bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,164
- 47,312
Any liberal can, at any time, step in and cover somebody’s Preexisting confition. That isn’t the point. The demand that other people pay for it is always the real point of socialism.
And temper tantrums follow.
It is not socialism. You have no clue what you are talking about. Insurance is about sharing costs.
Dear busybee01
1. insurance does not guarantee services will be paid for or that people can afford to pay for their portion.
2. for shared costs, look into health care cooperatives that are about the actual provisions and services made locally accessible. both progressives like the Greens and conservatives like Sean Hannity agree on health care coops as the best solution that eliminates conflicts over govt micromanaging choices.
3. as for socialism, in American politics this term tends to be used to mean govt interference and regulations over programs and not "literal" ownership.
the literal term means govt ownership, but people use the term loosely in America. the main conflict is that liberals see the govt authority as representing the people (while conservatives don't), and conservatives see the people as having the authority of govt (while liberals don't). so when you argue about whether 'govt' should be in control, the conservatives mean the PEOPLE should decide democratically while the liberals keep putting federal govt above the people. We all want "people" to be represented, but once this gets into the hands of "govt" it becomes controlled by politics in Congress and stops representing what the "people" were really asking for in the first place. so neither side gets represented, and both blame the other. the key is to return the decision making to the PEOPLE, and after policies and terms are set up to work properly, THEN model govt after what works -- so the PEOPLE decide on policies and govt represents the PEOPLE. Not giving up control over terms conditions and policies to politicians in DC first, then holding citizens and taxpayers enslaved to whatever comes out of Congress, which tends to be a corrupted compromised mess. that is what conservatives mean by socialism and opposing "govt control" of regulations (not necessarily literal "ownership" of the production or programs as the literal term means).
People who cry socialism often remind me of the boy who cried wolf. Any time you regulate something it becomes socialism. The government has the right to regulate insurance companies and requiring them to cover people with pre-existing conditions and capping rates for certain groups is not socialism. I have advocated that the Obamacare plan be reformed. I think we should get insurers, doctors and nurses together for a conference to find a rational system. I support the refundable tax credits and people choosing a plan that fits them. That is not socialism.
The government has no such right. However, the left has brainwashed people to believe it does.