Cory Booker: It Doesn’t Matter If Kavanaugh Is “Innocent Or Guilty”

[Weatherman2020]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

 

[toobfreak]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

 

[basquebromance]

"Republican John Kennedy loses it: Kavanaugh opponents were not breastfed and have no souls"

 

[Mac1958]

Well, it's mostly about political advantage anyway.

Just like screaming RACIST - the American Left just loves going too fucking far.

 

[AZGAL]

There is Durbin who tried the game of just face the camera and head of committee and request the FBI report yourself Kavanaugh...

 

[AZGAL]

hey Booker Crooked
SLUM BUCKET FILTH
willing to let young people all around the United States learn that some Senators do not believe in our cherished legal principles

 

[chops_]

What Cory Booker should have said:

"It doesn't matter if Kavanaugh is innocent or guilty; just as we Democrats continue to have their "Farticus" moments. And we derail any possibilities of him (Kavanaugh) becoming SCOTUS judge (in the future)."

 

[Borillar]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

 

[Siete]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

yo moron -

even if you take off your shoes to help you count you cant get to the number of judicial appointments Senate Republicans left in limbo in 2015 - none of you can.

stalling appointments is nothing new in politics - RW hypocrites are just candy ass guirly men who cant handle getting done to them what they do to others.

end of story

 

[toobfreak]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

Not only isn't there any grounds, basis or evidence to call Kavanaugh an alcoholic in the present or the past, you obviously don't know what a real alcoholic looks like (the senate is full of them) there is even less reason to suggest he has "anger management issues" over a situation where he has been asked more questions and been treated worse and more unfairly than any SC nominee in history to where his family has been smeared and threatened, nor any grounds to suggest a problem with "impulse control," much less any rationale to show why a justice who likes to toss a few back or can be pushed to anger has a DAMN THING to do with his ability to adjudicate the law. So you can take those thoughts of yours and cram them where the sun doesn't shine.

Moreover, if the SC has become politicized, look no further than the likes of Ginsberg, Kagan, Sotomayor, and others. Ginsgerg has been VERY public where she stands on Trump and will NEVER decide a case involving him in his favor REGARDLESS of what the law says. Indeed, it is the likes of Thomas and others who have shown an adherence to THE LAW as it was written, as the Founder and writers intended rather than trying to reinterpret it for the grounds of societal / political change.

Indeed, the entire radicalization and politicization of our government hasn't come from the constitutional moderates who have tried to steer even the rule of law, it has come wholly from the ever-far Left-swinging radicals in high places trying to force us ever more into a position of socialization and big-government fascism of everything.

 

[MisterBeale]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

Propaganda by Edward Bernays (1928)

 

[Polishprince]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Booker is full of crapola. The liberals were attacking on the Supreme Court decision before Kav's name was even mentioned

 

[ColonelAngus]

I thought we needed an FBI investigation to get all the facts.

Now the facts don't matter?

So the Dimms were LYING, huh?

 

[BluesLegend]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Booker is full of crapola. The liberals were attacking on the Supreme Court decision before Kav's name was even mentioned

Protesters showed up with protest signs that had a <fill in the blank> spot for the nominee. Once Trump announced the nominee THEN they wrote in the name with a sharpie.

 

[toobfreak]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

Propaganda by Edward Bernays (1928)

Mister Beale, seeing Noam Chomsky's name at the top pretty much tells all, but I'd love for you to take the article and digest it down into five or ten salient points!

 

[AZGAL]

your local grocery bag boy has more integrity in his little finger than this guy

 

[MisterBeale]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

Propaganda by Edward Bernays (1928)

Mister Beale, seeing Noam Chomsky's name at the top pretty much tells all, but I'd love for you to take the article and digest it down into five or ten salient points!

Why do I suggest folks read that document?

Not only do I suggest folks read that document, I suggest they read this one;

http://iwcenglish1.typepad.com/Documents/Gatto_Dumbing_Us_Down.pdf

Or for a more in depth understanding;

This one;

https://cdn.greathomeschoolconventions.com/free/Underground-History-of-America-Education.pdf


See, the thing is, the system was designed to control the populace. This is why education is funded by the government, and it is compulsory. This is why laws regulating corporations, and the corporations work hand in glove with the government to control information.

