Discussion/Opinions on Winners of Wed DEM Debate

[emilynghiem]

The Mayor of the biggest city in America is so low in the polls he’s literally falling off the stage.

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?
Socialism as a political belief or religion means Govt cannot be abused to establish or prohibit it.
If people want to practice it, they can fund it voluntarily similar to Christianity which the left keep citing as the motivation to take care of people in need on the Border.

So let's call it out for what it is: a political belief, religion or creed.
So Govt cannot discriminate on the basis of creed by penalizing or forcing taxpayers to pay for it.

 

[Pogo]

So she served in the fucking Hawaiian National Guard? Big deal. She is still a pro-big government liberal. Can’t fool American people. We have Trump in our corner.

Narcissistic liberals think people agree with these extremists lunatics? Laughed my ass off during whole debate. Not one of them looked or spoke Presidential and their ideas are nuts!

Sure generated a ton of wishful thinking ^^, this not-even-an-election-year-yet debate thingy.

This one's even quoting himself, having failed to find a suitable echo chamber pot

Nobody watched I can assure you. Majority of Americans feel we already have a President and Democrats ate crybabies that can’t accept it. I watched because I am a PoliSci major.

Apparently it didn't help your failing grades, did it.

But I won't argue with your self-assessment as a "nobody".

I have a Masters degree dip-shit.

I have no doubt you have a Masters in Dipshit. Your posts demonstrate that. As does your avatar.

 

[Pogo]

The Mayor of the biggest city in America is so low in the polls he’s literally falling off the stage.

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

 

[Bush92]

The Mayor of the biggest city in America is so low in the polls he’s literally falling off the stage.

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?
Socialism as a political belief or religion means Govt cannot be abused to establish or prohibit it.
If people want to practice it, they can fund it voluntarily similar to Christianity which the left keep citing as the motivation to take care of people in need on the Border.

So let's call it out for what it is: a political belief, religion or creed.
So Govt cannot discriminate on the basis of creed by penalizing or forcing taxpayers to pay for it.

I have a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Especially with regards to civil liberties.

 

[Bush92]

The Mayor of the biggest city in America is so low in the polls he’s literally falling off the stage.

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

My “ partisan hackery mission?” Nope. Just get on this site to hold the mirror up in order to show how stupid and dangerous liberals are to a free society.

 

[basquebromance]

Pocahontas sounds like a pissed off school librarian when you sneak in some Doritos

 

[Pogo]

The Mayor of the biggest city in America is so low in the polls he’s literally falling off the stage.

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

My “ partisan hackery mission?” Nope. Just get on this site to hold the mirror up in order to show how stupid and dangerous liberals are to a free society.

See what I mean?

Love the irony though. "Liberals dangerous to a free society" If there were any doubt about your lying about PoliSci, you just put that doubt to rest wid a quickness.

I have a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Especially with regards to civil liberties.

Completely written by .... all together now....... Liberals.

 

[Bush92]

The Mayor of the biggest city in America is so low in the polls he’s literally falling off the stage.

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

My “ partisan hackery mission?” Nope. Just get on this site to hold the mirror up in order to show how stupid and dangerous liberals are to a free society.

See what I mean?

Love the irony though. "Liberals dangerous to a free society" If there were any doubt about your lying about PoliSci, you just put that to rest wid a quickness.

Liberals are. They want government to run our lives from Washington D.C. they do not allow free speech on campus and want to arrest elected officials in Oregon who don’t agree with Marxist philosophy.

 

[Pogo]

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

My “ partisan hackery mission?” Nope. Just get on this site to hold the mirror up in order to show how stupid and dangerous liberals are to a free society.

See what I mean?

Love the irony though. "Liberals dangerous to a free society" If there were any doubt about your lying about PoliSci, you just put that to rest wid a quickness.


↑
I have a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Especially with regards to civil liberties.
Completely written by .... all together now....... Liberals.

Liberals are. They want government to run our lives from Washington D.C. and do not allow free speech on campus and want to arrest elected officials in Oregon who don’t agree with Marxist philosophy.

OK, at this point I'm spewing iced tea through my nose.

 

[Bush92]

The Mayor of the biggest city in America is so low in the polls he’s literally falling off the stage.

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

My “ partisan hackery mission?” Nope. Just get on this site to hold the mirror up in order to show how stupid and dangerous liberals are to a free society.

See what I mean?

Love the irony though. "Liberals dangerous to a free society" If there were any doubt about your lying about PoliSci, you just put that doubt to rest wid a quickness.

I have a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Especially with regards to civil liberties.

Completely written by .... all together now....... Liberals.

More government = less individual freedoms.

 

[Pogo]

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

My “ partisan hackery mission?” Nope. Just get on this site to hold the mirror up in order to show how stupid and dangerous liberals are to a free society.

See what I mean?

Love the irony though. "Liberals dangerous to a free society" If there were any doubt about your lying about PoliSci, you just put that doubt to rest wid a quickness.

I have a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Especially with regards to civil liberties.

Completely written by .... all together now....... Liberals.

More government = less individual freedoms.

Dood you are SO busted with your fake "PoliSci" song and dance. You're like a klown who claims to be a baseball player, then goes out to the field and says "where do I stand?". Completely clue-free.

