Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act

[tinydancer]

I should make it clear that I didn't put up President Clinton as a tit for tat. Bandar worked with Reagan to arm the mujahedeen.

I wish I could remember where I read it to give credit to the author who described Prince Bandar as being in the game of "coercive geopolitics" aka arming so called rebel fighters wherever and whenever it will benefit Saudi Arabia.

 

[Freewill]

The idiot Bush turns out to be a evil genius who would have thunk it?

 

[Sallow]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff

Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.

In accusations published yesterday by the leading Tea Party publication, Family Security Matters, Saudi Defense Minister and Intelligence chief Prince Bandar referred to as “Bandar Bush” in his Wikipedia biography for his close relationship with that family, was said to be the planner of 9/11.
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act | Veterans Today

From your link, the disclaimer that says it's all bullshit.

"Despite these pronouncements, these accusations may well be unfounded speculation."

Except it's not.

The Saudis planned, financed and even populated the group that perpetrated the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Their involvement was purged from the final report.

9/11 Link To Saudi Arabia Is Topic Of 28 Redacted Pages In Government Report; Congressmen Push For Release

Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup | New York Post

 

[LeftofLeft]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff

Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.

In accusations published yesterday by the leading Tea Party publication, Family Security Matters, Saudi Defense Minister and Intelligence chief Prince Bandar referred to as “Bandar Bush” in his Wikipedia biography for his close relationship with that family, was said to be the planner of 9/11.
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act | Veterans Today

Bring it on. The biggest 9-11 Cover Up occurred when Clinton National Security Advisor was caught at the National Archives stealing and destroying documents relating to 9-11 investigation. If this were all Bush's fault, why would any Democrat need to fall on the sword like that?

I say have your Bush Cover Up Investigation. Go After him in 2014; an election year. Given how divided the US Electorate is, investigating Bush on 9-11 can only mean bad news for Republicans, right? Go for it!

 

[zeke]

We have alot of scandals from the obama regime to investigate, but liberals are worried about something from 13 years ago. Lol, good luck!

Fuck you dude. Yea. Real Americans are worried about who, why and how the worst terrorist attack ever on our nation occurred. I still wonder how the Saudi family was allowed to fly out of the country. When we supposed had a lockdown on air traffic. But the Saudis got to fly. Why was that?

Your such a POS you are still "worried" about Obama's birth certificate. Right?

 

[zeke]

I expect a right wonger to come on here and claim that the Saudis had NOTHING to do with 9/11.
Why those terrorists flying those planes came from........IRAQ.

Right you right wongers? That is the reason we had to invade Iraq. They flew those planes. Except they didn't.

I know, the Iraqis' were mind controlling the Saudi and made them fly those planes into those buildings.

That why we had to invade Iraq. Mind control.

 

[Sallow]

Man we live in a world where you can murder a child and then sell a painting on e-bay for $100,000.

Must've taken a strong woman to undergo an abortion, rise from the table and sell a painting the very same day!

Perhaps that was her Obama-sanctioned dream?

You seem to have problems with our language.

"Child" is what humans are referred too as once they leave the womb.

"Fetus" is what they are called when they are in the womb.

"Abortions" are legal in this country, murder describes the unlawful killing of a human being.

 

[Sallow]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff

Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.

In accusations published yesterday by the leading Tea Party publication, Family Security Matters, Saudi Defense Minister and Intelligence chief Prince Bandar referred to as “Bandar Bush” in his Wikipedia biography for his close relationship with that family, was said to be the planner of 9/11.
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act | Veterans Today

Bring it on. The biggest 9-11 Cover Up occurred when Clinton National Security Advisor was caught at the National Archives stealing and destroying documents relating to 9-11 investigation. If this were all Bush's fault, why would any Democrat need to fall on the sword like that?

I say have your Bush Cover Up Investigation. Go After him in 2014; an election year. Given how divided the US Electorate is, investigating Bush on 9-11 can only mean bad news for Republicans, right? Go for it!

And that's not what happened.

In April 2005, Berger pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives in Washington.[2] According to the lead prosecutor in the case, Berger only took copies of classified information and no original material was destroyed. Berger was sentenced to a fine and a three-year suspension of his security clearance.[2]
Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why Clinton was even included in the 9/11 investigation is beyond me. 9/11 happened 8 months after he left office.

