Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did Hillary call an ethnic group "rapists"? Hey, Rump knew he'd get backlash, I'm sure this doesn't surprise him. He traded any credibility with Latinos in exchange for the drooling genuflecting of those who hate them. He's a gambler. Sometimes that works on balance, sometimes it doesn't and you go bankrupt four times.
No I didn't know about that video -- the other poster just made an oblique reference without posting it, so thanks for that. Hey, you know who should make another one like it? Women.
And then after that, "The Blacks". That one's easy -- doesn't even need dialogue. You just open on a close-up of the infamous Rump Board Game and pan back to various black people counting Rump Play Money. Rump's voice in the background going "I hate it I hate it". Then the camera pans back further and we see that the whole thing's being shot by short guys wearing yarmulkes.
I kill me. I can feel SNL writers reading this right now going "HEY WAIT! New Material!!"
Who has done more disservice to the blacks than this administration?
Oh, uh... the first fifteen Presidents.... Andrew Johnson... Woodrow Wilson.... probably a few more...
Unemployment--particularly younger male blacks is almost twice the national average. We've never seen so many disturbances by blacks such as riots and protests under any other administration since the Civil Rights act was passed. We have a President who threw out a huge Welcome Mat on our borders for people that come here and take jobs blacks would otherwise have had.
Piffle. Hype, statistical cherrypicking and speculation, but it's got nothing to do with my post.
Now I understand candidates have no control over what their little groups throw out there, but at the very least, Hillary should have said she doesn't approve of these children using language I would have never been allowed to utter as a child in front of my parents or any adult. I also stand by my point it's being swept under the rug my MSM because this video supports a Democrat candidate.
Hillary didn't make this ad or approve it. That's an association fallacy, bro. And it doesn't "support a Democratic candidate" --- it doesn't even mention a Democratic candidate. Matter of fact they don't mention anybody at all except Rump. Might wanna watch your own video if you wanna claim to be offended by it.
Ya ever think that maybe it's not known because it's what we call in broadcasting NBQ (Not Broadcast Quality - meaning it's got "fuck"s in it)?
I hope I remember to TiVo it. I don't watch SNL anymore ... it's past my bed time.With this video of Latino children cursing, it's even more important to show these people that their boycott is a dud.
Conservatives unite, TURN IT ON !!!
uhhh.... what video?
He didn't say they were "cursers" --- he said they were rapists.
Wonder if they'll do a skit about that. I would hope so.
With this video of Latino children cursing, it's even more important to show these people that their boycott is a dud.
Conservatives unite, TURN IT ON !!!
uhhh.... what video?
He didn't say they were "cursers" --- he said they were rapists.
Wonder if they'll do a skit about that. I would hope so.
With this video of Latino children cursing, it's even more important to show these people that their boycott is a dud.
Conservatives unite, TURN IT ON !!!
uhhh.... what video?
He didn't say they were "cursers" --- he said they were rapists.
Wonder if they'll do a skit about that. I would hope so.
"What video" ?!!!
Where have you been ?!
I hope I remember to TiVo it. I don't watch SNL anymore ... it's past my bed time.With this video of Latino children cursing, it's even more important to show these people that their boycott is a dud.
Conservatives unite, TURN IT ON !!!
uhhh.... what video?
He didn't say they were "cursers" --- he said they were rapists.
Wonder if they'll do a skit about that. I would hope so.
Tell all your friends. It's important now that Latino's are calling for a boycott, that we give them the opposite right back ! We need the highest ratings for the SNL season !!!
Donald Trump is controversial, and what better way to stir up ratings than to make him (or others) say controversial things--especially in the heat of anger?
The goal of NBC was two-fold: one of course was to make as much money as they can selling advertising...
Did Hillary call an ethnic group "rapists"? Hey, Rump knew he'd get backlash, I'm sure this doesn't surprise him. He traded any credibility with Latinos in exchange for the drooling genuflecting of those who hate them. He's a gambler. Sometimes that works on balance, sometimes it doesn't and you go bankrupt four times.
