Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 17,710
- 19,613
Liberals like you don't even know what a real woman is. Hint: they aren't born with penises.Real ladies prefer real virile liberal men to incel cons and Trumpbumplicans, yes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Liberals like you don't even know what a real woman is. Hint: they aren't born with penises.Real ladies prefer real virile liberal men to incel cons and Trumpbumplicans, yes.
Nah, 'queen, a female GOP justice nominee is like a fish out of water to Dems and libs.
No problem saying momma gotta leave the house.
I agree. But Ms. Barrett is obviously intelligent, and I think appealing. If the Dems try to destroy her does this hurt them with female voters, particularly white suburban women?
I am Pro Choice. People like you remind me why. But I dont make stupid statements that everyone supports that.: iProvide one example please. Thanks.So you don't like being a fail. Understandable. That won't change until you understand how to post and critically think. Critically thinking we know both parties bully women on the other side. Not going to change.Hmmmm...nice deflection. World would be better off if you were never born. True story.There are several examples above that educate you. Study them on how discuss dems will not alienate females in these hearings.Give me an example. I ll patiently wait. You are one of the reasons I am pro choiceAll Azog had to do was comment on the OP with his trolling, but that is difficult for him. He does not get that con females bully each other, so the OP is silly.Why is it that the mods allow their fellow cons to troll? If I wrote something like this I'd have a mod on my ass in 30 minutes.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
If you deny the above, then you can't read/understand or you are lying.
This entire thread. Go back to the beginning and come forward carefully. Once you realize assertions are not facts and require verifiable, accurate support, you will be on your way.
You could begin with giving support for the OP: evidence why Dems attacking a female nominated for SCOTUS would hurt Dem chances in the election, Be careful with RvW, though ~ just a hint. Here is some help on that: " A total of 77% say the Supreme Court should uphold Roe, but within that there's a lot of nuance — 26% say they would like to see it remain in place, but with more restrictions added; 21% want to see Roe expanded to establish the right to abortion under any circumstance; 16% want to keep it the way it is; and 14% want to see some of the restrictions allowed under Roe reduced. Just 13% overall say it should be overturned. " Poll: Majority Want To Keep Abortion Legal, But They Also Want Restrictions
Dems have painted themselves into a corner with women. It's going to be very difficult for Dems to attack and oppose a female SCOTUS nominee. Bank on this though, their #1 argument is likely to be abortion.
Why shouldn't it be? Roe vs Wade is supported by 70% of voters. In many states, overturning Roe vs Wade would affect women the most. A woman should have a say since it is their body.
You people have aborted over 50 million babies, it's not the occasional rape victim. Now run away and go lick your wounds.
You can go back to licking Trump's ass. Woman have the right to make the choice. It is their body.
I don’t think Trump can count on that same level of support this time, Amy Barret or no. His opponent is not Clinton and he has a record.Nope. Not even a little bit. Conservative women are not taken seriously by anyone, especially not conservatives.
Hillary lost the white female vote even though media idiots predicted because she was a white woman other white women would automatically vote for her.
If Dems are highly uncivil to Ms. Barrett I believe that has the potential to turn off a lot of swing or independent female voters.
In 2018, the white female vote split 49-49. In Pennsylvania, white women voted for the Democrat Senator over a Trump disciple by 12 points.
Clinton lost in 2016 because white women did not like Dim policies or her. If your Dim asshole pals beat up on Amy Barrett too hard you can kiss the white female vote goodbye yet again. Trump won the white female vote 53-47.
White Women Helped Elect Donald Trump (Published 2016)
While black and Hispanic or Latino women voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, 53 percent of white women who voted picked Mr. Trump, exit data show.www.nytimes.com
I don’t think Trump can count on that same level of support this time, Amy Barret or no. His opponent is not Clinton and he has a record.Nope. Not even a little bit. Conservative women are not taken seriously by anyone, especially not conservatives.
Hillary lost the white female vote even though media idiots predicted because she was a white woman other white women would automatically vote for her.
If Dems are highly uncivil to Ms. Barrett I believe that has the potential to turn off a lot of swing or independent female voters.
In 2018, the white female vote split 49-49. In Pennsylvania, white women voted for the Democrat Senator over a Trump disciple by 12 points.
Clinton lost in 2016 because white women did not like Dim policies or her. If your Dim asshole pals beat up on Amy Barrett too hard you can kiss the white female vote goodbye yet again. Trump won the white female vote 53-47.
White Women Helped Elect Donald Trump (Published 2016)
While black and Hispanic or Latino women voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, 53 percent of white women who voted picked Mr. Trump, exit data show.www.nytimes.com
President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.
Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.
I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.
Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?
Discuss.
There have been SCOTUS Justices that never served a day as judges.Age discrimination much? My goodness.Truth is always good, and in our cases, I look like a rock star compared to you. Thanks.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
Everyone loves bullying conservative women, even conservative women imo will bully each other.
Barrett is 48 years old.
Used to be, before Clarence Thomas, that judges needed to have a lot more than three fucking years as a judge.
