bodecea
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
Of course it is....goes without saying.The thread premise is a lie."Congressional Democrats have a plan to forever keep Republicans from winning elections and influencing policy decisions with H.R. 1 in the House, and the similar S. 1 in the Senate.
They want to empower the government to police more speech, force states to allow vote-by-mail and taxpayer funding of candidates, and silence Americans through fear by exposing their support for issue groups.
H.R. 1 would undermine state election oversight, like efforts to clean up old voter rolls. It eliminates any restrictions on vote-by-mail. Taxpayers would be on the hook for matching 600% of campaign contributions to subsidize candidates they may disagree with – a practice that has been ripe for corruption."
SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF SPEECH:
"It empowers federal regulators to categorize and regulate speech, including online.
All speech that simply mentions a candidate could be illegal four months out from an election if groups speak to the public. Worse, at any time, any funded communication that mentions an issue that might be associated with a politician could be illegal. The government just has to say the speech "promotes," "attacks," "supports" or "opposes" a potential candidate.
A newly-partisan Federal Election Commission, since the president would appoint the chairman, who would have new powers, and be a tie-breaking vote on a five-person board (down from a bipartisan six-person board).
The bill would also create a 'registry' / database of Americans and what issues they support. After this latest win there are a lot of influential Democrats calling for Conservatives and Trump supporters to be 'de-programmed', 'rounded up and sent to re-education camps'. This bill would create a way to identify and catalog a list of 'political threats' to make 'rounding them up' easier. 'Democrats can dress this up with talk of "dark money" and pretend they’re worried about money in politics, but they’re only worried about Americans with right-of-center views speaking out.'
"No billionaires will be harmed in the making of this legislation. The point is to silence dissent and shut down debate through fear, intimidation and overregulation. Americans already feel they cannot engage in healthy debate. A Cato Institute poll released last summer found 62% of respondents don’t believe they can express opinions publicly."
Grover Norquist: Pelosi, Schumer priorities – here's how free speech, fair elections and more at risk
Congressional Democrats have a plan to forever keep Republicans from winning elections and influencing policy decisions with H.R. 1 in the House, and the similar S. 1 in the Senate.www.foxnews.com