Did anyone interfere with your investigation? Mueller...No.

[BWK]

So after 8 hours of a billion ?'s, what did we learn that was new?

Exactly nothing

Wrong!

Well then we should see full steam ahead on impeachment by tomorrow.....go....go....go

Not necessarily. Indictment when he leaves office and being humiliated in the mean time works for me.

 

[skookerasbil]

So BWK....when does the shoe drop on the president? You've said it at least 1,000 times in the past 18 months! Maybe more.

Pardon me if I'm still laughing me balls off!

 

[Billiejeens]

So I was working so didnt see a lick of the hearing.....but saw a bunch of reports on the web that Mueller appeared very confused during alot of the questioning. Was it that bad?

Worse
The person who learned the most about The Mueller Report today was Robert Mueller.

And when asked if Trump would be indicted if he weren't president or could be indicted after he leaves office the answer was yes on both counts. That's not new to Mueller;

That's False -
You're not even a competent troll.

 

[Defiant1]

He's scared. He recognizes the American people are beginning to see the truth about him. He knows Trump will be reelected and his ass might just be on the line in a year or two for his collusion with the Democratic Party to overthrow a duly elected President.

Trump involved himself with an illegal election and that was proven with illegal campaign finance funding. He will be indicted. And a vote for Trump is a vote for a felon.

Why hasn't the FEC brought campaign finance charges against the Trump campaign?

For the same reason he can't be indicted while in office. They closed the case pending an indictment after he is gone.

Bullshit, they charged Obama.

Who charged Obama and with what?

President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a presidential campaign, POLITICO has learned.

 

[2aguy]

So.....this is about as helpful to the democrats as the epstein arrest.....

Mueller Time: Former Special Counsel Testifies About Trump, Russia Investigation

NBC:

Mueller answers “no” when asked by Ranking Member Collins if his investigation was ever curtailed or hindered at any point.
----------

Robert Mueller: my investigation was never curtailed, stopped, or hindered at any time.

Yet the report has numerous examples where he wanted to fire Mueller but his people would not do it.

Trump at one point told White House counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller and to lie about doing so; that Trump ordered campaign Corey Lewandowski to tell Attorney General Jeff Sessions to restrict the Russia investigation, and that Session could be fired for not doing so; and, to suggest Trump’s alleged witness tampering, to make clear to campaign Paul Manafort and and attorney Michael Cohen to not cooperate with investigations and even threatened Cohen’s family to keep the long-time fixer in line.

Someone obstructs justice when that person has a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. That is the legal meaning.

my investigation was never curtailed, stopped, or hindered at any time

just means that they tried but were able to pull the trigger its the intent and the intent is there with testimony from Trumps own people.

Did that guy pointing a gun at you ever shoot at you, hurt you with a bullet or make threats

NO because he used all his bullets up shooting at the wall

Hey this guy wanted to pay me money to lie for him but the check bounced

Its the intent not whether he was successful in doing it, its the effort put forth that failed

the White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, threatened to quit unless Mr. Trump stopped trying to get him to fire Mr. Mueller.

When Mr. Trump told Mr. McGahn in June to have Mr. Mueller fired, the president cited a series of conflict-of-interest issues that he insisted disqualified the special counsel from overseeing the investigation

As I have always said Trump is his own worst enemy, if he had said nothing and let the investigation take its course he would have beat it.

Also he really outsmarted Barr and his DOJ when he got them to define his testimony only as whats in the report

Who is your daddy

as many legal scholars have stated.....Trump didn't break the law.....you should pay attention.....

Wrong! And by the way, link those legal scholars and their legal opinions.

When even the democrat, left wing, government media are telling you asshats it was a disaster, you need to understand...it was a disaster....

 

[Billiejeens]

So after 8 hours of a billion ?'s, what did we learn that was new?

Exactly nothing

I do think that we learned that Mueller was just a name on the report
He was barely involved.

 

[2aguy]

So I was working so didnt see a lick of the hearing.....but saw a bunch of reports on the web that Mueller appeared very confused during alot of the questioning. Was it that bad?

Worse
The person who learned the most about The Mueller Report today was Robert Mueller.

And when asked if Trump would be indicted if he weren't president or could be indicted after he leaves office the answer was yes on both counts. That's not new to Mueller;

And you fail to give mueller correcting that statement.......Which makes your post stupid......

Robert Mueller Congressional Testimony: Impeachment Dies Again | National Review

And then Mueller walked it back. Early in the afternoon, he told the House Intelligence Committee,

“I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by [Representative Ted] Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion.’ That is not the correct way to say it,” Mueller said. “As we say in the report, and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

And just like that, Democratic dreams of impeachment died.

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump involved himself with an illegal election and that was proven with illegal campaign finance funding. He will be indicted. And a vote for Trump is a vote for a felon.

