Do you believe Cohen or Trump?

[beagle9]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Fox analyst Napolitano explains it very well.

Judge Napolitano Disproves Fox & Friends' Pro-Trump Talking Points Live On Air

Your specific question about “what crime” starts at 1:20.

Enjoy!

Napolitano ???? ROTFLMBO. Good grief.. Next !

What did he say that you think is laugh inducing? Oh yeah…you didn’t watch the video. Classic.

I didn't have to the name was enough.

 

[candycorn]

Yep, and why is that ?? Why does the left fear a Donald Trump like they do ?? Was it because up until Trump, the left with all their bullcrap had convinced the nation that they were the only real leadership to ever grace us with their treachery and tyranny without us even realizing it ???? Did Trump spoil their party in which they were having with our government system's be it local and federal, our public school's, college's, judge's, and/or anything else they chose to bully their way around in, and abuse us with ?????? Trump the party pooper should be their cry now, because he sure came to town doing just that.

Mueller has been so secret as a strategy in order to keep this bullcrap going until it satisfies the leftist machine somehow.

Is Mueller vulnerable to the leftist power base for some reason ??? What's in it for Mueller to wreck this nation over this bullcrap for years to come ??

Treachery ??? You MF ers started a bs war and you call us treacherous?? How many dead are you responsible for ?? How tf do you sleep at night?

What does the Iraq war have to do with any of this?

The same thing the Clintons have to do with it...zero. Yet the right wing (perhaps not you personally--I do not know) posters here continuously mention her/him/they

The Clintons have everything to do with it. Who paid for the Steele "dossier?"

Has nothing to do with Cohen; the subject of the OP.

 

[candycorn]

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Fox analyst Napolitano explains it very well.

Judge Napolitano Disproves Fox & Friends' Pro-Trump Talking Points Live On Air

Your specific question about “what crime” starts at 1:20.

Enjoy!

Napolitano has turned into a Trump-hating douchebag. He's opinion isn't worth the bandwidth used to broadcast it.

Oh…that is why he is on Fox.

So the Republican Mueller has turned
The Republican Napolitao has turned
Cohen has turned
Manafort has turned
Flynn has turned
Papadopolous has turned
The douche who ran the Enquirer has turned

How long until you turn? Or will you “take a bullet” for Trump?

All turning under pressure, just like anyone will do if threatened by things unrelated to an investigation. Is Mueller the equal to a leg breaker only in a mental sense ????

Thought the squimish Demon-crat's were weak stomached about torture by American's, yet here they are cheering it on in this Mueller probe/witch Hunt to hang/lynch one Donald Trump. Well I'll be darned, you don't say (hypocrisy at it's finest again). LOL

Dumbest Analogy Ever.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You meant your lack of interest in the evidence.

What "evidence?"

Derp.....

Exactly.

In other words, no evidence.

Derp.....

Like I said, your lack of interest in the evidence doesn't mean it's not there.

Everyone involved with those payments has spilled against Trump. He stands alone.

Wrong. It means I know what evidence is, and I know what horseshit is. You post nothing but the later.

Meanwhile, back in reality the case is progressing. Keep up the denial, loser.

 

[bripat9643]

Yep, and why is that ?? Why does the left fear a Donald Trump like they do ?? Was it because up until Trump, the left with all their bullcrap had convinced the nation that they were the only real leadership to ever grace us with their treachery and tyranny without us even realizing it ???? Did Trump spoil their party in which they were having with our government system's be it local and federal, our public school's, college's, judge's, and/or anything else they chose to bully their way around in, and abuse us with ?????? Trump the party pooper should be their cry now, because he sure came to town doing just that.

Mueller has been so secret as a strategy in order to keep this bullcrap going until it satisfies the leftist machine somehow.

Is Mueller vulnerable to the leftist power base for some reason ??? What's in it for Mueller to wreck this nation over this bullcrap for years to come ??

Treachery ??? You MF ers started a bs war and you call us treacherous?? How many dead are you responsible for ?? How tf do you sleep at night?

What does the Iraq war have to do with any of this?

The same thing the Clintons have to do with it...zero. Yet the right wing (perhaps not you personally--I do not know) posters here continuously mention her/him/they

The Clintons have everything to do with it. Who paid for the Steele "dossier?"

Has nothing to do with Cohen; the subject of the OP.

It has everything to do with Cohen. This whole thing would never have happened without the Steele dossier.

 

[bripat9643]

What "evidence?"

Derp.....

Exactly.

In other words, no evidence.

Derp.....

Like I said, your lack of interest in the evidence doesn't mean it's not there.

Everyone involved with those payments has spilled against Trump. He stands alone.

Wrong. It means I know what evidence is, and I know what horseshit is. You post nothing but the later.

