Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
Actually, George C. Wallace ran for President 4 times, in 1964-68-72-76. Three times as a liberal Democrat and once as an independent.
And he was rejected all 4 times- regardless of what ticket he ran on.
Wallace's liberal policy was Racism and Segregation. The same ones that liberal icons like Clinton's mentor, J. W. Fulbright and Al Gore's father advocated. Wallace chose to run as a Democrat 3 times, because he knew that was the party where his support was at.
When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
Actually, George C. Wallace ran for President 4 times, in 1964-68-72-76. Three times as a liberal Democrat and once as an independent.
And he was rejected all 4 times- regardless of what ticket he ran on.
Wallace's liberal policy was Racism and Segregation. The same ones that liberal icons like Clinton's mentor, J. W. Fulbright and Al Gore's father advocated. Wallace chose to run as a Democrat 3 times, because he knew that was the party where his support was at.
When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
Actually, George C. Wallace ran for President 4 times, in 1964-68-72-76. Three times as a liberal Democrat and once as an independent.
And he was rejected all 4 times- regardless of what ticket he ran on.
Wallace's liberal policy was Racism and Segregation. The same ones that liberal icons like Clinton's mentor, J. W. Fulbright and Al Gore's father advocated. Wallace chose to run as a Democrat 3 times, because he knew that was the party where his support was at.
I think you need to look up the definition of Liberal and Conservative
Yes, that is very conservative....because most of those private businesses are the ones who shaped those Jim Crow policies you doofus...When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
Actually, George C. Wallace ran for President 4 times, in 1964-68-72-76. Three times as a liberal Democrat and once as an independent.
And he was rejected all 4 times- regardless of what ticket he ran on.
Wallace's liberal policy was Racism and Segregation. The same ones that liberal icons like Clinton's mentor, J. W. Fulbright and Al Gore's father advocated. Wallace chose to run as a Democrat 3 times, because he knew that was the party where his support was at.
I think you need to look up the definition of Liberal and Conservative
There is nothing conservative about forcing private businesses to maintain segregation facilities for their customers of different ethnicities. My grandfather served whoever came into his store regardless of their race,as long as they had money.
They were not liberal you dumb ass.....When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
Actually, George C. Wallace ran for President 4 times, in 1964-68-72-76. Three times as a liberal Democrat and once as an independent.
And he was rejected all 4 times- regardless of what ticket he ran on.
Wallace's liberal policy was Racism and Segregation. The same ones that liberal icons like Clinton's mentor, J. W. Fulbright and Al Gore's father advocated. Wallace chose to run as a Democrat 3 times, because he knew that was the party where his support was at.
I remember being in school, and my liberal classmates, whose dads were union members in the mills, told me how great it would be if Wallace got in as he was going to send all of the African Americans back to Africa. I thought the lib idea was stupid then, and still do today.
When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
Actually, George C. Wallace ran for President 4 times, in 1964-68-72-76. Three times as a liberal Democrat and once as an independent.
And he was rejected all 4 times- regardless of what ticket he ran on.
Wallace's liberal policy was Racism and Segregation. The same ones that liberal icons like Clinton's mentor, J. W. Fulbright and Al Gore's father advocated. Wallace chose to run as a Democrat 3 times, because he knew that was the party where his support was at.
I think you need to look up the definition of Liberal and Conservative
There is nothing conservative about forcing private businesses to maintain segregation facilities for their customers of different ethnicities. My grandfather served whoever came into his store regardless of their race,as long as they had money.
They were not liberal you dumb ass.....When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
Actually, George C. Wallace ran for President 4 times, in 1964-68-72-76. Three times as a liberal Democrat and once as an independent.
And he was rejected all 4 times- regardless of what ticket he ran on.
Wallace's liberal policy was Racism and Segregation. The same ones that liberal icons like Clinton's mentor, J. W. Fulbright and Al Gore's father advocated. Wallace chose to run as a Democrat 3 times, because he knew that was the party where his support was at.
I remember being in school, and my liberal classmates, whose dads were union members in the mills, told me how great it would be if Wallace got in as he was going to send all of the African Americans back to Africa. I thought the lib idea was stupid then, and still do today.