No I didn't know about that video -- the other poster just made an oblique reference without posting it, so thanks for that. Hey, you know who should make another one like it? Women.
And then after that, "The Blacks". That one's easy -- doesn't even need dialogue. You just open on a close-up of the infamous Rump Board Game and pan back to various black people counting Rump Play Money. Rump's voice in the background going "I hate it I hate it". Then the camera pans back further and we see that the whole thing's being shot by short guys wearing yarmulkes.
I kill me. I can feel SNL writers reading this right now going "HEY WAIT! New Material!!"
Who has done more disservice to the blacks than this administration?
Oh, uh... the first fifteen Presidents.... Andrew Johnson... Woodrow Wilson.... probably a few more...
Unemployment--particularly younger male blacks is almost twice the national average. We've never seen so many disturbances by blacks such as riots and protests under any other administration since the Civil Rights act was passed. We have a President who threw out a huge Welcome Mat on our borders for people that come here and take jobs blacks would otherwise have had.
Piffle. Hype, statistical cherrypicking and speculation, but it's got nothing to do with my post.
Now I understand candidates have no control over what their little groups throw out there, but at the very least, Hillary should have said she doesn't approve of these children using language I would have never been allowed to utter as a child in front of my parents or any adult. I also stand by my point it's being swept under the rug my MSM because this video supports a Democrat candidate.
Hillary didn't make this ad or approve it. That's an association fallacy, bro. And it doesn't "support a Democratic candidate" --- it doesn't even mention a Democratic candidate. Matter of fact they don't mention anybody at all except Rump. Might wanna watch your own video if you wanna claim to be offended by it.
Ya ever think that maybe it's not known because it's what we call in broadcasting NBQ (Not Broadcast Quality - meaning it's got "fuck"s in it)?
No, I didn't think of that because that's not why it's being ignored by the MSM. While there was no name mentioned in the video, who do you think it was for then? Hillary is the front runner and unless charged with a crime, will remain so. If you want to claim that it had nothing to do with Hillary, fine, but it did have to do with support of the Democrat party or candidates.
Did Hillary call an ethnic group "rapists"? Hey, Rump knew he'd get backlash, I'm sure this doesn't surprise him. He traded any credibility with Latinos in exchange for the drooling genuflecting of those who hate them. He's a gambler. Sometimes that works on balance, sometimes it doesn't and you go bankrupt four times.
No I didn't know about that video -- the other poster just made an oblique reference without posting it, so thanks for that. Hey, you know who should make another one like it? Women.
And then after that, "The Blacks". That one's easy -- doesn't even need dialogue. You just open on a close-up of the infamous Rump Board Game and pan back to various black people counting Rump Play Money. Rump's voice in the background going "I hate it I hate it". Then the camera pans back further and we see that the whole thing's being shot by short guys wearing yarmulkes.
I kill me. I can feel SNL writers reading this right now going "HEY WAIT! New Material!!"
Who has done more disservice to the blacks than this administration?
Oh, uh... the first fifteen Presidents.... Andrew Johnson... Woodrow Wilson.... probably a few more...
Unemployment--particularly younger male blacks is almost twice the national average. We've never seen so many disturbances by blacks such as riots and protests under any other administration since the Civil Rights act was passed. We have a President who threw out a huge Welcome Mat on our borders for people that come here and take jobs blacks would otherwise have had.
Piffle. Hype, statistical cherrypicking and speculation, but it's got nothing to do with my post.
Now I understand candidates have no control over what their little groups throw out there, but at the very least, Hillary should have said she doesn't approve of these children using language I would have never been allowed to utter as a child in front of my parents or any adult. I also stand by my point it's being swept under the rug my MSM because this video supports a Democrat candidate.
Hillary didn't make this ad or approve it. That's an association fallacy, bro. And it doesn't "support a Democratic candidate" --- it doesn't even mention a Democratic candidate. Matter of fact they don't mention anybody at all except Rump. Might wanna watch your own video if you wanna claim to be offended by it.
