Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,376
- 57,108
- Thread starter
- #41
You really have gone off the rails, Buttercup.Glad to see you finally admit he is a Dimwinger.Let’s recap:Sorry Sport, it’s not a fallacy when I proved it. And in the process proved you to be a lying sack of shit.Looks like my “composition fallacy” was actually “composition fact”, huh Pogo
Nape. Fallacies are fallacies, period. Yours still stands there, rotting.
You "proved" NOTHING. You propped up a Composition Fallacy that you swallowed like so much bait from Dimbart. Now Dimbart KNOWS they put up a Composition Fallacy and figured anybody stupid enough to be reading Dimbart would swallow it hook line and sinker. And they were right because ---- here you are.
I posted a link in the OP identifying him as a Dimwinger.
You: He isn’t a Dimwinger.
Me: Here is a second link proving he is a Dimwinger.
You: Nuh-uh.
I would say I “proved” you to be a lying sack of shit moron, but we all already knew that.
”Nuh-uh” isn’t a debate skill, nor an argument. My multiple links prove you are a liar, an idiot, or both. I’m voting Both.
I didn't say he "isn't" anything. I said you posted a Composition Fallacy, by alleging a political party as a causation. You cannot prove that and there is no such thing as a link to it. Ergo, Composition Fallacy.
Aaaaand STILL no answer.
Not that there is one. That's why it's a fallacy, isn't it.
Also still waiting on the mayor's shoe size, astrological sign and what color his car is. I understand they're all causative factors as well.