Liability
Locked Account.
According to the press conference FBI barged in and shot him. I guess you could say negotiations failed.
I'd say they ended beautifully.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to the press conference FBI barged in and shot him. I guess you could say negotiations failed.
But they observed him holding a gun first....swut I herd.According to the press conference FBI barged in and shot him. I guess you could say negotiations failed.
If I just had a picture of the entrance....
Oh please. If they stormed in he could have been holding an ice cream cone and they'd say it was a gun.
"FBI Special Agent in Charge Steve Richardson at the scene said negotiations had broken down with the child's abductor and the kidnapper was "observed holding a gun."
Believing the child to be in imminent danger, an FBI team entered the bunker at 3:12 p.m. CT (4:12 p.m. ET) and rescued the boy, Richardson said, adding that the hostage-taker is dead."
Officials: Hostage standoff ends with child rescued, kidnapper dead - CNN.com
I read they threw in a stun grenade. I've noticed that in high-profile hostage situations -- the terrible Palcinski rampage in Baltimore several years ago was one -- they don't fool around, they just shoot them. Works for me: this guy needed shooting.
I'm glad to see the FBI is capable of doing something right. I never thought they'd get the kid out alive.
I don't think it matters if he was holding a gun or not. He held someone, a child, hostage for 7 days and refused to give that hostage up safely. The hostage was in danger every minute of every day. They don't need to wait until this guy isn't holding a gun against the police: in the interest of the hostage, they should be able to shoot and kill the hostage taker to save the child.But they observed him holding a gun first....swut I herd.According to the press conference FBI barged in and shot him. I guess you could say negotiations failed.
If I just had a picture of the entrance....
Oh please. If they stormed in he could have been holding an ice cream cone and they'd say it was a gun.
Not sure what this guy was trying to accomplish, but I think he knew he was a dead man. I also don't think he had any intention of killing or harming the kid. I imagine when they went in after him, he was an easy take down. Most likely it's what he wanted anyway. The good thing is it's over and the kid is safe, and we don't have to hear about this guy's trial.
"He was observed holding a gun" .... must have been line of sight or a CCTV insert.
Only took seven days too long but hey let's slap some backs.
However it was done, it was the best possible outcome.
It would have been better if the kid did not have to witness more death.
The cops were not able to see that outcome because the Gun Nutter insisted it end with guns
Still, very few details are coming out
My best guess was some type of flash grenade followed by shooting the kidnapper
Hope the kid is OK, he has been through quite an ordeal
Only took seven days too long but hey let's slap some backs.
It would have been nicer and better if it had happened much sooner, but seriously ---
MAYBE they felt obliged to try to do it without risking even the life of the nutjob.
Still, very few details are coming out
My best guess was some type of flash grenade followed by shooting the kidnapper
Hope the kid is OK, he has been through quite an ordeal
Still, very few details are coming out
My best guess was some type of flash grenade followed by shooting the kidnapper
Hope the kid is OK, he has been through quite an ordeal
hopefully he just had a heartattack and died