Corrupt Judge Shuts Down Trump's Plan to Protect America With Border Wall

Status
Not open for further replies.
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?

We’ll file that under “BILLIONS IN CASH LOADED ON PALLETS AND SHIPPED TO TERRORISTS IN IRAN DURING THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE”
That wasn't tax payer money appropriated by Congress.

Dayum, you rightards are dumber than shit. :eusa_doh:
Yes, it was US government money - which means in America the taxpayers own it, Comrade.
Nonsense. It was mostly money that had been used to purchase oil from Iran.
Obama took it from the Treasury.

Obama and his officials at the Treasury Department and State Department were clear: They would work assiduously to freeze out Iran from getting dollars to fund its mischief and mayhem around the world.

The Associated Press, puts it this way: "As the Treasury and State Department worked behind the scenes to help Iran access the dollar, the message to Congress remained the same: The JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) did not allow Iran to access the U.S. financial system."

Obama sent a clear message to Congress: If you don't block this nuclear deal, we will bar Iran's access to our financial system. The deal was clear, unequivocal.

It was also a lie. Obama lied, and so did others in his administration.

That's the conclusion of a report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It alleges Obama officials pushed the U.S. Treasury to let Iran convert the equivalent of $5.7 billion of funds held in Oman's Bank of Muscat from rials into dollars and subsequently into euros.

It required a special license by the U.S. Treasury, which was granted in February of 2016. But it was never disclosed, either to Congress or the American people.

OK, you say, $5.7 billion. What is that, when big economies like the U.S., Britain, Germany and France have economies trillions of dollars in size?

Apart from the lie, which is bad enough for an administration that claimed repeatedly to be "scandal-free," this money did not have innocuous uses. Far from it.

Our own State Department characterizes Iran as the No. 1 terrorist-supporting state on Earth. Every dollar it gets from us has an ultimate use that is highly questionable, which is the reason why the U.S. imposed sanctions in the first place.

Terrorist Funding
Washington Times national security correspondent Bill Gertz in February of this year reported that some of the $1.7 billion that the Obama administration officially handed over to the Iranians had ended up in the hands of terrorist groups. Those terrorist groups included Hezbollah, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and Iran's own Quds Force, the dirty tricks and terror branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

No one knows how much of the $5.7 billion that Obama allowed Iran to access also went to terrorist activities. Or, for that matter, how much went to further research activity on Iran's nuclear bomb project. That awaits a later investigation.

But it's important to note that the Iran nuclear deal also removed some $100 billion in sanctions on Iran. This made Iran once again a big player in the Mideast. It's almost certain that a good piece of that went to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards, which by some accounts control as much as 40% of Iran's economy.

It's clear from Obama administration actions, under both his Secretaries of State, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, that the Obama White House despised Israel and did all they could to undermine its security. How else can you explain the enabling of a terrorist-supporting regime?

The Obama administration failed to enforce its own "red line" in Syria on chemical weapons. By doing so, it in effect invited both Russia and Iran into that disintegrating country. Iranian troops today are within striking distance of our one true ally in the region, Israel.

Mideast Disintegration
The disintegration of Libya, the collapse of Egypt, and Turkey's embrace of radical Islam, all took place under Obama's watch. None of them were in the U.S.' interest.

The Mideast has been a mess for decades, but things got markedly worse under Obama. A big reason is the Iran nuclear deal didn't make anyone in the Mideast, Europe or U.S. safer. But it did empower the terrorist-supporting mullahs in Tehran.

The mullahs are now funding terrorism on Israel's border. They're biding their time until they can get another anti-Israel president in the White House. Mullahs with a nuclear weapon will be a nightmare. President Trump has a big job still ahead of him, but in his first year and a half in office he has undone much of Obama's damage. How Obama Secretly Gave Iran Access To Billions Of Dollars — And Also Enabled Terrorism
 
Great, show me where it says trump can spend that money...

H.R.3884 - 94th Congress (1975-1976): National Emergencies Act

And what "trillions" did Obama "spend" on Iran?
Obama gave billions to Iran.
He spent trillions on Obamacare, loans to foreign banks, Quantitative Easing.....you name it.
He also supplied terrorists like Hamas and al Qaeda with weapons.

Links

The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access to the US financial system
Too fucking rightarded. :cuckoo:

The money to Iran was Iran's money we had frozen.

Money spent on ObamaCare was appropriated by the Congress in accordance with the Constitution.

Regarding foreign bank loans, you should be more specific.