Ya ever think that maybe it's not known because it's what we call in broadcasting NBQ (Not Broadcast Quality - meaning it's got "fuck"s in it)?
No, I didn't think of that because that's not why it's being ignored by the MSM. While there was no name mentioned in the video, who do you think it was for then? Hillary is the front runner and unless charged with a crime, will remain so. If you want to claim that it had nothing to do with Hillary, fine, but it did have to do with support of the Democrat party or candidates.
I watched the whole thing (again) and it doesn't "support" anyone. It protests Rump, and it protests racism (by which they mean bigotry). The entire message is a negative. It's not "for" anybody. It doesn't even mention voting, let alone who to vote for. It just protests one guy's rhetoric. That's it.
How you get from that to "supporting Hillary" is a rocky fallacious road fraught with ass-umptions that only you can navigate. The rationality bus doesn't go there.
Did Hillary call an ethnic group "rapists"? Hey, Rump knew he'd get backlash, I'm sure this doesn't surprise him. He traded any credibility with Latinos in exchange for the drooling genuflecting of those who hate them. He's a gambler. Sometimes that works on balance, sometimes it doesn't and you go bankrupt four times.
No I didn't know about that video -- the other poster just made an oblique reference without posting it, so thanks for that. Hey, you know who should make another one like it? Women.
And then after that, "The Blacks". That one's easy -- doesn't even need dialogue. You just open on a close-up of the infamous Rump Board Game and pan back to various black people counting Rump Play Money. Rump's voice in the background going "I hate it I hate it". Then the camera pans back further and we see that the whole thing's being shot by short guys wearing yarmulkes.
I kill me. I can feel SNL writers reading this right now going "HEY WAIT! New Material!!"
Who has done more disservice to the blacks than this administration?
Oh, uh... the first fifteen Presidents.... Andrew Johnson... Woodrow Wilson.... probably a few more...
Unemployment--particularly younger male blacks is almost twice the national average. We've never seen so many disturbances by blacks such as riots and protests under any other administration since the Civil Rights act was passed. We have a President who threw out a huge Welcome Mat on our borders for people that come here and take jobs blacks would otherwise have had.
Piffle. Hype, statistical cherrypicking and speculation, but it's got nothing to do with my post.
Now I understand candidates have no control over what their little groups throw out there, but at the very least, Hillary should have said she doesn't approve of these children using language I would have never been allowed to utter as a child in front of my parents or any adult. I also stand by my point it's being swept under the rug my MSM because this video supports a Democrat candidate.
Hillary didn't make this ad or approve it. That's an association fallacy, bro. And it doesn't "support a Democratic candidate" --- it doesn't even mention a Democratic candidate. Matter of fact they don't mention anybody at all except Rump. Might wanna watch your own video if you wanna claim to be offended by it.
Ya ever think that maybe it's not known because it's what we call in broadcasting NBQ (Not Broadcast Quality - meaning it's got "fuck"s in it)?
No, I didn't think of that because that's not why it's being ignored by the MSM. While there was no name mentioned in the video, who do you think it was for then? Hillary is the front runner and unless charged with a crime, will remain so. If you want to claim that it had nothing to do with Hillary, fine, but it did have to do with support of the Democrat party or candidates.
I watched the whole thing (again) and it doesn't "support" anyone. It protests Rump, and it protests racism (by which they mean bigotry). The entire message is a negative. It's not "for" anybody. It doesn't even mention voting, let alone who to vote for. It just protests one guy's rhetoric. That's it.
How you get from that to "supporting Hillary" is a rocky fallacious road fraught with ass-umptions that only you can navigate. The rationality bus doesn't go there.
So if some right-wing group made a similar video against Hillary, it's simply against Hillary with no support of the Republicans or leading Republican candidates?
Rump is a ratings magnet, I agree. For the same reason that WWE or Gallagher smashing watermelons is. But who suggested he was responsible for cutting a debate by a hour? I'm not familiar with that (wasn't folllowing it either)?
