Democrats INSIST there is no voter fraud - again they lie

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Once again there is PROOF that Democrats commit election fraud. Not only do they do it, they do it often and without any remorse. They feel it is their "Right" to win by ANY means necessary.
Until the Right fully accepts that this is the domestic enemy we face, they will continue to gain ground.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges
Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

In Democrat states, I predict the Democrats (having no chance to win fairly) will resort to a level of election fraud never before seen in America. In places such as California, Washington and NewYork, and wherever they have their people in control they will brazenly manipulate the election to their favor.

If they couldn't impeach, take down by gun, or otherwise destroy Trump, they will use this as their last resort.

Should their corruption win the election, what comes next will be shocking.
Their goal is the dismantling of America as we knew it, installing Socialism and Globalism.

Once again showing conservatives are unable to present actual VOTER FRAUD. People voting multiple times, voting under other people’s names

You know, things a voter ID might prevent

Instead you offer ELECTION FRAUD by officials doctoring results. An act that Democrats fight to prevent

OK, winger, tell us why you object to proving who you are before voting.

you have to prove ID to buy booze, board a plane, get welfare, get food stamps, rent an apartment, buy a house, get a drivers licence, buy a car, get a passport, claim asylum, pick up a prescription, et. al. Who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID?

what is different about voting? We all know the answer, will you admit it? Because voter ID prevents most voter fraud and dems know that without fraud they can never win. Will you be honest for just once and admit that?

No, he won't. He has no problem with cheating as long as it promotes the Democrat party.

Show me the stastistics that show the amount of voter fraught that a photo IS will stop.

Your Google broken?

 

[deanrd]

Happens in every Dem Tard Shit Hole City in The US.

These are just the fraudulent votes found in just one small DemNazi town.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

A Michigan official who earlier this year received an award from the state’s Democratic Party is now facing six felony charges for allegedly forging records and falsely marking absentee ballots as invalid during the 2018 election.

Sherikia Hawkins, 38, city clerk for the city of Southfield, was arrested Monday after the Oakland County Clerk’s office noticed discrepancies in voter counts while certifying absentee ballots from Southfield. State police investigated and found that records had been altered so that nearly 200 voter files were improperly listed as invalid.

Why are you always screaming? They would ban me for that.

 

[Redfish]

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

And the left is very much aware that the remaining 10% would very likely vote Democrat. Why is that? For starters, the least responsible folks in our country vote overwhelmingly for Democrats and those are the people most likely not to have some forrm of ID. Secondly, the added advantage is that without voter id, illegals would at least have the opportunity to circumvent the system. Democrats love the potential of that too.

Yes, those voters without a photo ID are disproportionately Democrat. That is why you assfucks want the photo ID. Thanks for proving my point

OK, one more time. who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID? no one on welfare, no one getting food stamps, no one buying booze, no one using an ER, no one claiming asylum, no one getting social security, no one driving, no one getting on a plane or train, no one registering to vote, So who exactly are these american voters who have no ID? give us some examples.

 

[Redfish]

Once again there is PROOF that Democrats commit election fraud. Not only do they do it, they do it often and without any remorse. They feel it is their "Right" to win by ANY means necessary.
Until the Right fully accepts that this is the domestic enemy we face, they will continue to gain ground.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges
Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

In Democrat states, I predict the Democrats (having no chance to win fairly) will resort to a level of election fraud never before seen in America. In places such as California, Washington and NewYork, and wherever they have their people in control they will brazenly manipulate the election to their favor.

If they couldn't impeach, take down by gun, or otherwise destroy Trump, they will use this as their last resort.

Should their corruption win the election, what comes next will be shocking.
Their goal is the dismantling of America as we knew it, installing Socialism and Globalism.

