Despite all the spin..This is simple...Democrats: “Mexico must benefit from a deal.”

BrokeLoser

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2016
40,422
22,722
Trump: “Americans must benefit from a deal.”
That’s the bottom line and all good, real Americans know this. I’m thinking Trump knows exactly what he’s doing...AGAIN.
 
The dems always side with the drug dealers. That's why 70,000 kids die from drugs every year.
 
Trump is the one who said Mexico will benefit from the slight NAFTA alterations he’s calling a new deal.
 
Its pretty clear Dem's have sided with illegals and don't give a shit about the Americans illegals kill.
 
Its pretty clear Dem's have sided with illegals and don't give a shit about the Americans illegals kill.
we should have no illegal problem with a naturalization clause.

You mean like this one...
The first statute in the United States to codify naturalization law. Alternately known as the Nationality Act, the Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted citizenship to "any alien, being a free white person" who had been in the U.S. for two years. In effect, it left out indentured servants, slaves, and most women.
 
Its pretty clear Dem's have sided with illegals and don't give a shit about the Americans illegals kill.
we should have no illegal problem with a naturalization clause.

You mean like this one...
The first statute in the United States to codify naturalization law. Alternately known as the Nationality Act, the Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted citizenship to "any alien, being a free white person" who had been in the U.S. for two years. In effect, it left out indentured servants, slaves, and most women.
the Poor couldn't afford to challenge that patently unconstitutional law. Our original Constitution is both gender and race neutral. Persons, is what it refers to.
 
Its pretty clear Dem's have sided with illegals and don't give a shit about the Americans illegals kill.
we should have no illegal problem with a naturalization clause.

You mean like this one...
The first statute in the United States to codify naturalization law. Alternately known as the Nationality Act, the Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted citizenship to "any alien, being a free white person" who had been in the U.S. for two years. In effect, it left out indentured servants, slaves, and most women.
the Poor couldn't afford to challenge that patently unconstitutional law. Our original Constitution is both gender and race neutral. Persons, is what it refers to.

You mean the one that referred to blacks as 3/5’s of a person?
 
Most of the democrat leadership sees the stream of children the traffickers are bringing here to sell and they start salivating and can't think straight
 
Its pretty clear Dem's have sided with illegals and don't give a shit about the Americans illegals kill.
we should have no illegal problem with a naturalization clause.

You mean like this one...
The first statute in the United States to codify naturalization law. Alternately known as the Nationality Act, the Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted citizenship to "any alien, being a free white person" who had been in the U.S. for two years. In effect, it left out indentured servants, slaves, and most women.
the Poor couldn't afford to challenge that patently unconstitutional law. Our original Constitution is both gender and race neutral. Persons, is what it refers to.

You mean the one that referred to blacks as 3/5’s of a person?
they had to deal with the political reality of the time. it is still, gender and race neutral from intelligently designed Inception.
 
Most of the democrat leadership sees the stream of children the traffickers are bringing here to sell and they start salivating and can't think straight
Prohibition is worse; only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and proclaim they are not really like that, afterward.
 
Most of the democrat leadership sees the stream of children the traffickers are bringing here to sell and they start salivating and can't think straight
Prohibition is worse; only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and proclaim they are not really like that, afterward.

Prohibition is worse than child trafficking? Damn....only to drunks...dumbass.
 
Most of the democrat leadership sees the stream of children the traffickers are bringing here to sell and they start salivating and can't think straight
Prohibition is worse; only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and proclaim they are not really like that, afterward.

Prohibition is worse than child trafficking? Damn....only to drunks...dumbass.
All foreign nationals in the US should be federally identified. Upgrading Ellis Island and surrounding infrastructure is more cost effective and humane.
 
Most of the democrat leadership sees the stream of children the traffickers are bringing here to sell and they start salivating and can't think straight
Prohibition is worse; only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and proclaim they are not really like that, afterward.

Prohibition is worse than child trafficking? Damn....only to drunks...dumbass.
All foreign nationals in the US should be federally identified. Upgrading Ellis Island and surrounding infrastructure is more cost effective and humane.

Nice to see you're still an idiot, don't ever change.
 
Most of the democrat leadership sees the stream of children the traffickers are bringing here to sell and they start salivating and can't think straight
Prohibition is worse; only the right wing prefers to repeat historical mistakes and proclaim they are not really like that, afterward.

Prohibition is worse than child trafficking? Damn....only to drunks...dumbass.
All foreign nationals in the US should be federally identified. Upgrading Ellis Island and surrounding infrastructure is more cost effective and humane.

Nice to see you're still an idiot, don't ever change.
nothing but fallacy from the right wing; how usual and ordinary.
 

Forum List

Back
Top