Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am not a Laissez-faire capitalist who is against all government interventionWhen a foreign government is trying to take over our industry and markets the US government better respondIn a world where international trade cannot be avoided I prefer the trump approach of tariffs over the communist chinese policy of super corporatism that pits the chinese government against private American companiesthis from the guy that supports tariffs which is nothing more than governmental control of the private sector.
I am the only one in the discussion that actually supports the private sector, you want governmental control over it
of course you do, government interference and control is always your go to answer.
So, you really are not an advocate for the free market or for private industry.
if you are that makes you a very small minority
Leftist Site. Provide an unbiased source, “Berg”.Factually refute what the article says or STFU.I laugh
"Foreign Policy" magazine - 0ffshoot off The Washington Post - Praises Communist China and slams President Trump
SHOCK!
Name one unbiased source.
Tariffs are not interfering with domestic American companies just products made in chinaWhen libs are reduced to personal insults I know I’m winningWhat you unwittingly pointed out is that conservatives do not march in lockstepDamn, you truly suck at reading.
I never said anyone's opinion had to be the same, I was simply pointing out the hilarity of you partisan sheep that have to label everyone that does not agree with you 100% as members of the other side.
you are truly incapable of grasping the idea that some of us do not fall into either sheep pen
Wow, you really are functionally illiterate.
why do you who favors governmental interference of private companies call someone else a Lib?
Leftist Site. Provide an unbiased source, “Berg”.Factually refute what the article says or STFU.I laugh
"Foreign Policy" magazine - 0ffshoot off The Washington Post - Praises Communist China and slams President Trump
SHOCK!
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
Money didn't save Trump from bankruptcy 6 times Probably made money going bankruptIf anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcyThe farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffsYou mean a brainless globalist who does not care which country dominates the world?Then you're not a free market capitalist I guess. You can't have it both ways, private. Just as GG isn't a liberal and he is to the right of you on tariffs, moron. Actually, most Americans are to the right of Trump on this.
you betcha I care
How long do I have to keep paying these taxes that Trump imposed anyway? How many more farmers are bailed out or go bankrupt in your crazy left wing tariffs scheme?
Free market capitalist, not you.
I'm a liberal, but I ain't that liberal.
trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?
Leftist Site. Provide an unbiased source, “Berg”.Factually refute what the article says or STFU.I laugh
"Foreign Policy" magazine - 0ffshoot off The Washington Post - Praises Communist China and slams President Trump
SHOCK!
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
Money didn't save Trump from bankruptcy 6 times Probably made money going bankruptIf anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcyThe farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffsYou mean a brainless globalist who does not care which country dominates the world?
you betcha I care
How long do I have to keep paying these taxes that Trump imposed anyway? How many more farmers are bailed out or go bankrupt in your crazy left wing tariffs scheme?
Free market capitalist, not you.
I'm a liberal, but I ain't that liberal.
trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?
Money didn't save Trump from bankruptcy 6 times Probably made money going bankruptIf anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcyThe farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffsHow long do I have to keep paying these taxes that Trump imposed anyway? How many more farmers are bailed out or go bankrupt in your crazy left wing tariffs scheme?
Free market capitalist, not you.
I'm a liberal, but I ain't that liberal.
trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?
He has never gone bankrupt
Leftist Site. Provide an unbiased source, “Berg”.Factually refute what the article says or STFU.
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
Leftist Site. Provide an unbiased source, “Berg”.Factually refute what the article says or STFU.
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
Leftist Site. Provide an unbiased source, “Berg”.
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
you are free to disagree, but it is still true.
Leftist Site. Provide an unbiased source, “Berg”.
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.
With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.
With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.
This to me is non-biased. When we are discussing trade, I think the WSJ is a terrific and unbiased source.
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
you are free to disagree, but it is still true.
The Journal's editorial pages and columns, run separately from the news pages, have a conservative bent and are highly influential in American conservative circles. Despite this, the Journal refrains from endorsing candidates and has not endorsed a candidate since 1928.
WSJ.com reaches a global audience of 42.4 million digital readers per month who seek the news and information critical to their business and personal lives.
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.
With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.
This to me is non-biased. When we are discussing trade, I think the WSJ is a terrific and unbiased source.
So Liberals are not pro business? Mike Bloomberg is not pro business? That’s a new one.Leftist Site. Provide an unbiased source, “Berg”.
Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.
With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.
The farm subsidy moneyIf anything the money you dislike saved many from bankruptcyThe farmers were attacked by china in retaliation to tariffsYou mean a brainless globalist who does not care which country dominates the world?
you betcha I care
How long do I have to keep paying these taxes that Trump imposed anyway? How many more farmers are bailed out or go bankrupt in your crazy left wing tariffs scheme?
Free market capitalist, not you.
I'm a liberal, but I ain't that liberal.
trump came to their aid just as FDR reacted to the japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
By forcing many of them into bankruptcy? Good plan. Or is it socialist scheme to take tax payer money to help keep some of them afloat?
I dislike money? Is this another made up argument of yours?
So those bankruptcies which were caused by tariffs and not China and not all the farmers are being bailed out either.
Editorials are opinion pieces. I discount them as such. But if you’re talking trade then the true and unbiased source would be the news section of the WSJ as I have illustrated.
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.
With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.
This to me is non-biased. When we are discussing trade, I think the WSJ is a terrific and unbiased source.
I think if you take the paper as a whole it is on the conservative side. You have to include the editorial section.
Bloomberg is heavily invested in china and a disgusting apologist for that communist dictatorshipSo Liberals are not pro business? Mike Bloomberg is not pro business? That’s a new one.Name one unbiased source.
WSJ
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.
With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.
AllSidesBias
THe WSJ has a clear conservative bias.
I'm not saying they are on the level of the Gateway Pundit or do not have journalistic standards, but clearly biased.
I disagree. They have a business bias. That doesn't make them conservative.
I think a 'pro-business' bias (notice the quotes) would be considered fiscally conservative by most people.
With that said you were asked to provide a non-biased source and apparently by your own admission you couldn't.
This to me is non-biased. When we are discussing trade, I think the WSJ is a terrific and unbiased source.
It is less biased than most, that is for sure.
By the way, what is the source for your graph?
