Do Liberals on this board TRULY believe...

[easyt65]

That Hillary conducted absolutely NO - ZERO - Clinton Foundation business from the State Department as Secretary of State?

A simple 'Yes' or 'No' will do.

You're asking a specious question. You are assuming that corruption was the case without proof. Therefore, you are ASSUMNG corruption was the case.

What are you asking? To believe the facts, or an assumption.

Of course we believe in facts. Believing in assumptions is called faith, not factual.

I am not assuming anything. I want to know if libs TRULY believe Hillary did not mix State Dept and Foundation business. It's a simple question. Good lord, you guys aren't under oath / on trial.

 

[protectionist]

As soon as republicans stand up against Citizen United, only then will their whining be taken seriously. They ruled that money was speech and people with more money gets to be heard the loudest.

Don't like it? Stand against it. Like it? Then atop bitching.

Me? I don't like it...but again it's allowed and common. It's like being mad at only 1 fish for swimming and claiming all the other fish don't count.

The person with "more money" is Hillary Clinton, big time BOUGHT by Wall St banks & hedge funders ($200+ Million)

 

[protectionist]

Yes, you caught her

Hillary, in fact, sold cookies on behalf of the Clinton Foundation

DENIAL to the point of pathological.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

Yet all of that money got donated to either the Clinton Foundation or the Clinton Family Foundation. On top of that, the Clinton's never took a salary from either foundation, so anyone saying their using the foundation to get rich are wrong.

 

[easyt65]

Yet all of that money got donated to either the Clinton Foundation or the Clinton Family Foundation. On top of that, the Clinton's never took a salary from either foundation, so anyone saying their using the foundation to get rich are wrong.

So Chelsea doesn't / hasn't drawn a salary from the Foundation? REALLY?!

 

[Juan de Fuca]

Yet all of that money got donated to either the Clinton Foundation or the Clinton Family Foundation. On top of that, the Clinton's never took a salary from either foundation, so anyone saying their using the foundation to get rich are wrong.

So Chelsea doesn't / hasn't drawn a salary from the Foundation? REALLY?!

Chelsea Clinton isn't holding high political office last time I looked.

 

[easyt65]

You said the Clintons never took a salary. Chelsea is a Clinton....and she has never taken a salary from the Foundation.

She HAS been 'blessed' by extremely generous companies (conected to the Foundation) and Clinton biased media paying her enormous salaries for doing almost nothing. NBC, for example, paid her $600k for foing a couple little stories...which usually pays $100k. Very generous. Still, no connection.

 

[ClosedCaption]

As soon as republicans stand up against Citizen United, only then will their whining be taken seriously. They ruled that money was speech and people with more money gets to be heard the loudest.

Don't like it? Stand against it. Like it? Then atop bitching.

Me? I don't like it...but again it's allowed and common. It's like being mad at only 1 fish for swimming and claiming all the other fish don't count.

The person with "more money" is Hillary Clinton, big time BOUGHT by Wall St banks & hedge funders ($200+ Million)

You be better off typing the words "talking point".

 

[easyt65]

As soon as republicans stand up against Citizen United, only then will their whining be taken seriously. They ruled that money was speech and people with more money gets to be heard the loudest.

Don't like it? Stand against it. Like it? Then atop bitching.

Me? I don't like it...but again it's allowed and common. It's like being mad at only 1 fish for swimming and claiming all the other fish don't count.

The person with "more money" is Hillary Clinton, big time BOUGHT by Wall St banks & hedge funders ($200+ Million)

You be better off typing the words "talking point".

Still not answering I see, CC.

 

[ClosedCaption]

As soon as republicans stand up against Citizen United, only then will their whining be taken seriously. They ruled that money was speech and people with more money gets to be heard the loudest.

Don't like it? Stand against it. Like it? Then atop bitching.

Me? I don't like it...but again it's allowed and common. It's like being mad at only 1 fish for swimming and claiming all the other fish don't count.

So you won't answer without conditions...much like Hillary won't stop taking money from foreign nations that support terrorists unless she wins the Peesidency.

Got it.

Your question is built on conditions.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

You said the Clintons never took a salary. Chelsea is a Clinton....and she has never taken a salary from the Foundation.

She HAS been 'blessed' by extremely generous companies (conected to the Foundation) and Clinton biased media paying her enormous salaries for doing almost nothing. NBC, for example, paid her $600k for foing a couple little stories...which usually pays $100k. Very generous. Still, no connection.

She has the education to back up employment offers like that. So did George w. Bush's daughter, who still works for NBC.

 

[easyt65]

As soon as republicans stand up against Citizen United, only then will their whining be taken seriously. They ruled that money was speech and people with more money gets to be heard the loudest.

Don't like it? Stand against it. Like it? Then atop bitching.

Me? I don't like it...but again it's allowed and common. It's like being mad at only 1 fish for swimming and claiming all the other fish don't count.

So you won't answer without conditions...much like Hillary won't stop taking money from foreign nations that support terrorists unless she wins the Peesidency.

Got it.

Your question is built on conditions.

Yeah, the condition is 'YOUR OPINION'. Did she mix the two in YOUR opinion. Gawd, I have never seen a liberal have such a hard time give their opinion. Most of the time you can't get them to STOP giving their Opinions




If it's that hard to say 'no' it must be 'yes'.

 

[easyt65]

You said the Clintons never took a salary. Chelsea is a Clinton....and she has never taken a salary from the Foundation.

She HAS been 'blessed' by extremely generous companies (conected to the Foundation) and Clinton biased media paying her enormous salaries for doing almost nothing. NBC, for example, paid her $600k for foing a couple little stories...which usually pays $100k. Very generous. Still, no connection.