Quantitative easing was an act by the Federal Reserve, not Obama.
The Federal Reserve System is organized with a government agency at the top (the Board of Governors), and branches beneath them that resemble private corporations. The Board of Governors are all appointed for 14-year terms by the president.

What is it about the Federal Reserve you do not think a greedy, sitting President (who has a modest savings account and net worth when he enters his presidency and walks out with a $10,000,000.00 net worth) cannot influence? It hardly behooves you to call anyone else "f-word-" retarded. :rolleyes:
Keep those blinders close to ya!
LOL

Dumbfuck...

The president is not the Federal Reserve.

Quantitative easing began while Bush was president.

And it started under the Fed chairman who was first nominated by Bush.

It never ceases to amaze me just how rightarded you cons can be.
Link
Are you too fucking stupid to look up when quantitative easing began? Damn, you should know that without even needing to look it up. But here, being the kind-hearted Liberal I am, I'm more than happy to educate the less fortunate among us...

Quantitative Easing In Focus: The U.S. Experience

In the wake of the global financial crisis, the Federal Reserve used several rounds of QE to get the economy back on track. In this, the Fed started growing its balance sheet by purchasing government bonds and mortgage-backed securities. The first round of QE, also later called QE1, was initiated in November 2008.​

emphasis added to aid the less educated
 
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
You mean like using American warships to hunt down German submarines?
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

The forum's fucking moron makes one of his most moronic statements of all time.

No, fucking moron, I don't mean anything like that.

According to the Constitution, only the Congress can decide what to spend money on. All the president can do is agree or disagree with the Congress. That's why a judge has blocked this maneuver by Trump.

Now let's compare that to your fucking moronic comparison with the president "using American warships to hunt down German submarines"...

Fucking moron... the Constitution also declares the president to be Commader-in-Chief of the military, when called into service, with the power to deploy the military as he or she sees fit.
FDR was spending taxpayer money to hunt down the submarines of a country we weren't at war with. They were guarding British convoys. Where does the Constitution allow that?
 
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
This isn't about Demmie bullshitting all over the President whom they have targeted for a take out since he announced his run for President. When they carried it over to his administration's protective powers both in the Constitution and the President's Oath of Office, that is when we knew they were following somebody else's Constution and not the United States Constitution.

May each and every single Democrat in Congress who has gone with the pack spend three years in the solitary confinement for having tried to put President Trump's power on the shitter for trying to stop the financial burdens illegal immigrants have forcefully tried to inflict on the American taxpayer through rogue Democrat's trying to destroy Donald Trump and Republicans on every front in underhanded ways.
All that just to avoid answering my question? I graciously accept your concession.
The President did the right thing. You're asking me to do the Supreme Court's job. I am only qualified to defend the President from hound dogs like you who go along with the false accusations the Democrats have been throwing against President Trump because he won the office of President, and all their efforts on recruiting illegal aliens to vote Democrat failed.

People are going to prison in the near future for taking aim at President Trump and preventing him from keeping his oath of office. They're not the President. Neither is this hateful Democrat judge who couldn't find his ass with a search warrant.
LOLOL

Rightards have been saying people are going to prison over that for two years now.

Any... day... now..............
Nah, no prison. Straight to th' chair will do. Why waste money on criminals who pocketed every penny they could get their mitts on until they had triple-digit millions of laundered money. Most of that was paid by gullible taxpayers.\ who didn't inform themselves of the multiple crimes committed and number of friends who died, disappeared, or committed suicide with three shots to the back of the head.
 
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
Ask black jesus traitor.
Thanks for admitting the Constitution does not grant a president any such power.

He didn't. Obama spent all kinds of money not approved by Congress. When did Congress authorize the government to issue work visas to illegal aliens?
 
You are mistaken.

how is that NATIONAL EMERGENCY thingie workin' out for ya ........

:abgg2q.jpg:
Laugh now. Wait until Democrats using the Deep State are behind bars for treason. Then and only then will you understand your mistake.
:cuckoo:
Project much?
No.
How you gonna fix the fix your felony criminal leaders are in? :lmao:
 
Obama gave billions to Iran.
He spent trillions on Obamacare, loans to foreign banks, Quantitative Easing.....you name it.
He also supplied terrorists like Hamas and al Qaeda with weapons.

Links

The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access to the US financial system
Too fucking rightarded. :cuckoo:

The money to Iran was Iran's money we had frozen.