Meanwhile, back in reality the case is progressing. Keep up the denial, loser.

There is no "case."

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Derp.....

Exactly.

In other words, no evidence.

Derp.....

Like I said, your lack of interest in the evidence doesn't mean it's not there.

Everyone involved with those payments has spilled against Trump. He stands alone.

Wrong. It means I know what evidence is, and I know what horseshit is. You post nothing but the later.

Meanwhile, back in reality the case is progressing. Keep up the denial, loser.

There is no "case."

Sure, dope. Cohen was not just sentenced and AMI was not given immunity.

 

[candycorn]

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Fox analyst Napolitano explains it very well.

Judge Napolitano Disproves Fox & Friends' Pro-Trump Talking Points Live On Air

Your specific question about “what crime” starts at 1:20.

Enjoy!

Napolitano ???? ROTFLMBO. Good grief.. Next !

What did he say that you think is laugh inducing? Oh yeah…you didn’t watch the video. Classic.

I didn't have to the name was enough.

ok

 

[beagle9]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Sorry...but there is evidence and testimony that shows the funds were
A. Not paid by Trump, so were way over the limit
B. Not reported (and in fact intentionally hidden)
C. Made for the purpose of furthering the election chances of one Donald J Trump (also known as the Orange Blotus)

Wrong !!!!! They were made to keep possible blackmailing extortionist from attacking the office of our Presidency if Trump a billionaire business man were to win the office legitimately in which he did. No crime was committed, in fact an act in securing that office from head hunters was the act being committed. No crime there, and in fact after all that has come to light, Donald J. Trump was absolutely right in doing what he did in that NDA in order to protect the office if he became the President. That's the way I look at it all.

 

[candycorn]

Treachery ??? You MF ers started a bs war and you call us treacherous?? How many dead are you responsible for ?? How tf do you sleep at night?

What does the Iraq war have to do with any of this?

The same thing the Clintons have to do with it...zero. Yet the right wing (perhaps not you personally--I do not know) posters here continuously mention her/him/they

The Clintons have everything to do with it. Who paid for the Steele "dossier?"

Has nothing to do with Cohen; the subject of the OP.

It has everything to do with Cohen. This whole thing would never have happened without the Steele dossier.

Trump wouldn't have slept with Stormy and Ms. McDougal if there wasn't a Steele Dossier?
They wouldn't have been bought of illegally by Trump without the Steele Dossier?

These affairs (pun intended) happened well before the Dossier existed. The payoffs happened well before it came to light.

You've been debunked. Thanks for playing. Next.

 

[candycorn]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Sorry...but there is evidence and testimony that shows the funds were
A. Not paid by Trump, so were way over the limit
B. Not reported (and in fact intentionally hidden)
C. Made for the purpose of furthering the election chances of one Donald J Trump (also known as the Orange Blotus)

Wrong !!!!! They were made to keep possible blackmailing extortionist from attacking the office of our Presidency if Trump a billionaire business man were to win the office legitimately in which he did. No crime was committed, in fact an act in securing that office from head hunters was the act being committed. No crime there, and in fact after all that has come to light, Donald J. Trump was absolutely right in doing what he did in that NDA in order to protect the office if he became the President.

A crime was committed as described in depth by Andrew Napalitano, a former judge. The malicious intent to conceal campaign related expendiures.
Your saying "nun-unh" doesn't matter.

 

[nat4900]

Any day now. Any day now. Any day now. Any day now. Any day now. Any day now. Any day now.

 

[bripat9643]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Sorry...but there is evidence and testimony that shows the funds were
A. Not paid by Trump, so were way over the limit
B. Not reported (and in fact intentionally hidden)
C. Made for the purpose of furthering the election chances of one Donald J Trump (also known as the Orange Blotus)

Wrong !!!!! They were made to keep possible blackmailing extortionist from attacking the office of our Presidency if Trump a billionaire business man were to win the office legitimately in which he did. No crime was committed, in fact an act in securing that office from head hunters was the act being committed. No crime there, and in fact after all that has come to light, Donald J. Trump was absolutely right in doing what he did in that NDA in order to protect the office if he became the President.

A crime was committed as described in depth by Andrew Napalitano, a former judge. The malicious intent to conceal campaign related expendiures.
Your saying "nun-unh" doesn't matter.

There is no such crime, moron. Paying off bimbos extorting money from you is not a crime.

Neapolitano has only revealed that he's an imbecile.

 

[beagle9]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Cohen has nothing left to gain or prove. He's already been sentenced. No reason to hide or lie any more.

tRump on the other hand still has to keep the faithful in line and is hoping to avoid impeachment and prison so he has every reason.

