Confederate Flag nutbags crash black kid's party, yell "******" at them

[Mertex]

celebrating their heritage.

Their heritage is to own blacks......so yes, they may have been celebrating that.

 

[Correll]

To all of you lefties, So, in your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

What rocks?

DIdn't read the linked article.

And unwilling to answer the question honestly.

 

[Correll]

To all of you lefties, So, in your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

I don't believe that happened at all.
like I said, the black folks were at home having a party. Not driving around town looking for flagfliers to assault with stones.

Really?

Considering how bad you lefties claim flying the flag is, you don't think a bunch of black folks having a party might not be greatly offended by the sight of some Southern Whites flying the flag?>

SO, , in your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

 

[Correll]

To all of you lefties, So, in your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

I don't believe that happened at all.
like I said, the black folks were at home having a party. Not driving around town looking for flagfliers to assault with stones.

Its was a kids birthday party. The kind where they stand on the street and throw rocks at passerby's.

In your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

 

[Correll]

Right. We all know blacks aren't to be trusted. Especially when grouped together.
Just some good ole' boys. Never meanin' no harm. We was just fooling' about Roscoe.

Do you consider the flying of the Confederate Fly to be provocative?

Do you consider flying a swastika to be provocative?

FACT: Nazi's in Germany are prohibited from flying a swastika so they use the confederate flag instead.


In Germany, the Confederate flag is not void of political context. European skinheads and neo-Nazi groups have adopted the Confederate flag and variations of it because of its historical context as a symbol of racism and white supremacy.

Read more: Why is the Confederate flag flown outside the US - Business Insider

FACT: Nazi's in Germany are prohibited from flying a swastika so they use the confederate flag instead.

And they (conservatives) have the nerve to call Obama "Hitler".........they're so ignorant, they don't realize how much their party has in common with Nazis.

Bullshit.

What is bullshit? That they call Obama Hitler or that the Republican party has much in common with Nazis or both?

Well, I have seen it here on this Forum, where many cally Obama a Nazi, or Hitler. And, the Republican party does have a lot more in common with the Nazi's than liberals. So the only bullshit here is your calling it bullshit.

10 Similarities Between Ultra-Conservative Republicans and Nazis

BUT, THIS is the type of demagoguery that led to these blacks being so outraged over the sight of the Confederate Flag that they reacted with violence and threats.

The thing that has blacks so outraged is the constant barrage of insults from the right, and their devotion to the flag of slave-owners fighting to keep slavery. It would enrage you too, if you were to put yourself in their shoes.

Yes, all of your words are bullshit.

 

[Correll]

Right. We all know blacks aren't to be trusted. Especially when grouped together.
Just some good ole' boys. Never meanin' no harm. We was just fooling' about Roscoe.

Do you consider the flying of the Confederate Fly to be provocative?

I suppose to some it could be depending on the manner it's flying. If it were paraded several times past an outdoor party attended by black folks accompanied by verbal insults, that might do it.

Did those fellers believe it might be provacative if that's what they did?

Bullshit.

From the demagoguery that you lefties have been pushing the last few months, with the flying of the confederate flag equating support of slavery, you obviously consider it provocative.

THus, the one scenario has a group of blacks, in their/your mind, reacting strongly to a great provocation.

THe other scenario, has the whites randomly picking this birthday party, with a crowd that greatly outnumbered the truck drivers, for intimidation.

WOrds have consequences. Your lefty race baiting has primed blacks to react violently to the Confederate Flag.

I doubt this will be the last such incident.

THe other scenario, has the whites randomly picking this birthday party, with a crowd that greatly outnumbered the truck drivers, for intimidation.

With seven trucks decked out with flags?
Yes, I firmly believe the flagtards were looking for trouble.

The black folks were at home and not driving around town looking for someone flying flags to assault with stones.

He's going to defend the "losers" to no end.......no matter how obvious it is to everyone. That's the way racists roll.

These guys got rocks throw at them and yelled at for no reason. But none of them were hurt.

THe blacks got themselves riled up for no reason, and ruined their own party.

Who lost here?

Both sides.

This should not have happened.

BUt you libs don't seem to think that spreading hatred and bigotry is going to have consequences.

 

[Correll]

celebrating their heritage.

Their heritage is to own blacks......so yes, they may have been celebrating that.

You lefties are the ones that keep focusing on that. The only ones who keep focusing on that.

In your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

 

[Correll]

Ok, from now on I know better than to engage Correll in any sort of debate. He's just a flat out liar.

First time shame on him,....point is I wont be fooled again

Don't compound your asshole-ness with lies.

I have answered your "question" even more simply.

Now, hit me with your gotcha "point" that you think you have.

Go fuck yourself, I have better shit to do than talk with a bullshit artist

You are so full of it.

You had some stupid ass "gotcha" planned, probably built around misrepresenting a simple answer.

I gave it to you, and now, after making such an issue out of it, you're running away.

You've got nothing, certainly not the moral character to admit that your "Brothers" and "Sisters" here were behaving badly.

Well, can you prove me wrong? What was your point?

