Democrats Met With Russians

Those who live in glass houses should never throw stones.

Schermata-2017-03-03-alle-12.37.42.jpg.cf.jpg


001-MCCASKILL-RUSSIAN-SESSIONS-01-800x416.jpg.cf.jpg

putin-schumer-575x289.jpg


Where’s the outrage?

Democrat Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer continues to push the Russia conspiracy.But it was Schumer who met with Putin in New York City – not Trump.

The picture above was taken in 2003 as Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, enjoys a Krispy Kreme doughnut and coffee with Senator Charles Schumer from New York as Putin visits the first New York gas station of the Russian company Lukoil.

The hysteria over Trump administration officials talking — or not talking — with Russia needs to end.

It’s getting in the way of putting America back on track.

shumer-putin-575x328.jpg


Schermata-2017-03-03-alle-12.40.17.jpg.cf.jpg


Drudge Report
An Apples and Oranges comparison. US Senators on the Senate Armed Forces Committee 2 years ago certainly had the right to meet with the Russians because they are a part of government and are involved in shaping foreign policy. Prior to his inauguration Trump and his campaign staff and supporters did hot the right to meet with the Russians if the purpose is to make foreign policy commitments or solicit there interference in the election process.

Sessions was on the armed services committee, dumbass. He also had a perfect right to meet with the Russian ambassador.
And about what? The weather in the Ukraine.
 
Latest News:

PELOSI LIED ABOUT HER CONTACT WITH RUSSIANS, 'HAS A HISTORY OF EXCHANGING GIFTS WITH THEM'

(Seperate Thread)

The Liberals' Russian False Narrative Witch Hunt against Trump and his administration is blowing up in their faces!
 
And Schumer's meeting was a matter of public record, and a transcript of what was said is available. The press was invited to document what happened. That's not what happened in all of the Trump campaign meetings.
Wait. I thought they had the goods on Sessions. So they don't know what was said.

Thanks!

I know Sessions felt the need to lie about the meetings happening.

No you don't, because he didn't lie. He answered the question that was asked in the context of how it was asked. Only partisan hillarybots dispute that.

So he recused himself for no reason? Is Sessions a Democrat now?

He decided to recuse himself because Republican Congressmen asked him to do that.
 
And some don't know or refuse to acknowledge the difference between diplomatic talks and negotiations noticed to the WORLD and unlawful secret backroom deal making. Yup, you're on top of it all citing fucking Drudge. DAMN!

Another OP FAIL!


You clearly can't tell the difference, slick.
 
And Schumer's meeting was a matter of public record, and a transcript of what was said is available. The press was invited to document what happened. That's not what happened in all of the Trump campaign meetings.
Wait. I thought they had the goods on Sessions. So they don't know what was said.

Thanks!

I know Sessions felt the need to lie about the meetings happening.

No you don't, because he didn't lie. He answered the question that was asked in the context of how it was asked. Only partisan hillarybots dispute that.

So he recused himself for no reason? Is Sessions a Democrat now?

He decided to recuse himself because Republican Congressmen asked him to do that.

Because he got caught lying. No republican congressman said he should recuse himself before he was caught lying.
 
Wait. I thought they had the goods on Sessions. So they don't know what was said.

Thanks!

I know Sessions felt the need to lie about the meetings happening.

No you don't, because he didn't lie. He answered the question that was asked in the context of how it was asked. Only partisan hillarybots dispute that.

So he recused himself for no reason? Is Sessions a Democrat now?

He decided to recuse himself because Republican Congressmen asked him to do that.

Because he got caught lying. No republican congressman said he should recuse himself before he was caught lying.

You're a moron. He answered the question in the context that it was asked...that is, did he meet with Russians in reference to the Trump campaign. But, of course that doesn't advance your agenda, so you just ignore that. Case closed. You're wrong and there's no point in trying to discuss this with you since you refuse to acknowledge the truth.
 
I know Sessions felt the need to lie about the meetings happening.

No you don't, because he didn't lie. He answered the question that was asked in the context of how it was asked. Only partisan hillarybots dispute that.

So he recused himself for no reason? Is Sessions a Democrat now?

He decided to recuse himself because Republican Congressmen asked him to do that.

Because he got caught lying. No republican congressman said he should recuse himself before he was caught lying.

You're a moron. He answered the question in the context that it was asked...that is, did he meet with Russians in reference to the Trump campaign. But, of course that doesn't advance your agenda, so you just ignore that. Case closed. You're wrong and there's no point in trying to discuss this with you since you refuse to acknowledge the truth.

You should give Sessions a call, and explain that he has no reason to recuse himself. Nobody forced him to do that, but for some reason he thought he should.
 
