Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And I gave you mine when you asked. I only posted the definition from a dictionary when you ridiculously claimed my definition was wrong. And again, I believe a viable fetus' rights trump the woman's.Of course they have that. Again, I have grown kids to prove it.All I said was the ability to survive outside the womb.
Which they DO NOT HAVE. Perhaps you need to revisit or expand your definition of viability.
And why would I need to expand on a definition of viability when the definition I gave (which is not my definition) is in the dictionary...
viable
of a fetus : having attained such form and development of organs as to be normally capable of surviving outside the uterus
I didn't ask for a dictionary definition, I asked for yours. So fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
No, I said nothing of "fully functional organs" either.And I gave you mine when you asked. I only posted the definition from a dictionary when you ridiculously claimed my definition was wrong. And again, I believe a viable fetus' rights trump the woman's.Of course they have that. Again, I have grown kids to prove it.All I said was the ability to survive outside the womb.
Which they DO NOT HAVE. Perhaps you need to revisit or expand your definition of viability.
And why would I need to expand on a definition of viability when the definition I gave (which is not my definition) is in the dictionary...
viable
of a fetus : having attained such form and development of organs as to be normally capable of surviving outside the uterus
I didn't ask for a dictionary definition, I asked for yours. So fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
No you didn't. You said "ability to survive" with no context. The definition you quoted listed conditions, namely form and organ function. So, again, is it YOUR assertion that fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
No, I said nothing of "fully functional organs" either.And I gave you mine when you asked. I only posted the definition from a dictionary when you ridiculously claimed my definition was wrong. And again, I believe a viable fetus' rights trump the woman's.Of course they have that. Again, I have grown kids to prove it.Which they DO NOT HAVE. Perhaps you need to revisit or expand your definition of viability.
And why would I need to expand on a definition of viability when the definition I gave (which is not my definition) is in the dictionary...
viable
of a fetus : having attained such form and development of organs as to be normally capable of surviving outside the uterus
I didn't ask for a dictionary definition, I asked for yours. So fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
No you didn't. You said "ability to survive" with no context. The definition you quoted listed conditions, namely form and organ function. So, again, is it YOUR assertion that fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
I said viable.
And I demonstrated viability with my own kids who survived outside the womb.
Now you're simply lying about what I said as I did give context to viability -- context being able to survive outside of the womb.No, I said nothing of "fully functional organs" either.And I gave you mine when you asked. I only posted the definition from a dictionary when you ridiculously claimed my definition was wrong. And again, I believe a viable fetus' rights trump the woman's.Of course they have that. Again, I have grown kids to prove it.
And why would I need to expand on a definition of viability when the definition I gave (which is not my definition) is in the dictionary...
viable
of a fetus : having attained such form and development of organs as to be normally capable of surviving outside the uterus
I didn't ask for a dictionary definition, I asked for yours. So fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
No you didn't. You said "ability to survive" with no context. The definition you quoted listed conditions, namely form and organ function. So, again, is it YOUR assertion that fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
I said viable.
And I demonstrated viability with my own kids who survived outside the womb.
The term "viable" is inconsequential without conditions, which is why the definition YOU QUOTED listed them. I could say a goddamn brick is "viable" but it would be utterly meaningless without context. The term "viable" is an adjective. Adjectives are not standalone terms, they describe nouns - you know, 5th grade grammar? Persons, places, things, or ideas? A brick is viable as a building material. It is not a viable as a bicycle wheel. See how this works?
So, once again, are the conditions listed in the dictionary definition YOU posted the assertions that YOU align with - that the child gains the right to life when it has fully functioning organs?
Now you're simply lying about what I said as I did give context to viability -- context being able to survive outside of the womb.No, I said nothing of "fully functional organs" either.And I gave you mine when you asked. I only posted the definition from a dictionary when you ridiculously claimed my definition was wrong. And again, I believe a viable fetus' rights trump the woman's.I didn't ask for a dictionary definition, I asked for yours. So fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
No you didn't. You said "ability to survive" with no context. The definition you quoted listed conditions, namely form and organ function. So, again, is it YOUR assertion that fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
I said viable.
And I demonstrated viability with my own kids who survived outside the womb.
