Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You have it backward. Our election system isn't binary - that's a myth that the two parties are selling. But sadly, for most idiot voters, our thinking and political views are binary. They ignorantly accept the notion that the must vote D or R.
I'm complaining about the movement toward totalitarian government. I don't give a single shit about the various "sides" in the culture war. Government should have no power to dictate culture.No, you aren't. You are complaining without giving any solutions that would work in the real world.
I'm complaining about the movement toward totalitarian government. I don't give a single shit about the various "sides" in the culture war. Government should have no power to dictate culture.
That's just not true. If we don't vote for them, they won't get elected.The presidential election is fully designed to be binary, a leftover from when the top two became president and vice president. The combination of the EC and winner take all states relegates any third party without wide appeal and State level winners nothing but a spoiler.
So, you want to catch up?And yet they do, and the left right now is far worse than the right about it.
Of course. Using obvious examples better proves my pointSo you gotta compare kid porn and criminal acts to saying "a woman cannot be a man"?
You are trying to mix private and public, and that is not how it works.because it can be used on anyone if it's used on one.
That's the price of freedom of speech and expression.
Start your own platform. Problem solved.It is broke when someone who says "a woman cannot be a man" is banned for a perfectly legal statement.
No. Now stop derailing the thread by trying to make this about me.So you do support abortion right up to the second of birth for whatever reason a woman wants one?
That's just not true. If we don't vote for them, they won't get elected.
So, you want to catch up?
Of course. Using obvious examples better proves my point
You are trying to mix private and public, and that is not how it works.
Start your own platform. Problem solved.
Haha… I’m not justifying a thing. I saw you make a statement that I saw as false and I stated an argument showing why. Simple as that. Private companies have the right to regulate their content. I showed why.No, it shows your use of argumentum ad absurdum to justify silencing political opponents.
No. Now stop derailing the thread by trying to make this about me.
While you are allowed to go to city hall and protest you still need to follow the rules or you can be tossedNope. Just like city hall steps were the commons of old, social media is the commons of the new, and thus needs to be protected the same way.
Haha… I’m not justifying a thing. I saw you make a statement that I saw as false and I stated an argument showing why. Simple as that. Private companies have the right to regulate their content. I showed why.
While you are allowed to go to city hall and protest you still need to follow the rules or you can be tossed
What is it you want to preserve? Clearly, not limited government.No, I want to preserve what we have left.
