Did these Democrats ever read the Bill of Rights?

[occupied]

You didn’t address my post.
And you responded with an MSM lie about trump.

You first have to have a point to address you dog wormer swallowing Trumpbot. I don't automatically believe anything a politician says nor do I seek them out for medical advice.

 

[Flash]

When a government sets out to drastically reduce and control its constituent population the most vital data to that end is an accurate count of all the people. Just as years prior to COVID vaccines anti-vaxxers were relentlessly demonized as cranks, coots and tinfoil hat wearing moon-bats. Everything under the sun happens for a reason.

Liberals can't stand a free flow of ideas. They can't stand to have their lies and misinformation exposed so they are willing to do away with the freedom of speech to protect their agenda of turning the US into a Socialist Shithole.

In this case they want Illegals to be counted as citizens in the Census. They can't have anybody questioning the Census lest they be exposed. Despicable, isn't it?

 

[bripat9643]

Specifically the first amendment to the Constitution that specifies the right of free speech?

Is now any criticism of the government deemed to be against the law?

Isn't this what we see in totalitarian countries?

Spreading disinformation regarding the federal government’s once-a-decade decennial population count could land you in jail or fined thousands of dollars under new legislation introduced in the House and Senate this week.

The Honest Census Communications Act, introduced in the Senate by Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, and in the House by Reps. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., and Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., outlaws written, digital or telephonic communications about the Census that “has the intent to impede or prevent another person from participating in any census.”



Bill Would Criminalize Census Disinformation

These progs are simply unbelievable. They still claim to support the First Amendment!

 

[bripat9643]

You first have to have a point to address you dog wormer swallowing Trumpbot. I don't automatically believe anything a politician says nor do I seek them out for medical advice.

You do if they are Democrats.

 

[bripat9643]

Pretty sure no founder would have argued that you cannot be held responsible for what you say. They used to have duels over minor personal slander. Truth was important to them. Trying to say that lies are protected speech and you cannot be punished for the damage they cause is an insult to them.

The question is whether the government can arrest you or fine you, not whether you can "be held responsible." I hold you responsible for being such a fucking dumbass.

 

[bripat9643]

Yet the communist use a constitution for a basis of govt.

Do Communists Have a Constitution?


The constitutions of most communist states describe their political system as a form of democracy. They recognize the sovereignty of the people as embodied in a series of representative parliamentary institutions.

Communist state - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

We all know the Soviet Constitution was a big fat lie.

 

[bripat9643]

You really do despise the 14th and 10th amendments.

Of what relevance to his post are the 10th and 14th amendments?

 

[bripat9643]

So you're on the side of lies and disinformation? I guess someone has to defend them. You defend slander and libel too.

Thanks for admitting that you oppose the First Amendment.

 

[bripat9643]

Prove that all liberals are confused about the Constitution then.

Just read this thread.

 

[Moonglow]

We all know the Soviet Constitution was a big fat lie.

So was the US Constitution until the blacks that were slaves were freed.

 

[bripat9643]

The first amendment merely prohibits congress from infringing on what is considered natural rights. It does not grant you any rights that you don't already possess as a rational human being. Most importantly it does not protect you from the consequences of your actions.

It protects you from the government, you fucking dumbass. It protects you from, laws like the one this thread is discussing.

 

[bripat9643]

So was the US Constitution until the blacks that were slaves were freed.

Your point?

 

[bripat9643]

Just because it is a right doesn't mean rules can't be made in respect to that right.

Yes it does, you fucking moron.

Freedom of Religion doesn't mean you can kill using a human sacrifice for your religious activities.

Your rights end where someone else's rights begin.

Whose rights is this bill protecting?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

You first have to have a point to address you dog wormer swallowing Trumpbot. I don't automatically believe anything a politician says nor do I seek them out for medical advice.

Your point was about free speech. Politicians or otherwise are moot per the discussion. I gave you an example and you dodged the question.

 

[Flash]

It is not enough that these Democrat assholes want to do away with the First Amendment but also the Second. That Bill of Rights is a major impediment to turning the US into Socialist Shithole, isn't it?