 

[Freewill]

We have alot of scandals from the obama regime to investigate, but liberals are worried about something from 13 years ago. Lol, good luck!

Fuck you dude. Yea. Real Americans are worried about who, why and how the worst terrorist attack ever on our nation occurred. I still wonder how the Saudi family was allowed to fly out of the country. When we supposed had a lockdown on air traffic. But the Saudis got to fly. Why was that?

Your such a POS you are still "worried" about Obama's birth certificate. Right?

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/27/politics/27exodus.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0

The Sept. 11 commission examined the Saudi flights in its final report last year, and it found that no Saudis had been allowed to leave before national airspace was reopened on Sept. 13, 2001; that there was no evidence of "political intervention" by the White House; and that the F.B.I. had done a "satisfactory screening" of the departing Saudis to ensure they did not have information relevant to the attacks.

 

[Freewill]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff

Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.

In accusations published yesterday by the leading Tea Party publication, Family Security Matters, Saudi Defense Minister and Intelligence chief Prince Bandar referred to as “Bandar Bush” in his Wikipedia biography for his close relationship with that family, was said to be the planner of 9/11.
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act | Veterans Today

Bring it on. The biggest 9-11 Cover Up occurred when Clinton National Security Advisor was caught at the National Archives stealing and destroying documents relating to 9-11 investigation. If this were all Bush's fault, why would any Democrat need to fall on the sword like that?

I say have your Bush Cover Up Investigation. Go After him in 2014; an election year. Given how divided the US Electorate is, investigating Bush on 9-11 can only mean bad news for Republicans, right? Go for it!

And that's not what happened.

In April 2005, Berger pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives in Washington.[2] According to the lead prosecutor in the case, Berger only took copies of classified information and no original material was destroyed. Berger was sentenced to a fine and a three-year suspension of his security clearance.[2]
Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why Clinton was even included in the 9/11 investigation is beyond me. 9/11 happened 8 months after he left office.

yeah, it pretty much is what happened, imagine if Bush's buddies had done the same. Or better yet imagine what would happen to a president that tried to cover up a two bit break in.

Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The National Archives building in Washington, D.C..
On July 19, 2004, it was revealed that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating Berger for unauthorized removal of classified documents in October 2003 from a National Archives reading room prior to testifying before the 9/11 Commission. The documents were five classified copies of a single report commissioned from Richard Clarke covering internal assessments of the Clinton Administration's handling of the unsuccessful 2000 millennium attack plots. An associate of Berger said Berger took one copy in September 2003 and four copies in October 2003.[17] Berger subsequently lied to investigators when questioned about the removal of the documents.[2]

Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material on April 1, 2005.[2] Berger was fined $50,000,[18] sentenced to serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service, and stripped of his security clearance for 3 years.[2][19] The Justice Department initially said Berger stole only copies of classified documents and not originals.[20] But the House Government Reform Committee later revealed that an unsupervised Berger had been given access to classified files of original, uncopied, uninventoried documents on terrorism. During the House Government Reform Committee hearings, it was acknowledged, by Nancy Kegan Smith, that she granted Berger access to original materials in her office. [21]

On December 20, 2006, Inspector General Paul Brachfeld reported that Berger took a break to go outside without an escort. "In total, during this visit, he removed four documents ... Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)." Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office.[22][23]

On May 17, 2007, Berger relinquished his license to practice law as a result of the Justice Department investigation. Saying, "I have decided to voluntarily relinquish my license." He added that, "While I derived great satisfaction from years of practicing law, I have not done so for 15 years and do not envision returning to the profession. I am very sorry for what I did, and I deeply apologize." By giving up his license, Berger avoided cross-examination by the Bar Counsel regarding details of his thefts.[24]

 

[Sallow]

Bring it on. The biggest 9-11 Cover Up occurred when Clinton National Security Advisor was caught at the National Archives stealing and destroying documents relating to 9-11 investigation. If this were all Bush's fault, why would any Democrat need to fall on the sword like that?

I say have your Bush Cover Up Investigation. Go After him in 2014; an election year. Given how divided the US Electorate is, investigating Bush on 9-11 can only mean bad news for Republicans, right? Go for it!

And that's not what happened.

