Democrats Create Jobs. Trump Incites Violence To Mobs

[Norman]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Brilliant satire!!!

Wait, you are serious? I was hoping for satire and instead got the regular leftist projection thread of the week.

 

[Billy_Bob]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

WE now have more jobs than we do people on unemployment or out of the work force. So what would we expect to see happen to job growth?

Gawd you are a bunch of fucking idiots.. It cant grow if there are not people to make it happen... This is also why wages are rising... All good things..

 

[OKTexas]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Thanks for proving maobama really sucked on the economy compared to most recent presidents.

.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Democrats have vowed to return unemployment levels to pre Trump levels and repeal all tax cuts.

 

[007]

#AngryDemocratMob
#DemocratsAreThePartyofTrash
#DemocratPropagandaWing

My favorite hash tags I use on twitter. People are turning on the democrats on droves. People that identified as democrats no longer want to be associated with the party. The crap they've pulled since President Trump was elected has just turned a lot of people off.

 

[Crepitus]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

What do you want Republicans to do pass a law to mandate you to apply for a job?

? Didn't they already?

I think you have to apply for jobs to get unemployment right?

 

[BluesLegend]

Show of hands, who wants a low paying shit Democrat job? Yeah nobody thought so.

 

[Crepitus]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

Oh oh, Craptoshit has come on line. Still trying to rewrite history also.

Fed officials discussed hiking rates to 'restrictive' level

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve officials last month debated how high they should raise interest rates to achieve their economic goals, with some arguing that they might need to lift rates to a level that would modestly restrain growth.

Why the FUCK would the Fed Reserve Bank need to restrain growth if the economy is slowing down? I have been around a while, and I see this bull shit all the time. The economy starts looking really great under Republican's policies, then the Fed Reserve Chair asshole(put their by a liberal prick, like Obama) decides that the roaring economy of the Republicans needs to be ground to a halt, so then the liberal dickwads like "Blinkie" Pelosi or Dick(the Turban) Durbin, can bitch and moan that a Republican caused the mess. Then the spineless moderates actually believe the leftnutjobs, and votes in the likes of Carter or Obumbler and we get fucked for the time in office with Malaise, until the next Republican gets in. Rinse and repeat. Until people learn history, then history will keep repeating itself...

You mean so far the economy looks good under Obama’s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry he’ll fuck it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it from Clinton. The economy has looked good under Obama‘s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry Trump will fuck it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it over from Clinton. And that’s with that Trump will do after he took it over from Obama.

Yea those cash for clunkers policy Obama had created millions of jobs .


.

One of President Obama's worse mistakes.

 

[deanrd]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

What do you want Republicans to do pass a law to mandate you to apply for a job?

Why would Republicans mandate that you applied for a job they aren’t qualified for. Republicans aren’t qualified for hardly anything. Except to bitch and moan about immigrants coming in and taking jobs that they could never do. Because Republicans have no education and they don’t know anything about anything.
That’s what happens when you think education is bad for America. You aren’t qualified for anything.

They know how to inflate a tire with out an air pump or air compressor..


Do you?


.

Wow. That sounds like a great career move. Yeah, let them run with that.

 

[deanrd]

Show of hands, who wants a low paying shit Democrat job? Yeah nobody thought so.

Low paying sh!t jobs the Democrats do. Like engineer and IT manager and other sh!t jobs that require an education.

 

[deanrd]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

Oh oh, Craptoshit has come on line. Still trying to rewrite history also.

Fed officials discussed hiking rates to 'restrictive' level

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve officials last month debated how high they should raise interest rates to achieve their economic goals, with some arguing that they might need to lift rates to a level that would modestly restrain growth.

