Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
- May 18, 2010
- 61,469
- 18,668
Well the camera started rolling after the shooting so how do you know what happened before the driver was shot?My observation
1. The victim did nothing wrong and the traffic stop was hardly warranted
2. The officer overreacted to a black man having a gun (which he was legally entitled to have) and fired in a panic
3. After the shooting, the girlfriend remained calm while the cop was hysterical
4. The officer will not be charged with murder, he will claim he thought the man was reaching for his gun
5. The officer will be relieved of duty for failing to follow proper procedure
6. The city will settle out of court
From what I surmise the driver told the cop he had a gun then reached behind his back
Licensed to carry or not if you tell a cop you have a gun on you you'd better keep your hands in plain sight at all times
This is where the he said she said comes into play
Trivial traffic stop for a tail light. Man with girlfriend and young child in the car. I see a woman who is calmly recounting what happened while it is fresh in her mind and an officer who is hysterical and repeatedly swearing Fuck....fuck...Fuck
A driver is entitled to reach for his wallet when asked to do so. The officer will say he told him to hold still, the woman will claim he asked for his license
If the officer was carrying a camera and video, there would be no such questions
His career is over, but he will not be prosecuted
I am thinking this story is not over and I think there will be an investigation. I also think he will be prosecuted because of the publicity.
Have to see if the cops have their own video
If it plays out exactly like the girlfriend reported, there could be manslaughter. But cops are usually given the benefit of the doubt in these cases
You may be right but I am not so sure. When a member of congress gets involved, it puts added pressure on the prosecution to push charges.