🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Democrats Vote To End American Sovereignty.

Democrats did not do what the title of the thread says they did. I'm sure Stinky will reply with her usual cut-n-past in due time.

Thank you.


And yet the OP provides documented evidence that they voted for exactly that......

And you provided the same lie when I said the Democrats voted for infanticide.....and I proved that too.


Gads, you're a useless excuse for a human being.......but a perfect Democrat.
 
For the tenth time, Biden. You keep asking, as if the answer will provide you with some kind of advantage.

And everything I said was true. I can't help you.


Democrats voted to allow illegals to vote.....who'd you vote for?




There is no denying their hatred of this nation.
Here is the other half of their open borders policy:

"House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections​

“There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.”

The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 8770 today. As Tweeted by House Judiciary GOP:


Judiciary Democrats just voted to support NON-CITIZENS voting in our elections. There’s no hiding it. Democrats WANT non-citizens voting in our elections.
thelibertydaily.com

House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections ⋆ 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. “There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.” The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature...
thelibertydaily.com
thelibertydaily.com
 
Document shown in the OP

So you can't stop lying????


Who'd you vote for?????

Didn't show the Democrats voting to support non-citizens being able to vote in federal elections. Nothing comes close to verifying the hyperbole that they voted to end the USA's Sovereignty.

That's two. Going for another hat trick?
 
Democrats did not do what the title of the thread says they did. I'm sure Stinky will reply with her usual cut-n-past in due time.

Thank you.
She already has. I posted the facts. Not one of the conservatives here liked the truth. Never will.
 
Democrats voted to allow illegals to vote.....who'd you vote for?




There is no denying their hatred of this nation.
Here is the other half of their open borders policy:

"House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections​

“There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.”

The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 8770 today. As Tweeted by House Judiciary GOP:



thelibertydaily.com

House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections ⋆ 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. “There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.” The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature...
thelibertydaily.com
thelibertydaily.com
Absolute LIE. No matter what GOP, conspiracy theory sites you choose to go to.
 
Democrats voted to allow illegals to vote.....who'd you vote for?




There is no denying their hatred of this nation.
Here is the other half of their open borders policy:

"House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections​

“There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.”

The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 8770 today. As Tweeted by House Judiciary GOP:



thelibertydaily.com

House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections ⋆ 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. “There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.” The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature...
thelibertydaily.com
thelibertydaily.com
This is who Liberty Daily are. Very non partisan. Very telling the truth at all times.



The Liberty Daily ⋆ The Conservative Alternative to the ...​

https://thelibertydaily.com




The Conservative Alternative to the Drudge Report.
 
Reagan forgave 3 Million illegal residents during his administration . The greater flow of immigrants started with him.


But blame Democrats.

And post every obscure nonsense you WILL find on the dark corners of the web.
Yeah, that was supposed to be in exchange for the southern border being secured in the next year or two back then. Why the fuck is it still not secure, hmm?

Biden was in Congress then. FACT.
 
Are you a racist against Latinos? There are plenty of non Hispanic who come to the country as well.

NONE of them is allowed to vote unless they do become citizens.

I want evidence of the Obama allegations you posted.

You are basically accusing a REPUBLICAN of being a liar:

The 2020 US election was the most secure in American history, according to US elections officials.

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,” the coordinating bodies on election infrastructure and security said in a joint statement issued by the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

The statement directly contradicts President Donald Trump, who has made unfounded allegations of widespread voting irregularities and fraud. The president is using these claims to challenge the vote counts in several key states that delivered President-elect Joe Biden his apparent Electoral College victory.

The Trump campaign has filed dozens of lawsuits, some of which have already been dismissed. But the barrage of legal action and Trump’s false claims — often bolstered by right-wing media and some of the president’s allies in the Republican Party — have undermined overall faith in the electoral process and in the safety and security of US elections.