Not a huge controversy but a controversy nonetheless. Here's a link to one of the articles:
Trump Right on 2-Hour Debate Win on CNBC
Thanks for that, although I hardly consider the one-two punch of Newsmax and Donald Rump a "credible source" as to who influenced who.
Doubly interesting that the CNBC guy says it was always going to be two hours, and that Rump talks in terms of "getting the hell out of there".
Three and a half hours seems a long time -- two hours seems a long time -- but I'm counting TEN people on that stage. The more participants there are, the more each gets time cut out, if the total time is a constant. So ten people requires time, else it's not really a debate.
I think the criticism might be better focused on the idea of milking TV ratings out of a field that hasn't yet pared itself down to a manageable size. But on the other hand if you do want to preview the field, then you're gonna need time. Can't have it both ways.
How long was the Democratic debate with half as many participants?
Given the types of questions that were asked, I don't think we would have learned much more if the debate were even five hours. The questions were designed to start trouble between the candidates which they did.
In the Democrat debate, you learned just about everything you needed to know as a Democrat voter. In fact I have no idea WTF they will be discussing in the next Democrat debate.
The questions were chosen to match the behavior and statements of the contestants. If they had been talking about substantive things, their questions would have been about substantive things. As it is, they act like a bunch of school kids, and the questions reflected that.
No, the type of questions prompted them to act like a bunch of children. That was our complaint in the first place.
Donald Trump is controversial, and what better way to stir up ratings than to make him (or others) say controversial things--especially in the heat of anger?
The goal of NBC was two-fold: one of course was to make as much money as they can selling advertising, and two was to try and make all Republicans look bad, or at least as close as they could get. You didn't get much of that in the Democrat debate.
Posted November 8 2015 — 10:32 AM EST
Trump is still bringing the bump.
With Donald Trump hosting, Saturday Night Live jumped to its biggest overnight rating since 2012.
According to NBC, SNL had a whopping 6.6 household rating on Saturday night, easily beating the season’s previous high: the 41st season premiere last month, hosted by Miley Cyrus and with a guest appearance by none other than … Hillary Clinton. In fact, Trump’s overnight rating was 47 percent higher than the Miley/Hillary episode.
Suck on it Latino's !!!!!!!!!!!!!
47% higher than the Hillary episode.
Donald Trump gives SNL its biggest ratings in years
Posted November 8 2015 — 10:32 AM EST
Trump is still bringing the bump.
With Donald Trump hosting, Saturday Night Live jumped to its biggest overnight rating since 2012.
According to NBC, SNL had a whopping 6.6 household rating on Saturday night, easily beating the season’s previous high: the 41st season premiere last month, hosted by Miley Cyrus and with a guest appearance by none other than … Hillary Clinton. In fact, Trump’s overnight rating was 47 percent higher than the Miley/Hillary episode.
Donald Trump gives 'SNL' its biggest ratings in years | EW.com
They're making fun of trump tonightLatino's are calling for a boycott, and one group is even offering $5K to anyone who stands up and protests Trump at the show. The Tom's will be uniting with Latino's and other groups who are pro-illegal immigration, so it's important to support the show even if you don't personally support Trump.
Lets send a message with some really good ratings !!
Latino Group Offers $5000 to Any SNL Audience Member Who Heckles Trump
The Deport Racism PAC is offering a cash prize to any SNL audience member who calls out Donald Trump during his hosting gig on Saturday.
In a statement, the PAC said it “will pay $5,000 cash to anyone on the set of the show or in the studio audience” who is “heard saying ‘Deport Racism’ or ‘Trump is a Racist’ during the live broadcast.”
“NBC has invited Donald Trump to be the host of Saturday Night Live on November 7th despite outcry from the Latino community and supporters of equality,” the statement reads. “Giving Trump a platform on the hit comedy show sends the wrong message that his offensive and racist comments about Latinos and Mexicans are acceptable.”
Latino Group Offers $5000 to Any SNL Audience Member Who Heckles Trump
