Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thurmond was the ONLY one. THe rest all returned to the dem party, like good little boys.
Thurmond and Wright (his running mate) were the only ones. After that didn't work they went back to their governor jobs, then Thurmond went to run for the Senate but the state Democrats kicked him off the ballot and he had to run as a write-in, which he did, and won, and that's how he got to the Senate.
AGAIN ---- NAME RECOGNITION.
And the rest returned to the dem party like good little boys.
Your point that racism is not the defining narrative of those elections, that it was name recognition and not the issue of racism, is a very good one.
Indeed, your point is very, very close to mine, where I pointed out, in the last election of George Wallace, that his voters were NOT turned off by his flipping on the segregation issue, that that election, and thus others, were NOT about racism, as dishonest liberals always claim.
The myth of the Southern White voter, let alone ALL American white voters, being consumed by Evul Racism Hatred, and what have you,
is ironically LIBERALS, being evil and racist and full of hate for a race.
I guess I must say, OTHER liberals now, since you have finally seen the light. GOOD FOR YOU.
I look forward to your help in speaking the truth into their universe of lies.Thurmond was the ONLY one. THe rest all returned to the dem party, like good little boys.
No Thurmond wasn't the only one, then we got the next generation who had the same mindset as Thurmond. Trent Lott, Jeff Sessions, Orin Hatch, etc.
Sorry buddy, pick a definition and stick with it. The Dixicrats were brought up to support the insane claim that the South flipped parties based on racism.
Changing the usage of a word, halfway though a discussion, is just you being a liberal.
We already knew that. So you don't need to demonstrate your lack of a soul.
Really not an argument to make. Conservatism and racism pretty much go hand in hand, wherever you find conservatives you find racist.
If that was true, you wouldn't have to play word games to make your point. YOu could just MAKE IT, based on what actually happened, instead of putting your time and energy into being dishonest.
You are either a fool or a liar.
Prove me wrong, the folks you want to honor were conservative in their thinking and they were racist in their thinking. Almost all racist today are conservative in their thinking. Not hard to figure out.
The New Demokrat KKK.The Klan needs to make a comeback. In a big way.
They already have.
No Democrats in the klan today
They all belong to the RepubliKlan Party today
Lie much?
Nope
That is why they call them the RepubliKlan Party
Yes, I know this all bothers you wannabe klan members. Remember when you pussies had the guts to wear your hoods? Oh wait, you pussies were hiding then, too. Nevermind.
The Klan were democrats, democrats are traitor scum. Why would anyone want to join traitor scum?
They used to be Democrats, they are republicans today.
Good riddance.
What books would you ban/burn first? Uncle Tom's Cabin? Common Sense?
A book is totally different from a statue or monument honoring these traitorous racist.
The book of the Confederacy is more like Mein KamphGood riddance.
What books would you ban/burn first? Uncle Tom's Cabin? Common Sense?
A book is totally different from a statue or monument honoring these traitorous racist.
"Comrade" ...squawk! "Stalinists"....blah blah blah "Communists" yada yada yadaThe New Demokrat KKK.They already have.
No Democrats in the klan today
They all belong to the RepubliKlan Party today
Lie much?
Nope
That is why they call them the RepubliKlan Party
No one calls anyone that, Comrade shitferbrains.
The Klan died in 1968, sued into oblivion.
Hmm, we can do the same to your new brown shirts, ANTIFA....
Conservatism and the GOP have clearly benefited from racism.Thurmond was the ONLY one. THe rest all returned to the dem party, like good little boys.
Thurmond and Wright (his running mate) were the only ones. After that didn't work they went back to their governor jobs, then Thurmond went to run for the Senate but the state Democrats kicked him off the ballot and he had to run as a write-in, which he did, and won, and that's how he got to the Senate.
AGAIN ---- NAME RECOGNITION.
And the rest returned to the dem party like good little boys.
Your point that racism is not the defining narrative of those elections, that it was name recognition and not the issue of racism, is a very good one.