Once again showing conservatives are unable to present actual VOTER FRAUD. People voting multiple times, voting under other people’s names

You know, things a voter ID might prevent

Instead you offer ELECTION FRAUD by officials doctoring results. An act that Democrats fight to prevent

OK, winger, tell us why you object to proving who you are before voting.

you have to prove ID to buy booze, board a plane, get welfare, get food stamps, rent an apartment, buy a house, get a drivers licence, buy a car, get a passport, claim asylum, pick up a prescription, et. al. Who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID?

what is different about voting? We all know the answer, will you admit it? Because voter ID prevents most voter fraud and dems know that without fraud they can never win. Will you be honest for just once and admit that?

No, he won't. He has no problem with cheating as long as it promotes the Democrat party.

Show me the stastistics that show the amount of voter fraught that a photo IS will stop.

If its only one vote per precinct its too many. But not one of you lefties can tell us why you object to proving who you are before casting your vote. You had to prove who you are to get on the voter roles, so why not when you vote?

 

[LeftofLeft]

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

And the left is very much aware that the remaining 10% would very likely vote Democrat. Why is that? For starters, the least responsible folks in our country vote overwhelmingly for Democrats and those are the people most likely not to have some forrm of ID. Secondly, the added advantage is that without voter id, illegals would at least have the opportunity to circumvent the system. Democrats love the potential of that too.

Yes, those voters without a photo ID are disproportionately Democrat. That is why you assfucks want the photo ID. Thanks for proving my point

OK, one more time. who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID? no one on welfare, no one getting food stamps, no one buying booze, no one using an ER, no one claiming asylum, no one getting social security, no one driving, no one getting on a plane or train, no one registering to vote, So who exactly are these american voters who have no ID? give us some examples.

It is a bullshit excuse the Democrats use so they can continue to vote twice, have dead people vote, and illegals vote. Voter ID makes this more difficult. Makes you wonder why they had to bribe voters in 2004 with cigarettes, liquor, $5, and rides to the polls.

 

[RealDave]

Once again there is PROOF that Democrats commit election fraud. Not only do they do it, they do it often and without any remorse. They feel it is their "Right" to win by ANY means necessary.
Until the Right fully accepts that this is the domestic enemy we face, they will continue to gain ground.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges
Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

In Democrat states, I predict the Democrats (having no chance to win fairly) will resort to a level of election fraud never before seen in America. In places such as California, Washington and NewYork, and wherever they have their people in control they will brazenly manipulate the election to their favor.

If they couldn't impeach, take down by gun, or otherwise destroy Trump, they will use this as their last resort.

Should their corruption win the election, what comes next will be shocking.
Their goal is the dismantling of America as we knew it, installing Socialism and Globalism.

Once again showing conservatives are unable to present actual VOTER FRAUD. People voting multiple times, voting under other people’s names

You know, things a voter ID might prevent

Instead you offer ELECTION FRAUD by officials doctoring results. An act that Democrats fight to prevent

OK, winger, tell us why you object to proving who you are before voting.

you have to prove ID to buy booze, board a plane, get welfare, get food stamps, rent an apartment, buy a house, get a drivers licence, buy a car, get a passport, claim asylum, pick up a prescription, et. al. Who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID?

what is different about voting? We all know the answer, will you admit it? Because voter ID prevents most voter fraud and dems know that without fraud they can never win. Will you be honest for just once and admit that?

No, he won't. He has no problem with cheating as long as it promotes the Democrat party.

Show me the stastistics that show the amount of voter fraught that a photo IS will stop.

If its only one vote per precinct its too many. But not one of you lefties can tell us why you object to proving who you are before casting your vote. You had to prove who you are to get on the voter roles, so why not when you vote?

When you assfucks ensure every eligible voter has such an ID, go for it.

Until then, STFU.

What kind of anti-American piece of shit would demand a special ID to vote & then limit where you can get one?

They passed a photo ID law here in PA & did NOTHING to help people get one. They knew they were cheating.

You know it is cheating.

I

 

[RealDave]

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

And the left is very much aware that the remaining 10% would very likely vote Democrat. Why is that? For starters, the least responsible folks in our country vote overwhelmingly for Democrats and those are the people most likely not to have some forrm of ID. Secondly, the added advantage is that without voter id, illegals would at least have the opportunity to circumvent the system. Democrats love the potential of that too.

