The argument that someone's ability plus want(or instinct/desire) to do something thus makes it a right has been torn apart time on end, and it's what keep being issued here as the "proof" I seek.
It is not proof, it is flawed logic. The premises do not equal the conclusion. There is no logical bridge there.
I am able to, so IF I WANTED TO - kill my mom, that does not equate to having a right to do so.
They very term "right" has an actual definition. That's the crux of that.
It is not proof, it is flawed logic. The premises do not equal the conclusion. There is no logical bridge there.
I am able to, so IF I WANTED TO - kill my mom, that does not equate to having a right to do so.
They very term "right" has an actual definition. That's the crux of that.