Cohen's light sentencing, in light of what they said that he had done, is highly suspect to me. Was he given such a light sentence in order that people like you could sit here continuing the game that Mueller has been playing in an attempt to get Trump ???

Don't you know what a plea bargain is?

Is that what they call it these days ?? I thought it was called (baiting the hook) by leaving the tiny worm still squiggling in order to get a bigger fish.

 

[Lesh]

Wrong again. It's been explained to you multiple times why your theory is wrong. If an expenditure can have any conceivable private purpose, then it's not a campaign expenditure.

"Any conceivable private purpose" is not the standard

A. John Edwards was indicted and prosecuted. That shows that it is a crime. The fact that his lawyer was able to convince a jury that his actions were personal does not mean it wasn't a potential crime. I guess Trump needs to get in front of that Jury

B.Unlike John Edwards...there are records and evidence and witnesses that show it WAS for political purposes

 

[beagle9]

What does the Iraq war have to do with any of this?

The same thing the Clintons have to do with it...zero. Yet the right wing (perhaps not you personally--I do not know) posters here continuously mention her/him/they

The Clintons have everything to do with it. Who paid for the Steele "dossier?"

Has nothing to do with Cohen; the subject of the OP.

It has everything to do with Cohen. This whole thing would never have happened without the Steele dossier.

Trump wouldn't have slept with Stormy and Ms. McDougal if there wasn't a Steele Dossier?
They wouldn't have been bought of illegally by Trump without the Steele Dossier?

These affairs (pun intended) happened well before the Dossier existed. The payoffs happened well before it came to light.

You've been debunked. Thanks for playing. Next.

Working to protect the office of the presidency from sharks is a noble thing.

Trump did just that, and it worked. Could you imagine if he would have become president first ?? No telling who he might have been threatened by (oh wait the Demon-crats are doing a fine job of it on their own), the constant threatening that is.

Is the whitehouse under seige by a coup taking place, and this by various groups attempting to implement such a thing over Trump winning an election for just 4 years for starters ??

 

[beagle9]

Wrong again. It's been explained to you multiple times why your theory is wrong. If an expenditure can have any conceivable private purpose, then it's not a campaign expenditure.

"Any conceivable private purpose" is not the standard

A. John Edwards was indicted and prosecuted. That shows that it is a crime. The fact that his lawyer was able to convince a jury that his actions were personal does not mean it wasn't a potential crime. I guess Trump needs to get in front of that Jury

B.Unlike John Edwards...there are records and evidence and witnesses that show it WAS for political purposes

What was for political purposes ??? Anyone cleaning up to serve the office is somehow now a crime ??? So just go on and except the office knowing that it might be blackmailed while one is President because he or she refused to responsibly take care of loose ends that might be a problem for that office if won ??

 

[bripat9643]

Any day now. Any day now. Any day now. Any day now. Any day now. Any day now. Any

Wrong again. It's been explained to you multiple times why your theory is wrong. If an expenditure can have any conceivable private purpose, then it's not a campaign expenditure.

"Any conceivable private purpose" is not the standard

A. John Edwards was indicted and prosecuted. That shows that it is a crime. The fact that his lawyer was able to convince a jury that his actions were personal does not mean it wasn't a potential crime. I guess Trump needs to get in front of that Jury

B.Unlike John Edwards...there are records and evidence and witnesses that show it WAS for political purposes

The charges against Edwards were dismissed, dumb fuck. There was abundant evidence that the payments were made. The only issue in contention is whether they were campaign expenditures.

You really should just quit posting. Every time you do you only embarrass yourself.

 

[Lesh]

You really should just quit posting. Every time you do you only embarrass yourself.

Edwards was found not guilty on one count, and the judge declared a mistrial on the remaining five charges, as the jury was unable to come to an agreement

Stop projecting idiot

 

[candycorn]

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Sorry...but there is evidence and testimony that shows the funds were
A. Not paid by Trump, so were way over the limit
B. Not reported (and in fact intentionally hidden)
C. Made for the purpose of furthering the election chances of one Donald J Trump (also known as the Orange Blotus)

Wrong !!!!! They were made to keep possible blackmailing extortionist from attacking the office of our Presidency if Trump a billionaire business man were to win the office legitimately in which he did. No crime was committed, in fact an act in securing that office from head hunters was the act being committed. No crime there, and in fact after all that has come to light, Donald J. Trump was absolutely right in doing what he did in that NDA in order to protect the office if he became the President.

A crime was committed as described in depth by Andrew Napalitano, a former judge. The malicious intent to conceal campaign related expendiures.
Your saying "nun-unh" doesn't matter.

There is no such crime, moron. Paying off bimbos extorting money from you is not a crime.

Neapolitano has only revealed that he's an imbecile.

Again, it is when you don't report it as a campaign expenditure.