Conservatives Have A Big Night In Local And State Elections

[BluesLegend]

Woooo hooooooooooooo !

Voters elected Republicans and rejected progressive ballot initiatives, including anti-discrimination and marijuana legalization measures.

Conservatives triumphed in high-profile local and statewide elections on Tuesday, with voters delivering big victories to Republican candidates and rejecting progressive ballot measures.

In the Kentucky governor's race, tea party favorite Matt Bevin (R) defied expectations and defeated state Attorney General Jack Conway (D), becoming the first Republican governor in more than 40 years. Bevin, a businessman, previously challenged Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in a 2010 primary, but was trounced. This year's race was expected to be close, but Bevin's margin of victory was nearly 9 points.

MORE: Conservatives Have A Big Night In Local And State Elections

Republicans always win midterms and these off years because of low voter turnout. In my precinct they were only like 400 votes cast what I showed up around 6 o'clock at night. That's pathetic

That wasnt the case in '06 so you're wrong.
Again.

Very low voter turn out in 06. And if there was a spike, all that tells you is just how bad the GOP were from 2000-2006 under Bush's reign.

Thanks for admitting your post was wrong.
Voter turnout is always lower in off presidential years. But that didnt stop Dems from winning in some of thos years.

That's Different. After the Dem's took control of congress in the 2006 off year election they claimed it was a mandate from the people, that it was a repudiation of Bush and the GOP and the people had spoken. Now they claim the Republican victories are totally Different.

 

[sealybobo]

Woooo hooooooooooooo !

Voters elected Republicans and rejected progressive ballot initiatives, including anti-discrimination and marijuana legalization measures.

Conservatives triumphed in high-profile local and statewide elections on Tuesday, with voters delivering big victories to Republican candidates and rejecting progressive ballot measures.

In the Kentucky governor's race, tea party favorite Matt Bevin (R) defied expectations and defeated state Attorney General Jack Conway (D), becoming the first Republican governor in more than 40 years. Bevin, a businessman, previously challenged Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in a 2010 primary, but was trounced. This year's race was expected to be close, but Bevin's margin of victory was nearly 9 points.

MORE: Conservatives Have A Big Night In Local And State Elections

Republicans always win midterms and these off years because of low voter turnout. In my precinct they were only like 400 votes cast what I showed up around 6 o'clock at night. That's pathetic

That wasnt the case in '06 so you're wrong.
Again.

Very low voter turn out in 06. And if there was a spike, all that tells you is just how bad the GOP were from 2000-2006 under Bush's reign.

32 Govenorships….complete control of 22 state legislatures……...

I hope they all prove me wrong and do a good job. I root for Rick Snyder, not against him. Rooting against him is like rooting against myself. I just doubt the GOP will impress us.

 

[sealybobo]

Woooo hooooooooooooo !

Voters elected Republicans and rejected progressive ballot initiatives, including anti-discrimination and marijuana legalization measures.



MORE: Conservatives Have A Big Night In Local And State Elections

Republicans always win midterms and these off years because of low voter turnout. In my precinct they were only like 400 votes cast what I showed up around 6 o'clock at night. That's pathetic

That wasnt the case in '06 so you're wrong.
Again.

Very low voter turn out in 06. And if there was a spike, all that tells you is just how bad the GOP were from 2000-2006 under Bush's reign.

Thanks for admitting your post was wrong.
Voter turnout is always lower in off presidential years. But that didnt stop Dems from winning in some of thos years.

That's Different. After the Dem's took control of congress in the 2006 off year election they claimed it was a mandate from the people, that it was a repudiation of Bush and the GOP and the people had spoken. Now they claim the Republican victories are totally Different.

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

 

[ClosedCaption]

but: Turnout was VERY low across the country. Republicans could over interpret the results at their own peril. The presidential election, exactly one year way, will have dramatically larger and more diverse turnout, which works against the GOP. Serious structural problems persist: the Grand Old Party is still too white, too male and too old.

Lol !!!
Hillary = Old white woman will be 69 entering the white house if she wins.

Joey = Old white man will be 74 if he ends up jumping in and wins the white house.

Bernie = Old white man will be 75 entering the white house if he wins

A white old hag who's husband is a legendary pedophile, and a old white bat sh!t crazy socialist... Oh!!! The choices....