Money spent on ObamaCare was appropriated by the Congress in accordance with the Constitution.

Regarding foreign bank loans, you should be more specific.

Quantitative easing was an act by the Federal Reserve, not Obama.
The Federal Reserve System is organized with a government agency at the top (the Board of Governors), and branches beneath them that resemble private corporations. The Board of Governors are all appointed for 14-year terms by the president.

What is it about the Federal Reserve you do not think a greedy, sitting President (who has a modest savings account and net worth when he enters his presidency and walks out with a $10,000,000.00 net worth) cannot influence? It hardly behooves you to call anyone else "f-word-" retarded. :rolleyes:
Keep those blinders close to ya!
LOL

Dumbfuck...

The president is not the Federal Reserve.

Quantitative easing began while Bush was president.

And it started under the Fed chairman who was first nominated by Bush.

It never ceases to amaze me just how rightarded you cons can be.
Link
Are you too fucking stupid to look up when quantitative easing began? Damn, you should know that without even needing to look it up. But here, being the kind-hearted Liberal I am, I'm more than happy to educate the less fortunate among us...

Quantitative Easing In Focus: The U.S. Experience

In the wake of the global financial crisis, the Federal Reserve used several rounds of QE to get the economy back on track. In this, the Fed started growing its balance sheet by purchasing government bonds and mortgage-backed securities. The first round of QE, also later called QE1, was initiated in November 2008.​

emphasis added to aid the less educated
And you think I felt that Obama was the first president to use it??? LOL!!!

Course Obama used QE to monetize trillions of the National Debt.
Obama doubled the debt.....raising it from $10 trillion to roughly $20 trillion.....spending more than any other president in US history.
Imagine what would have happened if he hadn't used QE.
 
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
During national emergencies.
I wonder if the Iran Deal was a national emergency.
Obama spent trillions without congressional authorization but nobody stopped him.
All Trump wants is a few measly billion to protect us from a foreign invasion.
The hypocrisy by you folks is ginormous.
Great, show me where it says trump can spend that money...

H.R.3884 - 94th Congress (1975-1976): National Emergencies Act

And what "trillions" did Obama "spend" on Iran?
Where does it say he cannot? Tell the truth..... the truth.... the truth.... eh you don't know the truth. :rolleyes:
 
During national emergencies.
I wonder if the Iran Deal was a national emergency.
Obama spent trillions without congressional authorization but nobody stopped him.
All Trump wants is a few measly billion to protect us from a foreign invasion.
The hypocrisy by you folks is ginormous.
Great, show me where it says trump can spend that money...

H.R.3884 - 94th Congress (1975-1976): National Emergencies Act

And what "trillions" did Obama "spend" on Iran?
Obama gave billions to Iran.
He spent trillions on Obamacare, loans to foreign banks, Quantitative Easing.....you name it.
He also supplied terrorists like Hamas and al Qaeda with weapons.

Links

The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access to the US financial system
Too fucking rightarded. :cuckoo:

The money to Iran was Iran's money we had frozen.

Money spent on ObamaCare was appropriated by the Congress in accordance with the Constitution.

Regarding foreign bank loans, you should be more specific.

Quantitative easing was an act by the Federal Reserve, not Obama.
The Federal Reserve System is organized with a government agency at the top (the Board of Governors), and branches beneath them that resemble private corporations. The Board of Governors are all appointed for 14-year terms by the president.

What is it about the Federal Reserve you do not think a greedy, sitting President (who has a modest savings account and net worth when he enters his presidency and walks out with a $10,000,000.00 net worth) cannot influence? It hardly behooves you to call anyone else "f-word-" retarded. :rolleyes:
Keep those blinders close to ya!
LOL

Dumbfuck...

- The president is not the Federal Reserve.

- Quantitative easing began while Bush was president.

- And it started under the Fed chairman who was first nominated by Bush.

It never ceases to amaze me just how rightarded you cons can be. You gotta be a special kind of stupid to say Obama gave us quantitative easing. :cuckoo:

He sure enough continued it and it probably happened under him more than Bush. The "Stimulus Package did a great disservice to our nation. In the midst of it, Obama found a way to give millions (billions?) of taxpayer money to his buddies. Don't forget "Cash 4 Clunkers" that took all the affordable cars off the road, also subsidized with taxpayer funds.
 
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?

We’ll file that under “BILLIONS IN CASH LOADED ON PALLETS AND SHIPPED TO TERRORISTS IN IRAN DURING THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE”
That wasn't tax payer money appropriated by Congress.