Indeed, your point is very, very close to mine, where I pointed out, in the last election of George Wallace, that his voters were NOT turned off by his flipping on the segregation issue, that that election, and thus others, were NOT about racism, as dishonest liberals always claim.
The myth of the Southern White voter, let alone ALL American white voters, being consumed by Evul Racism Hatred, and what have you,
is ironically LIBERALS, being evil and racist and full of hate for a race.
I guess I must say, OTHER liberals now, since you have finally seen the light. GOOD FOR YOU.
I look forward to your help in speaking the truth into their universe of lies.Thurmond was the ONLY one. THe rest all returned to the dem party, like good little boys.
No Thurmond wasn't the only one, then we got the next generation who had the same mindset as Thurmond. Trent Lott, Jeff Sessions, Orin Hatch, etc.
Sorry buddy, pick a definition and stick with it. The Dixicrats were brought up to support the insane claim that the South flipped parties based on racism.
Changing the usage of a word, halfway though a discussion, is just you being a liberal.
We already knew that. So you don't need to demonstrate your lack of a soul.
Really not an argument to make. Conservatism and racism pretty much go hand in hand, wherever you find conservatives you find racist.
Racists identify as conservative and vote Republican.
Of course, this doesn’t mean all conservatives are racists – but racists have found refuge among the ranks of conservatives and Republicans, a significant portion of the Republican base is racist and bigoted, and Republicans are loathe to condemn the racists and bigots in the GOP for fear of losing the partisan advantage afforded Republicans given the steadfast loyalty racists and bigots have for the Party.
This is the Faustian agreement the GOP made the consequence of the Southern Strategy: to welcome with open arms bigots and racists – former Southern Democrats – ignoring their racism and accepting their votes for Republican candidates.
A nice fairy tale to tell children. Any looking at the real world, past or present shows it to be a completely lie.
Which is why you guys are so firm in your stone walling.
On some level, you know that the slightest hint of the Truth, will cause your house of lies to come crashing down, into flame and ruin.
And you are terrified of having to deal with the real world.
Sorry, that would be YOUR racist Dimwinger party.You just ignore the Grand Kleagle of the KKK who your party elected as Senate Majority Leader, and served until 2010.To a State legislature......20+ years ago.Duke was elected on the republican ticket, hehe.
Meanwhile......Robert KKK Byrd.
You don't hear me trying to defend Bird.
David Duke. Hehe.
Neither party is mine, not the Jackass or the Elephant. Racist, KKK, skinheads, etc. flocked to your beloved King.
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president
Thurmond and Wright (his running mate) were the only ones. After that didn't work they went back to their governor jobs, then Thurmond went to run for the Senate but the state Democrats kicked him off the ballot and he had to run as a write-in, which he did, and won, and that's how he got to the Senate.
AGAIN ---- NAME RECOGNITION.
And the rest returned to the dem party like good little boys.
Your point that racism is not the defining narrative of those elections, that it was name recognition and not the issue of racism, is a very good one.
Indeed, your point is very, very close to mine, where I pointed out, in the last election of George Wallace, that his voters were NOT turned off by his flipping on the segregation issue, that that election, and thus others, were NOT about racism, as dishonest liberals always claim.
The myth of the Southern White voter, let alone ALL American white voters, being consumed by Evul Racism Hatred, and what have you,
is ironically LIBERALS, being evil and racist and full of hate for a race.
I guess I must say, OTHER liberals now, since you have finally seen the light. GOOD FOR YOU.
I look forward to your help in speaking the truth into their universe of lies.No Thurmond wasn't the only one, then we got the next generation who had the same mindset as Thurmond. Trent Lott, Jeff Sessions, Orin Hatch, etc.
Sorry buddy, pick a definition and stick with it. The Dixicrats were brought up to support the insane claim that the South flipped parties based on racism.
Changing the usage of a word, halfway though a discussion, is just you being a liberal.
We already knew that. So you don't need to demonstrate your lack of a soul.
