Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results

[Maryland Patriot]

Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results - CNNPolitics.com

This isn't a crackpot story, multiple sources and the basis is science...

Considering the numerous hacking going on before hand this should be investigated.. Considering Comey practically tried to gift wrap the Election to Trump for Emails which Trump now admits aren't even worth investigating any more...

THREE WHACKO IT SPECIALISTS are the only ones calling for this. But you butthurt Libtards and others are trying to turn this into a big deal.

It's over. Get a life!

Three whacko IT specialist? Try a professor at Michigan University and two guys from Princeton University. They've been calling for the government to look into the voting machines for over a decade. This didn't just start this year with this election. Jesus Christ you Trump supporters are fucking numb nuts.

You should address us fucking numb nuts with more respect, we are in charge now, if you are nice and respectful we might not have to lock your representatives out of meetings and we might let you take the ride to prosperity with us.
I only point this out because I care.

 

[SmokeALib]

Can anybody tell me why Joe Buck announces NFL games?
He's worse than when he does MLB playoff games. And that's pretty damn bad.

 

[Ame®icano]

You obviously didn't read the new article I posted. The machines aren't going to report malfunction, and you won't know if they did malfunction unless you count the paper ballots. The professor in the article hacked one of the very same voting machines they used. He proved it can be done.

So Russians got in physical contact with our voting machines, loaded the software and stole the election. Really?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

How the fuck is something virtually impossible when they fucking SHOW YOU how to do it in around one minute?

Using their "ideal" conditions which is probably connected to the internet, or malware of some kind inserted into the ballot sample, and then, yes, they were able to hack it. But without those other two unlikely things happening, they couldn't have hacked it, and it's very unlikely (as the author pointed out) that hacking took place.

 

[Lewdog]

You obviously didn't read the new article I posted. The machines aren't going to report malfunction, and you won't know if they did malfunction unless you count the paper ballots. The professor in the article hacked one of the very same voting machines they used. He proved it can be done.

So Russians got in physical contact with our voting machines, loaded the software and stole the election. Really?

How about you read the articles before making comments about them? Then you'll look less stupid.

 

[Lakhota]

Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results - CNNPolitics.com

This isn't a crackpot story, multiple sources and the basis is science...

Considering the numerous hacking going on before hand this should be investigated.. Considering Comey practically tried to gift wrap the Election to Trump for Emails which Trump now admits aren't even worth investigating any more...

I agree! Hillary was cheated. Plus, she now has over 2 million popular votes ahead of Trump.

 

[Lewdog]

How the fuck is something virtually impossible when they fucking SHOW YOU how to do it in around one minute?

Using their "ideal" conditions which is probably connected to the internet, or malware of some kind inserted into the ballot sample, and then, yes, they were able to hack it. But without those other two unlikely things happening, they couldn't have hacked it, and it's very unlikely (as the author pointed out) that hacking took place.

The ballots are downloaded using the internet at the county voting offices. These offices have been proven able to be hacked. It's been done by the Russians. They showed how the ballots are then transfered from the voting offices to each of the machines using a memory card. Not real sure what is difficult to understand here. And has been said many times, until someone actually puts the system through the hand counting of paper ballots, we will never know if hacking has occurred.

 

[Ame®icano]

I said it wasn't the OP article. I was one I posted directly from the professor.

Want to Know if the Election was Hacked? Look at the Ballots

Professor at center of report that Russia hacked the election walks back his claim

You were saying?

 

[Maryland Patriot]

You obviously didn't read the new article I posted. The machines aren't going to report malfunction, and you won't know if they did malfunction unless you count the paper ballots. The professor in the article hacked one of the very same voting machines they used. He proved it can be done.

So Russians got in physical contact with our voting machines, loaded the software and stole the election. Really?

maybe the democrats should be more concerned with our borders.

 

[SmokeALib]

But, I fortun

Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results - CNNPolitics.com

This isn't a crackpot story, multiple sources and the basis is science...

