Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can an honest Conservative please explain the following to me - with "credible" proof:
1. What is the alleged Benghazi cover-up?
2. What was allegedly covered up?
3. Who allegedly covered anything up?
4. Why was anything allegedly covered up?
5. Who and how did anyone benefit from any alleged cover-up?
6. Did anyone in the Obama Administration allegedly intentionally cause the Benghazi tragedy?
7. Were any laws allegedly broken?
8. How is Benghazi allegedly different from embassy/consulate attacks and deaths under Reagan and G.W. Bush?
9. Why do Conservatives continue their obsession to politicize the Benghazi tragedy for points and profits?
Let it be known to all that EconChick refuses to answer my basic Benghazi questions.
Democrats voted for the invasion as well, not sure where you were. One of obama's claim to fame is he was one of the few objectors. many Dems were against the surge but were proven wrong.I would like to point out that Iraq did not attack us on 9-11. Also if you will recall, President Bush enjoyed huge bipartisan support in the wake of 9-11 and in support of the effort to kill or capture those involved. Republicans and Democrats gathered together to sing "God Bless America" in front of the capital. The Iraq invasion and occupation is a different matter.
But don't be modest, when the Administration put out their talking points on the Sunday shows what crimes were they covering up?
The cover up, since you and some libs here are still so unbelievably uninformed, is that they sent out Susan Rice to run her blowhole about how the attack was a reaction to that stupid anti-muslim flick that nobody saw. This was designed to cover up the fact that they were asleep at the wheel and radical Islam was not under control the way they were putting forth.
Why aren't you answering my questions, Lakkkkkkky? Two can play this game you corrupt idiot.
Can an honest Conservative please explain the following to me - with "credible" proof:
1. What is the alleged Benghazi cover-up?
2. What was allegedly covered up?
3. Who allegedly covered anything up?
4. Why was anything allegedly covered up?
5. Who and how did anyone benefit from any alleged cover-up?
6. Did anyone in the Obama Administration allegedly intentionally cause the Benghazi tragedy?
7. Were any laws allegedly broken?
8. How is Benghazi allegedly different from embassy/consulate attacks and deaths under Reagan and G.W. Bush?
9. Why do Conservatives continue their obsession to politicize the Benghazi tragedy for points and profits?
1-5. No cover up.
6-7. No.
8. When the country is attacked, both parties usually come together and rally behind the President, not criticize him while the attacks are still occurring.
9. Well, they can't talk about the economy or Obamacare can they?
Can an honest Conservative please explain the following to me - with "credible" proof:
1. What is the alleged Benghazi cover-up?
2. What was allegedly covered up?
3. Who allegedly covered anything up?
4. Why was anything allegedly covered up?
5. Who and how did anyone benefit from any alleged cover-up?
6. Did anyone in the Obama Administration allegedly intentionally cause the Benghazi tragedy?
7. Were any laws allegedly broken?
8. How is Benghazi allegedly different from embassy/consulate attacks and deaths under Reagan and G.W. Bush?
9. Why do Conservatives continue their obsession to politicize the Benghazi tragedy for points and profits?
1-5. No cover up.
6-7. No.
8. When the country is attacked, both parties usually come together and rally behind the President, not criticize him while the attacks are still occurring.
9. Well, they can't talk about the economy or Obamacare can they?
8. When the country is attacked, both parties usually come together and rally behind the President, not criticize him while the attacks are still occurring.
Wait, wait.....lol................you mean the way pathetic libs slimed Bush for all those years during the Iraq War????????????????
It is so fricken fun pointing out liberal lies, inconsistencies, stupidities, hypocrisy, and BS!
Now Boo, you're actually one of the libs I respect on here, so you deserve respectful treatment when I disagree with you, so I'll gently tell you that ya fell flat on that entire post, and that was just one example.
I would like to point out that Iraq did not attack us on 9-11. Also if you will recall, President Bush enjoyed huge bipartisan support in the wake of 9-11 and in support of the effort to kill or capture those involved. Republicans and Democrats gathered together to sing "God Bless America" in front of the capital. The Iraq invasion and occupation is a different matter.
But don't be modest, when the Administration put out their talking points on the Sunday shows what crimes were they covering up?
I see where you're going because I used to follow those principles until libs stepped all over them. Libs have broken all the principles as far as I'm concerned.
The problem is you contradict yourself by saying only the 9/11 attack counts and Iraq War doesn't. So you basically just said what Obama's doing doesn't count because he has gone back into Iraq. If you start mincing words that he has not, I won't waste time with that semantic dance.
Why aren't you answering my questions, Lakkkkkkky? Two can play this game you corrupt idiot.
Mine first. Why do my questions disturb you so much? I can't imagine a moron like you "supposedly" advising Chiefs of Staff. Funny...