Dayum, you rightards are dumber than shit. :eusa_doh:
Yes, it was US government money - which means in America the taxpayers own it, Comrade.
Nonsense. It was mostly money that had been used to purchase oil from Iran.
Obama took it from the Treasury.

Obama and his officials at the Treasury Department and State Department were clear: They would work assiduously to freeze out Iran from getting dollars to fund its mischief and mayhem around the world.

The Associated Press, puts it this way: "As the Treasury and State Department worked behind the scenes to help Iran access the dollar, the message to Congress remained the same: The JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) did not allow Iran to access the U.S. financial system."

Obama sent a clear message to Congress: If you don't block this nuclear deal, we will bar Iran's access to our financial system. The deal was clear, unequivocal.

It was also a lie. Obama lied, and so did others in his administration.

That's the conclusion of a report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It alleges Obama officials pushed the U.S. Treasury to let Iran convert the equivalent of $5.7 billion of funds held in Oman's Bank of Muscat from rials into dollars and subsequently into euros.

It required a special license by the U.S. Treasury, which was granted in February of 2016. But it was never disclosed, either to Congress or the American people.

OK, you say, $5.7 billion. What is that, when big economies like the U.S., Britain, Germany and France have economies trillions of dollars in size?

Apart from the lie, which is bad enough for an administration that claimed repeatedly to be "scandal-free," this money did not have innocuous uses. Far from it.

Our own State Department characterizes Iran as the No. 1 terrorist-supporting state on Earth. Every dollar it gets from us has an ultimate use that is highly questionable, which is the reason why the U.S. imposed sanctions in the first place.

Terrorist Funding
Washington Times national security correspondent Bill Gertz in February of this year reported that some of the $1.7 billion that the Obama administration officially handed over to the Iranians had ended up in the hands of terrorist groups. Those terrorist groups included Hezbollah, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and Iran's own Quds Force, the dirty tricks and terror branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

No one knows how much of the $5.7 billion that Obama allowed Iran to access also went to terrorist activities. Or, for that matter, how much went to further research activity on Iran's nuclear bomb project. That awaits a later investigation.

But it's important to note that the Iran nuclear deal also removed some $100 billion in sanctions on Iran. This made Iran once again a big player in the Mideast. It's almost certain that a good piece of that went to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards, which by some accounts control as much as 40% of Iran's economy.

It's clear from Obama administration actions, under both his Secretaries of State, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, that the Obama White House despised Israel and did all they could to undermine its security. How else can you explain the enabling of a terrorist-supporting regime?

The Obama administration failed to enforce its own "red line" in Syria on chemical weapons. By doing so, it in effect invited both Russia and Iran into that disintegrating country. Iranian troops today are within striking distance of our one true ally in the region, Israel.

Mideast Disintegration
The disintegration of Libya, the collapse of Egypt, and Turkey's embrace of radical Islam, all took place under Obama's watch. None of them were in the U.S.' interest.

The Mideast has been a mess for decades, but things got markedly worse under Obama. A big reason is the Iran nuclear deal didn't make anyone in the Mideast, Europe or U.S. safer. But it did empower the terrorist-supporting mullahs in Tehran.

The mullahs are now funding terrorism on Israel's border. They're biding their time until they can get another anti-Israel president in the White House. Mullahs with a nuclear weapon will be a nightmare. President Trump has a big job still ahead of him, but in his first year and a half in office he has undone much of Obama's damage. How Obama Secretly Gave Iran Access To Billions Of Dollars — And Also Enabled Terrorism
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

You're as brain-dead as they come.

Let me show you what you just posted...

That's the conclusion of a report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It alleges Obama officials pushed the U.S. Treasury to let Iran convert the equivalent of $5.7 billion of funds held in Oman's Bank of Muscat from rials into dollars and subsequently into euros.

It required a special license by the U.S. Treasury, which was granted in February of 2016.

... your own post, ya moron, showed the assets were frozen in an Omani bank. Our money is not held frozen in Omani banks. Did you understand any of this? The money did not come from the U.S. Treasury. The U.S. Treasury was needed to convert the assets from rials to dollars to euros.
 
During national emergencies.
I wonder if the Iran Deal was a national emergency.
Obama spent trillions without congressional authorization but nobody stopped him.
All Trump wants is a few measly billion to protect us from a foreign invasion.
The hypocrisy by you folks is ginormous.
Great, show me where it says trump can spend that money...

