Corona Virus Proves Trump Was Right on Borders and Trade

[AzogtheDefiler]

WSJ

THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.

I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.

I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.

I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.

With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.

So Liberals are not pro business? Mike Bloomberg is not pro business? That’s a new one.

Bloomberg is heavily invested in china and a disgusting apologist for that communist dictatorship

Can Democrats be pro business. Yes or No?

 

[HappyJoy]

Name one unbiased source.

WSJ

THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.

I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.

I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.

I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.

With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.

So Liberals are not pro business? Mike Bloomberg is not pro business? That’s a new one.

Pro business usually comes down to taxes and fewer regulations. it's why I put it in quotes. It's a low tax conservative opinion.

 

[eddiew]

How long do I have to keep paying these taxes that Trump imposed anyway? How many more farmers are bailed out or go bankrupt in your crazy left wing tariffs scheme?

Free market capitalist, not you.

I'm a liberal, but I ain't that liberal.

The farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffs

trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?

If anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcy

Money didn't save Trump from bankruptcy 6 times Probably made money going bankrupt

He has never gone bankrupt

Yes just his companies Think he's smart ...or just a con man?

 

[HappyJoy]

How long do I have to keep paying these taxes that Trump imposed anyway? How many more farmers are bailed out or go bankrupt in your crazy left wing tariffs scheme?

Free market capitalist, not you.

I'm a liberal, but I ain't that liberal.

The farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffs

trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?

If anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcy

I dislike money? Is this another made up argument of yours?

So those bankruptcies which were caused by tariffs and not China and not all the farmers are being bailed out either.

The farm subsidy money

Yeah, it's called taxes collected from you and me and given to someone else. Some have described that as socialism.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

WSJ

THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.

I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.

I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.

I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.

With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.

So Liberals are not pro business? Mike Bloomberg is not pro business? That’s a new one.

Pro business usually comes down to taxes it's why I put it in quotes. It's a low tax conservative opinion.

Not remotely. It deals with equities and what could impact the market, etc. So only Republicans read the WSJ and invest in the stock market? LOL

 

[Mac-7]

In a world where international trade cannot be avoided I prefer the trump approach of tariffs over the communist chinese policy of super corporatism that pits the chinese government against private American companies

of course you do, government interference and control is always your go to answer.

When a foreign government is trying to take over our industry and markets the US government better respond

So, you really are not an advocate for the free market or for private industry.

I am not a Laissez-faire capitalist who is against all government intervention

if you are that makes you a very small minority

I am used to being in the small minority.

The small minority that wants less government spending

The small minority that wants more personal freedom

The small minority that does not bow to the altar of the duopoly

I said IF you are a Laissez-faire capitalist which I dont think you are

Its more likely you are a common lib sailing under false colors

 

[HappyJoy]

THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.

I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.

I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.

I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.

With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.

This to me is non-biased. When we are discussing trade, I think the WSJ is a terrific and unbiased source.

I think if you take the paper as a whole it is on the conservative side. You have to include the editorial section.

Editorials are opinion pieces. I discount them as such. But if you’re talking trade then the true and unbiased source would be the news section of the WSJ as I have illustrated.

The paper overall has a conservative bias reglardless of which sections you personally read or not.

 

[Billiejeens]

The farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffs

trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?

If anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcy

Money didn't save Trump from bankruptcy 6 times Probably made money going bankrupt

He has never gone bankrupt

Yes just his companies Think he's smart ...or just a con man?

He is a genius

Billionaire Builder
TV and Movie star
Spectacular President
Defeater of multiple Coup attempts.

After he is gone from office the grateful citizens will build a MT Trumpmore that will forever leave Mt Rushmore feeling inadequate.

 

[Mac-7]

What you unwittingly pointed out is that conservatives do not march in lockstep

Wow, you really are functionally illiterate.

When libs are reduced to personal insults I know I’m winning

why do you who favors governmental interference of private companies call someone else a Lib?

Tariffs are not interfering with domestic American companies just products made in china

By American companies and for American companies...not that there really is such a thing. Companies care about profit, not borders.

If they are manufacturing in china thats their problem

if they dont like the tariffs and if their employees in china are all infested with the coronavirus thats their mistake

 

[HappyJoy]

WSJ

THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.

I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.

I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.

I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.

With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.

So Liberals are not pro business? Mike Bloomberg is not pro business? That’s a new one.

Bloomberg is heavily invested in china and a disgusting apologist for that communist dictatorship

Trump is also invested in China.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...fd1056-7956-11e8-aeee-4d04c8ac6158_story.html

Many American companies are invested in China. Have you personally boycotted each and everyone?

