- Nov 30, 2019
- 27,241
- 23,741
A small minority. Not a majority.Even those who support repealing the 2nd Amendment?
BTW, just out of curiosity, do you know the process for repealing an amendment to The Constitution?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A small minority. Not a majority.Even those who support repealing the 2nd Amendment?
No one is proposing giving up your guns...I mean, no one. They're looking for a ban on AR-15's..but that isn't gonna happen. Nor will simply raising the minimum age you can buy one to.
And again, let me point out the EXACT reasons you don't quote alt-right media. They lie to you. To keep people like you in a constant state of outrage. If you took the time to read through the SPLC link, you'll find that none of what you've copied here is the truth. However, this paragraph is taken directly from the link. And this is no surprise to anyone who has paid attention to the rise of the alt-right over the last decade plus.
"Those on the right appear more likely to approve of political violence. When asked whether they believed that “some violence might be necessary to protect the country from radical extremists,” 41% of Republicans agreed, compared to 34% of Democrats and 29% of independents. Over half of Republicans say the country seems headed toward a civil war in the near future, compared to 39% of Democrats".
So, your statement:A small minority. Not a majority.
Of course I do. It won't ever happen. But that's irrelevant to the point.BTW, just out of curiosity, do you know the process for repealing an amendment to The Constitution?
A small minority. Not a majority.
BTW, just out of curiosity, do you know the process for repealing an amendment to The Constitution?
None of which would have happened. It's a great campaign slogan. But that's all it is/was/will be until long after you and I are compost.You mean like hilary, the last democrat party candidate who supported Australian style gun banning and confiscation?
Clinton also didn't mention that the buyback was not optional – as it has been in some American cities – but mandatory. Although Australian citizens were compensated for their firearms (by increasing the tax on Medicare!), the government effectively confiscated hundreds of thousands of handguns, rifles and shotguns.
Most Australian citizens who were not in the military or law enforcement couldn't keep their guns even if they wanted to.
As far as "setting a different standard for gun purchases in the future," as Clinton put it, the Australian government stated that "personal protection" would not be regarded as a "genuine reason" for legally owning, possessing, or using a firearm – outlawing self defense as a reason to own a gun.
Present legitimate links.Yes...the leadership of the democrat party from obama, biden, pelosi to schumer want to ban and confiscate guns.....
You can lie all day long....but you can't lie to us.....sell your crap to biden voters....
Beto......
And another example of how your "no one" claim is false.Again...ANOTHER politician spouting campaign slogans. And one who had no legitimate shot at being President.
Well, when they show up at your door, let me know.And another example of how your "no one" claim is false.
A funny way to admit you were wrong, but OK.Well, when they show up at your door, let me know.
Until then, I return you to your regularly scheduled outrage.
No one is proposing giving up your guns...I mean, no one. They're looking for a ban on AR-15's..but that isn't gonna happen. Nor will simply raising the minimum age you can buy one to.
And again, let me point out the EXACT reasons you don't quote alt-right media. They lie to you. To keep people like you in a constant state of outrage. If you took the time to read through the SPLC link, you'll find that none of what you've copied here is the truth. However, this paragraph is taken directly from the link. And this is no surprise to anyone who has paid attention to the rise of the alt-right over the last decade plus.
"Those on the right appear more likely to approve of political violence. When asked whether they believed that “some violence might be necessary to protect the country from radical extremists,” 41% of Republicans agreed, compared to 34% of Democrats and 29% of independents. Over half of Republicans say the country seems headed toward a civil war in the near future, compared to 39% of Democrats".
Interesting take, but gleaned form PJ Media as to the subject of the poll, as a whole. You never struck me as a Southern Poverty Law Center, 2nd referencing kind of guy. The actual poll report breaks down like this:And here we have a poll of Americans on political assassination.....no surprise here...we are seeing democrats becoming more and more violent...
According to a recently released poll, nearly half of male Democrats under the age of 50 (44 %) say it’s acceptable to assassinate a politician “who is harming the country or our democracy,” the highest percentage of any age/gender/party demographic.
And here we have a poll of Americans on political assassination.....no surprise here...we are seeing democrats becoming more and more violent...
According to a recently released poll, nearly half of male Democrats under the age of 50 (44 %) say it’s acceptable to assassinate a politician “who is harming the country or our democracy,” the highest percentage of any age/gender/party demographic.
Takes one to know one.
Again, the vitriol, bile, and violence occurs primarily on the right.
Deal with it.