edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
You are still wrong. As I have already posted, Bush's total was 5,375,000 not your 7,502,000 or your 6,100,000. You are using monthly PRELIMINARY data and I am using the FINAL data. So you were off by 2,127,000.Then you are totally unbelievable since you won't cite your sources while I gave you the exact dates and more importantly the LINKS!
YOU provide nothing but your convoluted irrational and definitely indefensible stupid statements!
I am asking a simple question. At the end of 2008 there were 7,502,000 people employed then at the end of 2000!
Total fact. Totally irrefutable!
Bush ended in Jan 2009, not December 2008 dunce.
Clinton ended in Jan, 2001, not December 2000 dunce.
Ed's point stands, your numbers are lies by using the incorrect date of the Presidency.
I WAS WRONG!!!! I WAS WRONG!!! I was off by 1,402,000!!!
Jan 2009 142,099,000 http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02062009.pdf
Jan. 2001 135,999,000 http://www.bls.gov/news.release/history/empsit_02022001.txt
Total 6,100,000 more people working in 2009 then were working in 2001!
Also you are not taking into account the 6 million workers Bush added to the ranks of the unemployed in his 8 years. So while new jobs were created, they were not enough to keep up with the growth in population resulting in more people becoming unemployed than new jobs created for a net loss of 681,000 jobs over his 8 years.
Again here is the link to the accurate BLS historical data giving the FINAL numbers after all the monthly corrections.
Table A-1. Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age
Just check off the boxes for employed and unemployed seasonally adjusted numbers under the "total" heading and scroll to the bottom and click on "retrieve data." That will give you the last 10 years data, simply change 2003 to 2000 in the "change output options" section at the top and click on "go" to get the older data.