Who will you vote for then? Seems like you dont like any of them

 

[Rustic]

Republicans always win midterms and these off years because of low voter turnout. In my precinct they were only like 400 votes cast what I showed up around 6 o'clock at night. That's pathetic

That wasnt the case in '06 so you're wrong.
Again.

Very low voter turn out in 06. And if there was a spike, all that tells you is just how bad the GOP were from 2000-2006 under Bush's reign.

Thanks for admitting your post was wrong.
Voter turnout is always lower in off presidential years. But that didnt stop Dems from winning in some of thos years.

That's Different. After the Dem's took control of congress in the 2006 off year election they claimed it was a mandate from the people, that it was a repudiation of Bush and the GOP and the people had spoken. Now they claim the Republican victories are totally Different.

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

McCain was/is a moderate spineless Rino, the only reason he lost.

Real conservatives did not show up to the polls, hence low turnout just like four years latter.

 

[Rustic]

but: Turnout was VERY low across the country. Republicans could over interpret the results at their own peril. The presidential election, exactly one year way, will have dramatically larger and more diverse turnout, which works against the GOP. Serious structural problems persist: the Grand Old Party is still too white, too male and too old.

Lol !!!
Hillary = Old white woman will be 69 entering the white house if she wins.

Joey = Old white man will be 74 if he ends up jumping in and wins the white house.

Bernie = Old white man will be 75 entering the white house if he wins

A white old hag who's husband is a legendary pedophile, and a old white bat sh!t crazy socialist... Oh!!! The choices....

Who will you vote for then? Seems like you dont like any of them

I have not made up my mind yet...
But I will not be voting for a career politician no matter party.

 

[sealybobo]

That wasnt the case in '06 so you're wrong.
Again.

Very low voter turn out in 06. And if there was a spike, all that tells you is just how bad the GOP were from 2000-2006 under Bush's reign.

Thanks for admitting your post was wrong.
Voter turnout is always lower in off presidential years. But that didnt stop Dems from winning in some of thos years.

That's Different. After the Dem's took control of congress in the 2006 off year election they claimed it was a mandate from the people, that it was a repudiation of Bush and the GOP and the people had spoken. Now they claim the Republican victories are totally Different.

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

McCain was/is a moderate spineless Rino, the only reason he lost.

Real conservatives did not show up to the polls, hence low turnout just like four years latter.

No one knows what a real republican is. Or the last one that was president. Who was the last real republican in the white house?

McCain lost because he would have been like renominating Bush. Same with Romney. Same with the current GOP candidates.

 

[ClosedCaption]

but: Turnout was VERY low across the country. Republicans could over interpret the results at their own peril. The presidential election, exactly one year way, will have dramatically larger and more diverse turnout, which works against the GOP. Serious structural problems persist: the Grand Old Party is still too white, too male and too old.

Lol !!!
Hillary = Old white woman will be 69 entering the white house if she wins.

Joey = Old white man will be 74 if he ends up jumping in and wins the white house.

Bernie = Old white man will be 75 entering the white house if he wins

A white old hag who's husband is a legendary pedophile, and a old white bat sh!t crazy socialist... Oh!!! The choices....

Who will you vote for then? Seems like you dont like any of them

I have not made up my mind yet...
But I will not be voting for a career politician no matter party.

Suuuuuuure you wont, thats what they all say

 

[paulitician]

What is a 'Conservative?' No one smoking Marijuana should go to prison. Talk about Big Government over-reaches? Republicans should stop calling themselves 'Small Government Conservatives.' Hating black folks, gays, and supporting a Police State does not a Conservative make.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

What a shocker!

Republicans always win in low turnout elections - hence why Republicans try so hard to depress turnout with Voter ID laws and the like, and why Democrats try so hard to increase turnout.

 

[The Rabbi]

Republicans always win midterms and these off years because of low voter turnout. In my precinct they were only like 400 votes cast what I showed up around 6 o'clock at night. That's pathetic

That wasnt the case in '06 so you're wrong.
Again.

Very low voter turn out in 06. And if there was a spike, all that tells you is just how bad the GOP were from 2000-2006 under Bush's reign.

Thanks for admitting your post was wrong.
Voter turnout is always lower in off presidential years. But that didnt stop Dems from winning in some of thos years.

That's Different. After the Dem's took control of congress in the 2006 off year election they claimed it was a mandate from the people, that it was a repudiation of Bush and the GOP and the people had spoken. Now they claim the Republican victories are totally Different.