Do you really think there were tons of private business owners who were upset that they were forced to discriminate against black people?? gtfoh
Again, all you have to do is name me one single prominent conservative who was on the front lines of the civil Rights movement, there is a reason you can't...They were not liberal you dumb ass.....When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
Actually, George C. Wallace ran for President 4 times, in 1964-68-72-76. Three times as a liberal Democrat and once as an independent.
And he was rejected all 4 times- regardless of what ticket he ran on.
Wallace's liberal policy was Racism and Segregation. The same ones that liberal icons like Clinton's mentor, J. W. Fulbright and Al Gore's father advocated. Wallace chose to run as a Democrat 3 times, because he knew that was the party where his support was at.
I remember being in school, and my liberal classmates, whose dads were union members in the mills, told me how great it would be if Wallace got in as he was going to send all of the African Americans back to Africa. I thought the lib idea was stupid then, and still do today.
These were actually the scions of USW members. Devout Big Laborites. So, yes they were libs.
Boy do you have that wrongDo you really think there were tons of private business owners who were upset that they were forced to discriminate against black people?? gtfoh
Absolutely.
Why do you think that the lunch counter protesters chose huge chains like FW Woolworth to sit in at?
Because small private businessmen would have been likely to just serve them- and the protesters had ate before they got there and didn't have any money. They were there for a protest, not for lunch. A big liberal international firm from New York like Woolworth would stand by the law.
Again, all you have to do is name me one single prominent conservative who was on the front lines of the civil Rights movement, there is a reason you can't...They were not liberal you dumb ass.....When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
Actually, George C. Wallace ran for President 4 times, in 1964-68-72-76. Three times as a liberal Democrat and once as an independent.
And he was rejected all 4 times- regardless of what ticket he ran on.
Wallace's liberal policy was Racism and Segregation. The same ones that liberal icons like Clinton's mentor, J. W. Fulbright and Al Gore's father advocated. Wallace chose to run as a Democrat 3 times, because he knew that was the party where his support was at.
I remember being in school, and my liberal classmates, whose dads were union members in the mills, told me how great it would be if Wallace got in as he was going to send all of the African Americans back to Africa. I thought the lib idea was stupid then, and still do today.
These were actually the scions of USW members. Devout Big Laborites. So, yes they were libs.
Upton Sinclair....perhaps the father of the modern labor rights movement....is he a conservative??
A Phillip Randolph..another labor rights icon...is he a conservative??
Eugene Debs....is he a conservative??
You aren't smart enough to run that dumb shit by me....better stick to talking that dumb shit to your fellow trump lovers
It was 1808 and Democrats breed welfare slaves today.Lee owned slaves and fought a war to ensure they remained slaves. International slave trade had been banned in the US since 1805. The Confederacy didn’t need slaves from overseas. They had four million slaves and had no problem breeding their ownRobert E. Lee was opposed to slavery and the Confederate Constitution condemned the international slave trade. The abolitionist that pushed the Dred Scott case to US Supreme Court were the ones that destroyed the Missouri Comprise line of 1820.Especially in the attempt to get slavery established in new territories.Duty,honor, and bravery are never “lost causes.”
If a black store owner doesn’t want white customers...it’s his right as an entrepreneur.Boy do you have that wrongDo you really think there were tons of private business owners who were upset that they were forced to discriminate against black people?? gtfoh
Absolutely.
Why do you think that the lunch counter protesters chose huge chains like FW Woolworth to sit in at?
Because small private businessmen would have been likely to just serve them- and the protesters had ate before they got there and didn't have any money. They were there for a protest, not for lunch. A big liberal international firm from New York like Woolworth would stand by the law.
The big chains like Woolworth had stores all over the country. The bad publicity hurt them nationwide
The small, hometown business did not want to offend their community and vigorously enforced Jim Crow
Boy do you have that wrongDo you really think there were tons of private business owners who were upset that they were forced to discriminate against black people?? gtfoh
Absolutely.
Why do you think that the lunch counter protesters chose huge chains like FW Woolworth to sit in at?
Because small private businessmen would have been likely to just serve them- and the protesters had ate before they got there and didn't have any money. They were there for a protest, not for lunch. A big liberal international firm from New York like Woolworth would stand by the law.