No you don't, because he didn't lie. He answered the question that was asked in the context of how it was asked. Only partisan hillarybots dispute that.

So he recused himself for no reason? Is Sessions a Democrat now?

He decided to recuse himself because Republican Congressmen asked him to do that.

Because he got caught lying. No republican congressman said he should recuse himself before he was caught lying.

You're a moron. He answered the question in the context that it was asked...that is, did he meet with Russians in reference to the Trump campaign. But, of course that doesn't advance your agenda, so you just ignore that. Case closed. You're wrong and there's no point in trying to discuss this with you since you refuse to acknowledge the truth.

You should give Sessions a call, and explain that he has no reason to recuse himself. Nobody forced him to do that, but for some reason he thought he should.

Just shut up..you're whining about things that have already been explained and too stupid to write anything worth reading.
 
And now a Democrat is leading the lobbying on Russia's behalf in order to get the sanctions lifted. Note the JOHN PODESTA connection:


Russia's largest bank, Sberbank, has confirmed that it hired the consultancy of Tony Podesta, the elder brother of John Podesta who chaired Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, for lobbying its interests in the United States and proactively seeking the removal of various Obama-era sanctions, the press service of the Russian institution told TASS on Thursday.

"The New York office of Sberbank CIB indeed hired Podesta Group. Engagement of external consultants is part of standard business practices for us," Sberbank said....


Russia's Largest Bank Confirms Hiring Podesta Group To Lobby For Ending Sanctions | Zero Hedge
 
You're a moron. He answered the question in the context that it was asked...that is, did he meet with Russians in reference to the Trump campaign. But, of course that doesn't advance your agenda, so you just ignore that. Case closed. You're wrong and there's no point in trying to discuss this with you since you refuse to acknowledge the truth.

This is the common republican meme about what happened. But it's completely false. The question Franken asked of Sessions was what would he do if he were to be confirmed as Attorney General, and he got evidence that Trump associates had contacts with the Russians.
 
You're a moron. He answered the question in the context that it was asked...that is, did he meet with Russians in reference to the Trump campaign. But, of course that doesn't advance your agenda, so you just ignore that. Case closed. You're wrong and there's no point in trying to discuss this with you since you refuse to acknowledge the truth.

This is the common republican meme about what happened. But it's completely false. The question Franken asked of Sessions was what would he do if he were to be confirmed as Attorney General, and he got evidence that Trump associates had contacts with the Russians.


^^^ Bullshit Spin ^^^

I've posted the exact transcript. Franken posed a convoluted question with a lot of conditions and allegeds and hypotheticals...about which Sessions said he had no information.
 
Those who live in glass houses should never throw stones.

Schermata-2017-03-03-alle-12.37.42.jpg.cf.jpg


001-MCCASKILL-RUSSIAN-SESSIONS-01-800x416.jpg.cf.jpg

putin-schumer-575x289.jpg


Where’s the outrage?

Democrat Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer continues to push the Russia conspiracy.But it was Schumer who met with Putin in New York City – not Trump.

The picture above was taken in 2003 as Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, enjoys a Krispy Kreme doughnut and coffee with Senator Charles Schumer from New York as Putin visits the first New York gas station of the Russian company Lukoil.

The hysteria over Trump administration officials talking — or not talking — with Russia needs to end.

It’s getting in the way of putting America back on track.

shumer-putin-575x328.jpg


Schermata-2017-03-03-alle-12.40.17.jpg.cf.jpg


Drudge Report
An Apples and Oranges comparison. US Senators on the Senate Armed Forces Committee 2 years ago certainly had the right to meet with the Russians because they are a part of government and are involved in shaping foreign policy. Prior to his inauguration Trump and his campaign staff and supporters did hot the right to meet with the Russians if the purpose is to make foreign policy commitments or solicit there interference in the election process.

Sessions was on the armed services committee, dumbass. He also had a perfect right to meet with the Russian ambassador.
And about what? The weather in the Ukraine.

That information has already been published. There were multiple witnesses to each event.
 
And then there is the bit about JOHN PODESTA personally profiting by enabling the Russians to get control of 20% of the U.S. uranium supply.

You neglect to mention that 50% of the US is fueled by Russian uranium.
 
And then there is the bit about JOHN PODESTA personally profiting by enabling the Russians to get control of 20% of the U.S. uranium supply.

You neglect to mention that 50% of the US is fueled by Russian uranium.

Link?

You are inane. The U.S. is not fueled by 50% uranium regardless of the source. We use oil, hydro-electric, natural gas and coal far more than nuclear power.
 

Forum List

Back
Top