In April 2005, Berger pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives in Washington.[2] According to the lead prosecutor in the case, Berger only took copies of classified information and no original material was destroyed. Berger was sentenced to a fine and a three-year suspension of his security clearance.[2]
Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why Clinton was even included in the 9/11 investigation is beyond me. 9/11 happened 8 months after he left office.

yeah, it pretty much is what happened, imagine if Bush's buddies had done the same. Or better yet imagine what would happen to a president that tried to cover up a two bit break in.

Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The National Archives building in Washington, D.C..
On July 19, 2004, it was revealed that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating Berger for unauthorized removal of classified documents in October 2003 from a National Archives reading room prior to testifying before the 9/11 Commission. The documents were five classified copies of a single report commissioned from Richard Clarke covering internal assessments of the Clinton Administration's handling of the unsuccessful 2000 millennium attack plots. An associate of Berger said Berger took one copy in September 2003 and four copies in October 2003.[17] Berger subsequently lied to investigators when questioned about the removal of the documents.[2]

Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material on April 1, 2005.[2] Berger was fined $50,000,[18] sentenced to serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service, and stripped of his security clearance for 3 years.[2][19] The Justice Department initially said Berger stole only copies of classified documents and not originals.[20] But the House Government Reform Committee later revealed that an unsupervised Berger had been given access to classified files of original, uncopied, uninventoried documents on terrorism. During the House Government Reform Committee hearings, it was acknowledged, by Nancy Kegan Smith, that she granted Berger access to original materials in her office. [21]

On December 20, 2006, Inspector General Paul Brachfeld reported that Berger took a break to go outside without an escort. "In total, during this visit, he removed four documents ... Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)." Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office.[22][23]

On May 17, 2007, Berger relinquished his license to practice law as a result of the Justice Department investigation. Saying, "I have decided to voluntarily relinquish my license." He added that, "While I derived great satisfaction from years of practicing law, I have not done so for 15 years and do not envision returning to the profession. I am very sorry for what I did, and I deeply apologize." By giving up his license, Berger avoided cross-examination by the Bar Counsel regarding details of his thefts.[24]

Basically it was partisan bullshit even including Clinton in the investigation. And if they were doing that, they should have hauled in the Republicans who blocked Clinton's efforts to kill Bin Laden.

And Bush's buddies, who were in the PNAC, were lying about Iraq's involvement in the 9/11 attacks, chemical weapons and nuclear weapons. Bush, himself, lied about Aluminum Tubing, the Bush administration tortured prisoners and outed a CIA agent.

That's the short list.

 

[Freewill]

And that's not what happened.



Why Clinton was even included in the 9/11 investigation is beyond me. 9/11 happened 8 months after he left office.

yeah, it pretty much is what happened, imagine if Bush's buddies had done the same. Or better yet imagine what would happen to a president that tried to cover up a two bit break in.

Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The National Archives building in Washington, D.C..
On July 19, 2004, it was revealed that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating Berger for unauthorized removal of classified documents in October 2003 from a National Archives reading room prior to testifying before the 9/11 Commission. The documents were five classified copies of a single report commissioned from Richard Clarke covering internal assessments of the Clinton Administration's handling of the unsuccessful 2000 millennium attack plots. An associate of Berger said Berger took one copy in September 2003 and four copies in October 2003.[17] Berger subsequently lied to investigators when questioned about the removal of the documents.[2]

Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material on April 1, 2005.[2] Berger was fined $50,000,[18] sentenced to serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service, and stripped of his security clearance for 3 years.[2][19] The Justice Department initially said Berger stole only copies of classified documents and not originals.[20] But the House Government Reform Committee later revealed that an unsupervised Berger had been given access to classified files of original, uncopied, uninventoried documents on terrorism. During the House Government Reform Committee hearings, it was acknowledged, by Nancy Kegan Smith, that she granted Berger access to original materials in her office. [21]

On December 20, 2006, Inspector General Paul Brachfeld reported that Berger took a break to go outside without an escort. "In total, during this visit, he removed four documents ... Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)." Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office.[22][23]

On May 17, 2007, Berger relinquished his license to practice law as a result of the Justice Department investigation. Saying, "I have decided to voluntarily relinquish my license." He added that, "While I derived great satisfaction from years of practicing law, I have not done so for 15 years and do not envision returning to the profession. I am very sorry for what I did, and I deeply apologize." By giving up his license, Berger avoided cross-examination by the Bar Counsel regarding details of his thefts.[24]

Basically it was partisan bullshit even including Clinton in the investigation. And if they were doing that, they should have hauled in the Republicans who blocked Clinton's efforts to kill Bin Laden.