The big chains like Woolworth had stores all over the country. The bad publicity hurt them nationwide
The small, hometown business did not want to offend their community and vigorously enforced Jim Crow
Lee freed slaves that were left him and so did his wife.:Lee owned slaves and fought a war to ensure they remained slaves. International slave trade had been banned in the US since 1805. The Confederacy didn’t need slaves from overseas. They had four million slaves and had no problem breeding their ownRobert E. Lee was opposed to slavery and the Confederate Constitution condemned the international slave trade. The abolitionist that pushed the Dred Scott case to US Supreme Court were the ones that destroyed the Missouri Comprise line of 1820.Especially in the attempt to get slavery established in new territories.Duty,honor, and bravery are never “lost causes.”
If a black store owner doesn’t want white customers...it’s his right as an entrepreneur.Boy do you have that wrongDo you really think there were tons of private business owners who were upset that they were forced to discriminate against black people?? gtfoh
Absolutely.
Why do you think that the lunch counter protesters chose huge chains like FW Woolworth to sit in at?
Because small private businessmen would have been likely to just serve them- and the protesters had ate before they got there and didn't have any money. They were there for a protest, not for lunch. A big liberal international firm from New York like Woolworth would stand by the law.
The big chains like Woolworth had stores all over the country. The bad publicity hurt them nationwide
The small, hometown business did not want to offend their community and vigorously enforced Jim Crow
Afraid it is not his rightIf a black store owner doesn’t want white customers...it’s his right as an entrepreneur.Boy do you have that wrongDo you really think there were tons of private business owners who were upset that they were forced to discriminate against black people?? gtfoh
Absolutely.
Why do you think that the lunch counter protesters chose huge chains like FW Woolworth to sit in at?
Because small private businessmen would have been likely to just serve them- and the protesters had ate before they got there and didn't have any money. They were there for a protest, not for lunch. A big liberal international firm from New York like Woolworth would stand by the law.
The big chains like Woolworth had stores all over the country. The bad publicity hurt them nationwide
The small, hometown business did not want to offend their community and vigorously enforced Jim Crow
No, it is not his right......are you even familiar with the Civil Rights laws??If a black store owner doesn’t want white customers...it’s his right as an entrepreneur.Boy do you have that wrongDo you really think there were tons of private business owners who were upset that they were forced to discriminate against black people?? gtfoh
Absolutely.
Why do you think that the lunch counter protesters chose huge chains like FW Woolworth to sit in at?
Because small private businessmen would have been likely to just serve them- and the protesters had ate before they got there and didn't have any money. They were there for a protest, not for lunch. A big liberal international firm from New York like Woolworth would stand by the law.
The big chains like Woolworth had stores all over the country. The bad publicity hurt them nationwide
The small, hometown business did not want to offend their community and vigorously enforced Jim Crow
It's amazing to me that these folks are on here both trying to claim liberals are against civil rights and in favor of discrimination while at the same time trying to defend discrimination and being against civil rights.....Afraid it is not his rightIf a black store owner doesn’t want white customers...it’s his right as an entrepreneur.Boy do you have that wrongDo you really think there were tons of private business owners who were upset that they were forced to discriminate against black people?? gtfoh
Absolutely.
Why do you think that the lunch counter protesters chose huge chains like FW Woolworth to sit in at?
Because small private businessmen would have been likely to just serve them- and the protesters had ate before they got there and didn't have any money. They were there for a protest, not for lunch. A big liberal international firm from New York like Woolworth would stand by the law.
The big chains like Woolworth had stores all over the country. The bad publicity hurt them nationwide
The small, hometown business did not want to offend their community and vigorously enforced Jim Crow
Afraid it is not his rightIf a black store owner doesn’t want white customers...it’s his right as an entrepreneur.Boy do you have that wrongDo you really think there were tons of private business owners who were upset that they were forced to discriminate against black people?? gtfoh
Absolutely.
Why do you think that the lunch counter protesters chose huge chains like FW Woolworth to sit in at?
Because small private businessmen would have been likely to just serve them- and the protesters had ate before they got there and didn't have any money. They were there for a protest, not for lunch. A big liberal international firm from New York like Woolworth would stand by the law.
The big chains like Woolworth had stores all over the country. The bad publicity hurt them nationwide
The small, hometown business did not want to offend their community and vigorously enforced Jim Crow