Yes, those voters without a photo ID are disproportionately Democrat. That is why you assfucks want the photo ID. Thanks for proving my point

OK, one more time. who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID? no one on welfare, no one getting food stamps, no one buying booze, no one using an ER, no one claiming asylum, no one getting social security, no one driving, no one getting on a plane or train, no one registering to vote, So who exactly are these american voters who have no ID? give us some examples.

It is a bullshit excuse the Democrats use so they can continue to vote twice, have dead people vote, and illegals vote. Voter ID makes this more difficult. Makes you wonder why they had to bribe voters in 2004 with cigarettes, liquor, $5, and rides to the polls.

There are no statistics that show significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent.

What party of that are you too stupid to get.

 

[RealDave]

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

You think the Personal Identification authentication via signature “has worked for hundreds of years?” You sure about that? If this process has and continues to “work” - defined as best way for someone to authenticate themselves- how come an ID card is required to enter a government building, get a job, be a passenger on Federally-regulated transportation, buy prescriptions, or enter the Democratic National Convention? All of these entities and the people behind the policy disagree with you. Signatures are not the best way to authenticate someone.

When you say that this is a process that “works” you are referring to the exploitable gaps and vulnerabilities that perpetuate and facilitate the risks of voter fraud. You don’t want to acknowledge those risks or the fact that there are motivated entities who want and need to commit voter fraud. Compromising vendor one vote is an affront to the American People.

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

And the left is very much aware that the remaining 10% would very likely vote Democrat. Why is that? For starters, the least responsible folks in our country vote overwhelmingly for Democrats and those are the people most likely not to have some forrm of ID. Secondly, the added advantage is that without voter id, illegals would at least have the opportunity to circumvent the system. Democrats love the potential of that too.

Yes, those voters without a photo ID are disproportionately Democrat. That is why you assfucks want the photo ID. Thanks for proving my point

OK, one more time. who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID? no one on welfare, no one getting food stamps, no one buying booze, no one using an ER, no one claiming asylum, no one getting social security, no one driving, no one getting on a plane or train, no one registering to vote, So who exactly are these american voters who have no ID? give us some examples.

Now you are just being stupid.

You are trying to use a valid ID & pretend it is a photo ID.


I can do all of those things without a photo ID.
We are talking about photo IDs.

 

[Seawytch]

AGAIN Republicans

Where is your evidence of actual VOTER fraud?

The OP does not provide it

where is your evidence that it has not occurred? the question goes both ways.

Who in the USA that is on the voter rolls does not have some form of valid ID? Remember, you have to prove ID to GET ON the voter rolls.

You are passing laws that says voter fraud is a serious threat
Burden of proof is on you

Do you agree that the OP provides no evidence of voter fraud?

one fraudulent vote is one too many. Why do you object to proving who you are before voting? Who in the USA today is registered to vote but does not have any form of ID? then tell us how they managed to get registered without any ID.

We don't object to it. What we object to is the restrictive and narrow definition of what is an acceptable form of ID.

If your law is disenfranchising more voters than there is fraud you are preventing then it is not acceptable. The type of fraud prevented by restrictive IDs is less than one percent. LESS THAN. The number of Americans that don't have the types of ID required by many of the states disenfranches far, far more than that.

How Voter ID Laws Are Being Used to Disenfranchise Minorities and the Poor

. You have to prove identity and place or residence to register to vote. In some states that requires a government issued picture ID (like you have to show to collect welfare, get food stamps, or check into an ER). In some states a utility bill showing your name and address is all you need (note, you had to show some form of ID to get the utilities turned on).

So, what exactly is disenfranchising about requiring the voter to show the same ID that he or she showed when registering to vote?

and the cite you posted about people who don't have IDs is total bullshit.