And Bush's buddies, who were in the PNAC, were lying about Iraq's involvement in the 9/11 attacks, chemical weapons and nuclear weapons. Bush, himself, lied about Aluminum Tubing, the Bush administration tortured prisoners and outed a CIA agent.

That's the short list.

Links must be provided. Especially on the BS about the Republicans causing Clinton not to have the balls to take out OBL.

The whole of 9/11 was planned under Clinton and because of Clinton's actions. The hi-jackers went to flight school under Clinton and don't forget Berger was one of his boys.

 

[theHawk]

And that's not what happened.



Why Clinton was even included in the 9/11 investigation is beyond me. 9/11 happened 8 months after he left office.

yeah, it pretty much is what happened, imagine if Bush's buddies had done the same. Or better yet imagine what would happen to a president that tried to cover up a two bit break in.

Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The National Archives building in Washington, D.C..
On July 19, 2004, it was revealed that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating Berger for unauthorized removal of classified documents in October 2003 from a National Archives reading room prior to testifying before the 9/11 Commission. The documents were five classified copies of a single report commissioned from Richard Clarke covering internal assessments of the Clinton Administration's handling of the unsuccessful 2000 millennium attack plots. An associate of Berger said Berger took one copy in September 2003 and four copies in October 2003.[17] Berger subsequently lied to investigators when questioned about the removal of the documents.[2]

Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material on April 1, 2005.[2] Berger was fined $50,000,[18] sentenced to serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service, and stripped of his security clearance for 3 years.[2][19] The Justice Department initially said Berger stole only copies of classified documents and not originals.[20] But the House Government Reform Committee later revealed that an unsupervised Berger had been given access to classified files of original, uncopied, uninventoried documents on terrorism. During the House Government Reform Committee hearings, it was acknowledged, by Nancy Kegan Smith, that she granted Berger access to original materials in her office. [21]

On December 20, 2006, Inspector General Paul Brachfeld reported that Berger took a break to go outside without an escort. "In total, during this visit, he removed four documents ... Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)." Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office.[22][23]

On May 17, 2007, Berger relinquished his license to practice law as a result of the Justice Department investigation. Saying, "I have decided to voluntarily relinquish my license." He added that, "While I derived great satisfaction from years of practicing law, I have not done so for 15 years and do not envision returning to the profession. I am very sorry for what I did, and I deeply apologize." By giving up his license, Berger avoided cross-examination by the Bar Counsel regarding details of his thefts.[24]

Basically it was partisan bullshit even including Clinton in the investigation. And if they were doing that, they should have hauled in the Republicans who blocked Clinton's efforts to kill Bin Laden.

And Bush's buddies, who were in the PNAC, were lying about Iraq's involvement in the 9/11 attacks, chemical weapons and nuclear weapons. Bush, himself, lied about Aluminum Tubing, the Bush administration tortured prisoners and outed a CIA agent.

That's the short list.

Oh including Clinton was bullshit? Then why was Sandy Berger caught stuffing classified documents down his trousers in order to clear his Dear Leader?

Partisan bullshit didn't cause Berger to steal classified documents, just typical Democrat ass covering and lying.

But, lapdogs like you really don't care. They're good liberals and libs must be defended no matter what.

 

[jknowgood]

We have alot of scandals from the obama regime to investigate, but liberals are worried about something from 13 years ago. Lol, good luck!

Fuck you dude. Yea. Real Americans are worried about who, why and how the worst terrorist attack ever on our nation occurred. I still wonder how the Saudi family was allowed to fly out of the country. When we supposed had a lockdown on air traffic. But the Saudis got to fly. Why was that?

Your such a POS you are still "worried" about Obama's birth certificate. Right?

Still on talking points from 13 years ago? Lol Why don't bring out the other ones? Bush didn't do anything to stop the attacks, he finished reading a book to grammar school kids. He knew about it before it happened. He caused 911 to get sadaam. He is a cowboy. He caused katrina. Oh sorry i got off topic, but i'm sure you get the picture how idiotic you sound, and until you hold obama accountable you have no credit.

 

[Sallow]

yeah, it pretty much is what happened, imagine if Bush's buddies had done the same. Or better yet imagine what would happen to a president that tried to cover up a two bit break in.

Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The National Archives building in Washington, D.C..
On July 19, 2004, it was revealed that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating Berger for unauthorized removal of classified documents in October 2003 from a National Archives reading room prior to testifying before the 9/11 Commission. The documents were five classified copies of a single report commissioned from Richard Clarke covering internal assessments of the Clinton Administration's handling of the unsuccessful 2000 millennium attack plots. An associate of Berger said Berger took one copy in September 2003 and four copies in October 2003.[17] Berger subsequently lied to investigators when questioned about the removal of the documents.[2]

Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material on April 1, 2005.[2] Berger was fined $50,000,[18] sentenced to serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service, and stripped of his security clearance for 3 years.[2][19] The Justice Department initially said Berger stole only copies of classified documents and not originals.[20] But the House Government Reform Committee later revealed that an unsupervised Berger had been given access to classified files of original, uncopied, uninventoried documents on terrorism. During the House Government Reform Committee hearings, it was acknowledged, by Nancy Kegan Smith, that she granted Berger access to original materials in her office. [21]

On December 20, 2006, Inspector General Paul Brachfeld reported that Berger took a break to go outside without an escort. "In total, during this visit, he removed four documents ... Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)." Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office.[22][23]

On May 17, 2007, Berger relinquished his license to practice law as a result of the Justice Department investigation. Saying, "I have decided to voluntarily relinquish my license." He added that, "While I derived great satisfaction from years of practicing law, I have not done so for 15 years and do not envision returning to the profession. I am very sorry for what I did, and I deeply apologize." By giving up his license, Berger avoided cross-examination by the Bar Counsel regarding details of his thefts.[24]

Basically it was partisan bullshit even including Clinton in the investigation. And if they were doing that, they should have hauled in the Republicans who blocked Clinton's efforts to kill Bin Laden.

And Bush's buddies, who were in the PNAC, were lying about Iraq's involvement in the 9/11 attacks, chemical weapons and nuclear weapons. Bush, himself, lied about Aluminum Tubing, the Bush administration tortured prisoners and outed a CIA agent.

That's the short list.

Links must be provided. Especially on the BS about the Republicans causing Clinton not to have the balls to take out OBL.

The whole of 9/11 was planned under Clinton and because of Clinton's actions. The hi-jackers went to flight school under Clinton and don't forget Berger was one of his boys.

You're kidding..really?

You need links?

Clarke reviewed the plans for Sandy Berger, the National Security Director, and told him that it was in the "very early stages of development" and stressed the importance of only targeting bin Laden, not the entire compound. The NSC told the CIA to begin preparing the necessary legal documents to execute the raid.[46]

The senior management of the CIA was skeptical of the plan, and despite objections, canceled the operation, fearing that the risk to their operatives and financial costs were too high. It is unclear whether or not Clinton was aware of the plan.

As the Counter-terrorism Center continued to track bin Laden, they learned in 1998 that the Saudi government had bin Laden cells within the country that were planning attacks on U.S. forces. CIA Director George Tenet, encouraged by the Saudi's show of force against bin Laden, asked them to assist in the fight against bin Laden. Clinton named Tenet as his informal "personal representative" to work with Saudi Arabia on terrorism. The Saudis promised Tenet that they would do everything they could to convince the Taliban to release bin Laden for trial in America or elsewhere. The Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Turki bin Faisal, held various meetings with Taliban chief Mullah Omar and other leaders and received assurance that bin Laden would be removed. Omar, however, reneged on that promise.[38]

On August 7, 1998, Bin Laden struck again, this time with simultaneous bombings on the U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. (see above) The CIA, having confirmed bin Laden was behind the attack, informed Clinton that terrorist leaders were planning to meet at a camp near Khowst, to plan future attacks. According to Tenet, "several hundred," including bin Laden, would attend. On August 20, Clinton ordered the military to fire cruise missiles at Al-Qaeda terrorist training camps in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical factory in Khartoum, Sundan, where bin Laden was suspected of manufacturing biological weapons. While the military hit their targets, bin Laden was not killed. The CIA estimated that they had missed bin Laden by "a few hours."[43]

At the time of the attacks, Clinton was embroiled in the Lewinsky scandal (see below). This led many Republicans in Congress to accuse the president of "wagging the dog"—launching a military attack simply to distract the public from his personal problems. Clinton and his principals, however, insist that the decision was made solely on the basis of national security.[38]

