Democrats INSIST there is no voter fraud - again they lie

[deanrd]

Of course there’s voter fraud. That’s why so many Republicans went to prison. For voter fraud and election fraud.

 

[Redfish]

Of course there’s voter fraud. That’s why so many Republicans went to prison. For voter fraud and election fraud.

give us a list, names, states, and the crime they were convicted of-------------------OR, you could just STFU and stop posting lies on this message board.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Once again there is PROOF that Democrats commit election fraud. Not only do they do it, they do it often and without any remorse. They feel it is their "Right" to win by ANY means necessary.
Until the Right fully accepts that this is the domestic enemy we face, they will continue to gain ground.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges
Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

In Democrat states, I predict the Democrats (having no chance to win fairly) will resort to a level of election fraud never before seen in America. In places such as California, Washington and NewYork, and wherever they have their people in control they will brazenly manipulate the election to their favor.

If they couldn't impeach, take down by gun, or otherwise destroy Trump, they will use this as their last resort.

Should their corruption win the election, what comes next will be shocking.
Their goal is the dismantling of America as we knew it, installing Socialism and Globalism.

There is no significant, in person voter fraud. Most of the fraud uncovered has been committed by Republican officials.

 

[Redfish]

Once again there is PROOF that Democrats commit election fraud. Not only do they do it, they do it often and without any remorse. They feel it is their "Right" to win by ANY means necessary.
Until the Right fully accepts that this is the domestic enemy we face, they will continue to gain ground.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges
Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

In Democrat states, I predict the Democrats (having no chance to win fairly) will resort to a level of election fraud never before seen in America. In places such as California, Washington and NewYork, and wherever they have their people in control they will brazenly manipulate the election to their favor.

If they couldn't impeach, take down by gun, or otherwise destroy Trump, they will use this as their last resort.

Should their corruption win the election, what comes next will be shocking.
Their goal is the dismantling of America as we knew it, installing Socialism and Globalism.

There is no significant, in person voter fraud. Most of the fraud uncovered has been committed by Republican officials.

prove both of your claims. Simply making such statements does not prove anything except that you are a partisan hack.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Once again there is PROOF that Democrats commit election fraud. Not only do they do it, they do it often and without any remorse. They feel it is their "Right" to win by ANY means necessary.
Until the Right fully accepts that this is the domestic enemy we face, they will continue to gain ground.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges
Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

In Democrat states, I predict the Democrats (having no chance to win fairly) will resort to a level of election fraud never before seen in America. In places such as California, Washington and NewYork, and wherever they have their people in control they will brazenly manipulate the election to their favor.

If they couldn't impeach, take down by gun, or otherwise destroy Trump, they will use this as their last resort.

Should their corruption win the election, what comes next will be shocking.
Their goal is the dismantling of America as we knew it, installing Socialism and Globalism.

There is no significant, in person voter fraud. Most of the fraud uncovered has been committed by Republican officials.

prove both of your claims. Simply making such statements does not prove anything except that you are a partisan hack.

Hmm,no, I have no desire to convince you cultists of anything, nor am i demanding that you take my word for anything.

 

[Redfish]

Once again there is PROOF that Democrats commit election fraud. Not only do they do it, they do it often and without any remorse. They feel it is their "Right" to win by ANY means necessary.
Until the Right fully accepts that this is the domestic enemy we face, they will continue to gain ground.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges
Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

In Democrat states, I predict the Democrats (having no chance to win fairly) will resort to a level of election fraud never before seen in America. In places such as California, Washington and NewYork, and wherever they have their people in control they will brazenly manipulate the election to their favor.

If they couldn't impeach, take down by gun, or otherwise destroy Trump, they will use this as their last resort.

Should their corruption win the election, what comes next will be shocking.
Their goal is the dismantling of America as we knew it, installing Socialism and Globalism.

There is no significant, in person voter fraud. Most of the fraud uncovered has been committed by Republican officials.

prove both of your claims. Simply making such statements does not prove anything except that you are a partisan hack.

Hmm,no, I have no desire to convince you cultists of anything, nor am i demanding that you take my word for anything.

so you think its OK to make an unsupported claim, refuse to back it up, and then insult anyone who asks you to prove what you are saying--------------you are clearly a democrat of 2019

 

[LeftofLeft]

Once again there is PROOF that Democrats commit election fraud. Not only do they do it, they do it often and without any remorse. They feel it is their "Right" to win by ANY means necessary.
Until the Right fully accepts that this is the domestic enemy we face, they will continue to gain ground.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges
Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

In Democrat states, I predict the Democrats (having no chance to win fairly) will resort to a level of election fraud never before seen in America. In places such as California, Washington and NewYork, and wherever they have their people in control they will brazenly manipulate the election to their favor.

