Dershowitz and Cruz:Biden Has Violated Civil Rights Laws

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Ted Cruz is such a corrupt douchebag.

I am sure he feels the same about you. What did he say that was in error?

 

[Viktor]

Trump doubles down on vow to nominate woman to Supreme Court, says vetting process underway

President Trump on Monday reiterated during a campaign rally that he will nominate a woman to fill the empty seat on the Supreme Court that has been vacated following the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

www.foxnews.com

ROTFL! Trump did not say he would appoint only a woman. Biden said that. Holy shit

 

[Viktor]

I didn’t. You must have added it after I started to reply.

BULL

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Is freedom of choice unconstitutional?

Are president's allowed to only consider white, male nominees, or is that discrimination?

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

You'd be first in line in the shitting-of-chickes festival if Trump did such a thing, and we all know it.

You moonbats are nothing, if not totally predictable.

If they didn't have a double standard, they wouldn't have any standards at all.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Trump vows to appoint a woman to Supreme Court as vacancy re-energizes his political prospects | CNN Politics

President Donald Trump quickly moved to make the new Supreme Court vacancy a central issue in his reelection campaign, announcing Saturday he would name a replacement for the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg next week "and it will be a woman."

www.cnn.com

He vowed to appoint a woman. Isn’t that discrimination? Shouldn’t you be outraged?

No because he is replacing a woman who passed away with another woman, why is that a bad idea to you?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Trump vows to appoint a woman to Supreme Court as vacancy re-energizes his political prospects | CNN Politics

President Donald Trump quickly moved to make the new Supreme Court vacancy a central issue in his reelection campaign, announcing Saturday he would name a replacement for the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg next week "and it will be a woman."

www.cnn.com

He vowed to appoint a woman. Isn’t that discrimination? Shouldn’t you be outraged?

From your link:

As the crowd began chanting "Fill That Seat!" Trump said he had not made a final choice but was inclined to choose a woman".

Where is the word "vow" in that statement? He said "inclined", and those words do not have the same meanings.

Once again, Coyote lies!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I can’t find a single post of yours objecting, so it is a logical conclusion.

A logical conclusion? Based on what?
There must be a hundred things Trump did in office that I didn't feel the need to comment on.

The fact that you think you can simply assume what I thought of Amy Coney Barrett, who has turned
out to be a John Roberts type justice based on the observations of many, says a lot about your biased prejudicial temperament.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Indeed he did, I posted a link in pst #38. He vowed it would be a woman.

You lied.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

You lied.

Excellent catch.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

No because he is replacing a woman who passed away with another woman, why is that a bad idea to you?

Does the name Kamala Harris ring a bell for you?

Another black, female incredible Biden error.

There isn't anything wrong with black female appointments, per se.
But the idea that the democrats can just reach into their spare parts bag and pull out any old replacement
part, as long as her skin color is right and she pees sitting down, is the problem.

It's how you wind up with an abomination like Kanala Harris. As Obama said, you can always depend
on Joe to fuck up anything you give him to do.

 

[Viktor]

Trump vows to appoint a woman to Supreme Court as vacancy re-energizes his political prospects | CNN Politics

President Donald Trump quickly moved to make the new Supreme Court vacancy a central issue in his reelection campaign, announcing Saturday he would name a replacement for the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg next week "and it will be a woman."

www.cnn.com

He vowed to appoint a woman. Isn’t that discrimination? Shouldn’t you be outraged?

That was years ago. Maybe somebody did object.

 

[Maxdeath]

Do not care who Biden nominates. The fact he has limited his choices shows tha he is not interested in doing what is right for the country. It shows that he has no regard for for the Supreme Court or law. He only cares about pandering for votes and making himself look good

 

[Coyote]

That was years ago. Maybe somebody did object.

That was not “years ago”. That was a year and a half ago.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Is freedom of choice unconstitutional?

If your choice is to discriminate in hiring on the basis of race and sex, then yes.

Or, to put it another way, if Microsoft (for example) does not have the Constitutional right to say it will only hire a white male as CEO, then the federal government doesn't have the right to say it will only hire a black female as a Supreme Court Justice.

 

[Viktor]

That was not “years ago”. That was a year and a half ago.

How do you know that nobody objected to it???
You don't. Your whole complaint is BS.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Yet Trump did exactly that and you didn’t care.

Yet Biden is doing that now, and you don't care.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Not really because when the time came, he nominated several candidates and some were men. Biden published a list and only Black women were on it.

I believe he said he was "inclined" to choose a woman.

 

[22lcidw]

Y’all are idiots. Serious idiots. Biden can choose whoever he wants

Choosing someone who hates white people and will vote to kill them is something that cause self-preservation.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

That was not “years ago”. That was a year and a half ago.

He also did not say what you claimed you lied yet again.