She has the education to back up employment offers like that. So did George w. Bush's daughter, who still works for NBC.

I agree...but people aren't paying her $500k more than the going rate for the same job because she does 'feel good' stories better than everyone else. (Just joking)

 

[ClosedCaption]

As soon as republicans stand up against Citizen United, only then will their whining be taken seriously. They ruled that money was speech and people with more money gets to be heard the loudest.

Don't like it? Stand against it. Like it? Then atop bitching.

Me? I don't like it...but again it's allowed and common. It's like being mad at only 1 fish for swimming and claiming all the other fish don't count.

So you won't answer without conditions...much like Hillary won't stop taking money from foreign nations that support terrorists unless she wins the Peesidency.

Got it.

Your question is built on conditions.

Yeah, the condition is 'YOUR OPINION'. Did she mix the two in YOUR opinion. Gawd, I have never seen a liberal have such a hard time give their opinion. Most of the time you can't get them to STOP giving their Opinions




If it's that hard to say 'no' it must be 'yes'.

I'd say no doubt she did. The problem is that republicans have allowed it and defended it saying that money doesn't equal favors. Even going to the Supreme Court. Now they're pretending to be against it while being for it and saying it's allowed.

How many ways do you want it?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Btw, that's EXACTLY the same reason given for why Trump donated to dems over the years. Except you call it business so it's all good.

 

[Auld Phart]

You said the Clintons never took a salary. Chelsea is a Clinton....and she has never taken a salary from the Foundation.

She HAS been 'blessed' by extremely generous companies (conected to the Foundation) and Clinton biased media paying her enormous salaries for doing almost nothing. NBC, for example, paid her $600k for foing a couple little stories...which usually pays $100k. Very generous. Still, no connection.

She has the education to back up employment offers like that. So did George w. Bush's daughter, who still works for NBC.

She had the education to be paid 3x what experienced journalists were making, right out of college?

No wonder I laugh at you so much

 

[easyt65]

As soon as republicans stand up against Citizen United, only then will their whining be taken seriously. They ruled that money was speech and people with more money gets to be heard the loudest.

Don't like it? Stand against it. Like it? Then atop bitching.

Me? I don't like it...but again it's allowed and common. It's like being mad at only 1 fish for swimming and claiming all the other fish don't count.

So you won't answer without conditions...much like Hillary won't stop taking money from foreign nations that support terrorists unless she wins the Peesidency.

Got it.

Your question is built on conditions.

Yeah, the condition is 'YOUR OPINION'. Did she mix the two in YOUR opinion. Gawd, I have never seen a liberal have such a hard time give their opinion. Most of the time you can't get them to STOP giving their Opinions




If it's that hard to say 'no' it must be 'yes'.

I'd say no doubt she did. The problem is that republicans have allowed it and defended it saying that money doesn't equal favors. Even going to the Supreme Court. Now they're pretending to be against it while being for it and saying it's allowed.

How many ways do you want it?

So you think she did. Copy.

(What Republicans think the money didn't buy favors?)

 

[Juan de Fuca]

You said the Clintons never took a salary. Chelsea is a Clinton....and she has never taken a salary from the Foundation.

She HAS been 'blessed' by extremely generous companies (conected to the Foundation) and Clinton biased media paying her enormous salaries for doing almost nothing. NBC, for example, paid her $600k for foing a couple little stories...which usually pays $100k. Very generous. Still, no connection.

She has the education to back up employment offers like that. So did George w. Bush's daughter, who still works for NBC.

She had the education to be paid 3x what experienced journalists were making, right out of college?

No wonder I laugh at you so much

The Today show isn't journalism, Matt Lauer didn't even have a degree until he was 39. You do realize that most people in entertainment don't even have college degrees? It is whatever a network believes you'll add to the bottom line.

 

[Auld Phart]

You said the Clintons never took a salary. Chelsea is a Clinton....and she has never taken a salary from the Foundation.

She HAS been 'blessed' by extremely generous companies (conected to the Foundation) and Clinton biased media paying her enormous salaries for doing almost nothing. NBC, for example, paid her $600k for foing a couple little stories...which usually pays $100k. Very generous. Still, no connection.

She has the education to back up employment offers like that. So did George w. Bush's daughter, who still works for NBC.

She had the education to be paid 3x what experienced journalists were making, right out of college?

No wonder I laugh at you so much

The Today show isn't journalism, Matt Lauer didn't even have a degree until he was 39. You do realize that most people in entertainment don't even have college degrees? It is whatever a network believes you'll add to the bottom line.

and you skirt the point

She was being paid 3-6x what experienced coworkers in the field were being paid.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

You said the Clintons never took a salary. Chelsea is a Clinton....and she has never taken a salary from the Foundation.

She HAS been 'blessed' by extremely generous companies (conected to the Foundation) and Clinton biased media paying her enormous salaries for doing almost nothing. NBC, for example, paid her $600k for foing a couple little stories...which usually pays $100k. Very generous. Still, no connection.

She has the education to back up employment offers like that. So did George w. Bush's daughter, who still works for NBC.

She had the education to be paid 3x what experienced journalists were making, right out of college?

No wonder I laugh at you so much

The Today show isn't journalism, Matt Lauer didn't even have a degree until he was 39. You do realize that most people in entertainment don't even have college degrees? It is whatever a network believes you'll add to the bottom line.

and you skirt the point

She was being paid 3-6x what experienced coworkers in the field were being paid.

She was paid according to how much revenue she brought in. She was a celebrity and was paid accordingly just like Jenna Bush.