Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Linear politics is really the downfall of our freedoms and rights. Over a hundred years ago men drew lines in the sand and stood for their ideals. Yet those lines have changed very little since their inception. Our current view must become 3 dimensional, allowing for more ideas to be heard. Instead of left versus right, place ideas and positions on a 3 dimensional polynomial. As more issues are placed along the edges it eventually would become spherical. This would allow us to increase or decrease our physical representation of political positions, rather than: left, right, and the occasional middle.
Oh brother, another one who thinks he's 'deep'.....
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNsrK6P9QvI]Picard's Epic Double Facepalm - YouTube[/ame]
Haters gonna hate ;p
I'm not trying to sound deep I just think it's time for a drastic change. But if you prefer the Patriot Act or the NDAA keep checking that R or D they paid millions of dollars to place permanently on that ballot.
Apparently, someone hasn't read the 1st amendment.But there's more than enough in there that precludes the banning or prohibiting of them.Nothing in the Constitution sets up, or even refers to, political parties.
Apparently, someone hasn't read the 1st amendment.But there's more than enough in there that precludes the banning or prohibiting of them.
OK Brainiac. Where does the Constitution set up political parties, and where does this thread say anything about "banning" or "prohibiting" anything?
Some of y'all are so locked down in your tiny little world you can apparently only think in terms of "banning", not "doing". More's the pity.
Think some founding father suggested we don't have political parties since they only divide us. I agree.
Yay or Nay?
On a related subject, dissolve the electoral college and decide Presidents purely by popular vote? Yay.
Yay or Nay?
There can be a happy medium between a book sized ballot and laws designed to keep anyone not a R or D off the ballot.
Think some founding father suggested we don't have political parties since they only divide us. I agree.
Yay or Nay?
On a related subject, dissolve the electoral college and decide Presidents purely by popular vote? Yay.
Yay or Nay?
Apparently, someone hasn't read the 1st amendment.
OK Brainiac. Where does the Constitution set up political parties, and where does this thread say anything about "banning" or "prohibiting" anything?
Some of y'all are so locked down in your tiny little world you can apparently only think in terms of "banning", not "doing". More's the pity.
The 1st Amendment protects the creation and maintaining of Political parties. Nothing in the construction operation or goals of a political party are illegal or can be made illegal. They are regulated and policed by the Government to ensure they do not violate all applicable laws as the 1st Allows.
OK Brainiac. Where does the Constitution set up political parties, and where does this thread say anything about "banning" or "prohibiting" anything?
Some of y'all are so locked down in your tiny little world you can apparently only think in terms of "banning", not "doing". More's the pity.
The 1st Amendment protects the creation and maintaining of Political parties. Nothing in the construction operation or goals of a political party are illegal or can be made illegal. They are regulated and policed by the Government to ensure they do not violate all applicable laws as the 1st Allows.
And what the fuck does any of that have to do with this thread?
OK Brainiac. Where does the Constitution set up political parties, and where does this thread say anything about "banning" or "prohibiting" anything?
Some of y'all are so locked down in your tiny little world you can apparently only think in terms of "banning", not "doing". More's the pity.
The 1st Amendment protects the creation and maintaining of Political parties. Nothing in the construction operation or goals of a political party are illegal or can be made illegal. They are regulated and policed by the Government to ensure they do not violate all applicable laws as the 1st Allows.
And what the fuck does any of that have to do with this thread?
The 1st Amendment protects the creation and maintaining of Political parties. Nothing in the construction operation or goals of a political party are illegal or can be made illegal. They are regulated and policed by the Government to ensure they do not violate all applicable laws as the 1st Allows.
And what the fuck does any of that have to do with this thread?
You implied that the Constitution does not protect political parties from being banned or closed by the Government.
Dissolving political parties violates the constitution.
Changing the way we elect the President requires a constitutional amendment.
You will not see either anytime soon, if at all.
Unfortunate that you're such an idiot. Nothing in the Constitution sets up, or even refers to, political parties.
Welcome to our country. Please learn our Constitution. Duh.
Dissolving political parties violates the constitution.
Changing the way we elect the President requires a constitutional amendment.
You will not see either anytime soon, if at all.
Unfortunate that you're such an idiot. Nothing in the Constitution sets up, or even refers to, political parties.
Welcome to our country. Please learn our Constitution. Duh.
You did not post this? Someone hack your account?
Unfortunate that you're such an idiot. Nothing in the Constitution sets up, or even refers to, political parties.
Welcome to our country. Please learn our Constitution. Duh.
You did not post this? Someone hack your account?
Good god dood - take a remedial reading course.
Where do you see any indication whatsoever of anyone "banning" anything in that?
There is nothing in the United States Constitution referring to political parties. At all. So the gun nut is full of shit.
Nor is it relevant here because the fact remains, the question in this thread never made any suggestion about "banning" anything.
You did not post this? Someone hack your account?
Good god dood - take a remedial reading course.
Where do you see any indication whatsoever of anyone "banning" anything in that?
There is nothing in the United States Constitution referring to political parties. At all. So the gun nut is full of shit.
Nor is it relevant here because the fact remains, the question in this thread never made any suggestion about "banning" anything.
You specifically responded to his claim the Constitution prevent dissolving political parties by stating it did no such thing. The one that needs a lesson in reading and writing would be you.
Think some founding father suggested we don't have political parties since they only divide us. I agree.
Yay or Nay?
On a related subject, dissolve the electoral college and decide Presidents purely by popular vote? Yay.
Yay or Nay?
Think some founding father suggested we don't have political parties since they only divide us. I agree.
Yay or Nay?
On a related subject, dissolve the electoral college and decide Presidents purely by popular vote? Yay.
Yay or Nay?
Considering the Democratic Party is a coalition party made up of blacks, whites, browns, rich, poor, educated, uneducated, gay, straight, women, men, college professors, scientist and the uneducated, the religious, atheists, and so on, how is it a party of division? The GOP is 90% white. Now "THAT'S" division. Division from the rest of the country.
Think some founding father suggested we don't have political parties since they only divide us. I agree.
Yay or Nay?
On a related subject, dissolve the electoral college and decide Presidents purely by popular vote? Yay.
Yay or Nay?
.
As it appears, elected officials are more concerned with maintaining their own party's control over their rivals rather than serving the interests of the people .