Zone1 Do you believe in Free Speech

[martybegan]

Maybe you haven't noticed. There's more than one!

And most of them use the towers of the big guys, and the big guys would be the ones shutting down your content and access.

 

[martybegan]

It's called being a statist sellout. Enjoy your fascism.

Enjoy your SJW Communist gulag, unless they shoot you first.

 

[dblack]

And most of them use the towers of the big guys, and the big guys would be the ones shutting down your content and access.

I think that's bullshit, but fine. I'd find some other way to communicate.

You want to socialize pretty much any business that might get in the way of your culture war ambitions. Piss off.

 

[Slade3200]

Actually they can't because the phone company can't regulate their content. Same would apply to social media companies' platforms.

I don’t think that’s true… social meds has every write to regulate their content. If people start posting hard core porn or copyrighted materials then they have the right and responsibility to take it down

 

[dblack]

Enjoy your SJW Communist gulag, unless they shoot you first.

That's the bitch of it all. As long as voters keep falling for the lesser-of-two-evils scam, we're either going to get an overbearing left wing government, or an overbearing right wing government.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Starting a phone network from scratch?

Crazier things have happened.

 

[martybegan]

I think that's bullshit, but fine. I'd find some other way to communicate.

You want to socialize pretty much any business that might get in the way of your culture war ambitions. Piss off.

Just one specific situation with larger implications for freedom of expression and the continuation of our Republic as designed.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

It's called being a realist. Principles are fine and dandy as a basis but sticking to them when all you become is a forgotten martyr is idiotic.

Whatever. No point in having principles if you constantly have to compromise them. That's idiotic.

 

[martybegan]

I don’t think that’s true… social meds has every write to regulate their content. If people start posting hard core porn or copyrighted materials then they have the right and responsibility to take it down

Actually they posters are the ones liable, not the company unless notified and DIRECTED to take down the content.

 

[dblack]

Just one specific situation with larger implications for freedom of expression and the continuation of our Republic as designed.

Of course. Just this once. Except for all the other situations that have "larger implications".

 

[martybegan]

That's the bitch of it all. As long as voters keep falling for the lesser-of-two-evils scam, we're either going to get an overbearing left wing government, or an overbearing right wing government.

Then why aren't you manning the barricades yet?

 

[martybegan]

Of course. Just this once. Except for all the other situations that have "larger implications".

That's the whole point of drawing a line and holding to it. Our election system may be binary but our thinking and political views don't have to be.

 

[dblack]

Then why aren't you manning the barricades yet?

I'm am. But you are on the other side of those barricades.

 

[Slade3200]

Actually they posters are the ones liable, not the company unless notified and DIRECTED to take down the content.

Which they can and will be if they don’t take it down. Making the regulation of content on their platforms perfectly legal and sometimes required

 

[martybegan]

Whatever. No point in having principles if you constantly have to compromise them. That's idiotic.

So you do support abortion right up to the second of birth for whatever reason a woman wants one?

 

[martybegan]

I'm am. But you are on the other side of those barricades.

No, you aren't. You are complaining without giving any solutions that would work in the real world.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Actually they posters are the ones liable, not the company unless notified and DIRECTED to take down the content.

That's how it should be. Don't fix what ain't broke.

 

[martybegan]

Which they can and will be if they don’t take it down. Making the regulation of content on their platforms perfectly legal and sometimes required

So you gotta compare kid porn and criminal acts to saying "a woman cannot be a man"?

 

[dblack]

That's the whole point of drawing a line and holding to it. Our election system may be binary but our thinking and political views don't have to be.

You have it backward. Our election system isn't binary - that's a myth that the two parties are selling. But sadly, for most idiot voters, our thinking and political views are binary. They ignorantly accept the notion that the must vote D or R.

 

[martybegan]

That's how it should be. Don't fix what ain't broke.

It is broke when someone who says "a woman cannot be a man" is banned for a perfectly legal statement.