Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remind me sir...what efforts are these again?Queen inadvertently hits the mark, imo. If we had the blatant injustice we had in the early 60s, society would still address it.
A lot of whites think we did enough and got jack shite in return for our efforts. Hell, even I look at affirm action in college entrance, and the people getting a leg up are the kids of already successful minorities and new immigrants.
That wasn't the question.Ah....why would it need to be passed today?
But to indulge you...
If it wasn't passed then, and never had been, it would still be needed to have gotten passed.
Remind me sir...what efforts are these again?Queen inadvertently hits the mark, imo. If we had the blatant injustice we had in the early 60s, society would still address it.
A lot of whites think we did enough and got jack shite in return for our efforts. Hell, even I look at affirm action in college entrance, and the people getting a leg up are the kids of already successful minorities and new immigrants.
Could The Civil Rights Act of 1964 Be Passed Today?
In this current political climate?
Why/why not?
In this current political climate?
Why/why not?
Yes, unfortunately.
In this current political climate?
Why/why not?
That wasn't the question.Ah....why would it need to be passed today?
But to indulge you...
If it wasn't passed then, and never had been, it would still be needed to have gotten passed.
If the Supreme Court hadn't ruled that separate but equal was real you wouldn't need it either. Perhaps you should educate yourself on why things happened, instead of pretending that you actually know.
No, it would not pass. The parties we have today are not the parties we had in 1964. While the left may have moved to the left (debatable) the right has taken giant steps to the right (not debatable). In the past the parties had disagreements but the goal was always to make America a better place. Case in point: The Democrats believe it is best for the country if everyone has access to health care. The republicans have no problem with millions of people not being able to afford or get health care. You be the judge what is best for America. In the past differences were handled by compromise which is exactly how they are supposed to be handled in a democracy. That sentiment does not exist in the republican party of today. Don't believe me? Think about the word RINO. The republican goal is to win and the idea of compromise has ceased to exist in the republican party. Let a republican candidate even hint at compromise on anything and they are immediately thrown under the bus. How many times have we seen republicans say something that sounded vaguely like 'compromise' only to have to walk it back for the tea parties benefit. No, the Civil Rights Bill of 1964 would not have a chance of passing today and more's the sadness for that truth.In this current political climate?
Why/why not?