Biden Admin Amassing Millions of Records on US Gun Owners Amid New Crackdown on Firearms

The Biden administration in just the past year alone stockpiled the records of more than 54 million U.S. gun owners and is poised to drastically alter gun regulations to ensure that information on Americans who own firearms ultimately ends up in the federal government's hands, according to internal Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

The ATF in fiscal year 2021 processed 54.7 million out-of-business records, according to an internal ATF document obtained by the Gun Owners of America, a firearms advocacy group, and provided exclusively to the Free Beacon. When a licensed gun store goes out of business, its private records detailing gun transactions become ATF property and are stored at a federal site in West Virginia. This practice allows the federal government to stockpile scores of gun records and has drawn outrage from gun advocacy groups that say the government is using this information to create a national database of gun owners—which has long been prohibited under U.S. law.

The ATF obtained 53.8 million paper records and another 887,000 electronic records, according to the internal document that outlines ATF actions in fiscal year 2021. Gun activists described this figure as worryingly high and said it contributes to fears that the Biden administration is trying to keep track of all Americans who own firearms, in violation of federal statutes. The procurement of these records by the ATF comes as the Biden administration moves to alter current laws to ensure that gun records are stored in perpetuity. Currently, gun shops can destroy their records after 20 years, thereby preventing the ATF from accessing the information in the future.

"As if the addition of over 50 million records to an ATF gun registry wasn't unconstitutional or illegal enough, the Biden administration's misuse of ‘out-of-business' records doesn't end there," Aidan Johnston, the Gun Owners of America's director of federal affairs, told the Free Beacon. "Instead of maintaining the right of [licensed firearm dealers] to destroy Firearm Transaction Records after 20 years, buried within Biden's proposed regulations is a provision that would mean every single Firearm Transaction Record going forward would eventually be sent to ATF's registry in West Virginia."

The ATF's registry site has long been a battleground between gun advocates and the federal government. Those in favor of more restrictive gun measures want the ATF to digitize this registry and create a federal database of U.S. gun owners, a move opposed by groups such as the Gun Owners of America and the National Rifle Association. The ATF has so many records stored in its West Virginia site that several years ago the floor collapsed, according to the New York Times.

An ATF spokesman declined to comment on internal agency records but told the Free Beacon that the agency's "National Tracing Center processes millions of out of business records each month." However, "those out of business records do not constitute an initiation or continuation of any federal gun registry," the spokesman said.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 mandates that licensed firearm dealers that go out of business provide the ATF with their records. They are then processed into images, though the ATF maintains this database cannot be searched by a purchaser's name. Physical records, the agency says, are then destroyed.

The record-keeping issue has received new scrutiny as the Biden administration readies to implement several new restrictions on firearms and owners, including a proposed ban on anywhere from 10 to 40 million pistol braces, which are used as stabilizers on popular weapons such as AR-15s. Under these guidelines, gun owners would be ordered to register or destroy these pistol braces.

The ATF's proposed regulations would also require gun parts to be regulated with background checks, meaning that if an individual assembled a legal homemade gun, he may be forced to submit to up to 16 different background checks.

Gun advocates, including the Gun Owners of America, accuse the Biden administration of abusing the rule-making process to ensure these regulations are put into effect in record time, possibly before the end of the year.

"The Biden administration has forced ATF to undertake the rule-making process in record time—resulting in faulty argumentation and demonstrating that neither ATF nor Biden's anti-gun appointees know anything about the firearms and accessories they seek to regulate," said Johnston.

 

[occupied]

Your point was about free speech. Politicians or otherwise are moot per the discussion. I gave you an example and you dodged the question.

Until you post some sort of link to whatever you are talking about I am going to assume you are a lying sack of shit as usual. That's just how it is when the right does not seem to value honesty. This thread right here is a right winger's argument that lies are protected speech.

 

[bripat9643]

Until you post some sort of link to whatever you are talking about I am going to assume you are a lying sack of shit as usual. That's just how it is when the right does not seem to value honesty. This thread right here is a right winger's argument that lies are protected speech.

They are protected speech, dumbass. Even Dim lies are protected.

 

[Crepitus]

Democrats read?

They cannot read. They can only recite Party diktats.

Proving once more that Democrats are not allowed to read. Only to recite party dogma.

Thomas Jefferson would spit on you.

 

[Crepitus]

B. Which the leftists have morphed into speech that hurts someone’s feelings.

Who said anything about feelings, kid? I'm talking about material harm. Only snowflake conservitards are worried about "feelings".

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Until you post some sort of link to whatever you are talking about I am going to assume you are a lying sack of shit as usual. That's just how it is when the right does not seem to value honesty. This thread right here is a right winger's argument that lies are protected speech.

You never heard Biden refer to the “pandemic of the unvaccinated”? You’re unaware of Biden’s plans for vaccine mandates?