This is the first paragraph of Bernays book;

"THE conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society."

But this builds on an already socially conditioned populace from government run schools.

To understand, to really grasp the power of all of this social engineering, one really needs to read and digest the two works I posted first, then read the whole propaganda book, otherwise, most folks will cling to partisan politics, one side or the other.

Even you have identified Chomsky as, not trustworthy, because of his leftist leanings. But that is organizationally. . . he is also libertarian in that he doesn't like government. Again, we become victims of propaganda, b/c Chomsky stands against the government/corporate state. IOW, the intertwining of corporate power and government power, i.e., fascism.

When compulsory schooling, and corporate propaganda have done a number on someone, unpacking it in "five or ten salient points," in the form of a tweet, will never convince someone that their mind is not truly their own. You can tell them, but they will never believe that their personality that has taken a life time to create has been socially engineered. Only a deep insatiable desire to find out WHY our society is ill, or maybe being dosed on LSD, shrooms or Ayahuasca would move someone against their own programming, right?

"The glory which is built upon a lie soon becomes a most unpleasant incumbrance. ... How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again!"
- Autobiographical dictation, 2 December 1906. Published in Autobiography of Mark Twain, Volume 2 (University of California Press, 2013)

 

[Hutch Starskey]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Cory Booker: It Doesn’t Matter If Kavanaugh Is “Innocent Or Guilty”

That's not what he said at all.

Only a true dope would create such a thread and post a video that contradics the title.

Loser thread.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

hey Booker Crooked
SLUM BUCKET FILTH
willing to let young people all around the United States learn that some Senators do not believe in our cherished legal principles

The young people can watch the video and see that your outrage is retarded.

 

[ColonelAngus]

A rare glimpse of truth from a Leftard.

Facts, guilt or innocence aside, qualification or not, let's get serious that in no way come hell or high water do democrats ever have the intention of ever voting Kavanaugh into office.

Why should they? It's obvious that Supreme Court appointments are now just political appointments and the justices are merely politicians in robes. Politicians with lifetime appointments at that. That's why it is more important to seat a man who is likely an alcoholic, has anger management issues, and no impulse control than it is to find a person more suited to judge. Because he will reliably make far right rulings until his liver gives out.

Propaganda by Edward Bernays (1928)

Mister Beale, seeing Noam Chomsky's name at the top pretty much tells all, but I'd love for you to take the article and digest it down into five or ten salient points!

Why do I suggest folks read that document?

Not only do I suggest folks read that document, I suggest they read this one;

http://iwcenglish1.typepad.com/Documents/Gatto_Dumbing_Us_Down.pdf

Or for a more in depth understanding;

This one;

https://cdn.greathomeschoolconventions.com/free/Underground-History-of-America-Education.pdf


See, the thing is, the system was designed to control the populace. This is why education is funded by the government, and it is compulsory. This is why laws regulating corporations, and the corporations work hand in glove with the government to control information.

This is the first paragraph of Bernays book;

"THE conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society."

But this builds on an already socially conditioned populace from government run schools.

To understand, to really grasp the power of all of this social engineering, one really needs to read and digest the two works I posted first, then read the whole propaganda book, otherwise, most folks will cling to partisan politics, one side or the other.

Even you have identified Chomsky as, not trustworthy, because of his leftist leanings. But that is organizationally. . . he is also libertarian in that he doesn't like government. Again, we become victims of propaganda, b/c Chomsky stands against the government/corporate state. IOW, the intertwining of corporate power and government power, i.e., fascism.

When compulsory schooling, and corporate propaganda have done a number on someone, unpacking it in "five or ten salient points," in the form of a tweet, will never convince someone that their mind is not truly their own. You can tell them, but they will never believe that their personality that has taken a life time to create has been socially engineered. Only a deep insatiable desire to find out WHY our society is ill, or maybe being dosed on LSD, shrooms or Ayahuasca would move someone against their own programming, right?

"The glory which is built upon a lie soon becomes a most unpleasant incumbrance. ... How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again!"
- Autobiographical dictation, 2 December 1906. Published in Autobiography of Mark Twain, Volume 2 (University of California Press, 2013)

They are useful idiots and happy dumb sheep.