Crossing the unpresidential line: Media excoriates Clinton for banning a reporter from NH campaign

[CowboyTed]

The Bush administration sent a formal complaint to the IRish Embassy over this interview:



The interview, for which questions were approved by the White House press office, led to complaints by President Bush and his press officers for the "disrespectful" manner of Coleman, who interrupted the President several times, and the cancellation of a Laura Bush interview with RTÉ.

The White House complained to the Irish Embassy about the interview. An Irish government spokesman commented that "within Government, there was an acknowledgment that the interview lacked respect." RTÉ, however, stated it "totally stands over the conduct of the interview and Carole's journalism."[2]

Coleman stated that she resorted to interrupting the President because she was afraid his stock answers would eat up all time she had for interview: "It was a filibuster of sorts. If I didn’t challenge him, the interview would be a wasted opportunity".[3] She also said she was surprised by the White House staff's reaction to the interview, but that she had no regrets:

So look who started it... Should get that girl back.

 

[Obiwan]

RW "journalist". lol

Here Are The 5 Most Liberal And Conservative Media Twitter Feeds - Business Insider

#3 Most Liberal - Mother Jones

LW "Journalists" LOL!!!

It's actually more liberal than these!!!

#4 Most Liberal - Salon

And Now at #5 Most Liberal - Daily Kos

 

[whitehall]

She was able to ban the free press because she held her opening campaign speech on a freaking island which was the least accessible spot in the Big Apple.

 

[francoHFW]

RW "journalist". lol

LOL. So, what do you guys call the people on the Left side of the media?

Journalists and fact checkers of RW scum propagandists. And a lot of mealy mouth cowards paid by giant corps to gin up ratings with controversy, reporting RW BS as if it were respectable ...

 

[TemplarKormac]

The Bush administration sent a formal complaint to the IRish Embassy over this interview:



The interview, for which questions were approved by the White House press office, led to complaints by President Bush and his press officers for the "disrespectful" manner of Coleman, who interrupted the President several times, and the cancellation of a Laura Bush interview with RTÉ.

The White House complained to the Irish Embassy about the interview. An Irish government spokesman commented that "within Government, there was an acknowledgment that the interview lacked respect." RTÉ, however, stated it "totally stands over the conduct of the interview and Carole's journalism."[2]

Coleman stated that she resorted to interrupting the President because she was afraid his stock answers would eat up all time she had for interview: "It was a filibuster of sorts. If I didn’t challenge him, the interview would be a wasted opportunity".[3] She also said she was surprised by the White House staff's reaction to the interview, but that she had no regrets:

So look who started it... Should get that girl back.

Yeah, so its wrong no matter who does it. Take that "Bush did it" garbage out of here.

 

[francoHFW]

RW "journalist". lol

Here Are The 5 Most Liberal And Conservative Media Twitter Feeds - Business Insider

#3 Most Liberal - Mother Jones

LW "Journalists" LOL!!!

It's actually more liberal than these!!!

#4 Most Liberal - Salon

And Now at #5 Most Liberal - Daily Kos

Fact checkers and journalists- NOT lying scum like this guy. You wouldn't understand, hater dupe. The FACTS on this ass are still facts, functional moron.

 

[blackhawk]

The only thing they accomplished with this is reenforcing even more the perception that she is an elitist who thinks there should a different set of rules for her.

 

[francoHFW]

The Bush administration sent a formal complaint to the IRish Embassy over this interview:



The interview, for which questions were approved by the White House press office, led to complaints by President Bush and his press officers for the "disrespectful" manner of Coleman, who interrupted the President several times, and the cancellation of a Laura Bush interview with RTÉ.

The White House complained to the Irish Embassy about the interview. An Irish government spokesman commented that "within Government, there was an acknowledgment that the interview lacked respect." RTÉ, however, stated it "totally stands over the conduct of the interview and Carole's journalism."[2]

Coleman stated that she resorted to interrupting the President because she was afraid his stock answers would eat up all time she had for interview: "It was a filibuster of sorts. If I didn’t challenge him, the interview would be a wasted opportunity".[3] She also said she was surprised by the White House staff's reaction to the interview, but that she had no regrets:

So look who started it... Should get that girl back.

