Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Having fought against any item laden with mercury in my lifetime, yes conservative and a conservationist, I can't beleive so many of you are buying into this shit. Let alone the whole "ban it for the planet janet" bs I am witnessing.
Having fought against any item laden with mercury in my lifetime, yes conservative and a conservationist, I can't beleive so many of you are buying into this shit. Let alone the whole "ban it for the planet janet" bs I am witnessing.
Well speaking as a scientist, Incandescents are relatively harmless.
The most dangerous thing about it is the risk of fire. The gas used inside the bulb of an incandescent is a non-reactive gas that is almost completely harmless. Except Radon, but they don't use that.
Having fought against any item laden with mercury in my lifetime, yes conservative and a conservationist, I can't beleive so many of you are buying into this shit. Let alone the whole "ban it for the planet janet" bs I am witnessing.
Well speaking as a scientist, Incandescents are relatively harmless.
The most dangerous thing about it is the risk of fire. The gas used inside the bulb of an incandescent is a non-reactive gas that is almost completely harmless. Except Radon, but they don't use that.
Having fought against any item laden with mercury in my lifetime, yes conservative and a conservationist, I can't beleive so many of you are buying into this shit. Let alone the whole "ban it for the planet janet" bs I am witnessing.
Well speaking as a scientist, Incandescents are relatively harmless.
The most dangerous thing about it is the risk of fire. The gas used inside the bulb of an incandescent is a non-reactive gas that is almost completely harmless. Except Radon, but they don't use that.
Mercury is harmless?
Thank goodness that Republicans have their priorities in order
Thank goodness that Republicans have their priorities in order
And who was it that made banning the incandescent bulb a priority?
go with the LED versions people. Yes, they are way more expensive, but prices will come down eventually. Also, they generate almost no heat to speak of, are just as bright, will last practically forever, and use a tiny fraction of the electricity conventional 'Edison' bulbs do.
What's with the happy moment over generating no heat?
Pennsylvania should have you happy that anything generates heat. I'm today at a high of minus 5 C tomorrow is going to be a balmy plus 2 C and the lows are in the double digits.
I want heat. I need heat. When it actually hits minus 20 C and it does out here and that's the high for the day, do you think I care about anything other than heating the house?
Well speaking as a scientist, Incandescents are relatively harmless.
The most dangerous thing about it is the risk of fire. The gas used inside the bulb of an incandescent is a non-reactive gas that is almost completely harmless. Except Radon, but they don't use that.
Mercury is harmless?
I wasn't talking about CFL's, was I now?
Mercury is harmless?
I wasn't talking about CFL's, was I now?
Incandescent's have Mercury.
I wasn't talking about CFL's, was I now?
Incandescent's have Mercury.
That's actually incorrect, they do not contain mercury. However the production of an incandescent bulb has a larger mercury footprint than a CFL.
Once again, glad to see Congress has it's eye on what this country really needs
Hell with passing a budget, they cant be bothered with attacking the debt problem. What this country really needs is light bulbs and a Canadian pipeline
Thank goodness that Republicans have their priorities in order
And who was it that made banning the incandescent bulb a priority?
George Bush
And who was it that made banning the incandescent bulb a priority?
George Bush
really? Then why was it introduced by a DEMOCRAT?
Bill Summary & Status - 110th Congress (2007 - 2008) - H.R.6 - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
H.R. 6, 2007.
Nick Rahall of WV ... Dem.
(it had 198 co-sponsors)
What's crazy is the sick fucks actually thought banning them was a good idea to begin with, what the hell are we paying these people for?
I guess Obama got wind that the rest of us where catching on to his backroom corruption deals with Jeffery immelt and GE. GE would stand to make Billions off of legislation banning incandescent light bulbs.
GE CORRUPTION: How GE Intends to Make Money from Stimulus Package and Obama Administration - YouTube
Laughing at all the 100W light bulb hoarders.
As I would assume you would be laughing at those who suffer from S.A.D. who had a hard time finding natural light light bulbs after all this bullshit started??
What's crazy is the sick fucks actually thought banning them was a good idea to begin with, what the hell are we paying these people for?
I guess Obama got wind that the rest of us where catching on to his backroom corruption deals with Jeffery immelt and GE. GE would stand to make Billions off of legislation banning incandescent light bulbs.
GE CORRUPTION: How GE Intends to Make Money from Stimulus Package and Obama Administration - YouTube
The ban was signed in by a republican president. George Bush Jr. in fact.