After the attacks failed, Clinton moved his focus to diplomatic pressure. On the advice of the State Department, Clinton encouraged Pakistan, whose military intelligence agency was a patron of the Taliban, to pressure the Taliban to remove bin Laden. After numerous meetings with Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, the Pakistani's would still not cooperate.[38] Sharif eventually agreed to allow the United States to train Pakistani special forces to find bin Laden. When Sharif was ousted by Pervez Musharraf, the plan was abandoned.[47]

After encouragement by Richard Clarke, Clinton issued an executive order in July 1999 declaring the Taliban regime as a state sponsor of terrorism.[48] This was followed in October 1999 by Resolution 1267 sponsored by the United States placing economic and travel sanctions on the Taliban.[49] The Taliban, however, stood by bin Laden, and the United States, along with Russia, proposed yet another UN resolution (Resolution 1333), this time imposing an embargo an arms shipments to the Taliban.[50] The move was meant to weaken the Taliban in their fight against the Northern Alliance in their civil strife. However, the resolution did little to limit the illegal flow of arms from Pakistan.[38]

In August 1999, Clinton signed a Memorandum of Notification ordering the CIA to develop another plan to capture bin Laden, and giving the CIA the authority to order bin Laden be killed.[51]

Near the end of 1999, the Clinton administration, working with the government of Jordan, detected and thwarted a planned terrorist attack to detonate bombs at various New Year millennium celebrations around the world. The CIA confirmed that bin Laden was behind the plot, which was disrupted just days before the New Year.[43] While many credited Clinton's new CSG for playing a role in the foiling of these plots, critics claim it was "mostly luck."[52]

The CIA informed Clinton that they feared the thwarted attacks were just part of a larger series of attacks planned for the new year. Clinton asked Clarke and the CSG to draft plans to "deter and disrupt" al Qaeda attacks.[38]

On October 12, 2000, terrorists bombed the USS Cole in the harbor of the Yemeni port of Aden. The attack on the USS Cole (DDG-67), a U.S. Navy destroyer, killed 17 Navy sailors, and there was no clear indication during the last months of Clinton's term of who was responsible.[38] The CIA reported that they had "no definitive answer on [the] crucial question of outside direction of the attack—how and by whom. Clinton did not think it would be wise to launch an attack based on a "preliminary judgment," stating that he would have taken further action had he received definitive intelligence. The CIA was eventually able to confirm bin Laden's involvement with certainty a week after the Bush administration took office.[43]

As Clinton's second term drew to a close, the CSG drafted a comprehensive policy paper entitled "Strategy for Eliminating the Threat from the Jihadist Networks of al Qida: Status and Prospects." http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB147/clarke attachment.pdf The paper outlined a method to "roll back" al Qaeda over "a period of three to five years." Clarke stated that while "continued anti-al Qida operations at the current level will prevent some attacks, [it] will not seriously attrit their ability to plan and conduct attacks." This policy paper was forwarded to the incoming Bush administration.[43]
Foreign policy of the Bill Clinton administration - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Add in it was the REAGAN administration that trained and financed Osama Bin Laden when he was in the muj.

 

[jknowgood]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff

Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.

In accusations published yesterday by the leading Tea Party publication, Family Security Matters, Saudi Defense Minister and Intelligence chief Prince Bandar referred to as “Bandar Bush” in his Wikipedia biography for his close relationship with that family, was said to be the planner of 9/11.
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act | Veterans Today

Bring it on. The biggest 9-11 Cover Up occurred when Clinton National Security Advisor was caught at the National Archives stealing and destroying documents relating to 9-11 investigation. If this were all Bush's fault, why would any Democrat need to fall on the sword like that?

I say have your Bush Cover Up Investigation. Go After him in 2014; an election year. Given how divided the US Electorate is, investigating Bush on 9-11 can only mean bad news for Republicans, right? Go for it!

And that's not what happened.

In April 2005, Berger pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives in Washington.[2] According to the lead prosecutor in the case, Berger only took copies of classified information and no original material was destroyed. Berger was sentenced to a fine and a three-year suspension of his security clearance.[2]
Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why Clinton was even included in the 9/11 investigation is beyond me. 9/11 happened 8 months after he left office.