If they couldn't impeach, take down by gun, or otherwise destroy Trump, they will use this as their last resort.

Should their corruption win the election, what comes next will be shocking.
Their goal is the dismantling of America as we knew it, installing Socialism and Globalism.

Once again showing conservatives are unable to present actual VOTER FRAUD. People voting multiple times, voting under other people’s names

You know, things a voter ID might prevent

Instead you offer ELECTION FRAUD by officials doctoring results. An act that Democrats fight to prevent

based on this story they arent trying very hard to prevent it,,,

and the resistance to ID laws by dems proves there is something they wish to protect

So you actually read the story and agree it says NOTHING about voter fraud

Yes, there is something Democrats wish to protect. The right of people to vote without arbitrary restrictions based on no credible evidence

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

 

[rightwinger]

Once again showing conservatives are unable to present actual VOTER FRAUD. People voting multiple times, voting under other people’s names

You know, things a voter ID might prevent

Instead you offer ELECTION FRAUD by officials doctoring results. An act that Democrats fight to prevent

based on this story they arent trying very hard to prevent it,,,

and the resistance to ID laws by dems proves there is something they wish to protect

So you actually read the story and agree it says NOTHING about voter fraud

Yes, there is something Democrats wish to protect. The right of people to vote without arbitrary restrictions based on no credible evidence

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

A signature is virtually unenforceable as every signature would have to be validated against a known signature at the time the person was voting. That doesn't happen, which is exactly what the Democrats want. Providing proof at the time would undermind their ultimate goal, which is to obtain illegal votes. This all goes back to why they promote sanctuary cities and do not want to secure our border. It is obvious to anyone who isn't blinded.

When I vote in NJ the signature is right on the registration form. You have to sign on the spot

Easier to get a phony ID

 

[rightwinger]

Once again showing conservatives are unable to present actual VOTER FRAUD. People voting multiple times, voting under other people’s names

You know, things a voter ID might prevent

Instead you offer ELECTION FRAUD by officials doctoring results. An act that Democrats fight to prevent

based on this story they arent trying very hard to prevent it,,,

and the resistance to ID laws by dems proves there is something they wish to protect

So you actually read the story and agree it says NOTHING about voter fraud

Yes, there is something Democrats wish to protect. The right of people to vote without arbitrary restrictions based on no credible evidence

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

 

[22lcidw]

based on this story they arent trying very hard to prevent it,,,

and the resistance to ID laws by dems proves there is something they wish to protect

So you actually read the story and agree it says NOTHING about voter fraud

Yes, there is something Democrats wish to protect. The right of people to vote without arbitrary restrictions based on no credible evidence

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

You gotta be leaching on the government.

 

[rightwinger]

So you actually read the story and agree it says NOTHING about voter fraud

Yes, there is something Democrats wish to protect. The right of people to vote without arbitrary restrictions based on no credible evidence

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

You gotta be leaching on the government.

What is so hard about making sure people have ID

 

[LeftofLeft]

based on this story they arent trying very hard to prevent it,,,

and the resistance to ID laws by dems proves there is something they wish to protect

So you actually read the story and agree it says NOTHING about voter fraud

Yes, there is something Democrats wish to protect. The right of people to vote without arbitrary restrictions based on no credible evidence

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

Why would you be in favor of it any level if the current system works? If your numbers are correct, nearly 10 percent of the people have no access to some of the essentials we all depend on today. Why aren’t Democrats looking to close that gap and get IDs in these people’s hands?

 

[rightwinger]

So you actually read the story and agree it says NOTHING about voter fraud

Yes, there is something Democrats wish to protect. The right of people to vote without arbitrary restrictions based on no credible evidence

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

Why would you be in favor of it any level if the current system works? If your numbers are correct, nearly 10 percent of the people have no access to some of the essentials we all depend on today. Why aren’t Democrats looking to close that gap and get IDs in these people’s hands?

I’m cool with a national ID provided free to everyone
Link it to biometrics and DNA and use it for a drivers license, health insurance card, credit card, even to vote

 

[progressive hunter]

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

Why would you be in favor of it any level if the current system works? If your numbers are correct, nearly 10 percent of the people have no access to some of the essentials we all depend on today. Why aren’t Democrats looking to close that gap and get IDs in these people’s hands?