H.R.3884 - 94th Congress (1975-1976): National Emergencies Act

And what "trillions" did Obama "spend" on Iran?
Obama gave billions to Iran.
He spent trillions on Obamacare, loans to foreign banks, Quantitative Easing.....you name it.
He also supplied terrorists like Hamas and al Qaeda with weapons.

Links

The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access to the US financial system
Too fucking rightarded. :cuckoo:

The money to Iran was Iran's money we had frozen.

Money spent on ObamaCare was appropriated by the Congress in accordance with the Constitution.

Regarding foreign bank loans, you should be more specific.

Quantitative easing was an act by the Federal Reserve, not Obama.
The Federal Reserve System is organized with a government agency at the top (the Board of Governors), and branches beneath them that resemble private corporations. The Board of Governors are all appointed for 14-year terms by the president.

What is it about the Federal Reserve you do not think a greedy, sitting President (who has a modest savings account and net worth when he enters his presidency and walks out with a $10,000,000.00 net worth) cannot influence? It hardly behooves you to call anyone else "f-word-" retarded. :rolleyes:
Keep those blinders close to ya!
LOL

Dumbfuck...

- The president is not the Federal Reserve.

- Quantitative easing began while Bush was president.

- And it started under the Fed chairman who was first nominated by Bush.

It never ceases to amaze me just how rightarded you cons can be. You gotta be a special kind of stupid to say Obama gave us quantitative easing. :cuckoo:
Hmm, your reading comprehension is waning critically. But you do put words in other people's mouth to make your fellow idiots on the left think they did. I said influence not is. OH, wait I made it too hard! Both "influence" and "is" start with an "I." I should have known that would confuse you, I just can't think of all the ways you get confused, and poor lad, so often confused, too. :crying:
 
We’ll file that under “BILLIONS IN CASH LOADED ON PALLETS AND SHIPPED TO TERRORISTS IN IRAN DURING THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE”
That wasn't tax payer money appropriated by Congress.

Dayum, you rightards are dumber than shit. :eusa_doh:
Yes, it was US government money - which means in America the taxpayers own it, Comrade.
Nonsense. It was mostly money that had been used to purchase oil from Iran.
Obama took it from the Treasury.

Obama and his officials at the Treasury Department and State Department were clear: They would work assiduously to freeze out Iran from getting dollars to fund its mischief and mayhem around the world.

The Associated Press, puts it this way: "As the Treasury and State Department worked behind the scenes to help Iran access the dollar, the message to Congress remained the same: The JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) did not allow Iran to access the U.S. financial system."

Obama sent a clear message to Congress: If you don't block this nuclear deal, we will bar Iran's access to our financial system. The deal was clear, unequivocal.

It was also a lie. Obama lied, and so did others in his administration.

That's the conclusion of a report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It alleges Obama officials pushed the U.S. Treasury to let Iran convert the equivalent of $5.7 billion of funds held in Oman's Bank of Muscat from rials into dollars and subsequently into euros.

It required a special license by the U.S. Treasury, which was granted in February of 2016. But it was never disclosed, either to Congress or the American people.

OK, you say, $5.7 billion. What is that, when big economies like the U.S., Britain, Germany and France have economies trillions of dollars in size?

Apart from the lie, which is bad enough for an administration that claimed repeatedly to be "scandal-free," this money did not have innocuous uses. Far from it.

Our own State Department characterizes Iran as the No. 1 terrorist-supporting state on Earth. Every dollar it gets from us has an ultimate use that is highly questionable, which is the reason why the U.S. imposed sanctions in the first place.

Terrorist Funding
Washington Times national security correspondent Bill Gertz in February of this year reported that some of the $1.7 billion that the Obama administration officially handed over to the Iranians had ended up in the hands of terrorist groups. Those terrorist groups included Hezbollah, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and Iran's own Quds Force, the dirty tricks and terror branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

No one knows how much of the $5.7 billion that Obama allowed Iran to access also went to terrorist activities. Or, for that matter, how much went to further research activity on Iran's nuclear bomb project. That awaits a later investigation.

But it's important to note that the Iran nuclear deal also removed some $100 billion in sanctions on Iran. This made Iran once again a big player in the Mideast. It's almost certain that a good piece of that went to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards, which by some accounts control as much as 40% of Iran's economy.

It's clear from Obama administration actions, under both his Secretaries of State, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, that the Obama White House despised Israel and did all they could to undermine its security. How else can you explain the enabling of a terrorist-supporting regime?