Yes, exactly. You should be able to show a utility bill as your form of ID. The most restrictive states don't allow you to use your utility bill, but require state issued ID that shows your current name and address. Anywhere from 1-15% of citizens don't have current photo ID. You ARE disenfranchising more voters than you are stopping fraud...and that's not okay.

When it's the other way around, I'm 100% on board.

And you saying something is bullshit does not make it so.

 

[Seawytch]

Once again there is PROOF that Democrats commit election fraud. Not only do they do it, they do it often and without any remorse. They feel it is their "Right" to win by ANY means necessary.
Until the Right fully accepts that this is the domestic enemy we face, they will continue to gain ground.

Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges
Michigan official once honored by Dems now facing election fraud charges

In Democrat states, I predict the Democrats (having no chance to win fairly) will resort to a level of election fraud never before seen in America. In places such as California, Washington and NewYork, and wherever they have their people in control they will brazenly manipulate the election to their favor.

If they couldn't impeach, take down by gun, or otherwise destroy Trump, they will use this as their last resort.

Should their corruption win the election, what comes next will be shocking.
Their goal is the dismantling of America as we knew it, installing Socialism and Globalism.

Once again showing conservatives are unable to present actual VOTER FRAUD. People voting multiple times, voting under other people’s names

You know, things a voter ID might prevent

Instead you offer ELECTION FRAUD by officials doctoring results. An act that Democrats fight to prevent

OK, winger, tell us why you object to proving who you are before voting.

you have to prove ID to buy booze, board a plane, get welfare, get food stamps, rent an apartment, buy a house, get a drivers licence, buy a car, get a passport, claim asylum, pick up a prescription, et. al. Who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID?

what is different about voting? We all know the answer, will you admit it? Because voter ID prevents most voter fraud and dems know that without fraud they can never win. Will you be honest for just once and admit that?

No, he won't. He has no problem with cheating as long as it promotes the Democrat party.

Show me the stastistics that show the amount of voter fraught that a photo IS will stop.

If its only one vote per precinct its too many. But not one of you lefties can tell us why you object to proving who you are before casting your vote. You had to prove who you are to get on the voter roles, so why not when you vote?

Why is one percent of cases being fraud one too many but three or four times that number being disenfranchised by restrictive voter ID laws is just fine?

And FYI, the incidents of fraud are LESS THAN one percent.

 

[rightwinger]

So you actually read the story and agree it says NOTHING about voter fraud

Yes, there is something Democrats wish to protect. The right of people to vote without arbitrary restrictions based on no credible evidence

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

A signature is virtually unenforceable as every signature would have to be validated against a known signature at the time the person was voting. That doesn't happen, which is exactly what the Democrats want. Providing proof at the time would undermind their ultimate goal, which is to obtain illegal votes. This all goes back to why they promote sanctuary cities and do not want to secure our border. It is obvious to anyone who isn't blinded.

When I vote in NJ the signature is right on the registration form. You have to sign on the spot

Easier to get a phony ID

Getting a drivers license requires some documentation, at least in my state. Thats why it is always such a pain to get a new one if you lose yours. Just scribling a sig. just before you vote, that cannot be validated at that time, is ridiculously insecure.

Admit i, the reason Democrats don't want voter id is because IF illegals do decide to vote, they will be able to. Everyone knows this, even you, You just can't bring yourself to admit it.

Illegals don’t vote....Doesn’t happen
Why take the risk of deportation and jail just to cast one vote among tens of thousands?

Democrats don’t want voter ID because it is a tool for Republicans to use to suppress the vote

Why do Red States allow a hunting license for voter ID but not a college student ID?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Once again showing conservatives are unable to present actual VOTER FRAUD. People voting multiple times, voting under other people’s names

You know, things a voter ID might prevent

Instead you offer ELECTION FRAUD by officials doctoring results. An act that Democrats fight to prevent

OK, winger, tell us why you object to proving who you are before voting.

you have to prove ID to buy booze, board a plane, get welfare, get food stamps, rent an apartment, buy a house, get a drivers licence, buy a car, get a passport, claim asylum, pick up a prescription, et. al. Who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID?

what is different about voting? We all know the answer, will you admit it? Because voter ID prevents most voter fraud and dems know that without fraud they can never win. Will you be honest for just once and admit that?