In the statement, election officials noted that though some states may do recounts, “All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary.” This beefs up the security of the vote and allows officials to correct and identify mistakes in the counting process.

But the statement made one thing very clear: “There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”

Or as Chris Krebs, the head of CISA, put it: “TLDR: America, we have confidence in the security of your vote, you should, too.”




Gaslight fail. Fuck you. That election was the most fraudulent ever seen in America.
 
The text shown above says exactly the opposite of what the OP says. "Nothing in this section may be construed...to permit any non-citizen to vote..."

What gives?
You don't expect the truth to stand in the way of a right wing loon making a baseless allegation do you?
 
Democrat policy is the very opposite of the intent of 'citizenship.'



1. Citizenship is the goal and aspiration of Western political systems, and can be recognized by the assumption of both "human rights" and "natural rights," which are the pre-condition of their consent to be governed.

a. Those values are memorialized in the United States Constitution, the abrogation of which is the justification for revolution.

2. There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction. Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, and without national sovereignty.

3. The tenets of Liberalism are counter to this theme. Liberalism endorses open borders, and a 'citizen of the world' view....a construct that never has and never will exist.

a. Since the dawn of politics, some men have envisioned some global authority that would bring peace and harmony….Utopia. During the Enlightenment, Immanuel Kant argued in favor of a “united power and law-governed decisions of a united will” to create “perpetual peace.” Humanities Research: Volume XV. No. 1. 2009

4. ‘Global governance, the idea of all humankind united under one common political authority, has not existed so far in human history. This is not to say that it hasn’t been debated, called for, fought for…and as recently as the 20th century, enforced on large swaths of the planet….called communism.

a. Imaginary, not only unproven: data is available documenting the deleterious effects. Called communism, socialism, Liberalism, whatever, it responsible for over 100 million dead. How to explain its endorsement by the Western elites? Simple: it is a religious belief, largely based on a tragic misunderstanding of human nature, and the Left’s inability to confront, or even recognize, evil.

5. To recognize those wedded to this view, simply note who support the Democrat Party.
 
  1. Francis Fukuyama finds that neither the radical Islamists, nor the Chinese and Russian autocrats present a major ideological challenge to liberal democracy, in that neither offers a compelling ideology with worldwide appeal.
  2. But the worldview and ideology of global governance has a certain appeal both in the West, and in the broader international community..
    1. As difficult as it is to understand, global governance finds advocates either in spite of, or because it challenges the major premises of liberal democracy: individual rights over group rights; free speech; majority rule; democratic accountability; national identity, i.e., sovereignty.
    2. Why would Americans even consider suspending individual rights over group rights; free speech; majority rule; democratic accountability; national identity, i.e., sovereignty.
    3. Ah…yes: the indoctrinations of the ‘education system.’
    4. This is why America is confronted with the political and legal struggle to transform the modern democratic nation-state into a post-modern subordinate state.
There are two parties in America......the Republican Party, and the European/Globalist/Democrat Party.


Did you notice all the indoctrinated in this thread who would not support American sovereignty?
You know how they vote.....but no one can figure out why.
 
Drop it.....it reflects my family's journey as well.
You approached me about my opinion on a site where a diverse bunch of people opinionate constantly, which also was not directed at you. My father was not a Nazi....but I believe that drafting un-naturalized aliens especially from nations which have been enemies of ours is questionable
 
You approached me about my opinion on a site where a diverse bunch of people opinionate constantly, which also was not directed at you. My father was not a Nazi....but I believe that drafting un-naturalized aliens especially from nations which have been enemies of ours is questionable



As valid as any other opinion.
 
It is not about Latinos. It is about all CITIZENS who do not speak English, or very well, who are going to get a ballot in their language sot that they understand who they are voting for.

It is to help American CITIZENS, only.

Got it now???
Yep, I get it now. The far-left is going to send all non-English-speaking, uninformed foreigners a ballot explaining how they should vote for the DEMONRATS.
 

Forum List

Back
Top