You are so full of it.

You had some stupid ass "gotcha" planned, probably built around misrepresenting a simple answer.

I gave it to you, and now, after making such an issue out of it, you're running away.

You've got nothing, certainly not the moral character to admit that your "Brothers" and "Sisters" here were behaving badly.

 

[Carla_Danger]

To all of you lefties, So, in your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

What rocks?

DIdn't read the linked article.

And unwilling to answer the question honestly.

There's no proof of any rocks being thrown. They didn't capture it on video, so it never happened.

 

[Carla_Danger]

celebrating their heritage.

Their heritage is to own blacks......so yes, they may have been celebrating that.

You lefties are the ones that keep focusing on that. The only ones who keep focusing on that.

In your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

Hypothetical is all you've got because there's no proof that any rocks were thrown.

 

[Correll]

To all of you lefties, So, in your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

What rocks?

DIdn't read the linked article.

And unwilling to answer the question honestly.

There's no proof of any rocks being thrown. They didn't capture it on video, so it never happened.

Ummn, that is crazy talk.

Video is not the only standard of proof anywhere for anything, except in your head, right now, to give yourself an excuse to dismiss the more credible scenario.

In your opinion, would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

 

[Carla_Danger]

Bullshit.

From the demagoguery that you lefties have been pushing the last few months, with the flying of the confederate flag equating support of slavery, you obviously consider it provocative.

THus, the one scenario has a group of blacks, in their/your mind, reacting strongly to a great provocation.

THe other scenario, has the whites randomly picking this birthday party, with a crowd that greatly outnumbered the truck drivers, for intimidation.

WOrds have consequences. Your lefty race baiting has primed blacks to react violently to the Confederate Flag.

I doubt this will be the last such incident.

THe other scenario, has the whites randomly picking this birthday party, with a crowd that greatly outnumbered the truck drivers, for intimidation.

With seven trucks decked out with flags?
Yes, I firmly believe the flagtards were looking for trouble.

The black folks were at home and not driving around town looking for someone flying flags to assault with stones.

And they had guns and threatened to shoot them. Yep, they were angels minding their business and just happened to be parked across from a party, where they were making smores like nice young racist, gun totting death threat making honkies

One of them had a gun and threatened to shot the assholes that were harassing and threatening them.

Which is completely "nice". Blacks, even in the presence of confederate flags, don't have the right to do that.

If those blacks didn't want to be threatened with being shot, they shouldn't have bothered the guys in pickup trucks just driving by.

Just driving by and parked in a field 100' from the party.

Too funny.

After rock(s) were thrown, causing an accident, AND that single trucks passenger(s) were threatened by the angry and provoked blacks.

It is one thing to choose to believe one side over the other, but to pretend to be completely ignorant of the other side of the argument is to be a jerk.

You don't see me playing that game.

There's no proof of any accident. There's no proof of any flat tire.

 

[Correll]

celebrating their heritage.

Their heritage is to own blacks......so yes, they may have been celebrating that.

You lefties are the ones that keep focusing on that. The only ones who keep focusing on that.

In your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

Hypothetical is all you've got because there's no proof that any rocks were thrown.

NOt at all, all I've got.

But, part of what I have is that the one scenario is so much more credible than the other.

AND PART of that is all the demagoguery you lefties have been spewing over the Confederate Flag.

You have created a perception, for those dumb enough to listen to you, that the Confederate Flag is a symbol of slavery, racism, hatred, bad breath, dogs and cats living together, ect ect ect.

So, in that world, a line of trucks with such flags on it would be a huge provocation to the "black folks" just having a party.

Which is why I ask the "hypothetical" question and why you refuse to answer it.

Because the only answer a lefty can give to that question, honestly is yes.

And that supports the story of the White guys here.

Just driving by minding their own business when some crazy blacks started throwing rocks for no reason.



Would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

 

[Correll]

With seven trucks decked out with flags?
Yes, I firmly believe the flagtards were looking for trouble.

The black folks were at home and not driving around town looking for someone flying flags to assault with stones.

And they had guns and threatened to shoot them. Yep, they were angels minding their business and just happened to be parked across from a party, where they were making smores like nice young racist, gun totting death threat making honkies

One of them had a gun and threatened to shot the assholes that were harassing and threatening them.

Which is completely "nice". Blacks, even in the presence of confederate flags, don't have the right to do that.

If those blacks didn't want to be threatened with being shot, they shouldn't have bothered the guys in pickup trucks just driving by.

Just driving by and parked in a field 100' from the party.

Too funny.

After rock(s) were thrown, causing an accident, AND that single trucks passenger(s) were threatened by the angry and provoked blacks.

It is one thing to choose to believe one side over the other, but to pretend to be completely ignorant of the other side of the argument is to be a jerk.

You don't see me playing that game.

There's no proof of any accident. There's no proof of any flat tire.

You personally checked the guys truck out?

 

[Carla_Danger]

To all of you lefties, So, in your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

What rocks?

DIdn't read the linked article.

And unwilling to answer the question honestly.

There's no proof of any rocks being thrown. They didn't capture it on video, so it never happened.