Really not an argument to make. Conservatism and racism pretty much go hand in hand, wherever you find conservatives you find racist.
If that was true, you wouldn't have to play word games to make your point. YOu could just MAKE IT, based on what actually happened, instead of putting your time and energy into being dishonest.
You are either a fool or a liar.
Prove me wrong, the folks you want to honor were conservative in their thinking and they were racist in their thinking. Almost all racist today are conservative in their thinking. Not hard to figure out.
So, to support your conclusion, you make an unsupported assertion about some people from generations ago, and then make an unsupported asserting about some people today, you make no attempt to connect your two unsupported assertions across time, in any fashion,
And in your mind, you actually did something there, other than reveal yourself to be a drooling moron?
Incredible.
You are literally insane.
The New Demokrat KKK.They already have.
No Democrats in the klan today
They all belong to the RepubliKlan Party today
Lie much?
Nope
That is why they call them the RepubliKlan Party
No one calls anyone that, Comrade shitferbrains.
The Klan died in 1968, sued into oblivion.
Hmm, we can do the same to your new brown shirts, ANTIFA....
Conservatism and the GOP have clearly benefited from racism.Thurmond and Wright (his running mate) were the only ones. After that didn't work they went back to their governor jobs, then Thurmond went to run for the Senate but the state Democrats kicked him off the ballot and he had to run as a write-in, which he did, and won, and that's how he got to the Senate.
AGAIN ---- NAME RECOGNITION.
And the rest returned to the dem party like good little boys.
Your point that racism is not the defining narrative of those elections, that it was name recognition and not the issue of racism, is a very good one.
Indeed, your point is very, very close to mine, where I pointed out, in the last election of George Wallace, that his voters were NOT turned off by his flipping on the segregation issue, that that election, and thus others, were NOT about racism, as dishonest liberals always claim.
The myth of the Southern White voter, let alone ALL American white voters, being consumed by Evul Racism Hatred, and what have you,
is ironically LIBERALS, being evil and racist and full of hate for a race.
I guess I must say, OTHER liberals now, since you have finally seen the light. GOOD FOR YOU.
I look forward to your help in speaking the truth into their universe of lies.No Thurmond wasn't the only one, then we got the next generation who had the same mindset as Thurmond. Trent Lott, Jeff Sessions, Orin Hatch, etc.
Sorry buddy, pick a definition and stick with it. The Dixicrats were brought up to support the insane claim that the South flipped parties based on racism.
Changing the usage of a word, halfway though a discussion, is just you being a liberal.
We already knew that. So you don't need to demonstrate your lack of a soul.
Really not an argument to make. Conservatism and racism pretty much go hand in hand, wherever you find conservatives you find racist.
Racists identify as conservative and vote Republican.
Of course, this doesn’t mean all conservatives are racists – but racists have found refuge among the ranks of conservatives and Republicans, a significant portion of the Republican base is racist and bigoted, and Republicans are loathe to condemn the racists and bigots in the GOP for fear of losing the partisan advantage afforded Republicans given the steadfast loyalty racists and bigots have for the Party.
This is the Faustian agreement the GOP made the consequence of the Southern Strategy: to welcome with open arms bigots and racists – former Southern Democrats – ignoring their racism and accepting their votes for Republican candidates.
A nice fairy tale to tell children. Any looking at the real world, past or present shows it to be a completely lie.
Which is why you guys are so firm in your stone walling.
On some level, you know that the slightest hint of the Truth, will cause your house of lies to come crashing down, into flame and ruin.
And you are terrified of having to deal with the real world.
Smfh. Study History and not His-Story and you might learn something.
And the rest returned to the dem party like good little boys.
Your point that racism is not the defining narrative of those elections, that it was name recognition and not the issue of racism, is a very good one.
Indeed, your point is very, very close to mine, where I pointed out, in the last election of George Wallace, that his voters were NOT turned off by his flipping on the segregation issue, that that election, and thus others, were NOT about racism, as dishonest liberals always claim.