The Obama administration failed to enforce its own "red line" in Syria on chemical weapons. By doing so, it in effect invited both Russia and Iran into that disintegrating country. Iranian troops today are within striking distance of our one true ally in the region, Israel.

Mideast Disintegration
The disintegration of Libya, the collapse of Egypt, and Turkey's embrace of radical Islam, all took place under Obama's watch. None of them were in the U.S.' interest.

The Mideast has been a mess for decades, but things got markedly worse under Obama. A big reason is the Iran nuclear deal didn't make anyone in the Mideast, Europe or U.S. safer. But it did empower the terrorist-supporting mullahs in Tehran.

The mullahs are now funding terrorism on Israel's border. They're biding their time until they can get another anti-Israel president in the White House. Mullahs with a nuclear weapon will be a nightmare. President Trump has a big job still ahead of him, but in his first year and a half in office he has undone much of Obama's damage. How Obama Secretly Gave Iran Access To Billions Of Dollars — And Also Enabled Terrorism
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

You're as brain-dead as they come.

Let me show you what you just posted...

That's the conclusion of a report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It alleges Obama officials pushed the U.S. Treasury to let Iran convert the equivalent of $5.7 billion of funds held in Oman's Bank of Muscat from rials into dollars and subsequently into euros.

It required a special license by the U.S. Treasury, which was granted in February of 2016.

... your own post, ya moron, showed the assets were frozen in an Omani bank. Our money is not held frozen in Omani banks. Did you understand any of this? The money did not come from the U.S. Treasury. The U.S. Treasury was needed to convert the assets from rials to dollars to euros.
How many other terrorists did Obama pay money to?
 
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
During national emergencies.
I wonder if the Iran Deal was a national emergency.
Obama spent trillions without congressional authorization but nobody stopped him.
All Trump wants is a few measly billion to protect us from a foreign invasion.
The hypocrisy by you folks is ginormous.
Great, show me where it says trump can spend that money...

H.R.3884 - 94th Congress (1975-1976): National Emergencies Act

And what "trillions" did Obama "spend" on Iran?
Obama gave billions to Iran.
He spent trillions on Obamacare, loans to foreign banks, Quantitative Easing.....you name it.
He also supplied terrorists like Hamas and al Qaeda with weapons.

Links

The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access to the US financial system
Too fucking rightarded. :cuckoo:

The money to Iran was Iran's money we had frozen.

Money spent on ObamaCare was appropriated by the Congress in accordance with the Constitution.

Regarding foreign bank loans, you should be more specific.

Quantitative easing was an act by the Federal Reserve, not Obama.
Still parroting what he media told you, huh?
 
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
During national emergencies.
I wonder if the Iran Deal was a national emergency.
Obama spent trillions without congressional authorization but nobody stopped him.
All Trump wants is a few measly billion to protect us from a foreign invasion.
The hypocrisy by you folks is ginormous.
Great, show me where it says trump can spend that money...

H.R.3884 - 94th Congress (1975-1976): National Emergencies Act

And what "trillions" did Obama "spend" on Iran?
He gave Iran $150 billion, moron. He also put $1.5 billion in cash on a plane and delivered it to them.
 
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.

There are actually 150 cases of collusion, and 10 different cases of obstruction.

Denial isn't going to change those facts.

And no, the President doesn't have the power to spend money anyway he wishes.

And speaking of judges spanking this Presidents ass...

In a column for Politico, former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti explains that President Donald Trump and his legal team’s strategy to stonewall the Democrats and run out the clock by using the courts until after the election is backfiring spectacularly.

With Trump ignoring Congressional subpoenas, all but daring Democrats to take him in court, Mariotti claims the president will come to regret it because it could prompt impeachment hearings sooner rather than later.

“In the space of three days this week, two federal judges ruled decisively in favor of Congress’ right to subpoena President Trump’s personal financial and business records,” he writes. “The speed of the decisions—unusual in complex federal litigation—demonstrates a significant flaw in the administration’s ‘fight all the subpoenas’ strategy. More importantly, it suggests that Trump’s strategy of categorically fighting all Congressional subpoenas will undermine his ability to stonewall Congress in subsequent cases.”

According to the ex-prosecutor, Trump is doomed because the Constitution could not be clearer about how the government is supposed to work.

