Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tourist don't need to be naturalized. the simpler the better and less costly.there is no express immigration clause. there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization.where is that expressed not implied in our Constitution. The Establishment clause for an uniform rule of naturalization is clearly expressed.Your sophists games are noted and dismissed.
Controlling who and what enters the nation is the most basic aspect of good governance.
ONly an enemy of the people would oppose such a goal.
BUILD THE FUCKING WALL. DEPORT ALL THE FUCKING ILLEGALS. NOW.
Having the power to naturalize citizens of other nations is not the same as requiring that we do so.
We have the Right to decide who to invite into our community.
The illegals are here against our wishes.
That you side with them, makes you an enemy of the American people.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
Having the power to naturalize citizens of other nations is not the same as requiring that we do so.
We have the Right to decide who to invite into our community.
The illegals are here against our wishes.
That you side with them, makes you an enemy of the American people.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
naturalization covers it; there is no immigration clause.tourist don't need to be naturalized. the simpler the better and less costly.there is no express immigration clause. there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization.where is that expressed not implied in our Constitution. The Establishment clause for an uniform rule of naturalization is clearly expressed.
Having the power to naturalize citizens of other nations is not the same as requiring that we do so.
We have the Right to decide who to invite into our community.
The illegals are here against our wishes.
That you side with them, makes you an enemy of the American people.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
Having the power to naturalize citizens of other nations is not the same as requiring that we do so.
We have the Right to decide who to invite into our community.
The illegals are here against our wishes.
That you side with them, makes you an enemy of the American people.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
The illegals are not tourists, as you well know. YOu work to confuse the issue, because you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
naturalization covers it; there is no immigration clause.tourist don't need to be naturalized. the simpler the better and less costly.there is no express immigration clause. there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization.Having the power to naturalize citizens of other nations is not the same as requiring that we do so.
We have the Right to decide who to invite into our community.
The illegals are here against our wishes.
That you side with them, makes you an enemy of the American people.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
Having the power to naturalize citizens of other nations is not the same as requiring that we do so.
We have the Right to decide who to invite into our community.
The illegals are here against our wishes.
That you side with them, makes you an enemy of the American people.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
The illegals are not tourists, as you well know. YOu work to confuse the issue, because you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
we don't have an illegal problem; we have a lousy naturalization management problem.naturalization covers it; there is no immigration clause.tourist don't need to be naturalized. the simpler the better and less costly.there is no express immigration clause. there is an Express establishment clause for naturalization.
Having the power to naturalize citizens of other nations is not the same as requiring that we do so.
We have the Right to decide who to invite into our community.
The illegals are here against our wishes.
That you side with them, makes you an enemy of the American people.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
The illegals are not tourists, as you well know. YOu work to confuse the issue, because you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
"Covers it"? WTF, does that mean?
Deport them all. And you should go too. You are loyal to Mexico, not America, or your supposedly fellow Americans.
we don't have an illegal problem; we have a lousy naturalization management problem.naturalization covers it; there is no immigration clause.tourist don't need to be naturalized. the simpler the better and less costly.Having the power to naturalize citizens of other nations is not the same as requiring that we do so.
We have the Right to decide who to invite into our community.
The illegals are here against our wishes.
That you side with them, makes you an enemy of the American people.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
The illegals are not tourists, as you well know. YOu work to confuse the issue, because you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
"Covers it"? WTF, does that mean?
Deport them all. And you should go too. You are loyal to Mexico, not America, or your supposedly fellow Americans.
it should be a high crime And misdemeanor to lose money on border policy with a commerce clause, under Any form of Capitalism.we don't have an illegal problem; we have a lousy naturalization management problem.naturalization covers it; there is no immigration clause.tourist don't need to be naturalized. the simpler the better and less costly.
The illegals are not tourists, as you well know. YOu work to confuse the issue, because you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
"Covers it"? WTF, does that mean?
Deport them all. And you should go too. You are loyal to Mexico, not America, or your supposedly fellow Americans.