No, he won't. He has no problem with cheating as long as it promotes the Democrat party.

Show me the stastistics that show the amount of voter fraught that a photo IS will stop.

If its only one vote per precinct its too many. But not one of you lefties can tell us why you object to proving who you are before casting your vote. You had to prove who you are to get on the voter roles, so why not when you vote?

Why is one percent of cases being fraud one too many but three or four times that number being disenfranchised by restrictive voter ID laws is just fine?

And FYI, the incidents of fraud are LESS THAN one percent.

ID laws are not restrictive lol
Unless of course you are an illegal who can't get an ID

My grandmother was blind from birth and had massive medical problems and she still had an ID

 

[DBA]

A signature is virtually unenforceable as every signature would have to be validated against a known signature at the time the person was voting. That doesn't happen, which is exactly what the Democrats want. Providing proof at the time would undermind their ultimate goal, which is to obtain illegal votes. This all goes back to why they promote sanctuary cities and do not want to secure our border. It is obvious to anyone who isn't blinded.

When I vote in NJ the signature is right on the registration form. You have to sign on the spot

Easier to get a phony ID

Getting a drivers license requires some documentation, at least in my state. Thats why it is always such a pain to get a new one if you lose yours. Just scribling a sig. just before you vote, that cannot be validated at that time, is ridiculously insecure.

Admit i, the reason Democrats don't want voter id is because IF illegals do decide to vote, they will be able to. Everyone knows this, even you, You just can't bring yourself to admit it.

An illegal would need to register to vote & at the very least show ID the first time they vote.

Why would a person hiding from the government go into a government location where they would need to show an ID.

You assdfucks really need to quit lying about this.

Furthermore, asshole, 10-12% of eligiible voters do not have photo IDs

Illegals can get a drivers license in CA. That is all you need to know about how much they really care if illegals are in this country and participate. If presenting an ID is not required, how hard is it for an illegal to walk in and simply use a name that is on the list? They sign and vote. It isn't rocket science, they aren't in any danger of getting deported or even caught because no checks are being made and clearly CA wouldn't give a crap if they were illegal anyway.

So, you think illegals get the exact same drivers license.

As for just picking a name:
1) They have to know they person had not already voted.
2) The signature must match
3) The person does not stop in after to vote

Why would an illegal risk being caught as an illegal to do all of that?

Again, you arte being an ass.

My state has always asked for an ID before I vote. If you aren't responsible enough to get an ID, you aren't responsible enough to vote.

Your are being the ass. You know, as do any sane people, the reason Democrats are fighting against voter ID and it has everything to do with giving anybody, legal or not, a chance to vote. We are talking about the party that provides sanctuary to those in our country ILLEGALLY. They clearly don't care about the rule of law.

 

[DBA]

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

A signature is virtually unenforceable as every signature would have to be validated against a known signature at the time the person was voting. That doesn't happen, which is exactly what the Democrats want. Providing proof at the time would undermind their ultimate goal, which is to obtain illegal votes. This all goes back to why they promote sanctuary cities and do not want to secure our border. It is obvious to anyone who isn't blinded.

When I vote in NJ the signature is right on the registration form. You have to sign on the spot

Easier to get a phony ID

Getting a drivers license requires some documentation, at least in my state. Thats why it is always such a pain to get a new one if you lose yours. Just scribling a sig. just before you vote, that cannot be validated at that time, is ridiculously insecure.

Admit i, the reason Democrats don't want voter id is because IF illegals do decide to vote, they will be able to. Everyone knows this, even you, You just can't bring yourself to admit it.

Illegals don’t vote....Doesn’t happen
Why take the risk of deportation and jail just to cast one vote among tens of thousands?

Democrats don’t want voter ID because it is a tool for Republicans to use to suppress the vote

Why do Red States allow a hunting license for voter ID but not a college student ID?