 

[Mac-7]

You mean a brainless globalist who does not care which country dominates the world?

you betcha I care

How long do I have to keep paying these taxes that Trump imposed anyway? How many more farmers are bailed out or go bankrupt in your crazy left wing tariffs scheme?

Free market capitalist, not you.

I'm a liberal, but I ain't that liberal.

The farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffs

trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?

If anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcy

Money didn't save Trump from bankruptcy 6 times Probably made money going bankrupt

Trump did not go bankrupt

but some of his properties did

 

[Mac-7]

THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.

I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.

I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.

I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.

With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.

So Liberals are not pro business? Mike Bloomberg is not pro business? That’s a new one.

Bloomberg is heavily invested in china and a disgusting apologist for that communist dictatorship

Trump is also invested in China.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...fd1056-7956-11e8-aeee-4d04c8ac6158_story.html

Many American companies are invested in China. Have you personally boycotted each and everyone?

According to you link trump slapped tariffs on china even though it hurt his private business interests

that sounds like a patriot to me

 

[Billiejeens]

The farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffs

trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?

If anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcy

I dislike money? Is this another made up argument of yours?

So those bankruptcies which were caused by tariffs and not China and not all the farmers are being bailed out either.

The farm subsidy money

Yeah, it's called taxes collected from you and me and given to someone else. Some have described that as socialism.

Those people don't know what they are talking about.

 

[HappyJoy]

How long do I have to keep paying these taxes that Trump imposed anyway? How many more farmers are bailed out or go bankrupt in your crazy left wing tariffs scheme?

Free market capitalist, not you.

I'm a liberal, but I ain't that liberal.

The farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffs

trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?

If anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcy

Money didn't save Trump from bankruptcy 6 times Probably made money going bankrupt

Trump did not go bankrupt

but some of his properties did

Properties? Try companies and he left many holding the bag. He was also required to step down from companies when they filed for bankruptcy because he was the problem.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.

I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.

I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.

I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.

With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.

This to me is non-biased. When we are discussing trade, I think the WSJ is a terrific and unbiased source.

It is less biased than most, that is for sure.

By the way, what is the source for your graph?

AllSidesBias

which ironically gives the site you dismissed as biased the same rating they give the WSJ.

weird

 

[Harpy Eagle]

of course you do, government interference and control is always your go to answer.

When a foreign government is trying to take over our industry and markets the US government better respond

So, you really are not an advocate for the free market or for private industry.

I am not a Laissez-faire capitalist who is against all government intervention

if you are that makes you a very small minority

I am used to being in the small minority.

The small minority that wants less government spending

The small minority that wants more personal freedom

The small minority that does not bow to the altar of the duopoly

I said IF you are a Laissez-faire capitalist which I dont think you are

Its more likely you are a common lib sailing under false colors

and yet you are left of me...weird.

 

[HappyJoy]

By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?

If anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcy

I dislike money? Is this another made up argument of yours?

So those bankruptcies which were caused by tariffs and not China and not all the farmers are being bailed out either.

The farm subsidy money

Yeah, it's called taxes collected from you and me and given to someone else. Some have described that as socialism.

Those people don't know what they are talking about.

Don't you have a pile of dogshit to find to be your future 'Mt. Trumpmore'? Crazy ass sycophants.

 

[Mac-7]

THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.

I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.

I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.

I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.

With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.

So Liberals are not pro business? Mike Bloomberg is not pro business? That’s a new one.

Bloomberg is heavily invested in china and a disgusting apologist for that communist dictatorship

Can Democrats be pro business. Yes or No?

In theory yes

but in practice very few are

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.

I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.

With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.

So Liberals are not pro business? Mike Bloomberg is not pro business? That’s a new one.

Bloomberg is heavily invested in china and a disgusting apologist for that communist dictatorship

Can Democrats be pro business. Yes or No?

In theory yes

but in practice very few are

then you fit in well with them

 

[22lcidw]

The farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffs

trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?

If anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcy

Money didn't save Trump from bankruptcy 6 times Probably made money going bankrupt

Trump did not go bankrupt

but some of his properties did

Properties? Try companies and he left many holding the bag. He was also required to step down from companies when they filed for bankruptcy because he was the problem.

Poof...Obama broke before taking office and wallah....he is worth hundreds of millions now. Poof....Bill and Hill broke before taking office and wallah.....they are worth hundreds of millions now. How does this happen?