“Trump’s argument is doomed to fail in the courts because the constitution gives the House the ‘full Power of Impeachment’ and it could not exercise that authority without investigating presidential wrongdoing,” he explained. “If Trump’s team is not alarmed by the speed and sweeping nature (not to mention the almost dismissive tone) of the two judgments against the president, it should be. Trump’s strategy on a variety of fronts has been to take extreme positions denying Congressional authority to investigate the presidency.”

“The Achilles heel of Trump’s strategy is that his extreme positions are not fact-specific or nuanced and are easily disposed of as legally groundless,” he elaborated, adding, “If Trump continues down this path—over former White House counsel Don McGahn’s refusal to appear before the House Judiciary, for example—expect to see more swift rulings swatting down his legal arguments in the coming weeks and months. No court is going to rule that the Executive Branch can categorically refuse to produce evidence and witnesses from a criminal investigation of the president of the United States from the House of Representatives.”

He then advised Trump’s adviser’s to re-think what they are doing if they hope to succeed because they could be accelerating presidential impeachment hearings.

“His strategy is not only generating adverse results quickly, but it could very well convince a court that he is acting in bad faith,” he suggested. “If that happens, the House could get the courts to do what it is ill-equipped to do itself—enforce compliance with Congressional subpoenas.”

“That could get Congressional investigations, or even an impeachment inquiry, off the ground,” he concluded.
 
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.

There are actually 150 cases of collusion, and 10 different cases of obstruction.

Denial isn't going to change those facts.

And no, the President doesn't have the power to spend money anyway he wishes.

And speaking of judges spanking this Presidents ass...

In a column for Politico, former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti explains that President Donald Trump and his legal team’s strategy to stonewall the Democrats and run out the clock by using the courts until after the election is backfiring spectacularly.

With Trump ignoring Congressional subpoenas, all but daring Democrats to take him in court, Mariotti claims the president will come to regret it because it could prompt impeachment hearings sooner rather than later.

“In the space of three days this week, two federal judges ruled decisively in favor of Congress’ right to subpoena President Trump’s personal financial and business records,” he writes. “The speed of the decisions—unusual in complex federal litigation—demonstrates a significant flaw in the administration’s ‘fight all the subpoenas’ strategy. More importantly, it suggests that Trump’s strategy of categorically fighting all Congressional subpoenas will undermine his ability to stonewall Congress in subsequent cases.”

According to the ex-prosecutor, Trump is doomed because the Constitution could not be clearer about how the government is supposed to work.

“Trump’s argument is doomed to fail in the courts because the constitution gives the House the ‘full Power of Impeachment’ and it could not exercise that authority without investigating presidential wrongdoing,” he explained. “If Trump’s team is not alarmed by the speed and sweeping nature (not to mention the almost dismissive tone) of the two judgments against the president, it should be. Trump’s strategy on a variety of fronts has been to take extreme positions denying Congressional authority to investigate the presidency.”

“The Achilles heel of Trump’s strategy is that his extreme positions are not fact-specific or nuanced and are easily disposed of as legally groundless,” he elaborated, adding, “If Trump continues down this path—over former White House counsel Don McGahn’s refusal to appear before the House Judiciary, for example—expect to see more swift rulings swatting down his legal arguments in the coming weeks and months. No court is going to rule that the Executive Branch can categorically refuse to produce evidence and witnesses from a criminal investigation of the president of the United States from the House of Representatives.”

He then advised Trump’s adviser’s to re-think what they are doing if they hope to succeed because they could be accelerating presidential impeachment hearings.

“His strategy is not only generating adverse results quickly, but it could very well convince a court that he is acting in bad faith,” he suggested. “If that happens, the House could get the courts to do what it is ill-equipped to do itself—enforce compliance with Congressional subpoenas.”

“That could get Congressional investigations, or even an impeachment inquiry, off the ground,” he concluded.
Stop reading Soros websites, it makes you stupid.
 
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
During national emergencies.
I wonder if the Iran Deal was a national emergency.
Obama spent trillions without congressional authorization but nobody stopped him.
All Trump wants is a few measly billion to protect us from a foreign invasion.
The hypocrisy by you folks is ginormous.
Great, show me where it says trump can spend that money...

H.R.3884 - 94th Congress (1975-1976): National Emergencies Act

And what "trillions" did Obama "spend" on Iran?
How The Obama Administration Raided The Treasury To Pay Off Insurers
 
Great, show me where it says trump can spend that money...

