Dianne Feinstein epic fail

[TNHarley]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Why do you feel like this? Honestly..

I've said this before....because an assault weapons ban is pointless. If we were being serious about curbing violence, which we never will be, then a ban would have to include hand guns....which will never happen.

Probably not..
Why do you think banning all guns would solve anything?
Do you think criminals would oblidge?
Do you think freedom is easy?

 

[tjvh]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Why do you feel like this? Honestly..

I've said this before....because an assault weapons ban is pointless. If we were being serious about curbing violence, which we never will be, then a ban would have to include hand guns....which will never happen.

That's complete BS. No, if it was seriously about public safety you'd be attacking the Rights of the mentally ill, NOT the Rights of Law abiding citizens.

 

[RDD_1210]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

And who are you that you get to decide how others should be allowed to exercise their Second Amendment Rights?

I'm an American and last I checked I am allowed to have an opinion on what happens in America.

 

[RDD_1210]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Why do you feel like this? Honestly..

Never mind the fact that a ban on handguns is unconstitutional.

I don't see the word handgun anywhere in the constitution, which part was that in?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgFK5PJSLUo]"No retreat. No Surrender. That is Spartan law" - 300 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[eflatminor]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Why just a selective ban of inanimate objects that may be used to hurt an innocent person? Why not ALL firearms?

Since the written word can also spur violent actions from lesser citizens, can you also enlighten us as to which books we should ban? Better tells us which video games should be burn as well.

I don't know, I'm just so happy we have folks like you that clearly know what's best for everyone else...

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Come and take them nanny boy, you want my address?

Sure, post it up if you'd like. Probably should put your first and last name, as well as your social security number while you're at it.

Edward Solomon, 311 Johnson ave, Ronkonkoma, New York, 11779

I'll have my 12 gauge ready.

Facebook me

http://facebook.com/solomonscourge

 

[RDD_1210]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Banning assault weapons doesn't accomplish anything at all, since they account for only 1% of all firearm related deaths. And any bill that includes handguns would be shot down by the Supreme Court.

Instead of going after guns, why not address suicide. Suicides account for far more firearm related deaths than homicide.

Right, an assault weapons ban is rather pointless.

Why can't we do both?

And suicide and homicide are two entirely different animals...do I really need to explain the difference?

 

[RDD_1210]

Why do you feel like this? Honestly..

I've said this before....because an assault weapons ban is pointless. If we were being serious about curbing violence, which we never will be, then a ban would have to include hand guns....which will never happen.

Probably not..
Why do you think banning all guns would solve anything?
Do you think criminals would oblidge?
Do you think freedom is easy?

Because there are enough other countries with much tighter gun control laws and much lower levels of homicide and gun violence that tells me that it can work.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Why do you feel like this? Honestly..

Never mind the fact that a ban on handguns is unconstitutional.

I don't see the word handgun anywhere in the constitution, which part was that in?

DC v Heller
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment . The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Under any of the standards of scrutiny the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights, this prohibition—in the place where the importance of the lawful defense of self, family, and property is most acute—would fail constitutional muster.

You don't have to like the fact that a handgun ban is unconstitutional, but you do need to muster the intelectual honesty to admit it.

 

[RDD_1210]

Why do you feel like this? Honestly..

I've said this before....because an assault weapons ban is pointless. If we were being serious about curbing violence, which we never will be, then a ban would have to include hand guns....which will never happen.

That's complete BS. No, if it was seriously about public safety you'd be attacking the Rights of the mentally ill, NOT the Rights of Law abiding citizens.

How do you propose we target one and not the other?

 

[RDD_1210]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Why just a selective ban of inanimate objects that may be used to hurt an innocent person? Why not ALL firearms?

Since the written word can also spur violent actions from lesser citizens, can you also enlighten us as to which books we should ban? Better tells us which video games should be burn as well.

I don't know, I'm just so happy we have folks like you that clearly know what's best for everyone else...

You're welcome.

 

[eflatminor]

Why do you feel like this? Honestly..

