Democrats SUE to stop Arizona Senate from forensic audit of 2020 election

[colfax_m]

sure,, but where does it say how audits are done??

I already told you.

 

[progressive hunter]

how so? you see, if they find 250,000 illegal ballots from the audit that's the count of illegal ballots found. not sure what you didn't understand.

You have very little insight into what's going on.

projection,,

 

[colfax_m]

election officials are to follow election law on election day. why didn't that happen? wouldn't need this audit had the law been followed the night of the election.

Give me a detailed list of the laws that weren't followed, or if you'd rather, a specific example of one.

 

[jc456]

how so? you see, if they find 250,000 illegal ballots from the audit that's the count of illegal ballots found. not sure what you didn't understand.

You have very little insight into what's going on.

sure I do, look up the word forensic.

 

[colfax_m]

projection,,

I've spend an inordinate amount of time educating you about this process.

 

[progressive hunter]

election officials are to follow election law on election day. why didn't that happen? wouldn't need this audit had the law been followed the night of the election.

Give me a detailed list of the laws that weren't followed, or if you'd rather, a specific example of one.

you should already know that by now,,

 

[jc456]

how so? you see, if they find 250,000 illegal ballots from the audit that's the count of illegal ballots found. not sure what you didn't understand.

You have very little insight into what's going on.

projection,,

like he knows more than us. this dude always acts like he's in the room.

 

[colfax_m]

sure I do, look up the word forensic.

You really don't and it's painfully obvious.

 

[progressive hunter]

projection,,

I've spend an inordinate amount of time educating you about this process.

no you havent,,

 

[colfax_m]

you should already know that by now,,

I am not able to read the other poster's mind. I want to know what they're referencing.

 

[jc456]

election officials are to follow election law on election day. why didn't that happen? wouldn't need this audit had the law been followed the night of the election.

Give me a detailed list of the laws that weren't followed, or if you'd rather, a specific example of one.

huh? you don't know them? why are you here then?

 

[colfax_m]

no you havent,,

I've provided link after link after link with information that you've requested.

You've done jack shit.

 

[colfax_m]

huh? you don't know them? why are you here then?

I can't read your mind. Go for it. Show me you aren't just making shit up.

 

[progressive hunter]

no you havent,,

I've provided link after link after link with information that you've requested.

You've done jack shit.

and none of them have applied to your claims,, well maybe one or two, but not today for sure

 

[jc456]

no you havent,,

I've provided link after link after link with information that you've requested.

You've done jack shit.

we've explained the reason for the audit. you fail to comprehend that. your links are for shit. what a waste of time.

 

[jc456]

huh? you don't know them? why are you here then?

I can't read your mind. Go for it. Show me you aren't just making shit up.

no, no, you are the all knowing why don't you know the law on what election officials are supposed to do? my job isn't to educate you. educate yourself on election law.

 

[colfax_m]

no, no, you are the all knowing why don't you know the law on what election officials are supposed to do? my job isn't to educate you. educate yourself on election law.

You made the accusation. Put up or shut up.

 

[colfax_m]

and none of them have applied to your claims,, well maybe one or two, but not today for sure

Many have.

I guess you did provide some local network coverage...

...which also backed up my statement and proved you were a liar.

So thanks for that.

 

[struth]

The judges refused to hear the evidence.

Judges heard all properly submitted evidence. Don’t lie. But you also just said they never had the evidence until now. Try to be a little more consistent

How is a ballot proven to be illegal not evidence?

When you claim it’s proven but in reality it’s fine and you just don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yeah, that was the very problem. Courts would dismiss cases before adequate time for discovery.

Why are the Democrats trying so hard to hide the audit results?

The courts do not function as grand juries. Why are Republicans trying to hide the methods?

And courts should not interfere with the legislative branch. It is their decision to do the audit not the courts.

well the court has to act when a case is brought to them.

 

[schmidlap]

... no one's buying it anymore, and most never did.

Your pretense of being authorized to speak for everyone betrays your insecurity.

Try to summon the testicular fortitude to express your difference without pretending that you are being backed by a mob.

The citizen's getting hit with money coming out of their hard earned pockets is going to be impossible to defend. Can't make the idiocy up, but there it is right there in front of everyone to see and feel.

Your "everyone" recourse is desperate. Have the temerity to express your personal views without relying on hoards of anonymous confections.

The popularly-elected President remains popular by advocating for popular legislation. Democratic self-governance is thusly served.

If you have any credible public surveys that indicate otherwise, please provide links to them.