Yeah, so its wrong no matter who does it. Take that "Bush did it" garbage out of here.

It's important to educate the ignorant dupes that these OPs are not new OR NEWS.

 

[Jackson]

When are people going to get it through their heads...Hillary is above rules and above the law! You haven't figured that out yet? Rules and laws are for peons... Not someone as wealthy and elitist as her.

 

[Liffy]

Yep. Hillary is now picking and choosing whom can cover her campaign. She banned Daily Mail and designated print pool reporter David Martosko from covering her campaign because he dared criticize her campaign's lack of transparency. And for that, every media giant in the US descended on her campaign like a pack of angry wolves. The 14 organizations that made up Clinton’s traveling pool at her New Hampshire campaign sent out a statement today:

“We would like to see all campaign events open to the public and the full press corps, but when that is not possible we have agreed to pool coverage. We haven't yet had a clear explanation about why the pool reporter for today's events was denied access. But any attempt by the campaign to dictate who is in the pool is unacceptable. The pool is open to any print organization willing to take part."

Now, a print pool works something like this: rather than send fifty reporters from fifty news outlets to a given event, press organizations typically set up “pools” of reporters who take turns attending events and filing pool reports of what happened. Essentially it is a chosen rotation of reporters as decided on by the pool of press reporters.

Such blatant disregard for freedom of the press is...not surprising coming from Hillary Clinton. Just imagine what will happen if she wins the White House. Freedom of the press is a core premise set forth by the 1st Amendment. It is not up to Hillary and her minions to dictate whom and what covers her campaign.

The Clinton campaign denied access to the designated print pool reporter in New Hampshire this morning.

David Martosko of DailyMail.com was told by Hillary for New Hampshire staffer Meredith Thatcher that he was not approved for Monday's pooled events.

When Martosko asked Thatcher to phone her boss, Harrell Kirstein, he was again told that he had not been approved by the campaign.

Martosko pressed further and asked Thatcher if he was being prohibited from getting on either of the pool vans, to which she replied; 'I'm afraid that's right.'

When he asked why, she responded; 'All I know is what Harrell has told me. I got an email saying the print pooler would be changed for today. Sorry.'

Hillary Clinton campaign denies access to Daily Mail s political editor Daily Mail Online

So what? What does daily mail have to say/ask that the other media outlets wont

 

[Jackson]

Yep. Hillary is now picking and choosing whom can cover her campaign. She banned Daily Mail and designated print pool reporter David Martosko from covering her campaign because he dared criticize her campaign's lack of transparency. And for that, every media giant in the US descended on her campaign like a pack of angry wolves. The 14 organizations that made up Clinton’s traveling pool at her New Hampshire campaign sent out a statement today:

“We would like to see all campaign events open to the public and the full press corps, but when that is not possible we have agreed to pool coverage. We haven't yet had a clear explanation about why the pool reporter for today's events was denied access. But any attempt by the campaign to dictate who is in the pool is unacceptable. The pool is open to any print organization willing to take part."

Now, a print pool works something like this: rather than send fifty reporters from fifty news outlets to a given event, press organizations typically set up “pools” of reporters who take turns attending events and filing pool reports of what happened. Essentially it is a chosen rotation of reporters as decided on by the pool of press reporters.

Such blatant disregard for freedom of the press is...not surprising coming from Hillary Clinton. Just imagine what will happen if she wins the White House. Freedom of the press is a core premise set forth by the 1st Amendment. It is not up to Hillary and her minions to dictate whom and what covers her campaign.

The Clinton campaign denied access to the designated print pool reporter in New Hampshire this morning.

David Martosko of DailyMail.com was told by Hillary for New Hampshire staffer Meredith Thatcher that he was not approved for Monday's pooled events.