Getting a hunting license in my state requires a state issued ID. So...duh. Student IDs do not have anything to do with being a citizen and your eligibility to vote.

 

[Seawytch]

OK, winger, tell us why you object to proving who you are before voting.

you have to prove ID to buy booze, board a plane, get welfare, get food stamps, rent an apartment, buy a house, get a drivers licence, buy a car, get a passport, claim asylum, pick up a prescription, et. al. Who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID?

what is different about voting? We all know the answer, will you admit it? Because voter ID prevents most voter fraud and dems know that without fraud they can never win. Will you be honest for just once and admit that?

No, he won't. He has no problem with cheating as long as it promotes the Democrat party.

Show me the stastistics that show the amount of voter fraught that a photo IS will stop.

If its only one vote per precinct its too many. But not one of you lefties can tell us why you object to proving who you are before casting your vote. You had to prove who you are to get on the voter roles, so why not when you vote?

Why is one percent of cases being fraud one too many but three or four times that number being disenfranchised by restrictive voter ID laws is just fine?

And FYI, the incidents of fraud are LESS THAN one percent.

ID laws are not restrictive lol
Unless of course you are an illegal who can't get an ID

My grandmother was blind from birth and had massive medical problems and she still had an ID

I didn't say all ID laws were restrictive. I said some states are more restrictive in the IDs they will accept.

"Illegals" aren't voting.

 

[progressive hunter]

proving who you are is not a restriction,,,

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

A signature is virtually unenforceable as every signature would have to be validated against a known signature at the time the person was voting. That doesn't happen, which is exactly what the Democrats want. Providing proof at the time would undermind their ultimate goal, which is to obtain illegal votes. This all goes back to why they promote sanctuary cities and do not want to secure our border. It is obvious to anyone who isn't blinded.

When I vote in NJ the signature is right on the registration form. You have to sign on the spot

Easier to get a phony ID

Getting a drivers license requires some documentation, at least in my state. Thats why it is always such a pain to get a new one if you lose yours. Just scribling a sig. just before you vote, that cannot be validated at that time, is ridiculously insecure.

Admit i, the reason Democrats don't want voter id is because IF illegals do decide to vote, they will be able to. Everyone knows this, even you, You just can't bring yourself to admit it.

Illegals don’t vote....Doesn’t happen
Why take the risk of deportation and jail just to cast one vote among tens of thousands?

Democrats don’t want voter ID because it is a tool for Republicans to use to suppress the vote

Why do Red States allow a hunting license for voter ID but not a college student ID?

I would ask you to prove any red state allows a hunting permit as ID but whats the use

 

[LeftofLeft]

When Republicans can show 99 percent of voters have acceptable ID then they can require it

Right now it is around 90

And the left is very much aware that the remaining 10% would very likely vote Democrat. Why is that? For starters, the least responsible folks in our country vote overwhelmingly for Democrats and those are the people most likely not to have some forrm of ID. Secondly, the added advantage is that without voter id, illegals would at least have the opportunity to circumvent the system. Democrats love the potential of that too.

Yes, those voters without a photo ID are disproportionately Democrat. That is why you assfucks want the photo ID. Thanks for proving my point

OK, one more time. who in the USA today does not have some form of valid ID? no one on welfare, no one getting food stamps, no one buying booze, no one using an ER, no one claiming asylum, no one getting social security, no one driving, no one getting on a plane or train, no one registering to vote, So who exactly are these american voters who have no ID? give us some examples.

It is a bullshit excuse the Democrats use so they can continue to vote twice, have dead people vote, and illegals vote. Voter ID makes this more difficult. Makes you wonder why they had to bribe voters in 2004 with cigarettes, liquor, $5, and rides to the polls.

There are no statistics that show significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent.

What party of that are you too stupid to get.

Instead of calling people stupid, how about showing some brains and providing statistics, name the studies, provide methodologies behind the stats. At this point, you have merely provided reference to specious studies that back your opinion and make you feel good.

