🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Did you notice how none of them offered any specifics on the economy?

I just provided direct links to white papers by two of the candidates. How much you guys want to bet the topic starter isn't even reading them?
The only viable economic plan is strengthen the middle class and boost consumer spending. NONE of them offered such ideas.
Republicans despise the Middle Class.


Free trade was their idea with Nixon opening up China and George hw Bush selling us to Mexico with Nafta. Between destroying unions and this shit = smaller middle class. They dream of turning most of the American poor into slaves for the corporations!
We've yet to complete our plan of diabolical kitten killing. Getting us to 3rd world status will have to wait.

Priorities ya know
 
NONE of the candidates have any specifics of how exactly they would improve wages and create jobs.

GOP debates are a joke. The audience cheered when Jeb mentioned his 4% growth talking point without offering any specific policies. Are those people that naive?

Did you notice how none of them offered any specifics on the economy?

Yes, but it wasn't in the least surprising given that none of them have a clue about it to begin with.

And yes, that includes T-Rump.


except that he's richer and more successful than you will ever be, and knows more about creating jobs IN REAL LIFE than you or the professors that brainwashed you???
 
NONE of the candidates have any specifics of how exactly they would improve wages and create jobs.

GOP debates are a joke. The audience cheered when Jeb mentioned his 4% growth talking point without offering any specific policies. Are those people that naive?
Did you notice you're as stupid as rderp?

As I told him, they get SIXTY SECONDS to respond.
Get a grip troll
Right and they use those 60 seconds to bash Hillary/Obama/ObamaCare while not spending any precious time on HOW they would improve the economy.
Exactly. They know who the real enemy is, and that she was not on stage. A candidate who laid out specific economic policies in a debate like this would very quickly run out of time. IOW, your complaint is stupid.

oh yeah, she is so AWESOME that's why you all didn't VOTE for her the last time she ran. instead you put in nobody community agitator with no experience in anything but running his mouth
what debate were you watching.
watching Karly was like watching a bad ventriloquist act.
 
I just provided direct links to white papers by two of the candidates. How much you guys want to bet the topic starter isn't even reading them?
The only viable economic plan is strengthen the middle class and boost consumer spending. NONE of them offered such ideas.
"Strengthen the middle class" is a bullshit feel-good aphorism that is completely meaningless without a roadmap on how you would accomplish it. And you have the balls to criticize the candidates who put actual plans on the table!?!?
It's simple really. Cut their taxes and invest in infrastructure. Infrastructure projects create middle class jobs.



"My shovel-ready jobs werent so shovel-ready"


obama
 
Have you noticed that the Dem's haven't ever offered any specifics on any economic statement?

IT is NOT the job of government to improve wages or to create jobs.

Maybe you should consider that.


Maybe you don't understand reality. Have you ever considered that?? Oh'yess, you're the kind that thinks corporations should be allowed to do as they damn well please with their workers and environment.

Police = government
Building infrastructure = a shared tax in order to do it.
Public education = a shared tax in order to do it.

Your system doesn't work in reality and has never worked. A world ran by the corporation is a bad idea.
 
NONE of the candidates have any specifics of how exactly they would improve wages and create jobs.

GOP debates are a joke. The audience cheered when Jeb mentioned his 4% growth talking point without offering any specific policies. Are those people that naive?
Rather than parrot some email you and rdean received, maybe you should have actually watched and listened to the debate instead.

Governor Christie made reference to his 12 point plan for entitlement reform. All you had to do from there is look it up: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/christie_factsheet.pdf

Senator Rubio has a plan for tax reform: http://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/...?File_id=2d839ff1-f995-427a-86e9-267365609942

Governor Huckabee proposed the Fair Tax as a solution to our debt and to funding Social Security.
NONE of that will create jobs or boost wages.
Ta-daaaaaa!

You didn't even read them. Those plans would greatly impact jobs and wages.

The government can only affect those parts of the economy in which it operates.
So you think those plans coming directly from the candidates themselves would "greatly impact jobs and wages"? Why? Why should I think they aren't full of shit? HOW would those plans boost the economy?
Read the plans, then tell me why they wouldn't work.

I've explained why eliminating tax expenditures would greatly and positively impact the economy a zillion times on this forum, and that is a large part of Rubio's plan.
So you want me to explain why they wouldn't work without you explaining how they would? How they would is the premise of my thread. What tax expenditures would be eliminated?
 