The term "viable" is inconsequential without conditions, which is why the definition YOU QUOTED listed them. I could say a goddamn brick is "viable" but it would be utterly meaningless without context. The term "viable" is an adjective. Adjectives are not standalone terms, they describe nouns - you know, 5th grade grammar? Persons, places, things, or ideas? A brick is viable as a building material. It is not a viable as a bicycle wheel. See how this works?
So, once again, are the conditions listed in the dictionary definition YOU posted the assertions that YOU align with - that the child gains the right to life when it has fully functioning organs?
As far as "fully functioning organs," again, those are your words, not mine. As I've pointed out repeatedly, I also never said independent either. Organs that are viable but require medical assistance are still viable. Just like a new born baby is viable but also requires assistance.
LolLolLol
Planned Parenthood absolutely does not represent millions of conservative women....
How would you know what represents women?
Planned Parenthood has always been the enemy of conservative women
This from a lying Russian troll who clearly knows NOTHING about women.
Women WANT the right to choose. By age 40, 25% of American women have had abortions. Whether they talk about it or not, women want the right to choose when they have a child. Birth control does not work entirely as advertized, even when taken as directed.
I cannot imagine being forced to be pregnant with a child you cannot afford. That's the reality of abortion. As much as conservatives like to portray the women who terminate their pregnancies as amoral party girls, or heartless women who hate children, the hard reality is that majority of the women who get abortions are; (a) either married or in a committed relationship; and (b) already have one or more children.
What you have is a nation where poor married women cannot afford to have children, because they have no health care, no job protections during pregnancy, no affordable child care after the baby is born, and no way of providing for their families during pregnancy, confinement, and before returning to work.
Republican policies have created a nation where poor people are aborting their families because they can't afford to feed them.
Conservative women if they walk their talk, there is no need for abortion...
Conservative women don’t have the same interests and needs as progressive women… fact
The nanny state cannot be sustained, that has been proven over and over again
And I've repeatedly told you that I'm not speaking in terms of them being born into a world where they are independent and no one feeds them. I'm talking about the ability to survive, with help.Now you're simply lying about what I said as I did give context to viability -- context being able to survive outside of the womb.No, I said nothing of "fully functional organs" either.And I gave you mine when you asked. I only posted the definition from a dictionary when you ridiculously claimed my definition was wrong. And again, I believe a viable fetus' rights trump the woman's.
No you didn't. You said "ability to survive" with no context. The definition you quoted listed conditions, namely form and organ function. So, again, is it YOUR assertion that fully functioning organs is where you think the child achieves the right to live?
I said viable.
And I demonstrated viability with my own kids who survived outside the womb.
The term "viable" is inconsequential without conditions, which is why the definition YOU QUOTED listed them. I could say a goddamn brick is "viable" but it would be utterly meaningless without context. The term "viable" is an adjective. Adjectives are not standalone terms, they describe nouns - you know, 5th grade grammar? Persons, places, things, or ideas? A brick is viable as a building material. It is not a viable as a bicycle wheel. See how this works?
So, once again, are the conditions listed in the dictionary definition YOU posted the assertions that YOU align with - that the child gains the right to life when it has fully functioning organs?
As far as "fully functioning organs," again, those are your words, not mine. As I've pointed out repeatedly, I also never said independent either. Organs that are viable but require medical assistance are still viable. Just like a new born baby is viable but also requires assistance.
And I told you, repeatedly, that infants do not have the ability to survive outside the womb because an infant cannot sustain itself. This is indisputable FACT. So you either need to lay out the conditions of your phantom "viability" argument, or stop using the term because you clearly don't know how to apply it.
I'm talking about the ability to survive, with help.
I said that before. Were you not paying attention?I'm talking about the ability to survive, with help.
And there it is, the condition. See, that wasn't so hard now was it?
So you've defined viability as the ability to survive with assistance from a 3rd party. Guess what cupcake: A normal, healthy fetus of any age can survive with the help of it's mother via the gestational process, and is therefore VIABLE.
Way to defeat your own argument.
Amazing how strong Blind Faith is among Athiests.There is no god, you fucking idiot. god is a creation by man in order to deal with his mortality.
I said that before. Were you not paying attention?I'm talking about the ability to survive, with help.