The myth of the Southern White voter, let alone ALL American white voters, being consumed by Evul Racism Hatred, and what have you,
is ironically LIBERALS, being evil and racist and full of hate for a race.
I guess I must say, OTHER liberals now, since you have finally seen the light. GOOD FOR YOU.
I look forward to your help in speaking the truth into their universe of lies.Sorry buddy, pick a definition and stick with it. The Dixicrats were brought up to support the insane claim that the South flipped parties based on racism.
Changing the usage of a word, halfway though a discussion, is just you being a liberal.
We already knew that. So you don't need to demonstrate your lack of a soul.
Really not an argument to make. Conservatism and racism pretty much go hand in hand, wherever you find conservatives you find racist.
If that was true, you wouldn't have to play word games to make your point. YOu could just MAKE IT, based on what actually happened, instead of putting your time and energy into being dishonest.
You are either a fool or a liar.
Prove me wrong, the folks you want to honor were conservative in their thinking and they were racist in their thinking. Almost all racist today are conservative in their thinking. Not hard to figure out.
So, to support your conclusion, you make an unsupported assertion about some people from generations ago, and then make an unsupported asserting about some people today, you make no attempt to connect your two unsupported assertions across time, in any fashion,
And in your mind, you actually did something there, other than reveal yourself to be a drooling moron?
Incredible.
You are literally insane.
Wow, so you are telling us that those folks were not conservative in their thinking, pretty much the same as you are today.
The Democrats had the same problem with the Solid South fifty years agoConservatism and the GOP have clearly benefited from racism.Was Strom Thurmond a Dixiecrat?
Was Jessie Helms a Dixiecrat?
Thurmond was the ONLY one. THe rest all returned to the dem party, like good little boys.
Thurmond and Wright (his running mate) were the only ones. After that didn't work they went back to their governor jobs, then Thurmond went to run for the Senate but the state Democrats kicked him off the ballot and he had to run as a write-in, which he did, and won, and that's how he got to the Senate.
AGAIN ---- NAME RECOGNITION.
And the rest returned to the dem party like good little boys.
Your point that racism is not the defining narrative of those elections, that it was name recognition and not the issue of racism, is a very good one.
Indeed, your point is very, very close to mine, where I pointed out, in the last election of George Wallace, that his voters were NOT turned off by his flipping on the segregation issue, that that election, and thus others, were NOT about racism, as dishonest liberals always claim.
The myth of the Southern White voter, let alone ALL American white voters, being consumed by Evul Racism Hatred, and what have you,
is ironically LIBERALS, being evil and racist and full of hate for a race.
I guess I must say, OTHER liberals now, since you have finally seen the light. GOOD FOR YOU.
I look forward to your help in speaking the truth into their universe of lies.Was Strom Thurmond a Dixiecrat?
Was Jessie Helms a Dixiecrat?
Thurmond was the ONLY one. THe rest all returned to the dem party, like good little boys.
No Thurmond wasn't the only one, then we got the next generation who had the same mindset as Thurmond. Trent Lott, Jeff Sessions, Orin Hatch, etc.
Sorry buddy, pick a definition and stick with it. The Dixicrats were brought up to support the insane claim that the South flipped parties based on racism.
Changing the usage of a word, halfway though a discussion, is just you being a liberal.
We already knew that. So you don't need to demonstrate your lack of a soul.
Really not an argument to make. Conservatism and racism pretty much go hand in hand, wherever you find conservatives you find racist.
Racists identify as conservative and vote Republican.
Of course, this doesn’t mean all conservatives are racists – but racists have found refuge among the ranks of conservatives and Republicans, a significant portion of the Republican base is racist and bigoted, and Republicans are loathe to condemn the racists and bigots in the GOP for fear of losing the partisan advantage afforded Republicans given the steadfast loyalty racists and bigots have for the Party.
This is the Faustian agreement the GOP made the consequence of the Southern Strategy: to welcome with open arms bigots and racists – former Southern Democrats – ignoring their racism and accepting their votes for Republican candidates.