I just provided direct links to white papers by two of the candidates. How much you guys want to bet the topic starter isn't even reading them?
The only viable economic plan is strengthen the middle class and boost consumer spending. NONE of them offered such ideas.
"Strengthen the middle class" is a bullshit feel-good aphorism that is completely meaningless without a roadmap on how you would accomplish it. And you have the balls to criticize the candidates who put actual plans on the table!?!?
It's simple really. Cut their taxes and invest in infrastructure. Infrastructure projects create middle class jobs.
TEMPORARY

We need real jobs. Jobs that can sustain a family not this band-aid bullshit you all have been talking about since the FIRST summer of recovery.
 
it's hilarious watching left-wing losers just deny facts put straight in their faces!!!!


lol:banghead:
 
I just provided direct links to white papers by two of the candidates. How much you guys want to bet the topic starter isn't even reading them?
The only viable economic plan is strengthen the middle class and boost consumer spending. NONE of them offered such ideas.

so AGAIN; it isnt that they havent offered specifics; you just reject them. g5000 is right this time; your whole thread premise is a lie
No actually. Nothing they said would directly create jobs and boost wages.

your argument was that they didnt speak on that at all idiot
All they had to say was "yes, these ideas would boost wages and create jobs"
 
I just provided direct links to white papers by two of the candidates. How much you guys want to bet the topic starter isn't even reading them?
The only viable economic plan is strengthen the middle class and boost consumer spending. NONE of them offered such ideas.
"Strengthen the middle class" is a bullshit feel-good aphorism that is completely meaningless without a roadmap on how you would accomplish it. And you have the balls to criticize the candidates who put actual plans on the table!?!?
It's simple really. Cut their taxes and invest in infrastructure. Infrastructure projects create middle class jobs.



"My shovel-ready jobs werent so shovel-ready"


obama


That has more to do with Corruption then the concept of the public sector. America built the highways, regulated our clean air, water, food and pretty much built America into the super power it was.

We all know what a unregulated corporation does when it is allowed to do what it pleases.
 
I just provided direct links to white papers by two of the candidates. How much you guys want to bet the topic starter isn't even reading them?
The only viable economic plan is strengthen the middle class and boost consumer spending. NONE of them offered such ideas.
"Strengthen the middle class" is a bullshit feel-good aphorism that is completely meaningless without a roadmap on how you would accomplish it. And you have the balls to criticize the candidates who put actual plans on the table!?!?
It's simple really. Cut their taxes and invest in infrastructure. Infrastructure projects create middle class jobs.
TEMPORARY

We need real jobs. Jobs that can sustain a family not this band-aid bullshit you all have been talking about since the FIRST summer of recovery.
temporary, just like the republican controlled congress.
 
if its so simple why did obama make the richest richer and the poorest poorer leftard?
 
go vote Democrat continue the Trend under Obama and we can all just go live in the poor house. Democrats motto: trickle up Poverty


SNIP:
Record 93,770,000 Americans Not in Labor Force; Participation Rate Matches 38-Year Low

CNSNews.com) - A record 93,770,000 Americans were not in the American labor force last month, and the labor force participation rate remained at 62.6 percent, exactly where it was in June -- a 38-year low, the Labor Department reported on Friday.

In 1975, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics began keeping such records, 58,627,000 Americans were not in the labor force, and the number has grown steadily since then, breaking the 80-million mark at the end of George W. Bush's presidency; and the 90-million mark in July 2013, during Barack Obama's second term. The number of Americans not in the labor force has continued to rise since then.

According to the Congressional Budget Office's 2015 long-term outlook, the number of working Americans is expected to increase more slowly in coming decades, as more workers exit the labor force, many of them retiring baby-boomers; and fewer workers enter it -- given declining birth rates and a levelling-off of women in the labor force.

ALL the wonderful news on the Democrat economy here
Record 93 770 000 Americans Not in Labor Force Participation Rate Matches 38-Year Low
 
I just provided direct links to white papers by two of the candidates. How much you guys want to bet the topic starter isn't even reading them?
The only viable economic plan is strengthen the middle class and boost consumer spending. NONE of them offered such ideas.
"Strengthen the middle class" is a bullshit feel-good aphorism that is completely meaningless without a roadmap on how you would accomplish it. And you have the balls to criticize the candidates who put actual plans on the table!?!?
It's simple really. Cut their taxes and invest in infrastructure. Infrastructure projects create middle class jobs.
There is a right way and a wrong way to cut taxes. Cutting taxes with the current tax scheme would only make matters a lot worse.

Look. At. Rubio's. Plan.

READ!!!
 