When Martosko asked Thatcher to phone her boss, Harrell Kirstein, he was again told that he had not been approved by the campaign.

Martosko pressed further and asked Thatcher if he was being prohibited from getting on either of the pool vans, to which she replied; 'I'm afraid that's right.'

When he asked why, she responded; 'All I know is what Harrell has told me. I got an email saying the print pooler would be changed for today. Sorry.'

Hillary Clinton campaign denies access to Daily Mail s political editor Daily Mail Online

So what? What does daily mail have to say/ask that the other media outlets wont

Good question!

 

[Obiwan]

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=6959

www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org Date: 6/15/2015 10:36:13 PM
MOTHER JONES MAGAZINE (MJM)
222 Sutter St. - Suite 600
San Francisco, CA
94108


Phone 415) 321-1700
URL :Mother Jones Smart Fearless Journalism

• Magazine named for socialist labor organizer Mary Harris "Mother" Jones
• Does investigative reporting that mostly targets corporations, capitalists, private property, and Republican officeholders

Mother Jones is a bimonthly magazine and websitenamed for socialist "union organizer" Mary Harris "Mother" Jones (1830-1930). It prides itself on continuing her pursuit of socialist "social justice" by doing investigative reporting that mostly targets corporations, capitalists, private property, and Republican political officeholders.

Well-known leftist editors and writers on this magazine's masthead include Todd Gitlin, Molly Ivins, Bill McKibben, Richard Rodriguez, William Saletan, Orville Schell, Eric Schlosser, and Amy Wilentz.

Mother Jones began taking shape in 1974 when the Watergate scandal was demonstrating how investigative reporting could weaken and oust a Republican President elected by an overwhelming majority. Its genesis was a failed attempt to save the reigning radical magazine of the day, Ramparts.Ramparts editor David Horowitz had put together a team consisting of labor journalist Paul Jacobs, leftist entrepreneur Richard Parker, and leftist millionaire Adam Hochschild to take over Rampartsfrom its retiring editors, Horowitz and Peter Collier. When the trio had a falling out with Rampartsstaffers, they elected to leave and create their own magazine, which became Mother Jones.

The magazine was launched in February 1976.

Mother Jones focuses heavily on the evils of capitalism and the alleged desirability of government control over business. On a global level, the magazine reserves its harshest condemnations for the U.S. and Israel, and is staunchly supportive of Marxist regimes like Fidel Castro's Cuba.

In 1986 Mother Jones hired a young Michigan underground newspaper founder named Michael Moore as its Editor. Five months later, Moore was fired after he rejected an article by socialist Paul Berman, a piece that Moore claimed was "unfairly critical" of the Sandinista dictatorship in Nicaragua. Moore sued, claiming wrongful dismissal. He pocketed $58,000 in an out-of-court settlement of his lawsuit, then used the money to produce his first film documentary, "Roger and Me."

The Mother Jones magazine and website are owned by the non-profit, tax-exempt Foundation for National Progress (FNP), a 501(c)(3) "public-interest media organization." FNP has been supported by other left-leaning foundations, among them the Arca Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the Irving Harris Foundation, the Joyce Foundation, Kansas City Community Foundation, the Lannan Foundation, the Park Foundation, the Bill Moyers-run Schumann Center for Media and Democracy, and the Streisand Foundation. In 2000, the magazine, website and Foundation took in (from grants, donations, subscriptions, newsstand sales, rental of its mailing lists. and advertising) nearly $6 million. From 2002 to 2004, FNP received $410,000 in foundation grants.

 

[Liffy]

Why? Why!!??

 

[francoHFW]

The Bush administration sent a formal complaint to the IRish Embassy over this interview:



The interview, for which questions were approved by the White House press office, led to complaints by President Bush and his press officers for the "disrespectful" manner of Coleman, who interrupted the President several times, and the cancellation of a Laura Bush interview with RTÉ.