Ummn, that is crazy talk.

Video is not the only standard of proof anywhere for anything, except in your head, right now, to give yourself an excuse to dismiss the more credible scenario.

In your opinion, would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

It's a "he said, she said" situation.

The only thing we know for sure is that a convoy of Confederate flag-bearing pickup trucks and their passengers somehow ended up at a black child’s birthday party, who then yelled racial slurs.

From the link in the OP

Bush said, admitting that a specific racial slur was likely used by members of his group.

 

[Carla_Danger]

celebrating their heritage.

Their heritage is to own blacks......so yes, they may have been celebrating that.

You lefties are the ones that keep focusing on that. The only ones who keep focusing on that.

In your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

Hypothetical is all you've got because there's no proof that any rocks were thrown.

NOt at all, all I've got.

But, part of what I have is that the one scenario is so much more credible than the other.

AND PART of that is all the demagoguery you lefties have been spewing over the Confederate Flag.

You have created a perception, for those dumb enough to listen to you, that the Confederate Flag is a symbol of slavery, racism, hatred, bad breath, dogs and cats living together, ect ect ect.

So, in that world, a line of trucks with such flags on it would be a huge provocation to the "black folks" just having a party.

Which is why I ask the "hypothetical" question and why you refuse to answer it.

Because the only answer a lefty can give to that question, honestly is yes.

And that supports the story of the White guys here.

Just driving by minding their own business when some crazy blacks started throwing rocks for no reason.



Would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

You don't get to decide what's credible and what's not. I don't know what I would have done in that situation, because I wasn't there.

 

[Carla_Danger]

And they had guns and threatened to shoot them. Yep, they were angels minding their business and just happened to be parked across from a party, where they were making smores like nice young racist, gun totting death threat making honkies

One of them had a gun and threatened to shot the assholes that were harassing and threatening them.

Which is completely "nice". Blacks, even in the presence of confederate flags, don't have the right to do that.

If those blacks didn't want to be threatened with being shot, they shouldn't have bothered the guys in pickup trucks just driving by.

Just driving by and parked in a field 100' from the party.

Too funny.

After rock(s) were thrown, causing an accident, AND that single trucks passenger(s) were threatened by the angry and provoked blacks.

It is one thing to choose to believe one side over the other, but to pretend to be completely ignorant of the other side of the argument is to be a jerk.

You don't see me playing that game.

There's no proof of any accident. There's no proof of any flat tire.

You personally checked the guys truck out?

If there was visible damage, I'm sure they would have reported it.

 

[Correll]

To all of you lefties, So, in your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

What rocks?

DIdn't read the linked article.

And unwilling to answer the question honestly.

There's no proof of any rocks being thrown. They didn't capture it on video, so it never happened.

Ummn, that is crazy talk.

Video is not the only standard of proof anywhere for anything, except in your head, right now, to give yourself an excuse to dismiss the more credible scenario.

In your opinion, would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

It's a "he said, she said" situation.

The only thing we know for sure is that a convoy of Confederate flag-bearing pickup trucks and their passengers somehow ended up at a black child’s birthday party, who then yelled racial slurs.

From the link in the OP

Bush said, admitting that a specific racial slur was likely used by members of his group.

Yes, it is a "he said, she said" situation.

So in such a case one must compare both stories and judge likely hood.

Would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

The answer is obviously yes. THat is why you will not give it.

Thus, the white guys story becomes the more credible.

And once you realize that the blacks threw rocks,caused the accident, then went over to harass and threaten the lone truck's occupant(s) and then the other trucks came back to protect them,


then the question is, how does harsh language compare to that, as to whom the bad guy is here?

Oh, and btw, what kind of language do you think the outraged blacks were using?

Has anyone asked the lady from the party about that?

I doubt it.

It is ok for blacks to use racial slurs against whites.

 

[Correll]

celebrating their heritage.

Their heritage is to own blacks......so yes, they may have been celebrating that.

You lefties are the ones that keep focusing on that. The only ones who keep focusing on that.

In your opinion would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

Hypothetical is all you've got because there's no proof that any rocks were thrown.

NOt at all, all I've got.

But, part of what I have is that the one scenario is so much more credible than the other.

AND PART of that is all the demagoguery you lefties have been spewing over the Confederate Flag.

You have created a perception, for those dumb enough to listen to you, that the Confederate Flag is a symbol of slavery, racism, hatred, bad breath, dogs and cats living together, ect ect ect.

So, in that world, a line of trucks with such flags on it would be a huge provocation to the "black folks" just having a party.

Which is why I ask the "hypothetical" question and why you refuse to answer it.

Because the only answer a lefty can give to that question, honestly is yes.

And that supports the story of the White guys here.

Just driving by minding their own business when some crazy blacks started throwing rocks for no reason.



Would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

You don't get to decide what's credible and what's not. I don't know what I would have done in that situation, because I wasn't there.

Would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?

 

[Carla_Danger]

"Just driving by minding their own business when some crazy blacks started throwing rocks for no reason."


LOL! What an idiot.