Can an honest Conservative please explain the following to me - with "credible" proof:
1. What is the alleged Benghazi cover-up?
2. What was allegedly covered up?
3. Who allegedly covered anything up?
4. Why was anything allegedly covered up?
5. Who and how did anyone benefit from any alleged cover-up?
6. Did anyone in the Obama Administration allegedly intentionally cause the Benghazi tragedy?
7. Were any laws allegedly broken?
8. How is Benghazi allegedly different from embassy/consulate attacks and deaths under Reagan and G.W. Bush?
9. Why do Conservatives continue their obsession to politicize the Benghazi tragedy for points and profits?
1-5. No cover up.
6-7. No.
8. When the country is attacked, both parties usually come together and rally behind the President, not criticize him while the attacks are still occurring.
9. Well, they can't talk about the economy or Obamacare can they?
Can an honest Conservative please explain the following to me - with "credible" proof:
1. What is the alleged Benghazi cover-up?
2. What was allegedly covered up?
3. Who allegedly covered anything up?
4. Why was anything allegedly covered up?
5. Who and how did anyone benefit from any alleged cover-up?
6. Did anyone in the Obama Administration allegedly intentionally cause the Benghazi tragedy?
7. Were any laws allegedly broken?
8. How is Benghazi allegedly different from embassy/consulate attacks and deaths under Reagan and G.W. Bush?
9. Why do Conservatives continue their obsession to politicize the Benghazi tragedy for points and profits?
1-5. No cover up.
6-7. No.
8. When the country is attacked, both parties usually come together and rally behind the President, not criticize him while the attacks are still occurring.
9. Well, they can't talk about the economy or Obamacare can they?
8. When the country is attacked, both parties usually come together and rally behind the President, not criticize him while the attacks are still occurring.
Wait, wait.....lol................you mean the way pathetic libs slimed Bush for all those years during the Iraq War????????????????
It is so fricken fun pointing out liberal lies, inconsistencies, stupidities, hypocrisy, and BS!
Now Boo, you're actually one of the libs I respect on here, so you deserve respectful treatment when I disagree with you, so I'll gently tell you that ya fell flat on that entire post, and that was just one example.
I would like to point out that Iraq did not attack us on 9-11. Also if you will recall, President Bush enjoyed huge bipartisan support in the wake of 9-11 and in support of the effort to kill or capture those involved. Republicans and Democrats gathered together to sing "God Bless America" in front of the capital. The Iraq invasion and occupation is a different matter.
But don't be modest, when the Administration put out their talking points on the Sunday shows what crimes were they covering up?
I see where you're going because I used to follow those principles until libs stepped all over them. Libs have broken all the principles as far as I'm concerned.
The problem is you contradict yourself by saying only the 9/11 attack counts and Iraq War doesn't. So you basically just said what Obama's doing doesn't count because he has gone back into Iraq. If you start mincing words that he has not, I won't waste time with that semantic dance.
I'm comparing the opposition party's immediate response to the country being attacked by an enemy on 9-11-01 and 9-11-12.
Crickets, Lakkkkky, crickets on my questions.
Hillary obsession? First time brought up in 22 pages and that's an obsession. You do a lot of damage to your party, dummy.
Democrats voted for the invasion as well, not sure where you were. One of obama's claim to fame is he was one of the few objectors. many Dems were against the surge but were proven wrong.I would like to point out that Iraq did not attack us on 9-11. Also if you will recall, President Bush enjoyed huge bipartisan support in the wake of 9-11 and in support of the effort to kill or capture those involved. Republicans and Democrats gathered together to sing "God Bless America" in front of the capital. The Iraq invasion and occupation is a different matter.
But don't be modest, when the Administration put out their talking points on the Sunday shows what crimes were they covering up?
The cover up, since you and some libs here are still so unbelievably uninformed, is that they sent out Susan Rice to run her blowhole about how the attack was a reaction to that stupid anti-muslim flick that nobody saw. This was designed to cover up the fact that they were asleep at the wheel and radical Islam was not under control the way they were putting forth.
Crickets, Lakkkkky, crickets on my questions.
Hillary obsession? First time brought up in 22 pages and that's an obsession. You do a lot of damage to your party, dummy.
She sure does and if Bush were still POTUS she'd be screaming bloody murder about lies, cover ups and how she wants the truth.
Yup. She's a winner all right.
I remember the media spin right after it happened and during the election. Spontaneous riots aren't that well prepared. Is it a crime? It would be if the president was a Republican. No sale!Being accused of being asleep at the wheel is not a crime. On the night he announce bin Laden's demise the president warned that they were still going to try and attack us, even though the attack on the Consulate doesn't fit with al Qaeda's MO of a high profile attack with huge bombs and all.....
Here's the timeline of who saw that movie when, and what it caused.
The anti-Islam-film riots A timeline - The Week