 

[rightwinger]

People prove who they are by providing a signature under threat of prosecution. A process that has worked for hundreds of years

It is harder to fake a signature on the spot than it is to present a fake ID

A signature is virtually unenforceable as every signature would have to be validated against a known signature at the time the person was voting. That doesn't happen, which is exactly what the Democrats want. Providing proof at the time would undermind their ultimate goal, which is to obtain illegal votes. This all goes back to why they promote sanctuary cities and do not want to secure our border. It is obvious to anyone who isn't blinded.

When I vote in NJ the signature is right on the registration form. You have to sign on the spot

Easier to get a phony ID

Getting a drivers license requires some documentation, at least in my state. Thats why it is always such a pain to get a new one if you lose yours. Just scribling a sig. just before you vote, that cannot be validated at that time, is ridiculously insecure.

Admit i, the reason Democrats don't want voter id is because IF illegals do decide to vote, they will be able to. Everyone knows this, even you, You just can't bring yourself to admit it.

Illegals don’t vote....Doesn’t happen
Why take the risk of deportation and jail just to cast one vote among tens of thousands?

Democrats don’t want voter ID because it is a tool for Republicans to use to suppress the vote

Why do Red States allow a hunting license for voter ID but not a college student ID?

Getting a hunting license in my state requires a state issued ID. So...duh. Student IDs do not have anything to do with being a citizen and your eligibility to vote.

Student ID shows who you are. It is up to the registrar to verify citizenship
Many people with drivers licenses are perfectly legal but are not citizens

 

[progressive hunter]

A signature is virtually unenforceable as every signature would have to be validated against a known signature at the time the person was voting. That doesn't happen, which is exactly what the Democrats want. Providing proof at the time would undermind their ultimate goal, which is to obtain illegal votes. This all goes back to why they promote sanctuary cities and do not want to secure our border. It is obvious to anyone who isn't blinded.

When I vote in NJ the signature is right on the registration form. You have to sign on the spot

Easier to get a phony ID

Getting a drivers license requires some documentation, at least in my state. Thats why it is always such a pain to get a new one if you lose yours. Just scribling a sig. just before you vote, that cannot be validated at that time, is ridiculously insecure.

Admit i, the reason Democrats don't want voter id is because IF illegals do decide to vote, they will be able to. Everyone knows this, even you, You just can't bring yourself to admit it.

Illegals don’t vote....Doesn’t happen
Why take the risk of deportation and jail just to cast one vote among tens of thousands?

Democrats don’t want voter ID because it is a tool for Republicans to use to suppress the vote

Why do Red States allow a hunting license for voter ID but not a college student ID?

Getting a hunting license in my state requires a state issued ID. So...duh. Student IDs do not have anything to do with being a citizen and your eligibility to vote.

Student ID shows who you are. It is up to the registrar to verify citizenship
Many people with drivers licenses are perfectly legal but are not citizens

hey dipshit,,,you ever find that redstate that allows a hunting licence to vote???

didnt think so,,

 

[Redfish]

No, he won't. He has no problem with cheating as long as it promotes the Democrat party.

Show me the stastistics that show the amount of voter fraught that a photo IS will stop.

If its only one vote per precinct its too many. But not one of you lefties can tell us why you object to proving who you are before casting your vote. You had to prove who you are to get on the voter roles, so why not when you vote?

Why is one percent of cases being fraud one too many but three or four times that number being disenfranchised by restrictive voter ID laws is just fine?

And FYI, the incidents of fraud are LESS THAN one percent.

ID laws are not restrictive lol
Unless of course you are an illegal who can't get an ID

My grandmother was blind from birth and had massive medical problems and she still had an ID

I didn't say all ID laws were restrictive. I said some states are more restrictive in the IDs they will accept.

"Illegals" aren't voting.

How do you know that Manual Garcia illegally here from Honduras did not vote in the name of Joe Smith who is dead but still on the voter rolls? You said "illegals are not voting" Prove it.