I just provided direct links to white papers by two of the candidates. How much you guys want to bet the topic starter isn't even reading them?
The only viable economic plan is strengthen the middle class and boost consumer spending. NONE of them offered such ideas.
"Strengthen the middle class" is a bullshit feel-good aphorism that is completely meaningless without a roadmap on how you would accomplish it. And you have the balls to criticize the candidates who put actual plans on the table!?!?
It's simple really. Cut their taxes and invest in infrastructure. Infrastructure projects create middle class jobs.
TEMPORARY

We need real jobs. Jobs that can sustain a family not this band-aid bullshit you all have been talking about since the FIRST summer of recovery.
I don't think you realize how long it would actually take to fix our infrastructure system. While temporary, those high paying jobs would dramatically boost consumer spending and create jobs.
 
I just provided direct links to white papers by two of the candidates. How much you guys want to bet the topic starter isn't even reading them?
The only viable economic plan is strengthen the middle class and boost consumer spending. NONE of them offered such ideas.
"Strengthen the middle class" is a bullshit feel-good aphorism that is completely meaningless without a roadmap on how you would accomplish it. And you have the balls to criticize the candidates who put actual plans on the table!?!?
It's simple really. Cut their taxes and invest in infrastructure. Infrastructure projects create middle class jobs.



"My shovel-ready jobs werent so shovel-ready"


obama


That has more to do with Corruption then the concept of the public sector. America built the highways, regulated our clean air, water, food and pretty much built America into the super power it was.

We all know what a unregulated corporation does when it is allowed to do what it pleases.


because none of THOSE companies had any corruption right?

you losers just keep making endless excuses when facts put straight in your face go against your script
 
matthew

there are no more "Blue dogs" leftard

your Party purged itself of them
 
Christie said exactly what I have been saying for years. We are living longer, we should be working longer.

He does not go far enough, though. He would raise the retirement age by 2 years over a 25 year period. That's the same chickenshit solution the 80's Congress came up with. Our life expectancy has increased by 4 years since then, not 2 years.

The retirement age should be raised to 70 ASAP, and linked to 9 percent of the population going forward.
 
go vote Democrat continue the Trend under Obama and we can all just go live in the poor house. Democrats motto: trickle up Poverty


SNIP:
Record 93,770,000 Americans Not in Labor Force; Participation Rate Matches 38-Year Low

CNSNews.com) - A record 93,770,000 Americans were not in the American labor force last month, and the labor force participation rate remained at 62.6 percent, exactly where it was in June -- a 38-year low, the Labor Department reported on Friday.

In 1975, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics began keeping such records, 58,627,000 Americans were not in the labor force, and the number has grown steadily since then, breaking the 80-million mark at the end of George W. Bush's presidency; and the 90-million mark in July 2013, during Barack Obama's second term. The number of Americans not in the labor force has continued to rise since then.

According to the Congressional Budget Office's 2015 long-term outlook, the number of working Americans is expected to increase more slowly in coming decades, as more workers exit the labor force, many of them retiring baby-boomers; and fewer workers enter it -- given declining birth rates and a levelling-off of women in the labor force.

ALL the wonderful news on the Democrat economy here
Record 93 770 000 Americans Not in Labor Force Participation Rate Matches 38-Year Low



EXTREME BIAS ALERT :
About Us
CNSNews.com was launched on June 16, 1998 as a news source for individuals, news organizations and broadcasters who put a higher premium on balance than spin and seek news that’s ignored or under-reported as a result of media bias by omission.

Study after study by the Media Research Center, the parent organization of CNSNews.com, clearly demonstrate a liberal bias in many news outlets – bias by commission and bias by omission – that results in a frequent double-standard in editorial decisions on what constitutes "news."

In response to these shortcomings, MRC Chairman L. Brent Bozell III founded CNSNews.com in an effort to provide an alternative news source that would cover stories that are subject to the bias of omission and report on other news subject to bias by commission.

CNSNews.com endeavors to fairly present all legitimate sides of a story and debunk popular, albeit incorrect, myths about cultural and policy issues.

CNSNews.com has a full staff of credentialed journalists at its world headquarters in Reston, Virginia. In addition to news, CNSNews.com is proud to present commentary and analysis by some of the brightest minds and sharpest wits in the nation, including cartoonists.

CNSNews.com is a division of the Media Research Center, a not-for-profit 501 (c)(3) organization. Like National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System, CNSNews.com is able to provide its services and information to the public at no cost, thanks to the generous support of our thousands of donors and their tax-deductible contributions. However, unlike NPR or PBS, CNSNews.com does not accept any federal tax money for its operations.



CNSNews.com
1900 Campus Commons Drive
Suite 600
Reston, VA 20191
Main tel: 571-267-3500
877-CNSNEWS
 

Forum List

Back
Top