I’m cool with a national ID provided free to everyone
Link it to biometrics and DNA and use it for a drivers license, health insurance card, credit card, even to vote

as a communist of course youre in favor of that, but here in america we like our freedoms

why not just use the state ID already in play and not cost the government anymore money and us anymore of our freedoms''

 

[rightwinger]

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

Why would you be in favor of it any level if the current system works? If your numbers are correct, nearly 10 percent of the people have no access to some of the essentials we all depend on today. Why aren’t Democrats looking to close that gap and get IDs in these people’s hands?

I’m cool with a national ID provided free to everyone
Link it to biometrics and DNA and use it for a drivers license, health insurance card, credit card, even to vote

as a communist of course youre in favor of that, but here in america we like our freedoms

why not just use the state ID already in play and not cost the government anymore money and us anymore of our freedoms''

We are the UNITED STATES

Why have an ID that is only recognized in one state?
Why have an ID that only relates to driving?

 

[progressive hunter]

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

Why would you be in favor of it any level if the current system works? If your numbers are correct, nearly 10 percent of the people have no access to some of the essentials we all depend on today. Why aren’t Democrats looking to close that gap and get IDs in these people’s hands?

I’m cool with a national ID provided free to everyone
Link it to biometrics and DNA and use it for a drivers license, health insurance card, credit card, even to vote

as a communist of course youre in favor of that, but here in america we like our freedoms

why not just use the state ID already in play and not cost the government anymore money and us anymore of our freedoms''

We are the UNITED STATES

Why have an ID that is only recognized in one state?
Why have an ID that only relates to driving?

key word being STATES

I wonder if youve ever been right on anything

your DL/ ID is accepted in all states
not to mention you can only vote in the state you live in , so you argument is just stupid
and all states have a state ID that has nothing to do with driving,,,

 

[rightwinger]

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

Why would you be in favor of it any level if the current system works? If your numbers are correct, nearly 10 percent of the people have no access to some of the essentials we all depend on today. Why aren’t Democrats looking to close that gap and get IDs in these people’s hands?

I’m cool with a national ID provided free to everyone
Link it to biometrics and DNA and use it for a drivers license, health insurance card, credit card, even to vote

as a communist of course youre in favor of that, but here in america we like our freedoms

why not just use the state ID already in play and not cost the government anymore money and us anymore of our freedoms''

We are the UNITED STATES

Why have an ID that is only recognized in one state?
Why have an ID that only relates to driving?

key word being STATES

I wonder if youve ever been right on anything

your DL/ ID is accepted in all states
not to mention you can only vote in the state you live in , so you argument is just stupid
and all states have a state ID that has nothing to do with driving,,,

If you get pulled over in another state, they can’t verify your record or vehicle registration or outside warrants

Why not have a single ID that can be verified in all states?

What possible advantage is there to having 51 different driving licenses?

 

[progressive hunter]

Why would you be in favor of it any level if the current system works? If your numbers are correct, nearly 10 percent of the people have no access to some of the essentials we all depend on today. Why aren’t Democrats looking to close that gap and get IDs in these people’s hands?

I’m cool with a national ID provided free to everyone
Link it to biometrics and DNA and use it for a drivers license, health insurance card, credit card, even to vote

as a communist of course youre in favor of that, but here in america we like our freedoms

why not just use the state ID already in play and not cost the government anymore money and us anymore of our freedoms''

We are the UNITED STATES

Why have an ID that is only recognized in one state?
Why have an ID that only relates to driving?

key word being STATES

I wonder if youve ever been right on anything

your DL/ ID is accepted in all states
not to mention you can only vote in the state you live in , so you argument is just stupid
and all states have a state ID that has nothing to do with driving,,,

If you get pulled over in another state, they can’t verify your record or vehicle registration or outside warrants

Why not have a single ID that can be verified in all states?

What possible advantage is there to having 51 different driving licenses?

I have NEVER heard someone say their state ID was not accepted in another state without hesitation,,if you do I would like to see proof

we already have a perfect id system that can be verified in all states so why fuck that up, not to mention the added power that gives the feds,,,sounds like something a hitler or stalin would do,,

I would agree a state ID should be free but not a drivers licence

 

[rightwinger]

Still looking for evidence of rampant voter fraud

There is no serious cases of voter fraud that can be stopped with ID

 

[progressive hunter]

Still looking for evidence of rampant voter fraud

There is no serious cases of voter fraud that can be stopped with ID

just because you arent aware of it doesnt mean it isnt happening,,

and as we've seen you arent very bright,,,