Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside

But that would take integrity...something we've never seen from a progressives.

Has America become so numb by the decades of lies and cynicism oozing from Clinton Inc. that it could elect Hillary Clinton as president, even after Friday's FBI announcement that it had reopened an investigation of her emails while secretary of state?

Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside
She is the warmonger candidate you should love that.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:


Talk Vs Actions....We know you love war and want more of it. Let me guess you want to fight Russia and Syria and Iran etc etc.
 
Talk Vs Actions....We know you love war and want more of it. Let me guess you want to fight Russia and Syria and Iran etc etc.
So now your position is that Trump is all talk and no action? That he says one thing but does something else? Gee....he sounds like a great candidate. :lol:
 
But that would take integrity...something we've never seen from a progressives.

Has America become so numb by the decades of lies and cynicism oozing from Clinton Inc. that it could elect Hillary Clinton as president, even after Friday's FBI announcement that it had reopened an investigation of her emails while secretary of state?

Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside

She should step aside because of a baseless right wing witch hunt? lol, what planet are you from? Get a grip dude, she's your next president no matter how much you whine, cry and stomp your feet.
I didn't write the article dumb ass. I simply shared it... :lmao:

And you shared it because what, you disagreed with it?
Because it had information. Something you progressives are adverse to because you believe ignorance is bliss.
 
When the definitive post mortem of this dismal election is finally published, it should go something like this: The Republican establishment was foolish; the Democratic establishment was ruthless. The Republicans fumbled around incompetently and spinelessly in the face of an unforeseen challenge; the Democrats willfully and intentionally did all they could to carry a corrupt politician over the finish line, forcing the American public to choose between one known liar and another. Let’s review the facts:
  • The FBI continues to investigate Hillary Clinton’s maybe-criminal abuse of the Clinton Foundation as a front for systematic influence-peddling and her maybe-criminal mishandling of our nation’s secrets. Neither of these scandals is new. They both predate the launch of her presidential campaign.
  • Questions have swirled around the Clinton Foundation since Hillary was confirmed as secretary of state. Damaging evidence of outright influence-peddling — including evidence of large-scale donations made to the foundation as the State Department considered a crucial uranium deal — broke less than two weeks after her campaign announcement.
  • On April 23, 2015, the New York Times published an extraordinary story detailing the amount of money that was funneled to the Clinton Foundation (and to Bill Clinton directly) as the State Department considered whether to sign off on the sale of “one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States” to a Russian-controlled corporation. The chairman of the corporation donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation, and a Russian investment bank promoting Uranium One stock paid Bill Clinton a whopping $500,000 to give a speech in Moscow. The Clintons violated an agreement with the White House to “publicly identify all donors” by failing to disclose the Uranium One contributions. Hillary’s State Department approved the deal.
  • One month before the Uranium One story, as Clinton was preparing to announce her candidacy, the Times broke the news that still dominates the campaign today: Hillary “exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business.” Given the Clintons’ longstanding history of personal corruption, it should have been obvious to Democrats then that Hillary’s scandals were going to dog the party throughout the campaign, and, if she won, throughout her presidency. It would be a repeat of the 1990s, when an entire party was hijacked into relentlessly defending conduct that they would loudly condemn if it were attributed to any Republican.
  • Instead, the party did far more than merely acquiesce in Hillary’s decision to run. It did virtually everything it could to guarantee her victory. Scandal-free progressive politicians such as Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden stood aside. Superdelegates signed on with Hillary en masse. The DNC put its thumb on the scales to such an extent that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was ultimately fired to appease the Sanders holdouts. When angry Trump voters were accusing incompetent Republicans of “rigging” the system against their man, ruthless Democrats were were actually rigging the system for Hillary.
The Democratic Establishment Has Enabled Hillary’s Corruption at Every Turn
 
Of course the left wants to blame everyone other than their own leaders when things go sideways. But James Comey is not to blame for the the latest scandal. The blame is squarely on the shoulders of Hillary Clinton and her deep commitment to corruption.
  • The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Mr. McCabe’s wife, Jill McCabe, received $467,500 in campaign funds in late 2015 from the political-action committee of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime ally of the Clintons and, until he was elected governor in November 2013, a Clinton Foundation board member.
  • In February of this year, Mr. McCabe ascended from the No. 3 position at the FBI to the deputy director post (the No. 2 position). When he assumed that role, officials say, he started overseeing the probe into Mrs. Clinton’s use of a private email server for government work when she was secretary of state.
  • At a meeting early last week of senior Justice Department and FBI officials, a member of the department’s senior national-security staff asked for an update on the Weiner laptop, the people familiar with the matter said. At that point, officials realized that no one had acted to obtain a warrant, these people said.
  • The amount that was steered [Jill McCabe's] coffers was staggering. Nearly $500,000 for a state Senate seat, she apparently had no chance of winning. Since she got the money and then lost, that immediately raised red flags.
  • Was a senior Justice Department official getting special favors for his wife from a Clinton guy, while Mrs. Clinton, under active investigation by his department, including investigations in which he was materially involved.
Basically James Comey was forced to cover his butt because he was caught squarely in the Clinton corruption machine merely by taking a government job. If all of this comes out - the people want to know why a laptop with Clinton emails sat at the F.B.I. for 3 weeks without anyone getting a warrant for the emails.

FBI in Internal Feud Over Hillary Clinton Probe

What Really Bothers Glenn About the FBI’s Latest Move
 
If she gets elected she will be immune from prosecution during her term, and if the statute of limitations has run out on her crimes by the time her term is up she walks free.
 
But that would take integrity...something we've never seen from a progressives.

Has America become so numb by the decades of lies and cynicism oozing from Clinton Inc. that it could elect Hillary Clinton as president, even after Friday's FBI announcement that it had reopened an investigation of her emails while secretary of state?

Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside

Yea right. Who in the DNC would have the balls to tell the bulldyke to step aside?
IMG_0381.JPG
 

Forum List

Back
Top