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

Yes the majority of voterts in off year elections are rich Republicans. Take that to the bank.
This is why these conversations go nowjhere. When their errors are pointed out lefties simply compound them and end up saying increasingly stupid shit.

 

[The Rabbi]

Very low voter turn out in 06. And if there was a spike, all that tells you is just how bad the GOP were from 2000-2006 under Bush's reign.

Thanks for admitting your post was wrong.
Voter turnout is always lower in off presidential years. But that didnt stop Dems from winning in some of thos years.

That's Different. After the Dem's took control of congress in the 2006 off year election they claimed it was a mandate from the people, that it was a repudiation of Bush and the GOP and the people had spoken. Now they claim the Republican victories are totally Different.

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

McCain was/is a moderate spineless Rino, the only reason he lost.

Real conservatives did not show up to the polls, hence low turnout just like four years latter.

No one knows what a real republican is. Or the last one that was president. Who was the last real republican in the white house?

McCain lost because he would have been like renominating Bush. Same with Romney. Same with the current GOP candidates.

Rubio and Cruz are just like Bush? Hell, Bush isnt just like Bush.

 

[The Rabbi]

What a shocker!

Republicans always win in low turnout elections - hence why Republicans try so hard to depress turnout with Voter ID laws and the like, and why Democrats try so hard to increase turnout.

I showed where Democrats won mid term.
Ergo your post is both wrong and stupid.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

What a shocker!

Republicans always win in low turnout elections - hence why Republicans try so hard to depress turnout with Voter ID laws and the like, and why Democrats try so hard to increase turnout.

I showed where Democrats won mid term.
Ergo your post is both wrong and stupid.

Exceptions to the rule do not disprove the rule. Perhaps I shouldn't have said "always".

 

[Rustic]

Very low voter turn out in 06. And if there was a spike, all that tells you is just how bad the GOP were from 2000-2006 under Bush's reign.

Thanks for admitting your post was wrong.
Voter turnout is always lower in off presidential years. But that didnt stop Dems from winning in some of thos years.

That's Different. After the Dem's took control of congress in the 2006 off year election they claimed it was a mandate from the people, that it was a repudiation of Bush and the GOP and the people had spoken. Now they claim the Republican victories are totally Different.

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

McCain was/is a moderate spineless Rino, the only reason he lost.

Real conservatives did not show up to the polls, hence low turnout just like four years latter.

No one knows what a real republican is. Or the last one that was president. Who was the last real republican in the white house?

McCain lost because he would have been like renominating Bush. Same with Romney. Same with the current GOP candidates.

They lost because of low voter turnout, no real conservatives showed up to the polls. Millions just like me did not vote those years except in local elections.

Put in a real conservative that is not an career politician, people that have never before voted will show up to the polls.
The computer models just like the so called global warming computer models are not based on reality...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Thanks for admitting your post was wrong.
Voter turnout is always lower in off presidential years. But that didnt stop Dems from winning in some of thos years.

That's Different. After the Dem's took control of congress in the 2006 off year election they claimed it was a mandate from the people, that it was a repudiation of Bush and the GOP and the people had spoken. Now they claim the Republican victories are totally Different.

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

McCain was/is a moderate spineless Rino, the only reason he lost.

Real conservatives did not show up to the polls, hence low turnout just like four years latter.

No one knows what a real republican is. Or the last one that was president. Who was the last real republican in the white house?

McCain lost because he would have been like renominating Bush. Same with Romney. Same with the current GOP candidates.

They lost because of low voter turnout, no real conservatives showed up to the polls. Millions just like me did not vote those years except in local elections.

Put in a real conservative that is not an career politician, people that have never before voted will show up to the polls.
The computer models just like the so called global warming computer models are not based on reality...

This right here is my absolute favorite right-wing delusion.

 

[Rustic]

That's Different. After the Dem's took control of congress in the 2006 off year election they claimed it was a mandate from the people, that it was a repudiation of Bush and the GOP and the people had spoken. Now they claim the Republican victories are totally Different.

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

McCain was/is a moderate spineless Rino, the only reason he lost.

Real conservatives did not show up to the polls, hence low turnout just like four years latter.

No one knows what a real republican is. Or the last one that was president. Who was the last real republican in the white house?