Considering the numerous hacking going on before hand this should be investigated.. Considering Comey practically tried to gift wrap the Election to Trump for Emails which Trump now admits aren't even worth investigating any more...

I agree! Hillary was cheated. Plus, she now has over 2 million popular votes ahead of Trump.

But, unfortunately for you, and fortunately for the rest of the country, Crooked Hillary lost.

 

[Zander]

The LWNJ meltdown continues unabated!!

 

[Lewdog]

I said it wasn't the OP article. I was one I posted directly from the professor.

Want to Know if the Election was Hacked? Look at the Ballots

Professor at center of report that Russia hacked the election walks back his claim

You were saying?

Uh.. that is nothing different than what is in the article I posted that came DIRECTLY from the professor. The only difference? Your post comes from The Blaze and frames it in Right wing propaganda way.

Read the articles then comment. Do you comprehend? Do you speak and read English?

 

[Ame®icano]

You'd think if these Michigan scientist were legit... and since they are in... MICHIGAN, they would know if Michigan used any electronic voting.

You'd think that just because teaching computer programming makes you a scientist. I know kids that know much more about programming than those "scientists". If that is the measure for being scientist, then I am a scientist, since I am programming in several different languages and platforms.

Yeah a professor from Michigan working with experts from PRINCETON University... they area bunch of fucking idiots right? They don't know a fucking thing that are talking about!

They did not look at the actual ballot. They crunched numbers and came to conclusion that Trump got more votes than media and polls told them he will. The evidence is that Trump beat the odds, or that media lied to them. What to you think it's truth?

 

[Zander]

TRUMP!!!

 

[Lewdog]

The LWNJ meltdown continues unabated!!

I don't want Hillary in office... but because of posters like you, I'm cheering for this hand recount and I pray that Hillary wins just so I can see you have a nervous breakdown. Honestly.

 

[Zander]

TRUMP!!!!

 

[Zander]

The LWNJ meltdown continues unabated!!

I don't want Hillary in office... but because of posters like you, I'm cheering for this hand recount and I pray that Hillary wins just so I can see you have a nervous breakdown. Honestly.

Get a fucking life. Seriously. You're unhinged.

 

[Lewdog]

You'd think if these Michigan scientist were legit... and since they are in... MICHIGAN, they would know if Michigan used any electronic voting.

You'd think that just because teaching computer programming makes you a scientist. I know kids that know much more about programming than those "scientists". If that is the measure for being scientist, then I am a scientist, since I am programming in several different languages and platforms.

Yeah a professor from Michigan working with experts from PRINCETON University... they area bunch of fucking idiots right? They don't know a fucking thing that are talking about!

They did not look at the actual ballot. They crunched numbers and came to conclusion that Trump got more votes than media and polls told them he will. The evidence is that Trump beat the odds, or that media lied to them. What to you think it's truth?

They analyzed and found the numbers in areas were off by significant amounts and that in these same areas they were using machines that they had previously already had concerns about. What's the problem with the candidates paying for the recount and making sure the election process wasn't a fraud? I'm really not getting it. What's wrong with getting the results right?

 

[Ame®icano]

They didn't just base it on a theory, they replicated the fucking theory. THEY actually hacked a machine and changed the results of a mock election, on a same machine that is used in the election. If you fucking Rightwingers are going to comment about something, at least rad the fucking articles.

To do the hack, you have to have access to the machines.

So one claim is that someone had access to the machines to load the program, second is that someone are Russians. Really?

IMO, if anyone hacked the machines, that would be in favor of Democrats.

 

[Lewdog]

The LWNJ meltdown continues unabated!!

I don't want Hillary in office... but because of posters like you, I'm cheering for this hand recount and I pray that Hillary wins just so I can see you have a nervous breakdown. Honestly.

Get a fucking life. Seriously. You're unhinged.

No... someone that trolls numerous threads with a gif of a crying baby is unhinged. Please make sure to take video of yourself when they recount and make Hillary the POTUS. That's a gif I'd like to see.