the end he had to pay an additional $750. I bet you were heart broken when Maddow released them and it showed. He paid his fair share.How are they going to smear Trump because he exaggerates. We all know that. The perception of trump will not change. IF they are releasing them then there is something juicy.
NYT reports says that they have obtained these records that report Trump just paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016, and that same tiny amount the following year. Trump paid no income tax at all in 11 out of the 18 years that the Times examined after obtaining his tax-return data.
Yeah I want to see them
Really none of your business, but you loons keep this up. You're going to give Trump the Whitehouse back.Sure they do. I'm very interested in why the IRS didn't do mandatory audits of his taxes until 2019.