Why hasn't the FEC brought campaign finance charges against the Trump campaign?

For the same reason he can't be indicted while in office. They closed the case pending an indictment after he is gone.

Bullshit, they charged Obama.

Who charged Obama and with what?

President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a presidential campaign, POLITICO has learned.

So how much has the Trump campaign been fined?

 

[Billiejeens]

So I was working so didnt see a lick of the hearing.....but saw a bunch of reports on the web that Mueller appeared very confused during alot of the questioning. Was it that bad?

Nothing confusing about Mueller saying that Trump would be indicted if he wasn't president, and that he could be convicted after he left office. Anyone who doesn't understand that language is a vegetable retard.

“I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by [Representative Ted] Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion.’ That is not the correct way to say it,” Mueller said. “As we say in the report, and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

 

[Defiant1]

So I was working so didnt see a lick of the hearing.....but saw a bunch of reports on the web that Mueller appeared very confused during alot of the questioning. Was it that bad?

Nothing confusing about Mueller saying that Trump would be indicted if he wasn't president, and that he could be convicted after he left office. Anyone who doesn't understand that language is a vegetable retard.

“I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by [Representative Ted] Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion.’ That is not the correct way to say it,” Mueller said. “As we say in the report, and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

What do you call a person who the prosecutor cannot determine committed a crime?

Innocent

 

[MAGAman]

Are you saying trump couldn’t fire Mueller?

Not with corrupt intent.

You people are so childish.

Which branch of government for you think Mueller was a part of?

Read the Constitution. Read The Executives powers. It doesn't say "unless Democrats are Butthurt".

 

[BWK]

What is so crazy about all this that has been totally glossed over, is the conviction of Michael Flynn's advisor who is going to jail for the same crimes Flynn committed; Ex-Flynn business partner convicted of illegal lobbying This whole administration, before and after the election has been surrounded by thugs.

 

[BWK]

So I was working so didnt see a lick of the hearing.....but saw a bunch of reports on the web that Mueller appeared very confused during alot of the questioning. Was it that bad?

Nothing confusing about Mueller saying that Trump would be indicted if he wasn't president, and that he could be convicted after he left office. Anyone who doesn't understand that language is a vegetable retard.

“I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by [Representative Ted] Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion.’ That is not the correct way to say it,” Mueller said. “As we say in the report, and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

What do you call a person who the prosecutor cannot determine committed a crime?

Innocent

That's not what the prosecution said today;

 

[Meathead]

So I was working so didnt see a lick of the hearing.....but saw a bunch of reports on the web that Mueller appeared very confused during alot of the questioning. Was it that bad?

Nothing confusing about Mueller saying that Trump would be indicted if he wasn't president, and that he could be convicted after he left office. Anyone who doesn't understand that language is a vegetable retard.

“I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by [Representative Ted] Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion.’ That is not the correct way to say it,” Mueller said. “As we say in the report, and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

What do you call a person who the prosecutor cannot determine committed a crime?

Innocent

That's not what the prosecution said today;

It's over snowflake. Let it go.

 

[busybee01]

He confirmed that Manafort gave polling data and campaign information to a Russian business associate which has been identified by the FBI as a Russian with ties to Russian Intelligence. The same group that was directing the Russian efforts to help Trump.,

...although not Mueller or anyone is alleging collusion.

Because he was unable to find out what was done with the information. A Russian Intelligence plant can hardly be subpoenaed.

SCHIFF: Trump and his campaign welcomed & encouraged Russian interference?

MUELLER: Yes.

SCHIFF: And then Trump and his campaign lied about it to cover it up?

MUELLER: Yes.

 

[busybee01]

Again you demonstrate you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. There is no judge involved here. A sitting president can't be indicted. Have you not been paying attention or is the conversation just too hard for you to understand?

Which means volume two was created for the hearts of democrats BECAUSE THERE WAS NO COLLUSION OR conspiracy !

It was a bias opinion on how trump beat the shit out out democrats for two years.

Same question?
That once again is a lie. Do you know the difference between collusion and conspiracy?

Yes I do and in Mueller report he said NO CONSPIRACY NO COLLUSION
HE EVEN directed his answer to what the report says lol

He confirmed that Manafort gave polling data and campaign information to a Russian business associate which has been identified by the FBI as a Russian with ties to Russian Intelligence. The same group that was directing the Russian efforts to help Trump.,

Lol yea OK
I’m sure all campaigns share polling information with anyone that wants to hear.

How many other people did Manafort give that information to? In addition, he shared messaging, campaign strategy and battleground states. Manafort gave a road map for the Russians to follow.

 

[busybee01]

You don't have a thought without Trump telling you what to say. I am a homeless Republican.

Right...
If you are "republican" at all you are from the McCain-Romney-Bush wing of the democrat party
if that. Your posts tell me you are a neutered donkey.