The White House complained to the Irish Embassy about the interview. An Irish government spokesman commented that "within Government, there was an acknowledgment that the interview lacked respect." RTÉ, however, stated it "totally stands over the conduct of the interview and Carole's journalism."[2]

Coleman stated that she resorted to interrupting the President because she was afraid his stock answers would eat up all time she had for interview: "It was a filibuster of sorts. If I didn’t challenge him, the interview would be a wasted opportunity".[3] She also said she was surprised by the White House staff's reaction to the interview, but that she had no regrets:

So look who started it... Should get that girl back.

Yeah, so its wrong no matter who does it. Take that "Bush did it" garbage out of here.

BS> Booosh couldn't handle being interrupted by an Irish lassie? Did you check O'Really with Obama? NO PROBLEM. But having this lying hater along is too much. Feq him and his bs hate gotcha bs and you idiot hater dupes.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Daily Mail is barely a newspaper in the UK... It is complete trash...

That still doesn't change what she did, now does it?

 

[tinydancer]

Screw the a-hole RW propagandist liar. Not a real reporter. lol. The whole putrid Pub prpaganda machine is a disgrace, and this epitome of it deserves no respect from this campaign. No laws broken, Pubs do it all the time, hater dupes.

Fool. When the campaign refused to allow the designated pool reporter in this case the DM reporter, they effectively fucked over all the media involved in the pool.

Clinton doesn't get to pick and choose. The pool does.

And they aren't happy about it. They're pissed right off.

 

[Liffy]

Screw the a-hole RW propagandist liar. Not a real reporter. lol. The whole putrid Pub prpaganda machine is a disgrace, and this epitome of it deserves no respect from this campaign. No laws broken, Pubs do it all the time, hater dupes.

Fool. When the campaign refused to allow the designated pool reporter in this case the DM reporter, they effectively fucked over all the media involved in the pool.

Clinton doesn't get to pick and choose. The pool does.

And they aren't happy about it. They're pissed right off.

So what's gonna happen now huh?

 

[Jackson]

Screw the a-hole RW propagandist liar. Not a real reporter. lol. The whole putrid Pub prpaganda machine is a disgrace, and this epitome of it deserves no respect from this campaign. No laws broken, Pubs do it all the time, hater dupes.

Fool. When the campaign refused to allow the designated pool reporter in this case the DM reporter, they effectively fucked over all the media involved in the pool.

Clinton doesn't get to pick and choose. The pool does.

And they aren't happy about it. They're pissed right off.

So what's gonna happen now huh?

I hope this makes the main stream media and it makes her look like a damn fool she is.

 

[Liffy]

Screw the a-hole RW propagandist liar. Not a real reporter. lol. The whole putrid Pub prpaganda machine is a disgrace, and this epitome of it deserves no respect from this campaign. No laws broken, Pubs do it all the time, hater dupes.

Fool. When the campaign refused to allow the designated pool reporter in this case the DM reporter, they effectively fucked over all the media involved in the pool.

Clinton doesn't get to pick and choose. The pool does.

And they aren't happy about it. They're pissed right off.

So what's gonna happen now huh?

I hope this makes the main stream media and it makes her look like a damn fool she is.

I just hope she dies...

 

[Kosh]

The Bush administration sent a formal complaint to the IRish Embassy over this interview:



The interview, for which questions were approved by the White House press office, led to complaints by President Bush and his press officers for the "disrespectful" manner of Coleman, who interrupted the President several times, and the cancellation of a Laura Bush interview with RTÉ.

The White House complained to the Irish Embassy about the interview. An Irish government spokesman commented that "within Government, there was an acknowledgment that the interview lacked respect." RTÉ, however, stated it "totally stands over the conduct of the interview and Carole's journalism."[2]

Coleman stated that she resorted to interrupting the President because she was afraid his stock answers would eat up all time she had for interview: "It was a filibuster of sorts. If I didn’t challenge him, the interview would be a wasted opportunity".[3] She also said she was surprised by the White House staff's reaction to the interview, but that she had no regrets:

So look who started it... Should get that girl back.

See how the far left goes back to Bush even when Obama tried to ban Fox from the white house..