Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are the one telling outright lies. ID involves a lot more than "God designed creation"
ALL CHRISTIANS believe that God designed creation. Very few Christians believe in ID
For example, ID involves the belief that natural selection doesn't happen.
Gee, I thought that ID simply required that intelligence be involved in guiding the process. Glad to know I am wrong.
What is intelligent design?
Intelligent design refers to a scientific research program as well as a community of scientists, philosophers and other scholars who seek evidence of design in nature. The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection. Through the study and analysis of a system's components, a design theorist is able to determine whether various natural structures are the product of chance, natural law, intelligent design, or some combination thereof. Such research is conducted by observing the types of information produced when intelligent agents act. Scientists then seek to find objects which have those same types of informational properties which we commonly know come from intelligence. Intelligent design has applied these scientific methods to detect design in irreducibly complex biological structures, the complex and specified information content in DNA, the life-sustaining physical architecture of the universe, and the geologically rapid origin of biological diversity in the fossil record during the Cambrian explosion approximately 530 million years ago.
Intelligent Design
Guess I am not the only one. It seems you are putting words in people's mouths again. You seem to have a habit of that.
That is neither creationism nor ID
Try again
Either you are saying that Richard Dawkins is a Christian, or you are saying he doesn't know what he is talking about. I am intersted in seeing which it is.
Richard Dawkins on Intelligent Alien Design
Dawkins appears quite serious about the possibility of Intelligent Alien Design and has mentioned it on a number of occasions. From a recent documentary called "Expelled" we have: BEN STEIN: What do you think is the possibility that Intelligent Design might turn out to be the answer to some issues in genetics or in evolution.
DAWKINS: Well, it could come about in the following way. It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved, probably by some kind of Darwinian means, probably to a very high level of technology, and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. Now, um, now that is a possibility, and an intriguing possibility. And I suppose it's possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer.
More evidence that you can't read and understand what you've read
Dawkins doesn't believe in Intelligent Design. He believes in "Intelligent Alien Design".
There's a difference, you boob
You are the one telling outright lies. ID involves a lot more than "God designed creation"
ALL CHRISTIANS believe that God designed creation. Very few Christians believe in ID
For example, ID involves the belief that natural selection doesn't happen.
Gee, I thought that ID simply required that intelligence be involved in guiding the process. Glad to know I am wrong.
Intelligent DesignWhat is intelligent design?
Intelligent design refers to a scientific research program as well as a community of scientists, philosophers and other scholars who seek evidence of design in nature. The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection. Through the study and analysis of a system's components, a design theorist is able to determine whether various natural structures are the product of chance, natural law, intelligent design, or some combination thereof. Such research is conducted by observing the types of information produced when intelligent agents act. Scientists then seek to find objects which have those same types of informational properties which we commonly know come from intelligence. Intelligent design has applied these scientific methods to detect design in irreducibly complex biological structures, the complex and specified information content in DNA, the life-sustaining physical architecture of the universe, and the geologically rapid origin of biological diversity in the fossil record during the Cambrian explosion approximately 530 million years ago.
Guess I am not the only one. It seems you are putting words in people's mouths again. You seem to have a habit of that.
If an intelligent non-supernatural being created life, then who or what created the intelligent non-supernatural being?
ID doesn't mention God because ID'ers are dishonest, but there is no other conclusion that can be reached from ID except that a supernatural intelligence created life.
Either you are saying that Richard Dawkins is a Christian, or you are saying he doesn't know what he is talking about. I am intersted in seeing which it is.
Richard Dawkins on Intelligent Alien Design
More evidence that you can't read and understand what you've read
Dawkins doesn't believe in Intelligent Design. He believes in "Intelligent Alien Design".
There's a difference, you boob
Intelligent design is the concept that an intelligence is responsible for the present evolution of life on Earth. Unless we have time travel and exist because of a paradox, ie, we went back and designed ourselves, any intelligent design would have to involve an alien.
Gee, I thought that ID simply required that intelligence be involved in guiding the process. Glad to know I am wrong.
Intelligent Design
Guess I am not the only one. It seems you are putting words in people's mouths again. You seem to have a habit of that.
If an intelligent non-supernatural being created life, then who or what created the intelligent non-supernatural being?
ID doesn't mention God because ID'ers are dishonest, but there is no other conclusion that can be reached from ID except that a supernatural intelligence created life.
Define supernatural, any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Since I already proved that the world's most obnoxious atheist has no real problem with the concept of intelligent design I want to know why you insist that the only possible interpretation of it is one that lets you mock it. Are you so insecure in your own beliefs that you the only way you can compensate is by insisting that no one else can have one that does not correspond to your definition of it?
Does that mean that anything not testable by the scientific method is not science? I hope not, because that would toss out astrophysics and geology.