Ronald Reagan would have nothing to do with the Trump Republican Party. It is a far right wing, white supremacist, fascist party.
Your posts tell me you are a moronic, empty headed Trump Republican. I have not abandoned my principles except I apply it to both sides.

 

[MAGAman]

So what? He also said attempting to interfere in an investigation that fails to hinder it is still obstruction.

Mueller said Trump did not hinder Witchhunt.

 

[Kilroy2]

So.....this is about as helpful to the democrats as the epstein arrest.....

Mueller Time: Former Special Counsel Testifies About Trump, Russia Investigation

NBC:

Mueller answers “no” when asked by Ranking Member Collins if his investigation was ever curtailed or hindered at any point.
----------

Robert Mueller: my investigation was never curtailed, stopped, or hindered at any time.

Yet the report has numerous examples where he wanted to fire Mueller but his people would not do it.

Trump at one point told White House counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller and to lie about doing so; that Trump ordered campaign Corey Lewandowski to tell Attorney General Jeff Sessions to restrict the Russia investigation, and that Session could be fired for not doing so; and, to suggest Trump’s alleged witness tampering, to make clear to campaign Paul Manafort and and attorney Michael Cohen to not cooperate with investigations and even threatened Cohen’s family to keep the long-time fixer in line.

Someone obstructs justice when that person has a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. That is the legal meaning.

my investigation was never curtailed, stopped, or hindered at any time

just means that they tried but were able to pull the trigger its the intent and the intent is there with testimony from Trumps own people.

Did that guy pointing a gun at you ever shoot at you, hurt you with a bullet or make threats

NO because he used all his bullets up shooting at the wall

Hey this guy wanted to pay me money to lie for him but the check bounced

Its the intent not whether he was successful in doing it, its the effort put forth that failed

the White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, threatened to quit unless Mr. Trump stopped trying to get him to fire Mr. Mueller.

When Mr. Trump told Mr. McGahn in June to have Mr. Mueller fired, the president cited a series of conflict-of-interest issues that he insisted disqualified the special counsel from overseeing the investigation

As I have always said Trump is his own worst enemy, if he had said nothing and let the investigation take its course he would have beat it.

Also he really outsmarted Barr and his DOJ when he got them to define his testimony only as whats in the report

Who is your daddy

as many legal scholars have stated.....Trump didn't break the law.....you should pay attention.....

Yet so many legal scholars says that he did otherwise he would have been exonerated.

Does the Mueller report exonerate Trump? We asked 12 legal experts.

 

[Kilroy2]

So.....this is about as helpful to the democrats as the epstein arrest.....

Mueller Time: Former Special Counsel Testifies About Trump, Russia Investigation

NBC:

Mueller answers “no” when asked by Ranking Member Collins if his investigation was ever curtailed or hindered at any point.
----------

Robert Mueller: my investigation was never curtailed, stopped, or hindered at any time.

Yet the report has numerous examples where he wanted to fire Mueller but his people would not do it.

Trump at one point told White House counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller and to lie about doing so; that Trump ordered campaign Corey Lewandowski to tell Attorney General Jeff Sessions to restrict the Russia investigation, and that Session could be fired for not doing so; and, to suggest Trump’s alleged witness tampering, to make clear to campaign Paul Manafort and and attorney Michael Cohen to not cooperate with investigations and even threatened Cohen’s family to keep the long-time fixer in line.

Someone obstructs justice when that person has a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. That is the legal meaning.

my investigation was never curtailed, stopped, or hindered at any time

just means that they tried but were able to pull the trigger its the intent and the intent is there with testimony from Trumps own people.

Did that guy pointing a gun at you ever shoot at you, hurt you with a bullet or make threats

NO because he used all his bullets up shooting at the wall

Hey this guy wanted to pay me money to lie for him but the check bounced

Its the intent not whether he was successful in doing it, its the effort put forth that failed

the White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, threatened to quit unless Mr. Trump stopped trying to get him to fire Mr. Mueller.

When Mr. Trump told Mr. McGahn in June to have Mr. Mueller fired, the president cited a series of conflict-of-interest issues that he insisted disqualified the special counsel from overseeing the investigation

As I have always said Trump is his own worst enemy, if he had said nothing and let the investigation take its course he would have beat it.

Also he really outsmarted Barr and his DOJ when he got them to define his testimony only as whats in the report

Who is your daddy

as many legal scholars have stated.....Trump didn't break the law.....you should pay attention.....

Wrong! And by the way, link those legal scholars and their legal opinions.

When even the democrat, left wing, government media are telling you asshats it was a disaster, you need to understand...it was a disaster....

Does the Mueller report exonerate Trump? We asked 12 legal experts.

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

Mueller words himself and he believes that he can be tried for Obstruction of Justice