 

[Bush92]

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

My “ partisan hackery mission?” Nope. Just get on this site to hold the mirror up in order to show how stupid and dangerous liberals are to a free society.

See what I mean?

Love the irony though. "Liberals dangerous to a free society" If there were any doubt about your lying about PoliSci, you just put that to rest wid a quickness.


↑
I have a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Especially with regards to civil liberties.
Completely written by .... all together now....... Liberals.

Liberals are. They want government to run our lives from Washington D.C. and do not allow free speech on campus and want to arrest elected officials in Oregon who don’t agree with Marxist philosophy.

OK, at this point I'm spewing iced tea through my nose.

I’m casually drinking a beer. That’s you downfall Democrats. Your own narcissism.

 

[emilynghiem]

The Mayor of the biggest city in America is so low in the polls he’s literally falling off the stage.

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

Well, any verbal masturbation belongs in the FZ or other forums for that.

This is supposed to be a serious POLITICS discussion.

I am interested to know if a Masters in PoliSci is willing to take on Constitutional arguments
* that Political Religions don't belong in Govt where this violates the equal beliefs and creeds of taxpaying citizens
who have inalienable rights to religious freedom from such Govt establishments;
* and that Political Parties that are pushing political beliefs and religions are acting
as Religious Organizations and should be restricted as such.

Bush92 do you have an opinion on the above points?
If you don't think the Constitutional laws currently "strictly" as written/interpreted
are sufficient to argue against Political Religions such as SOCIALISM being established through Govt,
What STEPS legislatively or legally would you recommend to BAR
Political Religions such as Socialism from being imposed on the public through Federal Govt?

My stance is that this is ALREADY "unconstitutional" by the First Amendment
and also constitutes Discrimination by Creed by Civil Rights laws.

However, given the fact people still teach it is legal to push these BELIEFS by majority rule,
OBVIOUSLY the current laws are NOT being interpreted to bar Political Religions from being established through Govt.

Bush92 would it take
* Amending the Constitution to bar Political Religions such as Socialism from being established through Govt?
* Adding the CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVT SERVICE as a requirement for ALL members of the Executive,
Legislative and Judicial branches of Govt to follow to stop ABUSES OF GOVT BY PARTY
* or what would you suggest?

 

[Pogo]

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

My “ partisan hackery mission?” Nope. Just get on this site to hold the mirror up in order to show how stupid and dangerous liberals are to a free society.

See what I mean?

Love the irony though. "Liberals dangerous to a free society" If there were any doubt about your lying about PoliSci, you just put that to rest wid a quickness.


↑
I have a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Especially with regards to civil liberties.
Completely written by .... all together now....... Liberals.

Liberals are. They want government to run our lives from Washington D.C. and do not allow free speech on campus and want to arrest elected officials in Oregon who don’t agree with Marxist philosophy.

OK, at this point I'm spewing iced tea through my nose.

I’m casually drinking a beer. That’s you downfall Democrats. Your own narcissism.

What in the blue fuck does "that's you downfall Democrats" mean? You're not only a fake at PoliSci, you can't even write in English.

 

[Picaro]

These Sound Bite Parties aren't 'debates', for one, so wasting one's time watching them when you could do something more productive with your time, like staring at wall paper, is just crazy.

And, using the term 'PoliSci' in a serious conversation is evidence of serious brain damage and emotional retardation. Repeating it over and over again in lame attempts at sounding 'clever' is good cause for being locked up in a loony bin.

 

[basquebromance]

2020 will be about economics. Why is it that the path has gotten so much steeper, so much rockier, for hard-working people — and even steeper and rockier for people of color? This is a moment when we should tackle that

 

[basquebromance]

"Here's the lineup for tonight's Democrat debate

The nation's worst mayor

A failed Senate candidate

A fake Native American

Spartacus

An abusive boss

A Congresswoman who loves Assad

And three others polling at 0%

This is the best Democrats have to offer America?"

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

New York City is the most persuasive argument conservatives have to get voters to reject socialism.

Dear Bush92 Why not Constitutional religious freedom as the argument?

Because that would not serve his partisan hackery mission.

He has a Master Baiter's degree in it you know.

My “ partisan hackery mission?” Nope. Just get on this site to hold the mirror up in order to show how stupid and dangerous liberals are to a free society.

See what I mean?

Love the irony though. "Liberals dangerous to a free society" If there were any doubt about your lying about PoliSci, you just put that doubt to rest wid a quickness.

I have a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Especially with regards to civil liberties.

Completely written by .... all together now....... Liberals.

More government = less individual freedoms.

Sure, that's why real Conservatives want more government.

We don't want individual freedom for abortion, prostitutes, porn stars, drug dealers, drug abusers, Gay marriage, Gay pride parades,gangster rap stars, for Hollywood degenerates, for those who hire Illegal Immigrants, for the media moguls, for the individual freedom of those who outsource jobs.
Etc. etc. etc.

 

[basquebromance]

FACT: During the Obama-Biden administration, 535 migrants died in one Texas country alone (Brooks County)

 

[Snouter]

What is HILARIOUS is that "Big Bird -- I married an ugly Black and have an ugly, half Black male kid and remind him daily that cops of all ethnic backgrounds inherently want to shoot him for no reason," the total and completely failed New York City major DeBlasio actually won.