Death toll of Omicron

[Bob Blaylock]

I do not believe shit about the vax, that's why I haven't been jabbed.

I believe in the VAX, as a computer platform that was very good, and probably well ahead of its time, in the 1970s and into the 1980s. But it's been obsolete for a very long time, and the company that made it no longer really exists, other than as some outdated bits of intellectual property now owned by Hewlett Packard, which stopped making the last of the VAX line more than a decade and a half ago.

It's foolish that so many now look to an obsolete computer platform for a solution to a fake “pandemic” that was created and exploited by corrupt politicians. The only real solution that will ever exist to the COVID-1984 crisis will be in removing from office, as many as possible of the criminal politicians who have had a hand in creating, promoting, and exploiting it, and in violently lynching some of them as an example to any other politicians who might ever think of trying to pull this sort of bullshit again. As long as we allow criminal politicians to keep getting away with this shit, the COVID-1984 crisis will never end.

This kind of shit is what the Second Amendment is for.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

What is the death total for Omicron? 1 possible in Texas but it looks like it's BS.

There is also one case in the UK, which equally appears to be bullshit.

This leaves the verifiable count as…

0 deaths Omicron

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Good fucking grief! People are dying from COVID!! What do you propose we do??

People are dying from the OVEREACTION TO COVID-1984.

Virus-linked hunger tied to 10,000 child deaths each month

HOUNDE, Burkina Faso (AP) — The lean season is coming for Burkina Faso’s children. And this time, the long wait for the harvest is bringing a hunger more ferocious than most have ever known.

apnews.com

Note that the “virus-linked hunger” is not actually being caused by the virus itself. It is being caused by supply-chain and economic issues, resulting from the drastic and unwarranted overreactions to the virus.

Far more harm is being caused to individuals and societies, far more death, far more human suffering; by the measures being enacted under the fraudulent guise of “protecting” us from the virus, than the virus itself could ever possibly cause directly.

 

[EvMetro]

This is the only thread we need. Stop running from the truth

Wrong! This thread is specifically for documenting the Omicron death toll. That's it.

Got any new omicron deaths to post?

 

[EvMetro]

Only one we know of so far.

I'm disputing the one, until we can verify that it was "from" omicron vs "with" omicron.

 

[EvMetro]

Any new deaths yet?

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 578663Spare me the Gish gallop crap.
And you can climb down from your high horse. You do not get to claim the moral high ground when your lies and stupidity contributes to the loos of life. And you can take your oxymoron bullshiit and stick it where the sun don't shine. You do not get to decide who is a patriot and who is not. And if you want to discuss patriotism start a thread on it. Here you are just trolling.

No vulgarity .....no matter how totally I've destroyed your worldview, and exposed how uneducated you are.



A patriot is one who subscribes to American values and heritage.

You don't.....so 'patriot' is far from applicable to you or any progressive.



1. The Democrats are the European Party, the party of Obey.

We’re the other side, the personal liberty, individualism, the right to make personal decisions.


2. Let's remember what 'Progressive' means: it is the view of Rousseau
'Any who deny the general will (government's doctrines) should be treated like a rabid beast and be put to death.
That's 'Progressive.

3. It is the view of Hegel:
"...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.'" Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144)

a. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”(Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).
That's Progressive

4. It is the view of Hitler
Fact is, the Nazis learned eugenics from the American Progressives...

"Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws....
Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics

Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his“The Case for Sterilization.”
(Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)

German race science stood on American progressive’s shoulders.

5. And Progressives, Democrats, stand for the same aims as the Communist Party did.
Democrats, Liberals, Progressives have saddled America with cultural Marxism.




So, yes....based on education, knowledge, and reality, I do get 'the moral high ground,' and state that you are far, far from a patriot.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

We’re the other side, the personal liberty, individualism, the right to make personal decisions.

You mean like a woman's reproductive rights, or who consenting adults are allowed to marry?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You mean like a woman's reproductive rights, or who consenting adults are allowed to marry?

"Reproductive rights"????

Killing a separate and unique human being is hardly a 'right' in any civilized society.


Here's more of the education you are so sorely lacking, you dunce:


The unborn human receiving sustenance from its mother, is, nonetheless, a separate and distinct human being.

There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:

As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

Part of the Mother’s Body?

The slogan,

www.abort73.com

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?





Amazing how you don't understand that you've been trained to become a Nazi.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

"Reproductive rights"????

Killing a separate and unique human being is hardly a 'right' in any civilized society.


Here's more of the education you are so sorely lacking, you dunce:


The unborn human receiving sustenance from its mother, is, nonetheless, a separate and distinct human being.

There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:

As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

Part of the Mother’s Body?

The slogan,

www.abort73.com

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?





Amazing how you don't understand that you've been trained to become a Nazi.

I am not dealing with you insane Gish Gallop , off topic rants

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am not dealing with you insane Gish Gallop , off topic rants

You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.

I am not running or hiding. I just have better things to do than deal with insanity

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am not running or hiding. I just have better things to do than deal with insanity

Clearly, learning isn't one of those things.

 

[EvMetro]

off topic rants

Speaking of this, do you have some omicron deaths to post?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I am not running or hiding. I just have better things to do than deal with insanity

You cannot run away from it.

Wherever you go, there you are.

 

[EvMetro]

I am not running or hiding. I just have better things to do than deal with insanity

What's the latest omicron death toll number?

 

[EvMetro]

I wonder how many more people need to die from omicron before people realize how much they need vaccines to save them from this?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I am not dealing with you insane Gish Gallop , off topic rants

It's all plagiarized regurgitation anyway.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I wonder how many more people need to die from omicron before people realize how much they need vaccines to save them from this?

Go into a hospital with a full ICU and ER and ask them.

Please take video of your ass getting beaten to a pulp by the nurses.