Why the FUCK would the Fed Reserve Bank need to restrain growth if the economy is slowing down? I have been around a while, and I see this bull shit all the time. The economy starts looking really great under Republican's policies, then the Fed Reserve Chair asshole(put their by a liberal prick, like Obama) decides that the roaring economy of the Republicans needs to be ground to a halt, so then the liberal dickwads like "Blinkie" Pelosi or Dick(the Turban) Durbin, can bitch and moan that a Republican caused the mess. Then the spineless moderates actually believe the leftnutjobs, and votes in the likes of Carter or Obumbler and we get fucked for the time in office with Malaise, until the next Republican gets in. Rinse and repeat. Until people learn history, then history will keep repeating itself...

You mean so far the economy looks good under Obama’s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry he’ll fuck it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it from Clinton. The economy has looked good under Obama‘s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry Trump will fuck it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it over from Clinton. And that’s with that Trump will do after he took it over from Obama.

Yea those cash for clunkers policy Obama had created millions of jobs .


.

One of President Obama's worse mistakes.

Ever since Obama saved the car companies Republicans have thought that was a terrible mistake. Go figure.

 

[deanrd]

I know, right?

American tech brains choosing Canada

Why Tech Workers And Global Companies Are Choosing Canada

Tech workers are fleeing the United States to work in Canada

Would you want to work here with dangerous and violent Republicans in charge. They cheer assault and murder and lie about everything.

We have a record breaking 7.1 MILLION jobs available and Republicans are too stupid to do those jobs and they work to block companies from bringing in people to do those jobs. You can't force companies to hire stupid people if those stupid people aren't qualified and have no education.
Those companies aren't charities.

Make up your fucking minds...do you want big biz to prosper and expand or do you want American workers to be paid more?
Nobody trying to survive, build a future and improve their quality of life gives two fucks about how big Amazon can get...Personnel and applicant shortages are what drives wages up...we will never see an incline in wages so long as companies have a single file line of potential employees waiting at their door step. Whatever benefits good Americans the most is all that should matter...no?

Big biz has been prospering with record profits since Obama's second year in office. It's the American worker that hasn't. That hasn't changed under the grifter in chief, as big bix profits are even bigger, while the American workers wages are at 1970 levels.

Oh please. The economy was in the sh!thole. The car companies were about to go under. Banks were failing. And Obama turned all of that around.

Who doesn’t know that?

In fact, the same people that think the Republicans took down Bin Laden and think Obama was behind the mess after Katrina believe Obama was a lousy president for saving the car companies.

 

[Cellblock2429]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

/——/ The only jobs democRATs create are Gubmint leech jobs

 

[BluesLegend]

Show of hands, who wants a low paying shit Democrat job? Yeah nobody thought so.

Low paying sh!t jobs the Democrats do. Like engineer and IT manager and other sh!t jobs that require an education.

This is why you fools lose elections.

 

[skews13]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

/——/ The only jobs democRATs create are Gubmint leech jobs

 

[skews13]

Show of hands, who wants a low paying shit Democrat job? Yeah nobody thought so.

Low paying sh!t jobs the Democrats do. Like engineer and IT manager and other sh!t jobs that require an education.

This is why you fools lose elections.

Obama won his twice. With over 50% of the vote. Still has a 65% approval rating. What was dotards again?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Job growth is slowing now, and has been since tRump *took office*.

Oh oh, Craptoshit has come on line. Still trying to rewrite history also.

Fed officials discussed hiking rates to 'restrictive' level

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve officials last month debated how high they should raise interest rates to achieve their economic goals, with some arguing that they might need to lift rates to a level that would modestly restrain growth.

Why the FUCK would the Fed Reserve Bank need to restrain growth if the economy is slowing down? I have been around a while, and I see this bull shit all the time. The economy starts looking really great under Republican's policies, then the Fed Reserve Chair asshole(put their by a liberal prick, like Obama) decides that the roaring economy of the Republicans needs to be ground to a halt, so then the liberal dickwads like "Blinkie" Pelosi or Dick(the Turban) Durbin, can bitch and moan that a Republican caused the mess. Then the spineless moderates actually believe the leftnutjobs, and votes in the likes of Carter or Obumbler and we get fucked for the time in office with Malaise, until the next Republican gets in. Rinse and repeat. Until people learn history, then history will keep repeating itself...