Okay let me get this straight, obama has been in office over 5 years and anything goes wrong. It's bushes fault. Clinton is out of office for 8 months and nothing is his fault? Got it.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff

Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.

In accusations published yesterday by the leading Tea Party publication, Family Security Matters, Saudi Defense Minister and Intelligence chief Prince Bandar referred to as “Bandar Bush” in his Wikipedia biography for his close relationship with that family, was said to be the planner of 9/11.
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act | Veterans Today

Bring it on. The biggest 9-11 Cover Up occurred when Clinton National Security Advisor was caught at the National Archives stealing and destroying documents relating to 9-11 investigation. If this were all Bush's fault, why would any Democrat need to fall on the sword like that?

I say have your Bush Cover Up Investigation. Go After him in 2014; an election year. Given how divided the US Electorate is, investigating Bush on 9-11 can only mean bad news for Republicans, right? Go for it!

And that's not what happened.

In April 2005, Berger pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives in Washington.[2] According to the lead prosecutor in the case, Berger only took copies of classified information and no original material was destroyed. Berger was sentenced to a fine and a three-year suspension of his security clearance.[2]
Sandy Berger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why Clinton was even included in the 9/11 investigation is beyond me. 9/11 happened 8 months after he left office.

Berger Will Plead Guilty To Taking Classified Paper (washingtonpost.com)

Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, a former White House national security adviser, plans to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, and will acknowledge intentionally removing and destroying copies of a classified document about the Clinton administration's record on terrorism.

If this were all Bush's fault, why would someone so high up the chain from the other Party go in and destroy and remove? If it is all on Bush, and you are on the Clinton Camp, why wouldn't you just sit back and watch Bush hang? I mean, your administration did everything correct, right? Destroying or removing documents, copies or originals, should be the last thing you would do if this is all Bush's fault.

 

[zeke]

We have alot of scandals from the obama regime to investigate, but liberals are worried about something from 13 years ago. Lol, good luck!

Fuck you dude. Yea. Real Americans are worried about who, why and how the worst terrorist attack ever on our nation occurred. I still wonder how the Saudi family was allowed to fly out of the country. When we supposed had a lockdown on air traffic. But the Saudis got to fly. Why was that?

Your such a POS you are still "worried" about Obama's birth certificate. Right?

Still on talking points from 13 years ago? Lol Why don't bring out the other ones? Bush didn't do anything to stop the attacks, he finished reading a book to grammar school kids. He knew about it before it happened. He caused 911 to get sadaam. He is a cowboy. He caused katrina. Oh sorry i got off topic, but i'm sure you get the picture how idiotic you sound, and until you hold obama accountable you have no credit.

What tf. Even the Saudi government admits that 15 of the hijackers were Saudi nationals.
Look it up. A plane load of elite Saudi's did fly out of our country on 9/11. Check that out.

The Bush family has a good, long history with the Saudi royal family. True. Check it out.

The rest of the shit you through out there was just deflection. Sounds like a lot of hyperbole.

I didn't post anything that isn't common knowledge of the literate.

But feel free to show me wrong about what country the 9/11 hijackers were from.

If you can't do that, fuck ya. Cause the redacted parts of this report are not going to make the Saudis and Bush look good. You hate that don't ya? You've invested a good part of your life defending the indefensible Iraqi war. And it kills you to find out you were wrong.

 

[zeke]

Damn, I was wrong about the fly out dates. The Saudi family did not fly out on 9/11. They flew two days later. Should of shot the muttafuckers outta the sky.

 

[Freewill]

Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff

Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.

In accusations published yesterday by the leading Tea Party publication, Family Security Matters, Saudi Defense Minister and Intelligence chief Prince Bandar referred to as “Bandar Bush” in his Wikipedia biography for his close relationship with that family, was said to be the planner of 9/11.
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act | Veterans Today

From your link, the disclaimer that says it's all bullshit.

"Despite these pronouncements, these accusations may well be unfounded speculation."

Except it's not.

The Saudis planned, financed and even populated the group that perpetrated the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Their involvement was purged from the final report.

9/11 Link To Saudi Arabia Is Topic Of 28 Redacted Pages In Government Report; Congressmen Push For Release

Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup | New York Post

So tired of the BS, what was their motive. I see none. We made them rich and Bush was their buddy they had NOTHING to gain with such an attack.