The book of the Confederacy is more like Mein KamphGood riddance.
What books would you ban/burn first? Uncle Tom's Cabin? Common Sense?
A book is totally different from a statue or monument honoring these traitorous racist.
What "book of the confederacy," you drooling fucking moron?
I doubt you've ever read a book in your life.
Dic sucking racists still trying to defend dic sucking racists of the past...and then they wonder why we call them dic sucking racistsThey were not human. Legally they were property. South had honor, integrity and pride.600,000 died because the South was afraid they would lose their right to own another humanA union before you destroyed it, men enlisted from both sides. Often from same town. They stood arm by arm shoulder by shoulder and died that way.WHAT a was there in 1862?It was there in 1862 you blithering revisionist history idiot.There wasn’t a push to construct Union war memorials after 1910. There was for Confederate memorials
There were no memorials on the DC mall until the Vietnam Memorial.
After the Vietnam Memorial was built, Korean War vets said....how about us? Then WWII vets said.....how about us?
Hitlery wasn’t on the Republican ticket, dummy.Sorry, that would be YOUR racist Dimwinger party.You just ignore the Grand Kleagle of the KKK who your party elected as Senate Majority Leader, and served until 2010.To a State legislature......20+ years ago.
Meanwhile......Robert KKK Byrd.
You don't hear me trying to defend Bird.
David Duke. Hehe.
Neither party is mine, not the Jackass or the Elephant. Racist, KKK, skinheads, etc. flocked to your beloved King.
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president
That would be the Republikkklan party.
Revisionist history.The history of the klan and all white supremacists is firmly with the Republican Party.You sure know your party's history, Dimwinger.BULLSHIT.
The groundwork was lain for the Klan already with the Lost Cause pushing this revisionist narrative. The KKK rose directly out of the sensation of the movie "Birth of a Nation" which in turn rose out of a wildly popular play based on the wildly popular novel "The Clansman" in 1905. ALL of those were narrative of the Cult of the Lost Cause, ALL of them depicting the worst racial stereotypes and ALL of them penetrated deep into the culture. Simmons' whole point in rekindling the Klan in 1915 was to capitalize on that cultural momentum by making the Klan people saw in the movie into a real thing that people could actually join, and in the process put money in his pocket. So when the Klan became a real thing it did so in a fertile field that was built for it to take off. Within a decade its members numbered in the millions from sea to shining sea, FAR outpacing the reach of the original 1865 Klan.
Moreover ALL of them -- the book, the play, the movie, the race riots, the segregation, the Jim Crow laws --- were taking place simultaneously with the UDC propaganda transmitter campaign. The statue in this thread was erected in 1907. Ten years later they were affixing a plaque to a building in Pulaski Tennessee to "honor" that building as the birthplace of the original KKK.
There is little difference between the platforms of the KKK and Republican Party
The Dimwinger party is the party of the KKK.
Not TODAY
TODAY you cant differentiate between the agenda of the GOP and the agenda of the klan
That's bullshit, mainly because the Triple K is down to less than 200 members nationwide, more than half are law enforcement or embedded individuals working for news organizations keeping an eye on the extremists.
The KKK would totally disappear if it wasn't for the publicity given them by CNN and money provided by law enforcement officers paying dues.
The klan is a tool of the media and deep state, if you follow the money, not Republicans or conservatives at all.
I love how Trumpers try to disavow the Klan while also pushing all of the core policies that the Klan supports....
Maybe that is why the Klan believes Trump is one of them so much.....maybe that is why the klan and their confederate-porn show up at Trump rallies all of the time.....
When did conservatives ever push for segregation?? Always.....I love how Trumpers try to disavow the Klan while also pushing all of the core policies that the Klan supports....
Maybe that is why the Klan believes Trump is one of them so much.....maybe that is why the klan and their confederate-porn show up at Trump rallies all of the time.....
When did the Republicans ever push for segregation?
The Triple K is paid by Democrat operatives to show up at Trump events to cause trouble.