We have 30 million of the fuckers in this country. That is a problem, and you are a liar.
it should be a high crime And misdemeanor to lose money on border policy with a commerce clause, under Any form of Capitalism.we don't have an illegal problem; we have a lousy naturalization management problem.naturalization covers it; there is no immigration clause.The illegals are not tourists, as you well know. YOu work to confuse the issue, because you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.
You should go home. It is morally wrong for you to claim American citizenship while being loyal to Mexico.
"Covers it"? WTF, does that mean?
Deport them all. And you should go too. You are loyal to Mexico, not America, or your supposedly fellow Americans.
We have 30 million of the fuckers in this country. That is a problem, and you are a liar.
I prefer to be legal and Constitutional and subscribe to Capitalism.it should be a high crime And misdemeanor to lose money on border policy with a commerce clause, under Any form of Capitalism.we don't have an illegal problem; we have a lousy naturalization management problem.naturalization covers it; there is no immigration clause.
"Covers it"? WTF, does that mean?
Deport them all. And you should go too. You are loyal to Mexico, not America, or your supposedly fellow Americans.
We have 30 million of the fuckers in this country. That is a problem, and you are a liar.
You are welcome to call your congressman and ask for such a bill to be introduced.
Meanwhile, controlling who and what comes into the country, is the most basic aspect of good governance, and only an enemy of the people would oppose it.
You should go back to Mexico. That is where your true loyalty lies, not to America.
I prefer to be legal and Constitutional and subscribe to Capitalism.it should be a high crime And misdemeanor to lose money on border policy with a commerce clause, under Any form of Capitalism.we don't have an illegal problem; we have a lousy naturalization management problem."Covers it"? WTF, does that mean?
Deport them all. And you should go too. You are loyal to Mexico, not America, or your supposedly fellow Americans.
We have 30 million of the fuckers in this country. That is a problem, and you are a liar.
You are welcome to call your congressman and ask for such a bill to be introduced.
Meanwhile, controlling who and what comes into the country, is the most basic aspect of good governance, and only an enemy of the people would oppose it.
You should go back to Mexico. That is where your true loyalty lies, not to America.
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization
We don't have an immigration clause, it is a naturalization clause. We don't have an illegal problem we have a lousy right wing management problem. Only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy.I prefer to be legal and Constitutional and subscribe to Capitalism.it should be a high crime And misdemeanor to lose money on border policy with a commerce clause, under Any form of Capitalism.we don't have an illegal problem; we have a lousy naturalization management problem.
We have 30 million of the fuckers in this country. That is a problem, and you are a liar.
You are welcome to call your congressman and ask for such a bill to be introduced.
Meanwhile, controlling who and what comes into the country, is the most basic aspect of good governance, and only an enemy of the people would oppose it.
You should go back to Mexico. That is where your true loyalty lies, not to America.
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization
We don't want to naturalize the illegals, we want to send them home.
It is not credible that you are as stupid as you are pretending to be.
The right wing is clueless and Causeless about State Capitalism. State Socialism is all they know.Capitalism is most of power in political ideology across the world like U.S., France, Germany soon even Sweden if going to M+KD+C+L.
The right wing is clueless and Causeless about State Capitalism. State Socialism is all they know.Capitalism is most of power in political ideology across the world like U.S., France, Germany soon even Sweden if going to M+KD+C+L.
To me, the most hilarious thing about the wall is when you ask right wingers if they know you can defeat a wall with a ladder? They say, a ladder only helps you get up one side. It's too far to jump down. So you say one ladder and a rope or two ladders? Then they cry that you just hate Trump. Then I say I don't have too. The entire world outside of the GOP despises Trump.
in fact, even Putin and L'l Kim are disrespecting him. He has no one but people who don't believe a ladder can defeat a wall.
You may want to consider using Google translate.The right wing is clueless and Causeless about State Capitalism. State Socialism is all they know.Capitalism is most of power in political ideology across the world like U.S., France, Germany soon even Sweden if going to M+KD+C+L.
Socialism are Polish specie in World War Two but Soviet Union were Communism like current seat of Czech Republic they're back to 1980's era but Soviet Union are Russia in current forms and is Russia you did thought by Socialism and Capitalism did painful thought perhaps Russia and Cuba is less by Socialism in the world.