H.R.3884 - 94th Congress (1975-1976): National Emergencies Act

And what "trillions" did Obama "spend" on Iran?
Obama gave billions to Iran.
He spent trillions on Obamacare, loans to foreign banks, Quantitative Easing.....you name it.
He also supplied terrorists like Hamas and al Qaeda with weapons.

Links

The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access to the US financial system
Too fucking rightarded. :cuckoo:

The money to Iran was Iran's money we had frozen.

Money spent on ObamaCare was appropriated by the Congress in accordance with the Constitution.

Regarding foreign bank loans, you should be more specific.

Quantitative easing was an act by the Federal Reserve, not Obama.
The money Obama gave to Iran was our money.
Iran gave up ownership of that cash when they chose to attack us and take our diplomats hostage in the late 70s. They continued and still continue to attack us overseas.
You're such a fool that you think giving the enemy billions so they could fund terrorism was a rational act.

When Obama took office he sent millions overseas to foreign banks in the first month.
He was pilfering the Treasury.

The Stimulus was just a slushfund for pork projects.
Obama took over GM and Chrysler just to bail out unions and charged it to the US taxpayer.
Obama stole $700 billion from the Social Security fund to start up Obamacare. Then he wasted roughly $1.4 trillion on the program.....a program that is a total failure. A program that was intended to fail because is was intended to lead the way to Single-Payer. He caused so much debt that he started Quantitative Easing to buy some of it up in an attempt to lesson the deficit. He also forced the Treasury to lower interest rates to reduce the deficit artificially.

Sequestration was just a way to reduce the deficit and gut the military.....and the federal government is suffering extensively from the effects of this reckless policy along with stifling economic growth.
It was not our money. It was mostly money we froze rather than pay Iran for oil we purchased due to the Iranian hostage situation. It was Iran's money.
No it wasn't. It was a rationalization that was used to excuse treason on Obama's part.
We are quickly discovering that Iran has been carrying out aggressive acts even though they got all of that cash in advance. The deal was simply a cover for a former president's treason.

Let me see what should be the ultimate sentence for a former president's treason against a sitting president? Life in jail? Nah, that would cost more to "protect" him from other prisoners who could be his or Clinton's enemies.

They estimate 300 people participated in this little traitorous snafu against a sitting president, plus a majority of the Democrat party in both houses of Congress conspired to lie and obstruct President Trump's every decision and act and cheat America out of national protective measures. That also is treason. How are we going to house and feed 300 crochety Democrat conspirators in the FBI, both houses of Congress, plus Maxine Waters' evildoers who conspired and executed harassments of numerous Executive branch employees to hamstring President Trump.

eliminating America's traitors

eenie, meanie, miney, moe: shall we hang them high or low? :eusa_eh:
eenie, meanie, miney, my: some say we should hang them high! :eek-52:
we can't do that if they're black: they must have a touch of slack! :eusa_angel:
it might be a bit too harsh, if we drowned them in a marsh. :eusa_hand:
people say they're said to like: drugs that lift high Peaks of Pike :eusa_shhh:
maybe they would rather go--by injection, nice and slow :bigbed:
or would they prefer a shooter? yes, a twenty gun saluter :dunno:
nah that doesn't cut the pie; pull the pin, let devils fry :FIREdevil:
:muahaha:

 
Last edited:
This news is great for criminals and drug lords, bad for America, imho.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump's border wall construction plans

This President did not collude, and did not obstruct. He has the right to be the President, his use of the military is QUITE constitutional, and no other branch of government can use minor creeps to obstruct him with a rogue political party's has-beens.

Enough is enough.
Really? Where does the Constitution say the president can spend money on things the Congress does not approve?
During national emergencies.
I wonder if the Iran Deal was a national emergency.
Obama spent trillions without congressional authorization but nobody stopped him.
All Trump wants is a few measly billion to protect us from a foreign invasion.
The hypocrisy by you folks is ginormous.
Great, show me where it says trump can spend that money...

H.R.3884 - 94th Congress (1975-1976): National Emergencies Act

And what "trillions" did Obama "spend" on Iran?
How The Obama Administration Raided The Treasury To Pay Off Insurers
That raid defies the imagination. Wonder if that $10,000,000 Obama took home during his 8 years was partially due to kickback from certain insurance folks. Wonder how many banks in foreign countries with numbered accounts exist for future countries Obama visits and agrees to "lead." He sure doesn't like it here. Practically destroyed the American military's morale and ability to fight off schemers in 3rd world country. Yes, Obama did a number on America. And he has a wall around his house, but he doesn't support the border's closure to illegal traffickers.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top