Used to be that a SC post was for judges that had broader, lengthier experience.
RBG was 60 years old when appointed, not a fucking rookie.
No, azzhat.
Experience discrimination.
Barrett has only three years experience as a judge.
If you couldn't twist shit, you wouldn't be able to post at all, would you?
Age discrimination much? My goodness.Truth is always good, and in our cases, I look like a rock star compared to you. Thanks.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
Everyone loves bullying conservative women, even conservative women imo will bully each other.
Barrett is 48 years old.
Used to be, before Clarence Thomas, that judges needed to have a lot more than three fucking years as a judge.
Used to be that a SC post was for judges that had broader, lengthier experience.
RBG was 60 years old when appointed, not a fucking rookie.
No, azzhat.
Experience discrimination.
Barrett has only three years experience as a judge.
If you couldn't twist shit, you wouldn't be able to post at all, would you?
35% of the Justices appointed to SCOTUS over the years have had ZERO experience as judges.Used to be, before Clarence Thomas, that judges needed to have a lot more than three fucking years as a judge.Truth is always good, and in our cases, I look like a rock star compared to you. Thanks.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
Everyone loves bullying conservative women, even conservative women imo will bully each other.
Barrett is 48 years old.
Used to be, before Clarence Thomas, that judges needed to have a lot more than three fucking years as a judge.
Used to be that a SC post was for judges that had broader, lengthier experience.
RBG was 60 years old when appointed, not a fucking rookie.
Elena Kagan has ZERO years experience as a judge you blithering idiot hack.
Equal treatment is preposterous. So if one of my daughters is being attacked by a boy, another boy shouldn’t come to her rescue? She should fend for herself. Let me tell you something, you evil, fat troll. Boys and men on average are much stronger than girls and women. Men and boys need to defend and protect women.President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.
Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.
I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.
Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?
Discuss.
The idea that women shouldn't attempt to discredit a female nominee tells me that you're a man and a pretty clueless man at that. The whole idea of gender equality is equal treatment. Why should an unqualified or otherwise unsuitable candidate be given a pass just because she's a woman, or a woman of colour? Was Sarah Palin given a pass because she's a woman?
President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.
Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.
I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.
Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?
Discuss.
The idea that women shouldn't attempt to discredit a female nominee tells me that you're a man and a pretty clueless man at that. The whole idea of gender equality is equal treatment. Why should an unqualified or otherwise unsuitable candidate be given a pass just because she's a woman, or a woman of colour? Was Sarah Palin given a pass because she's a woman?
What are you on about? That is NOT what equal treatment means.Equal treatment is preposterous. So if one of my daughters is being attacked by a boy, another boy shouldn’t come to her rescue? She should fend for herself. Let me tell you something, you evil, fat troll. Boys and men on average are much stronger than girls and women. Men and boys need to defend and protect women.President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.
Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.
I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.
Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?
Discuss.
The idea that women shouldn't attempt to discredit a female nominee tells me that you're a man and a pretty clueless man at that. The whole idea of gender equality is equal treatment. Why should an unqualified or otherwise unsuitable candidate be given a pass just because she's a woman, or a woman of colour? Was Sarah Palin given a pass because she's a woman?
If RvW was overturned, the GOP would dissolve in the next national election,
: iProvide one example please. Thanks.So you don't like being a fail. Understandable. That won't change until you understand how to post and critically think. Critically thinking we know both parties bully women on the other side. Not going to change.Hmmmm...nice deflection. World would be better off if you were never born. True story.There are several examples above that educate you. Study them on how discuss dems will not alienate females in these hearings.Give me an example. I ll patiently wait. You are one of the reasons I am pro choiceAll Azog had to do was comment on the OP with his trolling, but that is difficult for him. He does not get that con females bully each other, so the OP is silly.Why is it that the mods allow their fellow cons to troll? If I wrote something like this I'd have a mod on my ass in 30 minutes.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
If you deny the above, then you can't read/understand or you are lying.
This entire thread. Go back to the beginning and come forward carefully. Once you realize assertions are not facts and require verifiable, accurate support, you will be on your way.
You could begin with giving support for the OP: evidence why Dems attacking a female nominated for SCOTUS would hurt Dem chances in the election, Be careful with RvW, though ~ just a hint. Here is some help on that: " A total of 77% say the Supreme Court should uphold Roe, but within that there's a lot of nuance — 26% say they would like to see it remain in place, but with more restrictions added; 21% want to see Roe expanded to establish the right to abortion under any circumstance; 16% want to keep it the way it is; and 14% want to see some of the restrictions allowed under Roe reduced. Just 13% overall say it should be overturned. " Poll: Majority Want To Keep Abortion Legal, But They Also Want Restrictions
She literally said that. “Equal Treatment”. And you wonder why abuses of women are up? Men need to be chivalrous because women are physically the weaker gender. Most of the time. You’re an exception, prancing Nancy boy.What are you on about? That is NOT what equal treatment means.Equal treatment is preposterous. So if one of my daughters is being attacked by a boy, another boy shouldn’t come to her rescue? She should fend for herself. Let me tell you something, you evil, fat troll. Boys and men on average are much stronger than girls and women. Men and boys need to defend and protect women.President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.
Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.
I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.
Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?
Discuss.
The idea that women shouldn't attempt to discredit a female nominee tells me that you're a man and a pretty clueless man at that. The whole idea of gender equality is equal treatment. Why should an unqualified or otherwise unsuitable candidate be given a pass just because she's a woman, or a woman of colour? Was Sarah Palin given a pass because she's a woman?
I am pro choice. Who is “they” in your post?If RvW was overturned, the GOP would dissolve in the next national election,: iProvide one example please. Thanks.So you don't like being a fail. Understandable. That won't change until you understand how to post and critically think. Critically thinking we know both parties bully women on the other side. Not going to change.Hmmmm...nice deflection. World would be better off if you were never born. True story.There are several examples above that educate you. Study them on how discuss dems will not alienate females in these hearings.Give me an example. I ll patiently wait. You are one of the reasons I am pro choiceAll Azog had to do was comment on the OP with his trolling, but that is difficult for him. He does not get that con females bully each other, so the OP is silly.Why is it that the mods allow their fellow cons to troll? If I wrote something like this I'd have a mod on my ass in 30 minutes.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
If you deny the above, then you can't read/understand or you are lying.
This entire thread. Go back to the beginning and come forward carefully. Once you realize assertions are not facts and require verifiable, accurate support, you will be on your way.
You could begin with giving support for the OP: evidence why Dems attacking a female nominated for SCOTUS would hurt Dem chances in the election, Be careful with RvW, though ~ just a hint. Here is some help on that: " A total of 77% say the Supreme Court should uphold Roe, but within that there's a lot of nuance — 26% say they would like to see it remain in place, but with more restrictions added; 21% want to see Roe expanded to establish the right to abortion under any circumstance; 16% want to keep it the way it is; and 14% want to see some of the restrictions allowed under Roe reduced. Just 13% overall say it should be overturned. " Poll: Majority Want To Keep Abortion Legal, But They Also Want Restrictions
The thing that unites them is they support Roe vs Wade. The Republican nominee will not be dealing in nuances. They will be looking to axe Roe vs Wade. That will create a political explosion not seen since slavery was a part of this country's fabric.
Dems have painted themselves into a corner with women. It's going to be very difficult for Dems to attack and oppose a female SCOTUS nominee. Bank on this though, their #1 argument is likely to be abortion.
Why shouldn't it be? Roe vs Wade is supported by 70% of voters. In many states, overturning Roe vs Wade would affect women the most. A woman should have a say since it is their body.
You people have aborted over 50 million babies, it's not the occasional rape victim. Now run away and go lick your wounds.
You can go back to licking Trump's ass. Woman have the right to make the choice. It is their body.
Translation, you people can't justify 50 million abortions got it.
I don’t think Trump can count on that same level of support this time, Amy Barret or no. His opponent is not Clinton and he has a record.Nope. Not even a little bit. Conservative women are not taken seriously by anyone, especially not conservatives.
Hillary lost the white female vote even though media idiots predicted because she was a white woman other white women would automatically vote for her.
If Dems are highly uncivil to Ms. Barrett I believe that has the potential to turn off a lot of swing or independent female voters.
In 2018, the white female vote split 49-49. In Pennsylvania, white women voted for the Democrat Senator over a Trump disciple by 12 points.
Clinton lost in 2016 because white women did not like Dim policies or her. If your Dim asshole pals beat up on Amy Barrett too hard you can kiss the white female vote goodbye yet again. Trump won the white female vote 53-47.
White Women Helped Elect Donald Trump (Published 2016)
While black and Hispanic or Latino women voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, 53 percent of white women who voted picked Mr. Trump, exit data show.www.nytimes.com
We'll see. Suburban moms do not like lawlessness and violence. The polls show that overwhelmingly. And the Dims have been tacitly or actively supporting the riots from the beginning.
You are misquoting her meaning, Azog. You could not her your own against her. Now do not alienate the liberal women, my friend: they vote.She literally said that. “Equal Treatment”. And you wonder why abuses of women are up? Men need to be chivalrous because women are physically the weaker gender. Most of the time. You’re an exception, prancing Nancy boy.
Nope. Not even a little bit. Conservative women are not taken seriously by anyone, especially not conservatives.
Hillary lost the white female vote even though media idiots predicted because she was a white woman other white women would automatically vote for her.
If Dems are highly uncivil to Ms. Barrett I believe that has the potential to turn off a lot of swing or independent female voters.
In 2018, the white female vote split 49-49. In Pennsylvania, white women voted for the Democrat Senator over a Trump disciple by 12 points.
Clinton lost in 2016 because white women did not like Dim policies or her. If your Dim asshole pals beat up on Amy Barrett too hard you can kiss the white female vote goodbye yet again. Trump won the white female vote 53-47.
White Women Helped Elect Donald Trump (Published 2016)
While black and Hispanic or Latino women voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, 53 percent of white women who voted picked Mr. Trump, exit data show.www.nytimes.com