McCain lost because he would have been like renominating Bush. Same with Romney. Same with the current GOP candidates.

They lost because of low voter turnout, no real conservatives showed up to the polls. Millions just like me did not vote those years except in local elections.

Put in a real conservative that is not an career politician, people that have never before voted will show up to the polls.
The computer models just like the so called global warming computer models are not based on reality...

This right here is my absolute favorite right-wing delusion.

It has never happened before to see, too bad.
Instead the dumba$$ GOP always puts spineless cowardly moderates who always happen to be career politicians. Then they wonder why none of their base shows up to the polls. Duh!!

You do know the definition for insanity??

 

[theDoctorisIn]

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

McCain was/is a moderate spineless Rino, the only reason he lost.

Real conservatives did not show up to the polls, hence low turnout just like four years latter.

No one knows what a real republican is. Or the last one that was president. Who was the last real republican in the white house?

McCain lost because he would have been like renominating Bush. Same with Romney. Same with the current GOP candidates.

They lost because of low voter turnout, no real conservatives showed up to the polls. Millions just like me did not vote those years except in local elections.

Put in a real conservative that is not an career politician, people that have never before voted will show up to the polls.
The computer models just like the so called global warming computer models are not based on reality...

This right here is my absolute favorite right-wing delusion.

It has never happened before to see, too bad.
Instead the dumba$$ GOP always puts spineless cowardly moderates who always happen to be career politicians. Then they wonder why none of their base shows up to the polls. Duh!!

You do know the definition for insanity??

If it has "never happened", what makes you so sure that it would happen?

Is it just a matter of faith?

 

[sealybobo]

It is different. Because rich republicans always vote. They even vote the years they get their asses kicked. So for us to win big in a mid term year is really saying something but I know you won't get that.

Bush also lost a lot of rich people's support. You don't know how many rich people I know that said they voted for Obama. THAT'S how bad the GOP was in 2006 and 2008.

Do you understand John McCain lost to a freakin black guy? We all thought that would NEVER happen. We almost didn't nominate him because of it. I remember thinking what a mistake that was because a black could never win the POTUS. But the GOP were so bad we would have voted for a Muslim Gay Black Woman over a GOP candidate in 2008.

And funny you guys won 2010 and 2014 but not 2012. Isn't that interesting?

McCain was/is a moderate spineless Rino, the only reason he lost.

Real conservatives did not show up to the polls, hence low turnout just like four years latter.

No one knows what a real republican is. Or the last one that was president. Who was the last real republican in the white house?

McCain lost because he would have been like renominating Bush. Same with Romney. Same with the current GOP candidates.

They lost because of low voter turnout, no real conservatives showed up to the polls. Millions just like me did not vote those years except in local elections.

Put in a real conservative that is not an career politician, people that have never before voted will show up to the polls.
The computer models just like the so called global warming computer models are not based on reality...

This right here is my absolute favorite right-wing delusion.

It has never happened before to see, too bad.
Instead the dumba$$ GOP always puts spineless cowardly moderates who always happen to be career politicians. Then they wonder why none of their base shows up to the polls. Duh!!

You do know the definition for insanity??

Then take a chance like us libs did and nominate a black or woman or Mike Huckabee!!!

 

[Rustic]

McCain was/is a moderate spineless Rino, the only reason he lost.

Real conservatives did not show up to the polls, hence low turnout just like four years latter.

No one knows what a real republican is. Or the last one that was president. Who was the last real republican in the white house?

McCain lost because he would have been like renominating Bush. Same with Romney. Same with the current GOP candidates.

They lost because of low voter turnout, no real conservatives showed up to the polls. Millions just like me did not vote those years except in local elections.

Put in a real conservative that is not an career politician, people that have never before voted will show up to the polls.
The computer models just like the so called global warming computer models are not based on reality...

This right here is my absolute favorite right-wing delusion.

It has never happened before to see, too bad.
Instead the dumba$$ GOP always puts spineless cowardly moderates who always happen to be career politicians. Then they wonder why none of their base shows up to the polls. Duh!!

You do know the definition for insanity??

If it has "never happened", what makes you so sure that it would happen?

Is it just a matter of faith?

Well, The status quo certainly isn't working, by the last two presidential elections... had no real voter turnout due to spineless cowardly moderates on the ticket.
I certainly didn't back them, along with millions of other conservatives.

I don't vote lesser of two evils...