And there it is, the condition. See, that wasn't so hard now was it?
So you've defined viability as the ability to survive with assistance from a 3rd party. Guess what cupcake: A normal, healthy fetus of any age can survive with the help of it's mother via the gestational process, and is therefore VIABLE.
Way to defeat your own argument.
As far as it being viable with the help of the mother, that is only inside of her body. So now you're trying, and failing, to alter my position -- which is viability to survive outside of the womb.
The difference is the law. It allows a woman to terminate her pregnancy up until the point the fetus can survive outside the womb.I said that before. Were you not paying attention?I'm talking about the ability to survive, with help.
And there it is, the condition. See, that wasn't so hard now was it?
So you've defined viability as the ability to survive with assistance from a 3rd party. Guess what cupcake: A normal, healthy fetus of any age can survive with the help of it's mother via the gestational process, and is therefore VIABLE.
Way to defeat your own argument.
As far as it being viable with the help of the mother, that is only inside of her body. So now you're trying, and failing, to alter my position -- which is viability to survive outside of the womb.
What difference does it make? Why is does your "viability" argument apply outside the womb and not inside?
Sadly, you are right.Believing in God just requires common sense.There is no god, you fucking idiot. god is a creation by man in order to deal with his mortality.
LolLolLolLol
Planned Parenthood absolutely does not represent millions of conservative women....
How would you know what represents women?
Planned Parenthood has always been the enemy of conservative women
This from a lying Russian troll who clearly knows NOTHING about women.
Women WANT the right to choose. By age 40, 25% of American women have had abortions. Whether they talk about it or not, women want the right to choose when they have a child. Birth control does not work entirely as advertized, even when taken as directed.
I cannot imagine being forced to be pregnant with a child you cannot afford. That's the reality of abortion. As much as conservatives like to portray the women who terminate their pregnancies as amoral party girls, or heartless women who hate children, the hard reality is that majority of the women who get abortions are; (a) either married or in a committed relationship; and (b) already have one or more children.
What you have is a nation where poor married women cannot afford to have children, because they have no health care, no job protections during pregnancy, no affordable child care after the baby is born, and no way of providing for their families during pregnancy, confinement, and before returning to work.
Republican policies have created a nation where poor people are aborting their families because they can't afford to feed them.
Conservative women if they walk their talk, there is no need for abortion...
Conservative women don’t have the same interests and needs as progressive women… fact
The nanny state cannot be sustained, that has been proven over and over again
Gross, some fat ass on the internet is mansplaining to a woman what women are and apparently dictating their interests.
So they survive “outside” the womb as “infants.” Then what were they in the ninth month inside the womb?Not true. Most born infants survive outside of the womb.Ability to survive outside of the womb.Until viability, the woman's rights trump the unborn child's.Does it ever occur to you nitwits that we're trying to protect the CHILD's rights?
Define viability.
Cool. An infant does not have the ability to survive outside the womb. Do we get to kill them too?
Faith in the Lord. You forgot that. I’ve been in combat. As the saying goes, “ there are no atheist in foxholes.”Sadly, you are right.Believing in God just requires common sense.There is no god, you fucking idiot. god is a creation by man in order to deal with his mortality.
Common sense or mass delusion. Take your pick.
The only excuses allowed for an abortion that late is if the unborn child is dying or facing lethal abnormalities or if the mother's life is in danger.So they survive “outside” the womb as “infants.” Then what were they in the ninth month inside the womb?Not true. Most born infants survive outside of the womb.Ability to survive outside of the womb.Until viability, the woman's rights trump the unborn child's.
Define viability.
Cool. An infant does not have the ability to survive outside the womb. Do we get to kill them too?
Not in “blue states” like The People’s Republic of California, The People’s Republic of Illinois, The People’s Republic of New York, The People’s Very Communist Republic of Massachusetts.The only excuses allowed for an abortion that late is if the unborn child is dying or facing lethal abnormalities or if the mother's life is in danger.So they survive “outside” the womb as “infants.” Then what were they in the ninth month inside the womb?Not true. Most born infants survive outside of the womb.Ability to survive outside of the womb.Define viability.
Cool. An infant does not have the ability to survive outside the womb. Do we get to kill them too?
