Connecticut shows why they want gun registraton so bad.

They tell us they just want to know who owns the guns.....that they want to ban.

Sure, they will grandfather your rifle under the law......if you register it.....until it comes time for them to ban them........then that grandfather provision was just a lie to get you to register your rifle.....

In other words, without any explanation of how his plan would work or promote public safety, Lamont is proposing to make tens of thousands of state citizens who complied in good faith with the registration requirements into criminals, with their guns summarily declared contraband and subject to seizure. To make matters worse, the authorities would already know who and where those citizens are.

This is a lie.

Guns aren’t going to be ‘banned,’ guns aren’t going to be ‘confiscated.’
 
Armed citizeneries are not herded into boxcars.
Thus, the Democrat's affinity for gun control.
This is a lie, more rightwing demagoguery.

It’s the First Amendment that keeps Americans free, not the Second.

The Second Amendment is about the right to possess a firearm for personal self-defense, not to ‘defend’ against ‘government tyranny.’
 
When has the US ever herded anyone into boxcars armed or not?
Never.

And it never will as long as the American people preserve the rule of law and our democratic institutions; the same rule of law and democratic institutions conservatives seek to destroy.
 
i don't think you have a clue as to what real fascism is.
We are all pretty damn sure it entails taking away the right to keep and bear arms when the people in power thinks it is a threat to them.
 
We are all pretty damn sure it entails taking away the right to keep and bear arms when the people in power thinks it is a threat to them.

& yet that isn't happening 'cept for military style weapons designed to turn people into swiss cheese & no need to have any kinda training because you don't need any skill whatsoever.
 
& yet that isn't happening 'cept for military style weapons designed to turn people into swiss cheese & no need to have any kinda training because you don't need any skill whatsoever.
LOL every firearm is a "military" weapon, but no actual military weapons are sold to civilians
 
& yet that isn't happening 'cept for military style weapons designed to turn people into swiss cheese & no need to have any kinda training because you don't need any skill whatsoever.
Whenever the filthy Libtards define "military weapons designed to turn people into swiss cheese" it usually means every firearm. Just look at the Euroweenie countries, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and commie states here in the US as examples.

The Democrats in DC said that Dick Heller couldn't keep a common handgun in his own home. He was a retired policman with all kinds of training. The Democrats in Chicago said that Otis McDonald couldn't carry any firearm. Those Democrat turds in NY said nobody could carry any firearm outside their home.

Liberals are bat shit crazy when it comes gun laws and we can't trust the sonofabitches.

My ARs are threat to nobody except pieces of paper and any assholes who wants to do my family harm.
 
LOL every firearm is a "military" weapon, but no actual military weapons are sold to civilians
I personally know People with Legally purchased MP5 and AK\ AKM & AR Pattern Weapons & Even Real Deal pre & War Issued Thompson Machine Guns all select Fire & all Transferable with Class 3 Tax Stamps
 
& yet that isn't happening 'cept for military style weapons designed to turn people into swiss cheese & no need to have any kinda training because you don't need any skill whatsoever.
Your average Remington Shotgun can do that ( The Swiss Cheese Thing )
 
I personally know People with Legally purchased MP5 and AK\ AKM & AR Pattern Weapons & Even Real Deal pre & War Issued Thompson Machine Guns all select Fire & all Transferable with Class 3 Tax Stamps
all made before 1986 and all perfectly legal but HIGHLY controlled the average person cant afford nor pass the requirements for one pretending otherwise is a joke. Further name one class 3 that went on a shooting spree.
 
all made before 1986 and all perfectly legal but HIGHLY controlled the average person cant afford nor pass the requirements for one pretending otherwise is a joke. Further name one class 3 that went on a shooting spree.
If an Uzi is only 8200.00$ and Tax Stamp is 375.00$ Then Entry level
Class 3 is affordable
 
& yet that isn't happening 'cept for military style weapons designed to turn people into swiss cheese & no need to have any kinda training because you don't need any skill whatsoever.


Knives kill more people than all rifles.....all rifles.

Total number of people who committed acts of mass public shootings in 2021?

6

Out of over 350 million people.

Your fear of these rifles is insane and irrational....there are over 20 million of them in private hands and barely 5 or so on a bad year are used for murder in public places..........

Fearing these rifles is insane.

Meanwhile, you likely vote for democrats....who have destroyed local police, and keep releasing the criminals who actually shoot the vast majority of the 10,000 gun murder victims each year......you don't care about that, but you are laser focused on a hand full of nuts, in a bad year........

You are the problem, not these rifles.
 
not every gun uses high velocity ammo & multi round magazines either.
What do you consider "high velocity"? The classic M-1911 .45 plows along at 450 feet per second and it's plenty lethal. The ancient, tame .38 Special runs between 800 and 1,000 fps. The .380 (9mm Kurz to Europeans) goes about 1,000 fps. The 30.06 rifle round goes 3,200 fps. The .338 Lapua goes 3,000 fps. The .300 Winchester Magnum goes 3,260 fps. The .458 Weatherby magnum goes 2,150 fps. Those are all civilian cartridges, and the rifle calibers are far more lethal than the anemic .223 Remington/5.56mm NATO round. Plus every one of those rounds can be fired from one or more rifles with removable multi-round magazines.
 
eugene stoner knew exactly how insane it was for the AR-15 be allowed for the general public to own one.


And yet it was patented as a civilian rifle before the military created their own version.....

The FOIA request itself was prompted from a Nov. 2017 article in The Atlantic in which the magazine, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with its anti-gun bent, attempted to bolster a claim that “these rifles were meant for the military, not civilians.”

“Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,” one critic of the article contended.

“The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.”



Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians
 

Forum List

Back
Top