Hellokitty
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 8,200
- 7,894
- 1,985
You're purposely distorting the truth.No, I'm just going by what the FBI has admitted, being that they never conducted an independent investigation of the DNC server/cloud based imaging, nor did they review a final report from Crowdstrike.
It's amusing how liberals who support abolishing ICE and now Police are so trusting of the FBI.
"Source close to the investigation says FBI didn't need the DNC servers because it already had the forensic data from upstream collection."
The bureau made âmultiple requests at different levels,â according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a âhighly respected private companyâ would get access and share what it found with investigators.
![]()
Comey: DNC denied FBIâs requests for access to hacked servers
The DNC and the bureau have been quibbling in public reports over whether the request was made.thehill.com
Crowdstrike CEO Has NO Direct Evidence Russia Stole/Exfiltrated DNC Emails
"Interesting admission in Crowdstrike CEO Shaun Henryâs testimony. Henry is asked when âthe Russiansâ exfiltrated the data from DNC. Henry: âWe did not have concrete evidence that the data was exfiltrated from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated.â
More from Crowdstrikeâs Shaun Henry: âThere are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just donât have the evidence that says it actually left.â
This takes me back to the qualified, ambiguous Mueller language I highlighted in my @RCInvestigates report âCrowdstrikeout.â The attribution of DNC hacking to Russia is tentative & appears at least partly based on inference, not hard evidence.
Recall that the Mueller report, in recounting the alleged Russian theft of emails, added the qualifier that the GRU âofficers *appear* to have stolen thousands of emails and attachments.â Perhaps they werenât sure, because Crowdstrike wasnât either.
Henry: âSir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didnât see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw.â
Thereâs a quote from Assange â maybe someone can find it, I canât rn â saying that itâs possible that many different actors, including state actors, got inside the DNC system, but that doesnât mean they actually stole (aka exfiltrated) the emails Wikileaks later released.
To be clear, Crowdstrike says it believes Russians hacked into DNC. But it admits to not having direct evidence that Russians actually exfiltrated the emails from DNC. This would track w/ what Assange has said: Russia may have hacked DNC, but they didnât provide stolen emails."
I want to stress what a pretty big revelation this is. Crowdstrike, the firm behind the accusation that Russia hacked & stole DNC emails, admitted to Congress that it has no direct evidence Russia actually stole/exfiltrated the emails. More from Crowdstrike president Shaun Henry:
Overstated and out of context. There was ample information and evidence that demonstrated it was Russia beyond any reasonable doubt. Far more information and evidence was provided by law enforcement that went way beyond the capabilities that CrowdStrike had available to them.
Although CrowdStrike didnât watch the files be exfiltrated, the DoJ was able to review traffic logs which demonstrated such.
Factually false
Itâs in the Mueller report, troll. They tracked the data movement from the DNC servers to the Russianâs AWS server in Arizona.
You have no facts.
I seriously doubt that the Mueller team had access to the DNC server. We know the FBI was not allowed access.
And the fact that Mueller never heard of GPS Fusion cast doubt that his team even conducted an investigation.
There is one thing I would bet on.....the DNC Server has been obliterated.
Access to the actual servers isnât necessary and would be highly unusual. This is a cyber crime. The evidence isnât housed on a physical device. Itâs data, which the DoJ most certainly did have access to.
The idea that his team didnât conduct an investigation and made up their whole report on the hacking is beyond ridiculous.
You do realize neither Crowdstrike nor the FBI investigated the Podesta emails and all Crowdstrike investigated was the hack?