Never mind the fact that a ban on handguns is unconstitutional.

I don't see the word handgun anywhere in the constitution, which part was that in?

Wow have you exposed your ignorance. You're right, the Constitution does not mention handguns...or any firearms for that matter. This means the regulation of such is NOT among the enumerated powers. The federal government therefore has no business meddling with them.

That all firearms one can 'bear' are specifically protected and enshrined in the Bill of Rights is merely gravy.

 

[PratchettFan]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Why do you feel like this? Honestly..

I've said this before....because an assault weapons ban is pointless. If we were being serious about curbing violence, which we never will be, then a ban would have to include hand guns....which will never happen.

That would not curb violence. It might change the tools used in violence, but I doubt it. The genie is already out of the bottle. Any attempt to put it back is a waste of time and effort.

 

[eflatminor]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Why just a selective ban of inanimate objects that may be used to hurt an innocent person? Why not ALL firearms?

Since the written word can also spur violent actions from lesser citizens, can you also enlighten us as to which books we should ban? Better tells us which video games should be burn as well.

I don't know, I'm just so happy we have folks like you that clearly know what's best for everyone else...

You're welcome.

Troll didn't address the questions posed. Typical.

 

[TNHarley]

You are so facetious lol

 

[RDD_1210]

Come and take them nanny boy, you want my address?

Sure, post it up if you'd like. Probably should put your first and last name, as well as your social security number while you're at it.

Edward Solomon, 311 Johnson ave, Ronkonkoma, New York, 11779

I'll have my 12 gauge ready.

Facebook me

http://facebook.com/solomonscourge

You forgot your SSN puss.

 

[tjvh]

I've said this before....because an assault weapons ban is pointless. If we were being serious about curbing violence, which we never will be, then a ban would have to include hand guns....which will never happen.

Probably not..
Why do you think banning all guns would solve anything?
Do you think criminals would oblidge?
Do you think freedom is easy?

Because there are enough other countries with much tighter gun control laws and much lower levels of homicide and gun violence that tells me that it can work.

Nobody is stopping you from relocating there. If you live in such fear in America, I'm sure you'd find much lower stress levels were you to go elsewhere.

 

[RDD_1210]

Never mind the fact that a ban on handguns is unconstitutional.

I don't see the word handgun anywhere in the constitution, which part was that in?

Wow have you exposed your ignorance. You're right, the Constitution does not mention handguns...or any firearms for that matter. This means the regulation of such is NOT among the enumerated powers. The federal government therefore has no business meddling with them.

That all firearms one can 'bear' are specifically protected and enshrined in the Bill of Rights is merely gravy.

Sign me up for my RPG!

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Probably for the best. An assault weapons ban doesn't go far enough. Should include handguns as well.

Why do you feel like this? Honestly..

I've said this before....because an assault weapons ban is pointless. If we were being serious about curbing violence, which we never will be, then a ban would have to include hand guns....which will never happen.

You'll never be serious about curbing violence until:

You realize that CAUSE and EFFECT are not the same.

Gun violence is an EFFECT of crime

Gun violence does not CAUSE crime.
-------------------

So what is causing crime?

Blacks and other minorities are forced to suffer from Inferior Educational Facilities and Inferior Educational Materials (including teachers). This reduces their High School Graduation rates incredibly (what use is Affirmative Action, when most black and other minorities don't even graduate high school to being with?).

Second: Unemployment has ravaged the black community (and other minorities) more than white communities -- so far.

Without education or employment opportunities, many young blacks (and other minorities) are FORCED to turn to crime IN ORDER TO SURVIVE, or subsist minimally on government handouts IN ORDER TO SURVIVE.

The Democrats like this system, because it enslaves blacks to their handouts, and thus votes. Democrats like the crime problem, because anyone who tries to become independent of the handout system (by resorting to crime), ends up behind bars and losing their right to vote.

Republicans like this system because they can use it to appeal to RACIST WHITES to get their own votes.

Did I make it clear to you?

-----------

Cause NOT EQUAL to Effect

/end thread