You mean so far the economy looks good under Obama’s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry he’ll fuck it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it from Clinton. The economy has looked good under Obama‘s policies that Trump has continued with. But don’t worry Trump will fuck it up. Because that’s what Republicans do. That’s what they did under bush when he took it over from Clinton. And that’s with that Trump will do after he took it over from Obama.

Yea those cash for clunkers policy Obama had created millions of jobs .


.

One of President Obama's worse mistakes.

Ever since Obama saved the car companies Republicans have thought that was a terrible mistake. Go figure.

What what was wrong with the likes of BMW, Toyota, Nissan ? They were doing fine in the redstates


.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Show of hands, who wants a low paying shit Democrat job? Yeah nobody thought so.

Low paying sh!t jobs the Democrats do. Like engineer and IT manager and other sh!t jobs that require an education.

This is why you fools lose elections.

Obama won his twice. With over 50% of the vote. Still has a 65% approval rating. What was dotards again?

And how did he do that ?

 

[Wyatt earp]

"The president rolled out a new line for his campaign at a rally last night," Stephanie Ruhle said. "'Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs.' That's really catchy. Isn't it? Well here's the thing. For 'facts' sake, how do the two parties compare when it actually comes to job creation under each president?

"Blue lines representing our Democratic presidents; red lines for our Republicans," Stephanie Ruhle said. "And for each a dotted line that shows the average growth for Republicans and Democrats. On average, the rate of job growth was almost two and a half times faster under Democratic administrations than it was with Republican ones. That is according to figures crunched from the Department of Labor looking at the gross domestic product, you know it as GDP, another growth metric to measure the strength of the economy. We can also see substantially better performance under Democratic presidents. Again, our dotted red and blue lines paint a clear picture. On average real GDP has grown about 1.6 times faster with a Democrat in the White House than with a Republican according to figures crunched in the Department of Commerce.

The reality is that this is not new. In 2012 authors Bob Deitrick and Lew Goldfarb wrote the book "Bulls, Bears and the Ballot Box" that identified this reality. Adam Hartung pointed out the book's conclusions in his article "Want A Better Economy? History says Democrat!" in Forbes.

From this book loaded with statistical fact tidbits and comparative charts, here are just a few that caused me to realize that my long-term love affair with Milton Friedman's writing and recommended policies in "Free to Choose" were grounded in a theory I long admired, but that simply have proven to be myths when applied!

• Personal disposable income has grown nearly 6 times more under Democratic presidents
• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown 7 times more under Democratic presidents
• Corporate profits have grown over 16% more per year under Democratic presidents (they actually declined under Republicans by an average of 4.53%/year)
• Average annual compound return on the stock market has been 18 times greater under Democratic presidents (If you invested $100k for 40 years of Republican administrations you had $126k at the end, if you invested $100k for 40 years of Democrat administrations you had $3.9M at the end)
• Republican presidents added 2.5 times more to the national debt than Democratic presidents
• The two times the economy steered into the ditch (Great Depression and Great Recession) were during Republican, laissez-faire administrations

For Fact's Sake: Which party has historically created more jobs

/——/ The only jobs democRATs create are Gubmint leech jobs

Why so many jobs in the red states, still no answer troll??..

 

[BluesLegend]

Show of hands, who wants a low paying shit Democrat job? Yeah nobody thought so.

Low paying sh!t jobs the Democrats do. Like engineer and IT manager and other sh!t jobs that require an education.

This is why you fools lose elections.

Obama won his twice. With over 50% of the vote. Still has a 65% approval rating. What was dotards again?

Obama was so awesome you idiots lost the House, Senate, White House, and SCOTUS.