LOL!!
Astrophysics and geology are subject to scientific experiments. Their concepts are testable.
Please explain how we can test conditions that we cannot replicate.
More evidence that you can't read and understand what you've read
Dawkins doesn't believe in Intelligent Design. He believes in "Intelligent Alien Design".
There's a difference, you boob
Intelligent design is the concept that an intelligence is responsible for the present evolution of life on Earth. Unless we have time travel and exist because of a paradox, ie, we went back and designed ourselves, any intelligent design would have to involve an alien.
And what intelligence created the alien?
If an intelligent non-supernatural being created life, then who or what created the intelligent non-supernatural being?
ID doesn't mention God because ID'ers are dishonest, but there is no other conclusion that can be reached from ID except that a supernatural intelligence created life.
Define supernatural, any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Since I already proved that the world's most obnoxious atheist has no real problem with the concept of intelligent design I want to know why you insist that the only possible interpretation of it is one that lets you mock it. Are you so insecure in your own beliefs that you the only way you can compensate is by insisting that no one else can have one that does not correspond to your definition of it?
You really don't know what the word "supernatural" means? You think "advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"?
LOL!!
Astrophysics and geology are subject to scientific experiments. Their concepts are testable.
Please explain how we can test conditions that we cannot replicate.
We can't but that doesn't matter. It is science if they say so.
That is neither creationism nor ID
Try again
Either you are saying that Richard Dawkins is a Christian, or you are saying he doesn't know what he is talking about. I am intersted in seeing which it is.
Dawkins appears quite serious about the possibility of Intelligent Alien Design and has mentioned it on a number of occasions. From a recent documentary called "Expelled" we have: BEN STEIN: What do you think is the possibility that Intelligent Design might turn out to be the answer to some issues in genetics or in evolution.
DAWKINS: Well, it could come about in the following way. It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved, probably by some kind of Darwinian means, probably to a very high level of technology, and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. Now, um, now that is a possibility, and an intriguing possibility. And I suppose it's possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer.
Richard Dawkins on Intelligent Alien Design
More evidence that you can't read and understand what you've read
Dawkins doesn't believe in Intelligent Design. He believes in "Intelligent Alien Design".
There's a difference, you boob
Please explain how we can test conditions that we cannot replicate.
We can't but that doesn't matter. It is science if they say so.
You are as bad as he is, insisting that only your interpretation of the world is valid. The only thing that is valid is truth, not what we think truth is.
We can't but that doesn't matter. It is science if they say so.
You are as bad as he is, insisting that only your interpretation of the world is valid. The only thing that is valid is truth, not what we think truth is.
And what are you suggesting "the truth" is?
You are as bad as he is, insisting that only your interpretation of the world is valid. The only thing that is valid is truth, not what we think truth is.
And what are you suggesting "the truth" is?
I am not suggesting it is anything, it simply is. Look at the world and study it for in the creation of God you find the best evidence of God. Psalm 19:1
LOL!!
Astrophysics and geology are subject to scientific experiments. Their concepts are testable.
Please explain how we can test conditions that we cannot replicate.
We can't but that doesn't matter. It is science if they say so.
And what are you suggesting "the truth" is?
I am not suggesting it is anything, it simply is. Look at the world and study it for in the creation of God you find the best evidence of God. Psalm 19:1
I'm not sure I understand your sentance there but if it is, then it should be able to be defined. If I say "water exists", then I should be able to define what it is.
Please explain how we can test conditions that we cannot replicate.
We can't but that doesn't matter. It is science if they say so.
Spoken like a true ignorant hick: someone who has no scientific education or understanding returning to the idea of "it I don't personally understand it, they're making it up". Here's a hint: scientists are smarter than you.
I am not suggesting it is anything, it simply is. Look at the world and study it for in the creation of God you find the best evidence of God. Psalm 19:1
I'm not sure I understand your sentance there but if it is, then it should be able to be defined. If I say "water exists", then I should be able to define what it is.
Can you? After all, water does exist. It just happens to be a lot easier to point to it and say water than to define it.
We can't but that doesn't matter. It is science if they say so.
Spoken like a true ignorant hick: someone who has no scientific education or understanding returning to the idea of "it I don't personally understand it, they're making it up". Here's a hint: scientists are smarter than you.
That's step 2. Once you make something up then claim that you are smarter and that's why no one understands you. Good one!
Spoken like a true ignorant hick: someone who has no scientific education or understanding returning to the idea of "it I don't personally understand it, they're making it up". Here's a hint: scientists are smarter than you.
That's step 2. Once you make something up then claim that you are smarter and that's why no one understands you. Good one!
If you studied science instead of religion you'd understand. Creationism belongs to religion class, not science class. Science needs evidence, not mythology.
